Were they seriously just criminal thugs and cattle raiders? Their cultural descendents all share themes of kingship, noble conduct, expansive cosmology, law, faith, cooperation with animals and philosophy, as well as high status for women (Celts, Germans, Latvians, Scythians, Issedones) which doesnt sound like it would culturally transmit for very long if they were just undisciplined young crooks kicked out of home and told to go rape a local farmer settlement
>Celts, Germans, Latvians
not cultural descendants
Yeah, those people who speak indo-European languages, have indo-European mythology and traditions and have the same DNA aren’t cultural descendants bro
you're a retard that would apply to all IE peoples
Yes, they are? Celts Germanics and Balts have the most Indo European DNA of any population outside chinkified Udmurts and Finns. And guess what Udmurts and Finns also have those traditions
retard you are talking about culture but actually mean something else entirely
They also had trannies just like today
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enaree
In the primary sources doesn't say a thing about them getting buttfucked or sucking dick. Which you clearly do ob a regular basis.
nothing wrong with that
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enaree
Sumerians created and institutionalised transgenderism first. Semites were always disgusting chinlet homosexuals.
>denial and whataboutism
hahahahahaha
go ahead, show me the primary sources where it says they took dick, everyone knows you do regularly though
>Sumerians
>Semites
The absolute state of this fucking board.
Taking celts and scythians as reference (I just don't know about the rest), being a warrior was seen as most honorable.
Other than that persians and scythians were descrived as fair and honorable people.
>Were they seriously just criminal thugs and cattle raiders?
A culture doesn't just spread across one and a half continents through natural population growth. Like the Anglos in America, they imposed their language and values onto the subjugated populations. Celts and Slavs are arguably a very ancient branch of the Indo-Europeans who spread very early in human history towards the North. Having bred with the Natives and lost most of their noble characteristics by the arrival of the Xakas, the Sarmathes, it is no wonder that the Celtic language vanished almost completely from the main continent by the end of the Middle Ages.
>Having bred with the Natives and lost most of their noble characteristics by the arrival of the Xakas, the Sarmathes, it is no wonder that the Celtic language vanished almost completely from the main continent by the end of the Middle Ages.
What is even the point of this word salad?
The pastoral economy would have planted seeds for a border reiver-like economy, wouldn't be too surprising to hear that a good portion of the first pioneers to make their way into the far west were seasoned raiders and the like, I don't know if they would've settled in many places though. Like the idea that there were cowboy sheriffs and outlaws/a wild west back then.
But I don't think early corded ware had horses, so this is probably all a bunch of junk I just posted
They were proto-mongols basically. or maybe proto-Arabs since Mongols didn't impose their language on conquered peoples.
There's an interesting exception with the basques. Higher concentration of r1b, yet pre IE/PIE lang
Villabruna R1b and Neolithic Old Europeans
this probably just means that the EEF women were teaching their kids a non IE language.
The R1b in basques is IE not neolithic.
>In human genetics, Haplogroup R-DF27 (R1b1a2a1a2a) is a Y-chromosome haplogroup which is a subdivision of haplogroup R-M269 (more specifically, its subclade R-) defined by the presence of the marker DF27 (also known as S250). Along with R-U152 and R-L21, the lineage is to a significant extent associated with Proto-Celtic, Celtic and later Celtiberian movements.
>is IE not neolithic
as in Bell Beaker, or as Celitc? I understand they're currently struggling with this, and they haven't fully figured out which cultures carried which Y-DNA, but damn, that'd make the whole thing way more digestible.
>kingship
every culture has this
Smells like cope.
You monkeys want to know why whitey always wins once and for all?
Firstly climate based evolution is an important factor because the climate will force a certain strata of human to survive within its environment while the ones that don't adapt die off.
Aryans spent most of their history in cold harsh environments which resulted in tye volution of certain behaviors to survive.
1. Their brain evolved to think ahead of time due to the arrival of winter resulting in the smartest ones surviving.
2. Whites are very law abiding because getting kicked out of your village in the cold results in death because you don't have a warm and lush enviroment waiting for you.
3. Monogamy was propagared naturally because breeding like rabbits in winter is suicide and it takes a high investment to raise children in those environments.
Finally you have the factor which is limited resources combined with a patriarchal society resulting in excess sons being encouraged to find their wealth elsewhere forming migrating tribes of eugenically selected climate hardened warriors which just keep constantly pouring in, the most recent example would have been germanic migrations late rome.
yeah but racism
confess anon, all of this you wrote was you thinking about it, or was it some other source, it's all pretty logical ngl
>expansive cosmology
What does this mean? Brainlet here