Is this God's way of getting ride of the sodomites? I always thought it was just a story, not something we would see in our lifetime.
Is this God's way of getting ride of the sodomites?
Is this God's way of getting ride of the sodomites? I always thought it was just a story, not something we would see in our lifetime.
Glad to be an incel. I will have a long healthy life
>mental health doesn’t count
You are german and germans can't be what you claimed to be, so you must be an ausländer.
Take a look at all the vitrified rocks in present day Sodom. Orbital strike baby. The bible is serious business I can assure you.
SATAN
Stratospheric Aerosol Transport And Nuclearisation
We`re practicing launching sulpur into the atmosphere to block out the sun
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/01/1069283/researchers-launched-a-solar-geoengineering-test-flight-in-the-uk-last-fall/
There are schools teaching that oral sex is normal and even encouraging it. If this risk exists, then something is telling me God doesn't want us to engage in it and its actually a sin.
I thought science was fake israelite magic? But isn’t when it aligns with your right wing dumb shit?
>your
>therefore admitting that the poster is a lefty and therefore shouldn't be here and deserves to be executed for its sins (let alone its post being disregarded)
There’s nothing scientific about HPV coming in as many flavors as Baskin Robbins, and being like pokemon, you can catch ‘em all
hpv causes cancer. this was obvious from the start.
science says ur an fag
> your right wing dumb shit
nope homosexual, just a simple common sense
my wife and i 69 a lot though
i fail to see how this is a gay-only punishment
While sodomy is used for homosexualry mostly nowadays, it can also mean any non-procreative sexual activity.
your cock doesn't reach her tonsils so she'll be fine
You contract the HPV from having sex with a bunch of people. There’s a chance you two don’t carry it but many do from their normal, even modest, sex life earlier on
Eating pussy is gay adjacent. Just because you're not gay doesn't mean doing some straight things isn't gay.
you ever jerk off?
you are touching a penis with your hand
touching a penis is gay.
>only homosexuals give head
spotter the underaged virgin loser
White woman will literally give you nagger diseases. kek. Fucking gross.
13% have 40% of HIV/AIDS in USA
plus
Pic related
H. Pylori is fucking scary, if you leave it untreated too long is not a matter of wheter it will give you cancer, is a matter of when, and the treatment is obnoxious as fuck, God I hate thag bug had my stomach like it was sandpapered
You shouldn't be eating pussy anyway. I'm married for 15 years & haven't once did it to my wife (to her dismay). She's gobbled on my dick hundreds of times.
Submitting to a woman for her pleasure is cucking 101, she'll lose respect for you & will ultimately destroy the relationship. You'll be calling a bull in no time to rekindle the flame.
You heard me, do not eat that pussy!
Eating pussy is great though. Feeling her and seeing her writhe in pleasure from you using your mouth is an unrivalled feeling. You own her in that moment. Nothing better
Depends, good for girlfriends or wife (wouldn’t know) but not something to do to strangers
Kek meaning I’m not married, did it to all my girlfriends, which some they are not very interested in getting it
>which some they are not very interested in getting it
the girl that took my v card didn't want me to go down, it broke my heart so i dumped her
Agree, feels like an intimate thing to do with someone you're close to.
You sound like a complete homosexual, just read what you posted.
HIV, Monkey Pox, HPV.
It's like God is trying to tell us something.
HPV is fake.
>take 11 patients with clinical condyloma acuminatum (genital warts)
>then take biopsies of warts
>then snap freeze them
>then grind each sample in phosphate-buffered saline with sterile sand, using mortar and pestle
>centrifuge the shit out of it
>take the supernatant and stored at −80°C
>then take a neonatal human foreskin from routine circumcision
>cut it into fragments of 1 by 1 mm
>incubated in 250 μl of the inoculum ( from steps before) for 1 h at 37°C
>implant graft under the skin of ear and under the renal capsule on both sides of three 5- to 8-week-old female mice
>kill the mice after 12 weeks
>none except one of the mice had a renal abnormality
>take the graft from the implant
>split it, fix one part with formalin and snap freeze other part in liquid N
>make histological assesment
>oh hmmm one of three got wierd in the renal area
>must be the Human papiloma virus
>because unsure
>take another neonatal human foreskin prepare it as before
>incubate in 225 μl of the (renal mice) lysate for 1 h at 37°C mice.
>implant it under the renal capsule on both sides of six 5- to 8-week-old female mice
>repeat experiment using a different foreskin on six additional mice
>sacrificed mice 19 weeks later.
>take now 11 of the 12 mice grafts
>grind them up and take again neonatal human foreskin as just as before and inoculate it as before
>but this time 3 by 3mm
>renal grafts are grafted in the usual manner, one per kidney, in six 6-week-old male mice
>repeat the experiment 4 times with different foreskins each time
>if mouse gets sick and has wierd malformation arround the kidney
>then my experiment was working and I have proven the HPV virus causes cancer, by implanting forskin next to mice kidneys
>100% logical and 100% ethical and 100% foreskin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC110112/
Because of this experiment, girls take the HPV vaccine with the age 12 or so.
>picrel is the mouse with foreskin renal implants
These three fellows look so fucking trustworthy.
https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/10-years-ago-today-cancer-vaccine-with-rochester-roots-approved-165222/
Robert Rose
Richard Reichman
William Bonnez
It must be science because of the meme terms guys.
Trust me.
>Xenografts
>Implanted in the Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Mouse
>proof of da virus
>trust me
>now take the vaccine which contains a propriatary compound nobody ever is allowed to study and publish a paper about
>trust me consoom da aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate
>nobody can get their hands on to see what it actually does
>just trust Merck
Wish I was a dumbass who worships naggerball when I learn shit like this.
Just read the headline. This is what they class as isolating a virus? FFS, the whole field of virology does appear to be fucking bullshit.
It's def not fake, it's just that they grossly exaggerate how good they are at their jobs. We are in 2023 and we still don't have a cure for 99% of viruses; that just about sums it up.
TLDR of Virology:
>Look at viruses under extremely powerful microscopes
>see how they live and react to stimuli and antiviral meds
>name the virus
>have no ability to kill 99% of viruses without killing the people in which they live.
>>Look at viruses under extremely powerful microscopes
are very small and most of them can be seen only by TEM (transmission electron microscopy).
Electron microscopy requires a few things:
>contrast metals (so that the electron beams bounce of)
>fixation (since EM is always creating a still image)
>a heat resistant sample
>a dehydrated & fixated sample
EM works fine to look at dry, dead or inorganic matter, because the composition for example in minerals is self contrasting.
But in Biological matter it requires extensive preparation.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2007.304
https://www.leica-microsystems.com/science-lab/brief-introduction-to-contrasting-for-em-sample-preparation/
For example to observe the structure of liver tissue you have to prepare it in the following way(s):
>dehydrate it (dry freezing is often used, sometimes with ethanol)
>staining it (heavy metals or even radioactive metals are used here. Uranylacetate or lead citrate)
>fixating it (often done with glutaraldehyde, paraffin, formaldehyde, osmium teroxide or epoxy resin)
>slicing up a thin part of the sample (<= 1mm in thickness)
These methods disrupt the natural state of an tissue &kills it.
Dehydration will alter the cells.
Exposing the cells with a toxic or radioactive staining agent alters the cells.
Pouring it with fixation agents will alter the cells and has the chance to create bubbles and pockets.
Slicing it up can cut relevant cells, and its contents in half. Meaning if a "sausage" formed cell is present it will be cut, and will appear round, since the imaging of the slice is a 2D representation of a 3D object.
> webm rel
This is a ff footage of the EM staining procedure and it's effect of the cells.
>this is dehydration with ethanol
>the black outlines, are the original cell size
>you see it shriveling up
They then can only point and declare.
A still image does not show causality of disease.
They cannot even know how a unknown new virus looks like.
But they showed me pictures of COVID viruses anon, why would they lie to me?
if this is "the science" I think its time to relive what they did in salem 1600s
.you can get HPV from a handrail or a simple kiss
So no
It’s not oral sex, it’s the diet, the vapes and the vaxx. Oral maybe, and only if you’re a filthy Amerimutt and your women don’t have a proper hygiene.
That's what I'm thinking too. Men have been carpet cleaning for centuries, but we've only been eating fast food like McDonald's and chemical-laden processed foods as a staple part of our diet for about 50 years.
Another thing that's definitely not being counted as "smoking" is smoking pot, pot concentrates, and vaping solutions of nicotine and cannabinoids. I was walking out the grocery store yesterday morning and seeing it from the passenger side, I thought someone's car was on fire. Turns out it was just some white trash thot sucking on a vape as if they were her dying breaths. I'd never seen such big vape hits one after the other. Anyways…
Throat cancer is DEF on the rise; this much is certain. Where it's coming from is not entirely clear. It could be HPV, but it could also be the insane amounts of preservative and flavoring chemical compounds that are in our foods, now-socially acceptable pot abuse—which is often not counted by doctors as "smoking" data—as well as air pollution and low air quality both outdoors and indoors.
naggers spit in your food
People who have those unhealthy habits drink less water and are constantly dehydrated
A choice between living to 50 with a pussy on my face and 70 with no pussy on my face is a trivial one.
what about a face for a pussy?
>oral sex
>throat cancer
wait, I thought cancer was not transmitted. Everything they can't cure, they call it cancer. Hey, but vaccines stopped a pandemic from a fake virus. I will do my research and trust my science. Also, there was a campaign this week in my daughter's school to vaccinate against HPV. I said no.
>Also, there was a campaign this week in my daughter's school to vaccinate against HPV. I said no.
Yikes, you're not fit to be a parent.
because the government and science want to help us right?
Yes, but mostly they want your money. They achieve this by keeping you healthy you retard. Of all the things to rail against you chose an HPV vaccine, and you use your daughter's future as the gamble.
>science and government keeping you healthy
you learnt nothing from the "pandemic"
Bro you are so naive or this is bait. Like the type of person who would cut his dick off naive
As a parent it is SO HARD to know who is on what side, and who actually has your kids' best interest at heart. When I was in high school, the HPV vaccine was brand new; it'd just been approved by the FDA. Basically every mother of every girl over the age of 12 got their daughter vaccinated because it seemed like the right thing to do. Was it? We'll never know.
What I do know is that HPV was—based on raw statistical data—spreading like wildfire among teens during the early 2000's. However, was it always there and nobody knew? Is it really as deadly, or does it always cause warts like the Wiki articles and Dr. Scare-You-Straight tell you?
This is where politics and just general bullshit come into play. How can you trust a gov't like the USA's and how can you trust drug companies who brought us stuff like Thalidomide, OxyContin, mRNA, and other drugs that've ruined lives?
It's truly maddening, and yes, this is VERY political for anyone questioning whether this should even be here.
>Also, there was a campaign this week in my daughter's school to vaccinate against HPV. I said no.
Good one anon. HPV vax was one of the first I was suspicious of.
What about the gardasil trial?
They introduced a new mystery adjuvant.
> Aluminium Hydroxyphosphate Sulphate.
Nobody knows what it does, except that it is a toxin.
Never studied just put in the Gardasil and approved.
https://ebm.bmj.com/content/26/6/285
They put it in the Placebo arm of the trial.
Saline with aluminium adjuvants vs. the vaccine which also contains the aluminium adjuvants.
And never disclosed it to the participants.
Of which some in the Placebo arm, got severe adverse events...
And after the trial, these placebo patients got offered the real vaccine...
> WHICH WORSENED THEIR REACTION
"Under The Skin"
https://odysee.com/@HiramAbiff:7/Under-the-Skin-2022:5
https://unterdiehaut.online/en/
that lingo shit about chemicals never stuck to me.
Does not have to.
It pretty simple, they say:
>we need to put poison in vaccine to create immune reaction
>without it vaccine does not work
>trust us
>but we will never test the poison "enhancer" ever
>we just compare it with a injection, that contains the same "enhancer"
This part alone should create distrust:
>trust me if you are healthy, you have to get it before you get sick
>trust me there is a invisible boogeyman arround that will kill you
>if you do not take this, even if you are totally healthy
The cancer itself is not transmissible, what happens is rather that HPV virus gets into cells and inserts its code into the cells dna. However the way it does this mean it not only causes them to be permanently infected, it can also cause dna damage as a side affect with cancer as the result.
you could be right, but I'm thinking such cancer could be a bacteria or more likely a fungi... because we know women get lots of types of fungi in their meat hole. Once I get my new job i will buy me a lab to do some testing and post the results here on the international community of shamans and nuclear scientists of /misc/
This is actually a plausible explanation. Is there any experimental evidence to back it up?
This just seems to tell me that if you suck hundreds of cocks you'll get cancer, doesn't apply to monogamous couples
>trusting media and doctors
kek
remember those doctors told you that it was safe and effective and now claim gardening causes heart attacks
why would God not want me to lick my wife's pussy?
It always has been though, this is not new. Good news for muff eaters is that oropharyngeal cancers from HPV infection have a very good prognosis. Tobacco related, not so much. Don't even get me started on poos and their beedle quid shit they shove in their lips.
Well I'll probably end up getting throat cancer because I like going down on my gf.
me? I'm just gonna keep eating pussy.
This is made up bullshit to coerce you into taking a HPV vaccine.
> thought to cause
> may cause
> it is believed
qualifiers like this are necessary because statistics can only give a probabilistic answer and finding a direct biological/chemical cause is extremely hard.
It's not bullshit at all. My dad is an ENT doctor and he diagnoses young people (less than 30 y.o) with oropharyngeal cancer on almost a weekly basis. He said in the 80s when he started his career, he would diagnose throat cancer in young people once a month if that.
And my dad works in Nintendo. Do you think that the reduction in smoking might have had a bigger effect that HPV?
Are you implying smoking protects you from cancer? Wtf. And by the way, HPV vaccine only protect against very few strains of the virus, most of his patients with oropharyngeal cancer had the vaccine done, although it might've been too late since the vaccine was generalized in the early 2010s and they were already probably sexually active by that time.
>Are you implying smoking protects you from cancer? Wtf.
No i am implying that vaccine trials are a complete scam
interdesting
I knew a guy, infamous womanizer. My friends father. He got it from this lifelong vice
It killed him in under two years btw
Oral sex (male on female) must be a relatively new phenomenon of human civilization. I cant imagine any guy willingly going down on a female earlier than say the 1930s. Hygiene. Swampy, musty fish buried in the center of a hairball.
married 8 years. wife gives bj and I never eat her out mainly for this fear alone. thought this was common knowledge
Imagine never getting a blowjob I'd be bitter too
>be a fag
>put your pipi in not good places
>pipi is full of disease
>puts pipi in mouth
>mouth gets disease
i don´t why people are so stupid these days.
>eating pussy has existed for as long as humanity has
>seemingly no record of it at all anywhere
>closest to a record of it is the bible condemning sodomy, even though there's seemingly zero biblical foundation for the claim that sodomy is anything other than homosexuality
>HPV vaccine introduced around 2006
>everyone has to get it because the media said so because otherwise your daughter's uterus will fall out
>suddenly throat cancer rates start an exponential climb together with the number of HPV vaccinations
I dunno guys, I feel like something doesn't quite fit this narrative. Also how come HPV causes cancer in the contact region (mouth and throat), but no dick cancer when the dick comes into contact with it?
>because it goes down your throat
Female vagina liquids end up in your urethra too, yet as far as we know there's no increase in dick/testicle/prostate cancer for having a lot of sex.
>God made it so to punish sodomites
Ok but what's the mechanism then? Everything God made he made with a mechanism behind it. Fire doesn't just burn your hands but not feet, for example.
no record of it at all anywhere
Meant to say "seemingly no record of it causing cancer/bad stuff".
HPV is a cancer...
Happening in women post 50 years of age.
They created a vaccine.
Gardasil 5...
Within a period of 8 years.
And a small 42 month trial of pre 26 year old girls.
To show efficacy of preventing cancer... that normally appears after tha age of 50...
Within a 42 months trial.
And some subsequent 12 and 7 months trials...
Then after mysteriously all of a sudden the girld who got vacced with Gardasil 5 got cancer (which they normally should not get).
Then gardasil 5 got pulled from the marked..
But they did a upgrade.
> Gardasil 9
With the same conditions.
https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,%20blood%20&%20biologics/published/Package-Insert---Gardasil.pdf
Study 001
> Dose-finding substudy extended from Day 1 through Month 7, and the duration of immunogenicity substudy was
42 months
Study 002
>Lot consistency substudy compared 3 manufacturing lots for immunogenicity of the
vaccine in 9-15 year-old girls, in a randomized and double-blinded fashion.
The duration of P002 study was 12 months (for safety).
Study 009
> The study compared 9vHPV vs. Gardasil for immunogenicity and safety in 9-15 year-old girls. This was a
double-blind randomized trial with the duration of 7 months.
> 9-15 year-old girls.
> 9-15
And the usual sneaky trick of not using an inert placebo
> It would be unethical not to
So you have one crap trial that reached conclusions of effectiveness far to early. Probably has had safety signal ignored, But hey our new vax is only as dangerous as that, give it to everyone.
vaccine trials do not show effectiveness.
They show antibody reactions.
Thats it.
From that they interprete immunity with nothing to back it up.
If I poke you with a rusty needle you also have high antibodies, because you have now poison in your body and your white blood cells get agitated.
Thats all.
They compare:
>meme virus debris + Adjuvants and Excipients
>meme other Virus debris + same Adjuvants and Excipients
I noticed this with the coof narrative
> provoked a strong immune response
Means it spiked antibody levels, for a version of the virus from 2 years ago. Says absolutely nothing about it's effects on the disease. But cheap and easy to get a positive result if all you do is look9ing for a spike in antibodies. Hell I am sure I could cut my skin and demonstrate an increase in antibody levels.
Stop asking questions anon. Just trust the science.
>sucking cock causes throat cancer
>but fucking is fine
it has probably more to do with the fact that the people who suck on genitals generally have a less healthy lifestyle.
What does throat cancer even mean?
>thyroid cancer
How does it happen?
Who does it happen to?
Imagine your body is a collective organism, and not a compartmentalized.
Like all your organs share the same blood etc.
Now imagine there was multiple campaigns to inject yourself with poisons, like aluminium hydroxide, and memeRNA and such.
Now you bodily fluids travel in different places.
Now imagine the Globohomo worshippers, have the highest intake of all the vaccines that are offered.
How can this not make click?
>it has probably more to do with the fact that the people who suck on genitals generally have a less healthy lifestyle.
Meanwhile chad is sucking on the bean
God's the realest nigga. Thot patrol King
homosexuals are gonna find this news...
HARD TO SWALLOW!
Heh
Yes, God hates blow jobs. Get your father drunk in a cave and fuck him instead
I don’t think it’s blow jobs causing it anon
I didn't read that nonsense. Of course it's not. God still hates blowjobs and buttsecks and doesn't mind incest though
>God still hates blowjobs and buttsecks a
then why'd she make it feel so good?
Because if you're happy and you know it, it's a sin
so as long as im misurble when doing it it's ok?
Not sure. Ask your God and get your head checked for being miserable while getting a blow jibber
eh they're alright but i was never "blown" away by them
unironically missionary under the covers in the dark is underrated in imho
The Bible is so true, that even if it wasnt divine word that correctly described the nature of God, it’d still be true
It is interesting what had happened before so they did need to put that quote there.
IM NEVAAAAAAAAAA GONNA STHAP EATIN PUSSY
It's literally not due to male genitalia if you could actually read, it's about men who eat womens pussy, there was a reason you were shamed for doing it, it not only is an act of submission but also clearly gives you cancer. Hate the gays all you want but atleast they're not submitting to a woman LOL.
Marriage and monogamy are an evolutionary solution to STDs
Imagine giving head to a roastie who fucked a ton of naggers before you. It's like playing Russian roulette.
>Is this God's way of getting ride of the sodomites?
No it's just his backup plan when he's busy. His first choice is fire from the heavens. See picrel
They make it very fucking clear to you what happens when you act like a degenerate. The 10 commandments/ 7 deadly sins, if you take it at face value. Is a pretty nice guide line to not fucking yourself over in life due to your short sighted hedonistic actions. My GF is an accountant in a building that is like 95% women. All of her middle aged, obese coworkers who fucked around with drugs and casual sex in their youth have all given up on the idea of children or ever finding a man that wants more than to treat them as a cum dumpster. Two of them just moved in with each other and both have cats and are terminal pot heads.
People with STDs are scumbags
No it is a sign that children need to be vaccinated against HPV before they start engaging in sexuall activity.
they get what they deserve
>stick dick in ass
>stick dick in mouth
>now mouth has diseases
SurprizeSurprize
but the mouth is connected to the butt?