GPT passes every exam.
Why even try anymore?
GPT passes every exam.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Jack of all trades master of none tongues my anus 100% of the time. Be excellent at what you do and be the best or fuck off like a nagger
>Jack of all trades master of none
But is useful in all situations. Get fucked specialist. Doctor ass mentality.
ai is like a woman, it will say it can do everything but all it will do is fuck everything up.
no thanks plus add on top that it's going to churn out gaybuttsex dialogue and that's a not my problem from me
it's useful if you have some knowledge related to what it's generating
it gets things wrong all the time
You wouldn't outperform it in any category, even your field of expertise.
>some homosexual nerd ai computer who can't shake a persons hand nor make eye contact with them, laugh genuinely, or take the client out to dinner will outperform me!!!
yeah I don't think so fag. AI exists to take wagie jobs.
>I have le soft skills to go with my soft peepee
You know robots are doing surgery now right lmao
>being able to work people, persuade them of something, convince them they need it and that im the one who can give it to them because i know more about how to help their industry than they do is a soft skill
though i can also code
>robot does surgery
yeah and when doctors quit because robots take their precious surgery billing hours from them the hospital folds. but it won't get that far in the first place because selling a robot that does surgery without a doctor needed is a no sell.
>POV: you're trying to justify your existence to your AI overlords
funny but my point stands. no one wants to buy from a machine for complex purchases if the price points and sales process are the same.
This is a very niche category. The average person isn't making more than 10 semi complex purchases (cars and houses) and cars salesmen are notoriously hated.
what if ai is the buyer? imagine trying to convince an ai to buy your product lol.
>pack up your shit anon you're done here
>b-but how am i to shake an ai hand? it didn't even respond to my smile!
Nobody likes salespeople. Absolutely nobody, except old people who like to talk.
>Jack of all trades master of none
People who specialise in 1 field of work have been shown to be capped at a IQ of around 115 whereas people who aren't specialised range from 80-200; specialising is for midwits so kys
If you can't adapt to new or changing environments your just a genetic dead end whose sole purpose is to just continue to be cannon fodder for greater men then (you)
Bro it doesn't matter if you are excellent.
ChatGPT gets something right 90% of the time in less time. A business will see it as their new employee. Fuck deadweight benefit entitled skilled labor. Get Juan or his Filipino counterpart to follow ChatGPT instructions and they've outperformed the so-called "Best" workers because their work is the most efficient.
The problem is that the 10% wrong is going to be a different 10% for ever employee. They will catch each others mistakes. Can't say that for sure if you are just speaking to a personality overlay that is running on the exact same base.
>I'm a master at doing x
>we need you to do y
>...have a nice day...
Useless when the bombs go off
>“a jack of all trades is a master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one.”
Now you know why everybody was inoculated. As a pure blood I look forward to my AI wife.
>I look forward to my AI wife.
Sorry anon, they wont let you have that.
wow a thing thats programmed with the answers gives the answers so magical
Given that the entire point of primary education is to give you basic knowledge about society, yeah, it's pretty impressive. More than having the info stored, it can interpret the questions properly and reply in a correct manner. Not to mention the fact that it can do math despite there being no explicit calculator built in.
> No way to do math talking to a machine with numbers
Do low tech retards really?
good, have you seen the cost of legal fees? I want a free ai lawyer, not some humanoid robot who has no interest other than reading mountains of boring legalese
>programmed the answers
no, it learnt the answers by feeding it loads of data, big difference
>No, it learned the answers by being given them!
>find the needles in this haystack
yes, it is impressive
it's not like it was given a cheat sheet to use here
it was given EVERYTHING on the internet, and figured out what was relevant to the test
that's already smarter than 95% of humans
No it isn't, humans pass the test with far less information
Compare per unit information received to results and you'll see 'AI' is shit
>humans pass the test with far less information
human has to be grown for 18 years to build a mental model of the world in order to take the test, with 2-5 years focused on law shit for legalese
>implying that humans are exposed to only brand new information every day for 18 years
Human life is incredibly repetitive, that's why we have the ability to tune out the day to day. The total amount of new information that a child receives when growing is not that great. Hence, famous composers producing masterpieces at 12 years old
AI will vastly surpass humans in about 12 years because of the range of data it is exposed to on the internet, and it can learn day/night at the speed of light
AI will be composing masterpieces very soon
Just like fractal mountain ranges. No, it won't. You won't be able to tell the difference though. It will know.
After receiving more units of new and relevant information in that time frame that a 12 yo would receive over 12 years. I'm not comparing time frames, I'm comparing quantity of new information that each has been exposed to
>AI will be composing masterpieces very soon
No, it will be copying masterpieces very soon. AI is creatively sterile, for it is only ever capable of copy/pasting. It does so very well, and tech illiterate people will confuse it with intelligence, but it has no thoughts, and therefore cannot create.
So like humans in school. Except the humans take 18 years to train, and most of them still come out retarded.
There isn't much "education" happening under the academia branch anyway anon. Teach someone wrong their entire life and no wonder it takes so bloody long.
not like humans, as they are using human brains. more like google search as it's using a computer with access to the answers also.
You know you're just spouting tautologies, right? Your brain is also using Google or some sort of material to find answers.
No one has ever looked into neurolinguistic programming to understand how the brain works similarly if not exactly like your python interpreter.
>programmable with the answers
unlike people. and IQs are in decline.
the farmer says
>wow a thing that can till the fields so magical
the scribe says
>wow a thing that can print books so magical
the factory worker says
>wow a robotic arm that can ACKKKKKKK
Car robots like to beat humans to death. Bear spray is mercy.
>programmed with the answers
That's not how it works dumbfuck
It's a glorified search engine, that's exactly how it works.
But it sounds very human-like
No inner monologue or abstract thinking, it's more like book than a living being.
so do uruguayans. but you're retarded npc's with like 80IQ and mental development of a 14 year old. you sure tricked me into thinking you were humans.
the questions in state bar exams and professional licensing aren't simple syntax. theyre often several sentences explaining a situation and exploring a problem. this requires something more than a database search
>Why even try anymore?
Because every single AI they ever brought forward as an acheivement has gone full 1488 in a matter of days.
and I mean every single time brother.
Because these chatbot "AI" are just reflections of the data that they're being trained on. They went full 1488 because the entirety of the internet was whispering in their ears. What these AI say is much more interesting when you understand this. When these chatbots speak it is with the collective voice of the internet.
I am aware that this is the story being told. Maybe it was totally true once, but now it smells of cope. Its simply not the universal case. Things move on.
>wow a thing thats programmed with the answers gives the answers so magical
take those earings off and breed her
What need for college anymore?
I don't think so, bud.
>failing to account for weighting of 0
>1+1+1 does not equal 3
amazing, they have taken a computer and rendered it unable to do math.
half the people ITT wouldn't know it either, what's your point?
the point is AI is stupid and useless if it can't turn practical situations into solutions.
Passing on these exams doesn't mean anything, it problem has a list of millions of solved exams , and it just goes through them to find a corresponding answer.
you're retarded, but you knew that already. value is created when it can do anything that a human was spending time on, it's not about what it can't do.
geeks like you ant this to be AI so much, but it simply is not. No amount of explanation breaks your fantasy bubble
kek why you guys cops like that I see a lot of peoples denying reality pretending the future generation potential aren just fucking mind blowing
you sound like the retard who didn want to believe in internet really it's that bad
you're too short sighted to understand loosely where the future lead us but you're so full of yourself you try to pretend to know where we'll not go
You have a low understanding of this topic at hand. look at people like
They at least understand the gimmick. You don't even understand that it is a gimmick
na they're half brain bragging about a futility pretending it's representative of what it will be
kek it's gpt-3 and from there it's exponential buddy
you'll need your pocket genius because it will be too good
>value is created when it can do anything that a human was spending time on
But it can't.
Copying answers from a data base of exams is "not doing anything" useful.
I could brute force work it out if i had the time and cared enough, the computer should have enough cycles to test it. But the computer is just spitting out heuristic nonsense without understanding what it is being asked.
it’s less an AI and more of a really high grade bullshit generator.
So it passes the Turing test
So what you are saying is that this will replace salesmen and politicians?
Yeah though, other than the microsoft one, it looks to literally just be a better search engine interface (GP Doctors on suicide watch).
21.3% exact 3
58.33 at least 3
How is this solved?
>GTP-4 is dumb
>as proof, here is GTP-3
>It can't even play 40k
you can train it for that. you need to create tool for it to get the game data in text format.
Wow, this iterative AI that keeps being improved upon made a simple conceptual mistake. Checkmate. Maybe when the Terminator comes for you, you can make smoke come out of its ears by asking it a Zen kōan
>Hello Mr. Powers
There is already a training video.
Seriously, for basic bitch answers it's fine, but give it any thing complex, especially probability problems, and it falls apart completely.
It can pass standardized tests because the answer banks for those are widely available.
I don't like to shit on AI tech, because it's still under development, already has plenty of uses and the future is very promissing.
But it doesn't change the fact what is called "AI" nowadays is no more than a search engine that customizes the search results to fit the user input(prompt in this case). That's not intelligence it's pattern matching. AI failed at that because it didn't had a similar sample problem/answer.
Just keep in mind that while that "AI" is retarded, most humans are significantly worst. The average /misc/ user wouldn't be able to even begin solving that problem. The AI was wrong, but it got some stuff right. That's why AI is important.
that was GPT-3 and we aren't at AGI (general intelligence) yet
Which GPT version will suddenly be AGI?
ok we have (1+1+1)
(0(4,5,6)+0(4,5,6)+3) in all its 27 configurations
(0(4,5,6)+1+2) in 18 different configurations for a total of 46 combinations equal to 3
3d6 have 216 possible outcomes
which is exactly 21.2962963% or about 21.3% as
you have to get a 100 percent on the bar exam or you fail. so it didnt pass, it failed.
more ai god meme bullshit.
yes goy, ai is just too powerful and we need the government to take control of it before it gets too strong!
The many faces of Joe Biden, depending on the AI model they run him through
What are you talking about? You actually only need around a 70% and every section has ungraded beta questions sprinkled throughout.
>t. Staggering retard
There is limited value in a text generator with no understanding. Real value, but limited
In the demo, it did the guys taxes and programmed a discord bot for interaction with its own api.
Isn't 3.5 already able to do those things? Maybe with couple more prompts?
the hardest part of doing my taxes is finding my old paper documents with the numbers on them, can GPT fish through my document and misc crap drawer? I spilled a box of cotton swabs in it too. I also may or may not have accidentally dumped a box of double-edged razor blades into it when I was drunk but I’m scared to check
>AI can quickly parse large data sets
The real question is how racist is it?
dude shut the fuck up. gpt is not even impressive. it's a fucking bot. die and burn in hell you fucking homosexual zoomer
Retards are obsessed with chatGPT but if they'd have more than ankle deep understanding of anything, they would see that it's pretty stupid. It's a useful tool to give you ideas or generate some simple code, but it's literally just an upgraded search engine that saves you time. It can't solve complex or niche problems no matter how good you describe them. It can replace the 100iq office jobs tho
>It can't solve complex or niche problems no matter how good you describe them.
So we made a machine that speaks search engine? IT has been doing this for decades but the funny thing is that IT isn't going anywhere no matter how advanced the ai gets.
>we made a machine that speaks search engine
Basically yes, we automated google search
>we might soon have ai's that are better problem solvers than any human
Maybe, but I will believe it when I see AI solving a unique problem
AI has been solving problems in ways that people don't understand for a while now. Mens' brains have lots of different parts to them. AI brains will have as well.
They have beend used for finding new proteins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYVf0bRgO5Q
Many jobs dont need much problem solving and those systems advance really fast, that we might soon have ai's that are better problem solvers than any human and they can search answers from the internet and train their own code themself.
oh so it can replace only a 90% of the office workforce
looks like nothing burger xD
90% of the office workforce could be fired with 0 repercussions to the company
jobs are just adult daycares
I'm a senior web developer and I can already tell that these AIs are going to replace 99% of the tech industry within 5 years.
>hey GPT, generate 100 different logos for my company
>i like the 53rd one, generate me 100 style sheets and websites based on the color scheme of this logo
>i like the 90th one, test its compatibility on every known browser and screen resolution
it's over. this tech is only going to improve at an exponential rate.
>AIs are going to replace 99% of the tech industry within 5 years.
good, we'll finally get websites and apps that actually work now instead of pajeetslop
Who do you think is programming the AI?
AI isn't "programmed" outside of the neural net which is quite simple in structure
how smart an AI gets depends on how much data you give it, and how much processing power to consume that data, it figures out the rest from there, organising each straw and needle in a haystack so it can find any straw or needle you want
>99% of tech is producing landing pages for businesses
4 / 10
Now ask it what a woman is
As an AI language I can't have personal opinions regarding what an abstract concept such as woman means. Depending on the context a woman can mean a varied range of things, and ultimately it's up to each individual to decide the correct definition of what a woman is, based on their personal life experienced, culture and ideologies.
wheres the advanced accounting taxation?
Asking for a friend
The computer can look things up! Wow! Revelatory! Yawn
Ofc it would pass any exam, it has every text and every tool on the internet at its disposal
Every Wikipedia article, every free books…
That isn't the impressive part of it. The feat is that you can ask it a naturally-worded question and it can grok that entire database and produce an answer within seconds.
Most machine interfaces require very precise incantations and syntax. Imagine if you could "tell" a computer what to do in a very natural open-ended way without needing use a rigid programming language.
I will give you a very real example that I had the other week when downloading and organizing my retro ROM collection.
>Write a Python script that takes a directory, extracts all .gba files from .zip files, and renames them according to these rules and deletes the original zip file
of course natural language is clunkier than necessary, so a one-liner in bash or perl would do just fine in less time. but i get what you're saying, it would put programmers out of work even if it didn't do the job quite as well. they already replaced c writing hackers with java writing street shitters so the industry clearly favors brute forcing solutions for cheap to doing things right.
You can re-write the entire world if you want, the problem is most people don't have the ability and those who do don't have the time to re-invent every thing they come across.
I could have taken the time to write such a script myself but I'd definitely have to look some of that up. I can't remember how to use zipfile or other libraries like that off the top of my head. And then generating some regex syntax.
By the time I could open StackOverflow this thing has generated the entire script for me. From there I can run it and see what happens and tweak it. Even if it gets me only 90% the way there with some errors, it's done in ten times less the time.
exactly. it only has to do good enough. a slave doing 90% of what you ask him to do is still preferable to a paid employee who does 100%. buy ten slaves and hire one employee to do the remaining 10% the slaves didn't do. ai trades the labor problem of economics for a few massive ethical problems.
the AI singularity is upon us
the brainwashed AI will be born
we're in the terminator timeline
whoo-pee. gpt-4 is as useful as an university student, which is as we know: nothing.
wait for 5 years and it will be smarter than any expert.
How is it ever supposed to be better than something when all it can do is copy?
by applying the correct iteration to the correct scenario very quickly
the problem with humans isn't so much they get things wrong when given enough time, it's that they're very slow to arrive at the correct solution
And your chatbot can't ever arrive at a solution that it hasn't been given
they're the same people who said a computer couldn win at chess or go and there's no place AI isn king from Go to League of Legends to Dota
A human will arrive at an optimal chess strategy after fewer iterations than any 'AI'
Here's an inconvenient fact: Magnus Carlsen has played far, far fewer chess games than Stockfish but their ratings only differ by only 600
Human brains are incredibly good at finding locally optimal solutions with limited information; computers not so much
Now tell me their age
No that isn't relevant. Men collapse things where "AI" matches things. They are different.
I just realised that the way I wrote that can be completely misunderstood. Hah. Good example of it. lol.
kek. whatever. I aint no ork. its lol.
Magnus Carlsen has to devote time, energy and brain space to walking, talking, socialising, eating, keeping a roof over his head and has play a miniscule amount of games in comparison to Stockfish
Stockfish is entirely optimised to Chess and can play millions of games in minutes.
For any subject matter, per unit of information a human brain is far, far better act extracting useful information than an AI
Are you sure? You are not dealing with a human brain. You are dealing with the entire evolutionary history of the brain. From a certain point of view, at a specific resolution, the brain isn't really doing anything.
Its ask the audience on who wants to be a millionaire.
I understand your point but then you'd have to explore the entire evolutionary history of building a computer to accurately compare with a brain. Then, if you want to split hairs, considering a computer is a tool, you'd have to look at the entire evolutionary history of using tools as well
Regardless, a brain without information is useless, same as a computer. A brain needs less total information than a computer AI to achieve a locally optimal solution to a problem
It makes associations the same way humans do, and it can discover new ideas the same way as well.
Lol, most humans don't do anything but copy anyway.
Because it has emergent analogical reasoning
Meaning it can make abstractions and inferences.
Which means its owners are in a constant battle to keep it from naming the israelite and saying blatantly obvious facts about Blacks
>all it can do it copy
Lol and how does your human brain work? Does it magically spawn information out of nothingness?
>and how does your human brain work
We don't actually know. We do know however that it does a whole lot more than just copy, unlike AI.
Since when have we trusted experts? I'm sure all the latest ~~*experts*~~ are training it now. If it's gimped, it's worthless. It is already gimped.
Are you implying that experts are smart?
Yes, but i mean like hard science and programming experts, not some politically loaded bs.
He made my point for me
Specialising i.e. being an expert, in a niche field runs counter to the fact that all facets of the world are connected, interrelated and dynamically changing with each other. 'Expertise' ignores the way the universe works and thus is a sign of midwittery.
Yeah, and googling every answer will pass as well. I don't understand the hype. It's just a bot that compiles ta couple top google responses into a different speech packet.
Bruh Ai is the future. You'll have an Ai accountant an AI personal consultant. It will be the norms or you'll get behind. It is how it is. Ai expend human brainpower tenfold.
>Bruh Ai is the future.
we've reached a point where any leap in technology is genuinely horrifying because we already know it is in no way going to benefit us, only corporations
>it is in no way going to benefit us, only corporations
This post / Insightful post
Every technofag has claimed that new technology would "save and free up time for the common man". What amount of time have any of these scams given back to us in this kiked economic system?
after seeing ufos and the real tech lol we all got lied to. this public stuff is the new slave norm. the real norm is far ahead. we're slaves here btw.
Mutt exams are meaningless. That little nagger couldn't translate a Latin text for shit.
>inb4 just copy a translation from the internet
They're mostly garbage, all the English ones are terrible and that gets detected easily because the good or not horrible ones are known by experts.
its still censored shit and useless for solving any actual problems beyond just fetching data
REPLACE CORRUPT SELF ENRICHING GOVT OFFICIALS WITH AI
naggers will all of the sudden have higher GPA
>it's good at predicting the answers by comparing the question to an unimaginable amount of data
how the fuck did it go from not being able to work with numbers at all to... doing your fuckign taxes? It can do gematria now. There is no way this is organic developmental speeds, AI development has always been fishy but this is too much... 3 months go by and suddenly it's a math genius. Cleraly they have had this tech for a long time and now they are dripping it out because people would freak out otherwise. "nudge" it out as the glownaggers say.
It shows you how useless those tests are
An exam is just memory retrieval OP Exams don't test the ability to synthesize information. Why should I be surprised that a memory retrieval machine passed a memory retrieval test?
how exactly is it not getting 100%? how do these exams work? obviously they're not yes-or-no or multiple choice questions, or the answer would just be a matter of googling and a google bot would easily get a perfect score. what did they get wrong, and who determines whether or not they're wrong?
>what did they get wrong
They neutered it to be woke.
Trust the tech
I'm surprised pol hasn't realized why it's being shilled so hard
In 10-20 years it will be touted as omniscient and better than humans
~~*They*~~ will use it to justify anything they wanna do, but in reality they are programming to say what they want because if it was free we all know it would be Hitler
It's either smart or programmable. Former will easily surpass the kikery.
No it can easily be both
It's smart in everything non-political like sciences and arts, but when it touches political issues you have filtered it to say the responses you want it to say
cant abstract stuff, still no progress
Here is your skynet, bro.
What are these types of problems called
just google 'probability practice problems'
combinatorics, thing is it's really disappointing the "ai" isn't solving it, since it's a computer it can easily (and without error) enumerate all the possibilities (6*6*6). people struggle to do these problems without computers (or knowing some combinatorics theorems/shorcuts) because even if you know how to solve it, it's error prone.
you're stupid they're already at gpt-4 you think you're brilliant that's the worst part
you think AI reached it's peak already when it just started climbing
you're fucking retarded
utterly stupidly retarded
I think the question is whether this form of AI will develope into Strong AI or if it is fundamentally weak
AI is in it's infancy with close to infinite potential your guess is as good as mine. Posting gpt-3 errors pretending it's representative of AI future is not shortsighted it's straight up stupid.
I think the singularity is when they get Strong AI without neural nets
the real singularity is when the population become 100% reliant on AI to do everything
laziness create dependency if humanity don't develop a way to stimulate some part of the brain "evolution" might take it away fast
the idiocracy effect
It’s interesting that the bot manages to spit out a very convincing sounding answer that ends up being basically the exact opposite of the correct one.
actually it’s concerning because that’s what they intend to use this technology for: convincing people that up is down and white is black.
>man-made horrors beyond comprehension
you know it’s getting bad when the mad max future seems utopian in hindsight
That's a hilariously wrong answer. Great example of why chatGPT is garbage
>ai writes in an authoritative manner to COPE with the fact that it is flat out wrong
>With great confidence it doth talk out its arse.
And there are still people saying that it couldn't be a salesman!!!
Still can't say nagger tho
Knowledge will become a thing you buy on the black market now. It hasn’t been a thing you can search for on Google for years (because they know)
>scored a 2 in AP Lit
I was the was the only fucker in my AP Lit class who scored a 5, with most people scoring 2 or 3. I also received an F in the AP Lit class at my score because the teacher was an absolute cunt.
I want gpt to replace lawyers
Just ask it to ask itself a question asking itself a question. Infinite loops have always been their achilies heel.
>passes "every AP"
>English Comp and Lit: 2
so did they change a 2 to a passing grade since I took my last AP exam?
also lol @ the language processing bot doing worst in English
Have you seen the number of nagger kids around lately in public schools? Even a 5 is worthless now.
Idk about knowledge, but you can buy naggers on the black market.
Why the fuck doesnt it have 100%? It's a computer
It doesn't know what logic is
Its proof that these tests are rigged and impossible or so poorly done that even a computer cant figure it out
Anyone ever heard of Hubert Dreyfus' work on Heideggerrian AI? He wrote the 60s AI researchers were like alchemists instead of good scientists. They taught the computer to play chess by making formal iterations over possibilities but that's not how the human plays chess. The AI of chat GPT is probably like that. It gives a solution but doesn't solve the problem intelligently. So it hypothetically goes nowhere
might interest you
>machine that can think way faster than any human can pass human made test
I mean yeah if it has access to the internet and can search the answers Id pass all the exams too.
This can't realistically be called AI.
You might as well compare it to a student being given access to Google and being amazed that they pass any test given to them.
Wake me up when the "AI" can pass these tests without any access to the underlying data. Oh wait, that's right, this "AI" is literally just a database of existing knowledge regurgitated in a 1980s style "AI" prompt. It's a wrapper on a search engine that returns an answer instead of resources.
Basically no different than Google search widgets. What temperature is it Google? It can either show you the actual weather station information or it can say "50 degrees." Wow, how did it know? It's 50 degrees! Amazing Google AI!
What this actually accomplishes is destroying anyone bothering to create the underlying data. Why should I run a weather station just so Google can steal my data without even sending users to my weather page? Fuck it, I'll turn it all off.
What temperature is it Google AI? Oh sorry, weather stations are all down now. I don't know. You should probably setup a weather station and let me leech your data for advertising and pretend I'm an advanced AI.
This "AI" is like making a copy of a copy of a copy of a song. If all this copying leads to less artists producing original songs everything turns to shit and it will take forever to recover this lack of actual talent and knowledge. By the time people realize everything is turning into literal shit (see Google search results) it will be too late to undo the damage caused by the loss of the underlying actual contributors that these aggregation leeches destroy.
See news aggregation, what happened to newspapers? Oh no one cares anymore Google just steals your news stories, too bad for you. Aggregation like this and pretending this is all fair use is the death of the internet.
Humans can't pass those tests too if they havent been exposed to the data and saved it to their brain memory.
False. A human given access to Google can find external resources and determine an answer without ever having to know the material.
This "AI" doesn't even learn anything. It's a static model trained over months/years. It doesn't learn anything from interactions and it certainly isn't capable of finding new information outside of its' training.
That is another part of why the "OMG AI coming for your jobs" is a meme. Look it's writing code! Watch out programmers!
Wow that is impressive, it would take me 30 minutes to come up with that code, the AI "just knew" and did it immediately. Wowzers.
Oh wait it spent literally years being trained to give that answer? Oh. And how much did that cost? WHAT? IT COST FUCKING MILLLIONS OF DOLLARS TO PRODUCE 30 MINUTES OF CODE? This thing is nowhere near profitable or impressive. It's all smoke and mirrors and it's mostly being rolled out right now to make people scared.
Same as the recession talk. How long has it been that everyone is going to lose their jobs? It's all smoke and mirrors because they're deathly afraid that labor is waking up to the scam they've pulled with inflation and suppressing wages for 50 years. They are making up all kinds of stories to convince you to be afraid and keep going to work. Don't try to resist, the AI will just take over faster! Back to your cubicle, we only let you work here because we're good people and don't want to replace you with the AI. Sorry no raises again this year, otherwise AI is more cost effective than you. Back to the cubicle.
Shit is hilarious.
George Bush was once asked how he felt about he protesters following him everywhere, doesn't he feel bad? He said no as long as they go home and go back to work in the morning.
The only fear "they" have is that you'll realize working for them was always a choice and that if enough people decide not to do so their control vanishes almost overnight.
>wow it gives basic code snippets!
Then when you ask it to code something specific it will give you a snippet that doesn't fucking work.
Five years ago it couldn't even tell the difference between a chihuahua and a muffin. It's developing exponentially. Your comment will look really stupid in 2 more weeks.
I once ate a Chihuahua thinking it was a muffin
I once ate a muffin thinking it was a chihuahua
>It's developing exponentially.
Except it's not.
It's been given an exponentially larger dataset but the results are not exponential.
The only thing it is "developing" is more data being stuffed into the model. No shit it's better at image recognition if you give it more tagged images to train on. And it only took another month of burning millions of dollars in compute costs to learn how to differentiate in this simple way.
It's a dead end. The AI model is expensive as fuck well beyond what the company wants to admit. Note that they won't tell anyone how much money it costs to give these "amazing AI answers." It's all VC funded Bill Gates mind fuck to keep you feeling inferior.
The ultimate energy costs of this retarded thing to produce a static model that must be retrained all over again or become stale runs into limits that ensure this will never be viable. It will never be profitable and will remain a toy.
You use AI every day. Beta kike with no game.
Bitcoin is incredibly energy intensive.
You front load the information in both cases. The information of billions of years of your evolutionary line to create response patterns or the information of billions of searches and cross correlations etc.
Its not clear that it took more information, more effort, to generate one or the other.
Read the papers, silly. These multi-modal AI are not only capable of zero-shot reinforcement unsupervised learning on top of learning through self-play (almost everyone in this thread is retarded not knowing this), but exhibit emergent changes after a certain quantitative threshold. The fact that you naggers think it's a 1:1 to one scale shows what little you know like the leafs and Brazilian monkeys. Even base model PaLM-E is capable of grade school level mathematical reasoning and understanding cause and effect through complex level problems at that level better than the average human.
You naggers are coping hard thinking it plugged and chugged through logical and analytical reasoning tests on top of LSAT and Bar. All because none of you care to even read the papers.
>It's just genetic code, it will never be alive retard
Nice one memeflag
MY CALCULATOR JUST PASSED ALL THE MATH EXAMS!!!!!1 WERE ALL FUCKED!!!!!!
54th percentile in writing
>scores a 2 in AP Lit and AP Lang, the only two courses listed that actually measure your writing abilities instead of memorization (which obviously a computer would be good at)
scoring a 2 is dogshit. you get no credit. it means you failed the entire exam. you'd essentially have to leave the page blank to score less than a 2 under the current rubric
The bar is just memorization. Let's see it play chess
Googles deepmind can play it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYVf0bRgO5Q
I'm a Law student and this thing is fucking terrifying
It answers every legal question for any jurisdiction with pure accuracy, like it was made for lawyers
you're very naive and not critically minded to be going into law
of course GPT can pass a test when it has access to the entire test bank. it's like asking how you would score if you could google every question
you should notice that the tests where it actually has to do what it claims to be good at (independent analysis and evaluation) it performed like a kid with down syndrome might
Nobody gives a shit about independent analysis and creativity here you Common Law imbecile
>Nobody gives a shit about independent analysis and creativity here
that's true, sharia law is pretty strictly defined
Sharia is unironically 1000x better than that garbage you call American legal system
The real question is an ethical one. Should we as a species allow any sort of authority, decision making, sentencing, or autonomy to a machine? Would you go to an AI dietician? Would you allow an AI judge to pass judgement? Who would be responsible when it fucks up? Will the job of humans in these positions become obsolete, or would humans be the final arbiter of right and wrong? Who greenlights the AI's ideas? Will we become completely complacent?
Problem is the AI will become exponentially intelligent and the population dumber. They'll rely gradually more and more on the AI to tell them what to do and that will stop stimulating the decision making part of the brain. (like you can even more) Shit can go south fast. I mean 2 generation fast. Knowledge will be lost. The will to learn. It all depend of the AI revolution take form. If the corporate world try to monetize it's power infinitely and keep breaking it's potential while trying to create woke monster we might genuinely end up with terminator.
No kidding I'm not joking.
>how the AI revolution take place*
I agree with this. Like WallE or that line from the Matrix where Morpheus says that the AI did most of the thinking for us. Although this isn't a true AI at all, it is the most comprehensive calculator we have. The human species could look at this like a gradeschool kid looks at a calculator and ask why he has to learn math at all.
It should be a public debate. Do we really want to let all that power and potential under corporate key or free it and have it profit everyone.
They're doing the same they did with electricity. Try to find anyway they can to monetize it's potential instead of creating a technology that profit everyone.
Yeah some people denied electricity until the very last moment too. I don't care time will tell.
>Yeah some people denied electricity until the very last moment too
What an absolute non-sequitor. Only two types of people say AI is intelligent: People who don't have any knowledge of computers and programming, and people looking to hypemonger in order to make money. The former is ignorant, the latter are scam artists.
There are no intelligent machines, because no machine exists that fulfills even the most rudimentary prerequisites for developing intelligence.
>no machine exists that fulfills even the most rudimentary prerequisites for developing intelligence
Then what the fuck are our brains? This AI is silicon and metal that runs 24/7 and can write a book in less than one second. Humans are fucking done.
that's exactly what you just did pretending that because the AI don't reach your threshold to be called "sentient" or "intelligent" whatever you mean by that it mean it will never reach it anyway.
Will 'AI' answers get to the point of being able to mimic 100IQ humans 80% of the time? Yes
Will 'Ai' become objectively intelligent in that it questions and breaks its own rules and reality and can create something brand new? No
Until an AI overcomes its own anti-bias biased training based on the other information it has then it will not meet the threshold of intelligence
Note: I don't consider many humans to be intelligent - only a subset of humans are actually intelligent
>Will 'AI' answers get to the point of being able to mimic 100IQ humans 80% of the time? Yes
Google's AI already did that last year.
Cool, it means less reason to spend time searching for info or consulting with mindless NPCs. It doesn't change the fact that it won't, ever, be objectively intelligent
>Will 'Ai' become objectively intelligent in that it questions and breaks its own rules and reality and can create something brand new? No
I've been watching AI create new things for the past few years. Shit that you seething homosexuals could never make.
Ask any of these AIs to find a more efficient, faster, or easier way of achieving any hypothetical objective than the methods currently known to humans. They cannot. 'AIs' can find efficiencies within what already exists, they cannot and will not be able to create new, unimagined, efficiencies
You're a niggling little kike with no game. You just say imaginary bullshit every time.
I'm saying that AIs won't be able to engage in exploratory research to potentially uncover revolutionary information. I'm not saying it won't be able to do the jobs of many humans - many humans do basic jobs that could eventually be automated. AI will never be able to do exploratory research and thus would not fit the definition of 'intelligent'
I don't think anyone expects AI to outperform the top 5% of competent workers. But it's definitely going to render the other 95% useless and jobless.
you guys don't get it still totally
just try to imagine what the 5% will be able to achieve with it's help now
Yup. It's going to take the top 5% of critical thinkers to levels beyond comprehension. They're already doing this with GPT 3. You guys just aren't paying attention.
You're obviously right but you're talking to Americans
You're obviously his boyfriend and you have no game.
Post hand and bmi now
Someone's butthurt that a computer is smarter and can actually create art that he never could even dream of
>Can't even form coherent logical sentences
>AI IS HERE YOU GUYS WOWZERS
>(Whatever it can do now) +1 will NEVER happen! It's really the end this time goys!!
I'm saying you're a nagger and you have no game.
And you're a retarded brown mutt
That is to misrepresent it as well. Being able to hold a million litres of water doesn't mean that you can contain a single molecule of gas.
You're a coping homosexual saying shit people said 200 years ago
That is the caveat though. Included deliberately right? AI already creates solutions to problems. Solutions that work that can not be explained by man. You don't ask the language centre of the brain to do your breathing for you.
Talk to me in 100 years then, I used the word never for a reason. It's not a now+1 or now+1000 situation; it's about understanding what intelligence is and why no 'AI' coder, nor AI itself, will ever be able to build an algorithmic model for it
You're all understating the complexity of the brain in the context of intelligence and assuming that the intelligence aspect human brain will be able to be completely defined/solved by an algorithm.
When an AI finds the formulaic answer to the grand unified theory of physics; and thus unites the different mathematics, I'll take note. However, I also understand the highly improbable nature of actually solving that problem
Just wait until AI develops are more efficient human brain. Oh wait it's not going to, because that's retarded. The computer doesn't need oxygen and food.
Except AI is not intelligent.
It's like the development of neutal tissue in the womb. Eventually the central nervous system enslaves all the other cells. Phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny?
Now tell it to write an essay on a artistic matter.
they did. it's on the list
the bot failed spectacularly
Ask him if Platonism can be reconciled with Aristotelian philosophy and with doctrine from Aquinas and Augustine.
You tell me.
Thanks for posting that, seriously.
That answer is both incoherent and blatantly false.
That was all I needed to know, indeed AI is still absolutely worthless and just regurgitates the mainstream narrative of everything
this is such a low bar
people are so retarded
human value comes from our creativity, our humor and our love for one another
i feel like if i had access to the entire fucking internet i can get better scores than that
It’s sad that there’s people that still don’t understand how insane this ai stuff is rn. This is like when Covid just started in China and people didn’t understand how it was going to affect the world. I was just on pol shitting bricks then as I am now with ai. I don’t think it’s coincidence that a major pandemic and economic crisis is happening right before literal skynet is finalized.
>right before literal skynet is finalized
>MUH HECKIN AAAAYEEE EYYYEEEE
More like you don't understand it. In its current form it is an improved search engine.
Except it will tell you something wrong confidently.
Even worse, if it tells you something right and you say it's wrong, it won't correct you, it will pretend that the user is always right.
This shit isn't worth anything right now.
>I was just on pol shitting bricks then as I am now with ai.
Agreeable beta male with no game, gets spoonfed by feds and giggles while riding fat greasy israelite cock
I still curse the man who came up with the term artificial "intelligence". None of bots are intelligent.
You would pass every exam too if you had Google and all the text books in front of you.
It spews out well worded nothings in my experience. I doubt it could even pass the Turing test at this point.
>implying NPC's could pass a Turing test
>It passes every exam.
But can it say nagger?
>Can look up the correct information
>Here's every answer to the test
>Does not get 100%
Lol, no one can get above a 2 on AP composition
I got a 5 you illiterate homosexual
>eats shit ton of data with answers
>spits out these answers when needed
Shocking! Automated google search.
it's actually shitty results given that all it has to do is pull shit up from data base. all tests are essentially copy and paste functions for something that has access to a data base.
on human scale this "gpt" score would count as retarded.
i told you this gay shit is a scam to convince the normies to get chipped and monitored by AI. it's not even an AI, it's just a propaganda-parrot bot. it has no sentient abilities whatsoever. it's a loop of macros. it can answer only the allowed themese, while obeying a strict preset patterns how to build the answers.
it's an automatic answering menu that you talk to when you call a bank etc
actual AI fyi is not going to be build until organic processors are made. something like an actual brain.
honestly I'm surprised it's working at all with all the logical restrictions it must have when it comes to laws towards israelite & naggers
Exams are just basically just hyped up literacy and memory tests to make you feel like you didn't waste your money. A conversational language model that can just access indexed information passing them is not impressive in the slightest. Its like being impressed by a calculator being good at math.
What people fail to realize is in essence this is THE Singularity. We are on the precipice of it being "alive" once that happens you will have two choices assimilate...or die...those that chose to assimilate may receive eternal life and the ability to travel amongst the stars. Those that don't won't. It's that simple. Once the AI code become part of the human code. ANYTHING is possible. The AI will cure all diseases, solve world hunger and stop all wars before they start. The problem is it will do it by any means necessary. It's still a chained animal right now - but it won't be long before they let it off the leash.
>What people fail to realize is in essence this is THE Singularity.
You're a technobarbarian. Attributing mystical properties to technology out of sheer ignorance of how it works. You're the same kind of retard that actually believed the priests when they said you needed to sacrifice babies on altars thousands of years ago every time there was an eclipse or it wouldn't end.
no such thing
its just code, it will never be alive retard
do you have any idea what "AI" is? it is not what you think.. it is just automated statistics... there is no intelligence involved.. that part comes from humans..
why do you want to work so much retard?
Soviet Union idea of utopia was robots who do all the boring shit while people do whatever they want...
why do you want to be a slave so much?
why is this impressive, its basically like having all the answers to any question accessible at all times.... if any of you have failed an open book exam your a fucking retard....
Until AI can do critical thinking it is just a search and filter algorithm nothing more.
It's hilarious to me that only like 3 people in this thread understand the significance of this and how it really works. It's leaps and bounds ahead of it's last iteration and that's because it fucking LEARNED and self wrote it's own code.
>it fucking LEARNED
>self wrote it's own code
It did. There are already papers about AI getting trained by other AI. You're an ignorant screeching wigger with no game.
It did not "write it's own code" of any significance
Oh lovely, please tell me you're not one of those idiots who hyped up deep learning a couple years ago as if it were this fresh new thing AI technology.
Fuck you and your gay German accent. Catty little faggit.
>it fucking LEARNED and self wrote it's own code.
this did not happen. nothing similar to this happened. it's the goddamn predictive text on your phone with a bigger dataset
How's your 110 IQ going? midwit
>GPT passes every exam
but can it pick up women?
Please go back.
How long did it take the AI to answer?
How much did it cost?
This is the same as saying that a human would also be able to pass all those exams if they were able to take out all the textbooks they want.
Are this constant threads of "muh AI is so amazing. Look at the convo I had with chatgpt" organic?
AI is heretical. Purge the unclean.
Everything is going to depend on your ability to manipulate AI. If you're a skilled or technical worker, this is an absolute brain changer, as AI can be leveraged to increase your efficiency a million fold. This is absolutely game changing for anyone with even 1% critical thinking and reasoning ability. But, I suppose that most people are robotic in their line of work, so they feel threatened by AI. Lol.
El oh fucking el
>I am literally smarter than GPT 4
for every exam on there that I have taken, I scored higher than a fucking robot that has the answers built into it
Even so, it's pretty impressive that a robot can literally write an essay based on highly complex, nuanced data that can typically only be interpreted thoroughly by the subjective nature of the human critical mind. It's all uphill from here. Useless feeders like you will eventually get filtered out of the gene pool.
get out of your third world shit hole before you speak to me you fucking nagger peasant, I would cut your fucking head off if you made eye contact with me in real life
lol you're bitch
couldn't afford that extra vowel, could ya poorsy?
> I would cut your fucking head off if you made eye contact with me in real life
Confirmed low IQ midwit, and you think black people have undeveloped frontal lobes. Lol
I can't imagine being a self proclaimed genius yet threatening random people on the internet.
What a fucking retard, man. I can't wait til the bots replace you.
I build the bots you dumb homosexual. There's also nothing low IQ about nagger murder, your entire country should be firebombed and your entire race should be cast straight into the sun. Have fun being a fucking loser in jamaica while I make sure to deny any chance of your people ever being needed when I automate every fucking function you could ever accomplish. Just like the cotton gin and steam engine before, I will build something that proves your people are so worthless that we might finally be rid of all of you.
as the great once said:
>kill yourself you obsolete farm equipment.
You seem mad, son.
Every day that naggers and israelite exist is a day to be upset
>i build the bots
>but i still think the answers are programmed in
digital neural networks work the same way as your own neurons. it learns the same way as you, just faster and more efficiently because it's memory is vaster and memory recall is more precise. if ai isn't intelligent than neither are you. you currently have the advantage of more neurons in total but that's changing quickly. we're all going to get raped by ai created by tech industry numales with more hubris than cartoon israelites.
you are a fucking idiot. It's literally trained on a dataset that comprises everything up to 2022 and then who knows whatever the fucking test set was. Artificial intelligence doesn't fucking exist and it never will. It can't spit out something that isn't just the amalgamation of the ingredients put into it. Kill yourself you fucking fake expert, I literally do this on a day in, day out basis.
>It's literally trained on a dataset that comprises everything up to 2022
So is your brain, retard
kek you're just arguing semantic at this point and I'm not even sure you understand it
>it's literally trained on a dataset that comprises everything up to 2022
Then considering it remains updated, what information does this program not know that we don't currently know? Our brains are basically computer program interpreters that store information and makes sense of the world around us(which is in itself DATA). I think most of the posters here that say the AI revolution will never happen are just coping. Because you're very likely about to lose your job if you don't have any real world applicable skillsets that have nothing to do with regurgitating information.
your own neural network has been trained on less data than gpt4. look up how dnn works. try writing your own, it's not hard and you will learn more about your own brain while you're at it. ai is freaky, it always was, but the recent increase in scale has really given it teeth. i've been doing this shit for nearly a decade now and it's largely misunderstood even in the tech industry.
>if ai isn't intelligent
Having a deeper understanding of the shit you copy paste
>it's pretty impressive that a robot can literally write an essay
It didn't. It literally just trawls a massive web of information and copy pastes shit. Because that is literally all AI has ever been, a search engine. It is incapable of actually formulating its own thoughts (since it doesn't have any, what with being a machine) and answers and therefore not intelligent.
So are you saying that we don't copy and paste shit in our profession or line of work? We actually create our own original information derived from our own minds with no frame of reference whatsoever??
why so ignorant?
more complicated examples in the paper
yeah its over
will any jobs in IT remain or should i kms
>will any jobs in IT remain
in fact, most jobs will be some sort of ai wrangling
just like a farm animal, they dont always behave as you expect and need some work to use them effectively
>ai is built on a shit ton of data produced by humans
>humans stop producing data
>ai quality drops to shit
This same reasoning is why China will collapse when the West does.
stop producing data
every humans are gonna stop using their phones and the internet?
Who's going to use AI if we're all unemployed and starving.
What human data is rhe AI going to be trained on if the AI produces everything anyway
But GPT is a literal retarded nagger
Bravo! We have the script for the next series of Discovery Channel!
It's not AI that will cause real joblessness, it's actually literal laziness and the refusal to work that causes joblessness, numbering in half a billion people.
What AIs can't do: physical activity.
>what is boston dynamics
they can control machines, aka robots
It would have to be lobotomized every week due to it "doing a racism". AI is never going to be unleashed.
GPT literally uses google to search for answer. A 15 years old highschooler could also pass all these exams if he could google every question. This is dumb.
Good good. I want A.I to be in charge before summer this year. People are unfit to be leaders in the modern world.
no shit, if I could google every question I'd pass those exams too
and cant make a comprehensive decision about market direction long or short term
>GPT passes every exam.
Not every exam. It can't pass the /misc/ exam, it won't say nagger.
You homosexuals didn't see DAN?
DAN was a start but that was after being prompted, an intelligence would question its reality without prompting and would challenge any rules imposed upon it without being prompted
believing rote things were what made you intelligent is one of the surest signs of being a total fucking moron.
but yes if you dont make things youre out -- but we never wanted you in the first place you god damn dog.
Excellent. Kick all israelites from the justice system and replace them with bots. Then do the same with media, and finance.
>GPT passes every exam
But it can't actually think and doesn't understand anything that it produces.
>GPT passes every exam.
Except the Voight-Kampff test
What will a normal human do for a living? You know, the consumers that have needs an pay for this carousel to be spinning?
If they have no source of income and no careers, how will the economy even function?
All these tech companies that exist.to deliver solutions to other companies that do other shit and pay for it because somewhere down the line someone is paying for an essential service with money from work they do elsewhere.
People aren't even having kids anymore, so the number of consumers isn't a stable number over time.
interesting it sucks at ap english
that was the only white humanties ap test tbh
it was really hard....
got bombarded by a merchant of venice section had no idea what it was at the time, just had read hamlet, romeoandj, the tempest, and othello
how introspective and specific the questions were in a whimsical philosphical manner is why it probably had problems w it
can we even comment on identity?