>You put your hand in the box with 2 Silver balls... and pull out a Gold ball...
Any 'mathematical probability' that includes a chance of pulling a Gold ball from 3 boxes is bullshit.
There are 2 boxes that might have a gold ball in them, you have picked one of them, the chance the other ball is also Gold is only 50:50.

Yes, but the ~~*pilpul*~~ argument tries to make it out of 3 so shut that shit down with the 'obvious' false choice.
Topic: You shouldnt be vooting if you're too dumb not to counter-act ~~*tricks*~~ at the start.

Because IQ only gets you so far in recognizing the decades long cause-effect of what politicians do. You need to have been working and paying taxes for at least 2 decades before you start to see it. Shit Obama did in 2008 is exploding NOW. Do you think a 25 year old kid has a fucking chance understanding the consequences of his votes?

People under 40 years old shouldn't vote. And this won't cull ALL the retards, but it will tilt the balance in favor of wisdom just enough to give justice a fighting chance.

At least basic civics tests. Or maybe removing parties from next to candidates and if you are unsure have pamphlets with their positions in house.
The tribe thing made it retarded.

If you got a gold ball then obviously you didn't get the all silver box so 50/50 right.

I'd just shake them all though cuz I know the difference in sound.

Not necessarily iq, but a test about whatever you're about to vote about, yes, absolutely. Things like which candidate is proposing what policy and so on.
Anyone fighting against this is corrupt, knows it, and should be dealt with accordingly.

proof:
There are exactly 3 ways to pick the golden ball. Two of which are box 1, and one of which is box 2. So by a simple counting argument, conditioned on picking a golden ball, P(B1) = 2/3, P(B2) = 1/3

P(S|B1) = 0
P(S|B2) = 1/2 (assuming replacement, it is 1 without replacement)

By probability marginalisation:
P(S) = P(S|B1)P(B1) + P(S|B2)P(B2)

P(S) = 0 * 2/3 + 1/3 * 1/2 = 1/6 (or 1/3 with replacement)
QED

its 50% because there are two options
gold
silver
so, you have a 50% chance of picking either gold or silver, at any point.
first pick? that's a 50/50 what you get.
(100% from 1, 50% from 2, 0% from 3 ... = 50% average)
second pick? same thing, 50/50.
(its either box 1 or box 2. so, box 1 = 0% chance of picking silver, box 2 = 100% chance of picking silver ... = 50% average)

there are only two choices, so it's 1/2. aka 50%.
if there were 3 choices, then it would be 1/3. aka 33%.

No. IQ is impacted by education, and the moment that politicians realize they can control who votes by depriving those they don’t like from public education is the moment we will start our gradual transition into oligarchy

59%

anyone claiming otherwise is just peak schizo

50 what did i win?

Kneel.

50%

1342

straight line

cant get to 30mph average

I'm black and managed to solve these quite easily you need harder questions

it's 2/3 for OP

>1342

Wrong. Look at line 5

7523

I think you're correct. But maybe there's multiple answers.

7523 by my calculations

7523

good puzzle

It was fun, but pretty easy.

Explain

Simple

Checks out

Fiddy pasen

It's the other way around, flat earther's don't believe in gravity.

Wtf do women answer then.

Something like this

That's reta- oh they're women.

>You put your hand in the box with 2 Silver balls... and pull out a Gold ball...

Any 'mathematical probability' that includes a chance of pulling a Gold ball from 3 boxes is bullshit.

There are 2 boxes that might have a gold ball in them, you have picked one of them, the chance the other ball is also Gold is only 50:50.

It's just easier to say it's 50% because there are only two possibilities remaining...you either pull out a silver ball or a gold ball.

Yes, but the ~~*pilpul*~~ argument tries to make it out of 3 so shut that shit down with the 'obvious' false choice.

Topic: You shouldnt be vooting if you're too dumb not to counter-act ~~*tricks*~~ at the start.

50/50

quantum leap speed

This is not a riddle in the sense that it is more a matter of semantics.

No.

Because IQ only gets you so far in recognizing the decades long cause-effect of what politicians do. You need to have been working and paying taxes for at least 2 decades before you start to see it. Shit Obama did in 2008 is exploding NOW. Do you think a 25 year old kid has a fucking chance understanding the consequences of his votes?

People under 40 years old shouldn't vote. And this won't cull ALL the retards, but it will tilt the balance in favor of wisdom just enough to give justice a fighting chance.

Obama

sorry Bush

At least basic civics tests. Or maybe removing parties from next to candidates and if you are unsure have pamphlets with their positions in house.

The tribe thing made it retarded.

If you got a gold ball then obviously you didn't get the all silver box so 50/50 right.

I'd just shake them all though cuz I know the difference in sound.

Not necessarily iq, but a test about whatever you're about to vote about, yes, absolutely. Things like which candidate is proposing what policy and so on.

Anyone fighting against this is corrupt, knows it, and should be dealt with accordingly.

Hard agree. If you don't know the policy you're voting for, only the face, your vote should be fed into a furnace.

>things like which candidate

My fucking brain parsed this as "which canaanite"

overly wordy trash didn't read

it should be all pattern recognition

2/3 x 0% + 1/3 x 100% = 1/3

Not necessarily, but I do believe a civics test should be required, similar to the one immigrants take for citizenship.

No IQ test to vote. If you pay taxes and are an adult male, you get to vote. Women and children don’t vote.

1/3

⅔

1/3rd without replacement

1/6th with replacement

proof:

There are exactly 3 ways to pick the golden ball. Two of which are box 1, and one of which is box 2. So by a simple counting argument, conditioned on picking a golden ball, P(B1) = 2/3, P(B2) = 1/3

P(S|B1) = 0

P(S|B2) = 1/2 (assuming replacement, it is 1 without replacement)

By probability marginalisation:

P(S) = P(S|B1)P(B1) + P(S|B2)P(B2)

P(S) = 0 * 2/3 + 1/3 * 1/2 = 1/6 (or 1/3 with replacement)

QED

Stupid intelligent people are the reason this world will go to hell

It's 50% pseudoguru

feels like a troll post

It's the exact syntax that chatgpt uses if you pose the question to it, so it's probably not trolling, just pseudointellectual

Probably ChatGTP 🙂

3/4?

>voting

99

Whoops. I meant 96

64

54*

1st number multiplied by the 2nd number then the 1st number added to the result.

>8x11=88

>88+8=96

40

Cheers m8

Cheers Ruud

96

no

The answer is 42.

Probability is mathematical pilpul. As much as rabbis wish to they can’t predict the future. Only Gods knows and he determines all outcomes.

>Five out of seven

its 50% because there are two options

gold

silver

so, you have a 50% chance of picking either gold or silver, at any point.

first pick? that's a 50/50 what you get.

(100% from 1, 50% from 2, 0% from 3 ... = 50% average)

second pick? same thing, 50/50.

(its either box 1 or box 2. so, box 1 = 0% chance of picking silver, box 2 = 100% chance of picking silver ... = 50% average)

there are only two choices, so it's 1/2. aka 50%.

if there were 3 choices, then it would be 1/3. aka 33%.

this, holy shit. based. good job, me.

tl;dr. Write it in one sentence

No. IQ is impacted by education, and the moment that politicians realize they can control who votes by depriving those they don’t like from public education is the moment we will start our gradual transition into oligarchy

3 out of 5 JFC