is this true?
is this true?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
is this true?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
I fucked your mom in the ass
else if(a > b && b < a)
lmao
I'm I retarded? Wtf was she even going for here?
>I'm I retarded?
Comparing the legendary inverse square root algorithm from ID software to a function that has to return largest of two numbers which is not even correct. In a way this stupid post actually tells a lot of the modern state of programming or modern world in general. Men did all the dirty work to abstract a lot of complex tasks so that dumbass like her and others in comment section can understand but instead they failed to understand and all they can do now is to point and laugh while being replaced by a cheap worker. Women in tech should be squashed like cockroaches they are.
>Women in tech should be squashed like cockroaches they are.
They can squash my cockroach if you know what I'm saying
Ive always believed in equality and fairness, but the grim conclusion is women should never be allowed in tech/engineering because they place feels over anything, over function, fact, practicality etc and it ends in a disaster
women are great in other fields they have natural proclivity for, like healthcare and education
They are fine for webshit where there isn't a lot of math and clean code and many comments matters
I guess "math meritocracy is bullshit" could be a real thing if general intelligence was separated from mathematical ability in formal settings, although these women are definitely not smart enough to think of this.
Lol a bunch of corrupt fucks build a shit bridge and bribe inspectors, when shit hits the fan they put this "wymen built it" diversion. Nice, just keep following the script.
Factually wrong, simpy, they wanted fancy look and went for it without proofchecking all the engineering, basic durability etc. Then they tried to sue independent experts who checked the plans - and those said they were only paid for basic checks. MCM cheaped out on everything and neglected safety.
Exactly what happens when females are in charge. When you destroy meritocracy and only virtusignalling psychopaths make career.
Six people killed, 10 injured.
Regardless of "muh females" boogieman (or boogiewoman?), the bridge was already cracking days before the accident and the corrupt fucks from the FDOT decided to ignore because "it was not a concern"
>is this true
A while back when I first saw this screenshot, I decided to look up Karlie Kloss' twitter account to see if she made this tweet. No such tweet existed, although it's possible she deleted it out of embarrassment.
In any case, the code on the left is a real function written way back when to compute the reciprocal of a square root really fast... or at least a damn good approximation of it. Nowadays we have a dedicated CPU instruction for this if need be. The code on the right, meanwhile, is incorrect.
I'm not like the other girls teehee
I am most triggered by the inconsistent comment placement.
and the 2-space indentation, that shit quickly becomes unreadable
2-space indentation is the standard for Delphi
Also no identation inside the function, and curly brackets on a new line
There's no such thing as too many comments. You're cheating others, including yourself, out of understanding your own program if you do shit like this.
return (a > b ? a : b);
if you need comments you're retarded, you must switch careers now, go study art or something
If you can't see how comments would facilitate understanding that return statement (Not the operator, but how it fits into the program and the larger philosophy of the program) then you're clueless and a mediocre programmer.
PERFORMANCE CODE BTFO
I'm with Kloss, I'm sorry.
>a = 6
>b = 6
>result 5
The hilarious thing about the code on the right is that if it were ever used in a program where the result was used in the greater program, there'd be an edge case bug that the programmer would have a hard time tracking down.
>an edge case bug that the programmer would have a hard time tracking down.
What's the bug?
a and b having the same values will return 5 regardless of their values.
I noticed that heh. I guess it really wouldn't be a bug if 5 was a sentinel value, but its still horrible nonetheless.
You'd have to be specifically coding around it, which makes calling the function "max" unintuitive.
Seen this pic several times and still not sure if it was a real tweet by this whore or just a fake shitpost.
She never wrote this. This is an edit made by some angry incel, possibly Carmack.
God early 2016 really was a different planet
>max(9, 9)
>returns 5