Just a quick question. Why did a massive resource rich country with a large population need a youtuber to dig holes for them?
Just a quick question.
Just a quick question. Why did a massive resource rich country with a large population need a youtuber to dig holes for them?
Because black people don't know how to make meatballs.
Endemic corruption and incompetence
It's like asking why Europe colonized Africa instead of vice versa.
How can you be so incompetent to the point you cant dig a hole I don't understand
How did Ireland starve when they are surrounded by water from all sides because they're an island?
Potato famine is bullshit
The Irish don't know how to make meatballs.
Nigga are you fucking retarded, you don't not starve by drinking you fucking mongoloid
You can't drink ocean water either. The Irish had to dig wells.
look at the image attached.
There is not just H20 in the ocean
Irish famine was entirely due to English exporting all the food like livestock out of Ireland, the blight of potatoes only made the problem worse. Muslim countries tried to help the Irish by exporting excess food to them, but the British denied it because it was more shameful to allow swarthy non Christians to help out than to you know, not let citizens starve to death.
This. Europe was able to get their shit together first. Europe was the first country to figure out that trade... was good. SHOCKING.
Literally their whole rise was based on open markets and restricting their governments from pilfering the merchants and businesses.
Meanwhile African countries steal from all the companies in the area on a constant basis. Their idea of responsible government is devaluing their own currency. The west sees someone of a different race/religion and sees a trade partner... Africa sees someone who should be murdered and have their assets seized.
*Group of countries*
Resources incentivize extractive economies which tends to reduce the ability of a healthy middle class to form, hence the resource curse
Qatar
>tends to
Most of the petrostates have low populations, there's still no real middle class though. You're either rich or poor. Minus the oil, they have no real industry or ability to continue economically.
They can dig wells just fine though.
Again, small population. There's significantly more poverty in the African countries because of their larger population relative to their resource wealth.
I bet Russia could dig a well.
Russia has a significant amount of crippling poverty outside of the Moscow and Saint Petersburg area including a lack of plumbing.
I don't think you understand how well digging works. It requires heavy machinery. If the capital isn't already present, there's no way for the locals to afford to do that.
I'm sorry I just don't buy it. So much resources and land, a large population. And they still have to beg a fucking youtuber to come fix their problems. This is some staggering incompetence
See
Amazing you people havent realize this simple truth
I don't care if you buy it, that's the answer.
Why can't africans and their apologists for once stop hiding behind excuses and actually accomplish something? My country went through hell the 200 last years and we still have a functioning society
Why would you bother doing anything when other people will just do it for you? There wouldn't be such a big population of the civilized world stopped giving them aid
It's not an excuse, it's the reason. You're making some kind of judgement, I am not. The reason just exists. Get your retarded feelings out of it, they don't matter.
They whine incessantly about muh European colonization while forgetting America, Australia and Canada also began as European colonies. I wonder why those all become nice, prosperous places unlike African countries that were also colonized...
Inclusive institutions, easy access to capital markets, strong liberal tradition
What prevented Africa from having those things?
Their incredibly low IQ and Genetics
Colonization was built on extractive institutions there, capital markets were never extended to the locals, and they had no connection to Rome, Greece, or the Enlightenment.
They had the same connections as america and Canada and Australia though the same countries colonized them for the same reasons
No, they didn't. Colonists in those areas came from Roman descended governments. Africans had no exposure to that.
Who was colonizing Africa then? And what about basically all of south america?
I can't put into words how fucking retarded your statement just was.
Truly mindboggling.
Colonization is the reason wakanda isn't real. Whitey stole all they vibranium
That's not my argument
Colonization in LATAM was less extractive. The Spanish forced integration. African colonization had almost no integration so when the colonists left there was a mass exodus of institutional knowledge.
In the case of Africa, powerful missionary lobbies in London pushed the British government into more and more involvement in African affairs, often over the opposition of colonial and treasury officials, and initial attempts at limited involvement often led to being drawn deeper and deeper into unforeseen circumstances requiring wider and wider military and political commitments. What made all this possible, not only for Britain but for other European colonial powers as well, was that the resources required to take over large areas of Africa were relatively small compared to what was available to the European governments. As one historian of warfare has noted: "One month of a European war cost more than a year of colonial war."
When maintaining control of African colonies became more costly as independence movements there gained momentum after World War ll, the continent was abandoned as swiftly as it had been conquered. In the relatively few cases where a sustained and determined effort was made to hold onto a colony seeking independence, or to maintain a local European hegemony in the face of indigenous uprisings, it was typically where a substantial expatriate European community in the colonies was unwilling to leave or reluctant to share power, as in Algeria and Rhodesia. In short, there was little to suggest that African colonies had sufficient economic value to the imperial nation as a whole to put up a real fight to hold onto them.
>As one historian of warfare has noted: "One month of a European war cost more than a year of colonial war."
You mean a post-feudal society dominated a pre-agricultural society? Shocking.
This was never going to last forever as it's easier to emulate the policies of successful companies instead of innovating. Poor countries grow at faster rates than rich countries, all else being equal.
Even if a small % of Africans were benefiting from the arrangement, those gains would eventually trickle into the wider society.
The impact of Europe on Africa, for good and evil, was relatively brief as history is measured about three generations, as compared to the centuries in which the Romans ruled Britain or imperial China ruled parts of Southeast Asia or the Moslems ruled parts of Europe. Just as the 1880s saw the beginning of the European 'scramble for Africa,' so the 1960s saw their massive withdrawal. This withdrawal began in the northern tier of Moslem states in the 1950s, when Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia became independent, then spread rapidly southward over the next two decades as Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, the Congo, Kenya, and other black nations achieved their independence. Much as the withdrawal of Roman rule from Britain led to widespread retrogressions, so in many parts of Africa the departure of the European rulers was followed by technological breakdowns, failing economies, and political chaos marked by military coups.
This is post-hoc rationalization. Why weren't the Africans the ones doing the colonization?
I think the simplest explanation is the lack of beasts of burden. Societies from North Africa to India to Europe all had access to animals that could make agriculture a step up from hunter-gatherer societies.
Europe arguably benefited the most as the terrain limited the movement of troops from Anatolia which allowed wealth to build up.
Zebras are just as useful as horses
Hannibal made use of Elephants quite well Millenia ago
Imagine plowing your fields with elephants.
They are really stupid like the typical ghetto hoodrat that causes death and destruction in the US is a genius compared to a pure black thats how fucking stupid black people really are and why our ancestors in the slavery days called them full on subhuman animals.
Tribal loyalties are pre-civilizational.
When people are hired because they look like you or are your cousin they're not there because of merit, and don't maintain their position through merit
Most black africans outside of South Africa are clueless about colonialism let alone their own history. Which means if you asked a black why their country is shit they wouldnt even give you an answer because the very notion eludes their simple minds
>My country can be better than this? How is that possible? This white guy is crazy
Answer my question. Why couldn't locals dig a hole? Why did beast have to do it for them?
imagine using Qatar as a counterexample lmfao
Norway proves your curse is just low IQ issue
Norway has a low population in relation to its resource wealth. They also have had functional, inclusive institutions for a huge period of time. Most of Africa was built on extractive institutions and those persisted after the decolonization push. It doesn't help that many of them also flirted with communism during the Cold War.
They should extract some water from the ground lmao
nagger elites dont give a shit about their poor
>there is no african middle class
Who do you think goes to private schools in African countries you dumbass?
>there is no african middle class
vs
>[there is no] healthy middle class
hmmm
They get their water from rivers and shit, well water is cleaner but if you're African you don't really care
>Expecting naggers to be able to do anything at all in their sorry lifes
I do not like MrBeast.
China is best country confirmed!
Ooga booga well-digging technology can reach shallow water tables but they need the huwhite man's help to build deeper wells
Presumably they only needed money unless Mr Beast was importing the entire production and labor chain.
I would imagine they needed money, specialized tools and maybe a Western-educated engineer. The Ngubus could provide any manual labor needed.
What is 6 divided by 3?
Believe it or not the bulk of Africa cannot comprehend this simple 4th grade mathematical problem.
This guy is still going. Excuses on top of excuses. Literally every race on earth can function in shitty hostile environments but for africans to succeed everything needs to be absolutely perfect
Africa isnt hostile to black africans thats why these stupid fucks arent extinct in Africa yet. Creature even dumber than naggers like Pgymies and Khoisan also still exist in Africa too.
Because their government is a neoliberal puppet state run by a cartel of international satanic capitalist pedophiles
>muh pedophiles are the reason I can't dig a hole!
You can't dig holes if the equipment is privately owned by vanguard, blackrock, exxonmobil and the french state
>only these 3 companies have well digging technology
damn...
Well yeah, do you think a country living in semi-feudal conditions is supposed to invert well drilling technology on their own? Do you think people living in the bronze age could construct aqueducts?
>a well is as simple as digging a hole.
>after you dig it, the drinkable water just sorta shows up.
I wonder how many people who have been saying this shit the past couple of days have dug a well by theirselves?
Obviously my high IQ would allow me to instantly and perfectly dig a well with no training or tools. Third worlders BTFO
>lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes. When he comes at ya, doesn't seem to be livin'
why does he do those uncanny thumbnails? Is he goofin around or somehow think it looks good?
Because just like in America where the Evil White Man forces black people to wash their chicken and never change the batteries in their smoke alarms. In Africa YT goes around literally slapping the shovels and augers out of black peoples hands whenever they try to dig wells.
Whats the redpill on this fag?
>why the name mr beast?
>why the goofy girl white people smile
>why the basedboi facial hair
>were does he get the money
>why do weird youtube stunts
>why help africans
Countries with an abundance of natural resources tend to get bogged down in corruption. Its why the US and England were able to succeed on the shoulders of Africa.
When the US grew cotton, it predictable sparked a civil war.