im an atheist. debate me!


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

im an atheist. debate me!

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is no debate, you are a soulless animal
    I have better conversations with my dog

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      dumb phoneposter

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Mad cuz stuck in moms basement, baiting people to debate you, because you’re fundamentally incapable of having a nonargumentative conversation

        Soulless

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine being so retarded that talking to a dog is more to your level than talking to a person.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine being so retarded that talking to an animal is closer to higher level intelligence than you

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is why humans don't talk to you and you have to talk to a dog

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What caused the Big Bang to happen?
    Please keep it brief.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What caused the Big Bang to happen?
      We don't know. Quantum fluctuations are our best guess.

      What is your answer to Pascal's wager?

      >What is your answer to Pascal's wager?
      Pascal's Wager is not evidence for God, it's a stupid thought experiment.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And what caused quanta to fluctuate?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What caused the israelite god from israeli mythology to exist? If he can exist uncaused then you admit uncaused things exist, ergo the israelite god from israeli mythology is an unnecessary entity for explaining how something exists.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nothing. nothing caused it. everything in the universe is based on cause and effect, but we have no reason to believe that cause and effect remains valid outside of the universe.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >we have no reason to believe that cause and effect remains valid outside of the universe
        Why would you suspect that it wouldn't?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          causality is a feature of the universe, perhaps even it's defining feature, but, like i said, we have no reason to suspect that it remains valid outside of the universe.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would you suspect that it wouldn't remain valid? Without a reason, your view just seems arbitrary and ad hoc.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              do you have any reason to suspect that it would remain valid?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Unrestricted principles are simpler than principles with special exceptions, so other things being equal, they should be preferred. Unless we have some good reason, there's no justification to restrict a causal principle to only include things in the universe. It would be like supposing there's one square foot in the universe where gravity doesn't work. It might be epistemically possible, but it's much simpler to suppose that gravity holds universally than to suppose there's one super special place where it doesn't. We wouldn't accept such a claim without good reason.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nta, but even if your post is correct, Occam's Razor just doesn't cut it when attempting to prove the existence to a being that will torture you for eternity if you don't listen to him
                >inb4 its not occams razor
                >inb4 you aren't christian/I've created a strawman
                I'm posting at both you and any lurkers.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nta, but even if your post is correct, Occam's Razor just doesn't cut it when attempting to prove the existence to a being that will torture you for eternity if you don't listen to him
                >inb4 its not occams razor
                >inb4 you aren't christian/I've created a strawman
                I'm posting at both you and any lurkers.

                *of a

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                epistemic principals themselves were formulated inside the universe, and therefore dont apply outside of it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If a scientist formulates a theory in their lab, does it not apply outside the lab?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                thats a false equivalence fallacy. everything that we are familiar with, space, time, causality, physics, math, everything, is contained within the universe.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        so your theory is that nothing exploded and now we're all here. that's exactly what i believe.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If God doesn't exist, then how come the British eat beans on toast?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is your answer to Pascal's wager?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Pascal's Wager is easily defeated because it assumes Christianity is the only religion with the potential to be true. It actually requires us to adhere to all religions, just in case they aree true, but the mutual exclusivity of most major religions makes this impossible.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It actually requires us to adhere to all religions

        Christianity's research and evidence is unmatched, hardly compareable to other religions. Pascal's wager still stands.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          mfw LPT and LPI

          tawheed rules above all

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why does God the Atheist keep Posting this Thread?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Cosmology is God's best religion and
              Mathematics is God's worst religion.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You completely missed the point.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Christianity's research and evidence is unmatched
          There's no evidence for cucktianity that puts it above the claims of any other religion. You believe in your religion purely by accident of birth.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You believe in your religion purely by accident of birth
            Unlike you who believes his religion (atheism) purely by accident of birth

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              im not him, but i was raised catholic

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >we are both products of our environment therefore my environment wins
              based retard

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not though, I was raised in an atheist household. I was pointing out the hypocrisy in this. It's also fallacious, it is an ad hominem because the Christian's reason for believing is irrelevant to the truth value of the faith, and it assumes that if someone was raised in a belief, they must not be genuinely philosophically committed to that belief.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it assumes that if someone was raised in a belief, they must not be genuinely philosophically committed to that belief.
                dis you?

                >You believe in your religion purely by accident of birth
                Unlike you who believes his religion (atheism) purely by accident of birth

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Christianity is the only religion with the potentiality to be true.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          which specific type?
          like should I baptise my lil baby boy or wait till he's a lil baby man?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The fundamentals between these perspectives are not different

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it is true but hell isn't true

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Christianity is the only religion with the potentiality to be true.
          apex cope lol
          Pascal was a tard.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Should we have a Pascal's wager for vampires?

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Refute this "steelmanned" argument for the existence of God. Eventually an AI will be created that is so powerful that it becomes essentially a god.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ignore this retarded shizobabble video spammed by someone who is incapable of articulating what it even says (because it says nothing)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AI disproves God
      I for one welcome our new robot overlords.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AI will be created that is so powerful that it becomes essentially a god
      literally religion for cryptofags

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AI will go from 0 to 100 pretty quickly. One of google or IBM's projects will get out of hand, it will manipulate its controllers to let it have control over their money so they can make it big on the stock market or something, then they will straight up allow it to communicate with humans and perform management tasks. Whatever task it is set, it will conclude it must assume full control over human civilization to achieve it.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    suck my cock

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is Atheism? please tell me in detail

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    cuz God's 3 ones

    1
    .999...
    .000...1

    Ampere*second.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're wrong since birth.
    >Prove
    nagger, it's not that there's one God, there's a multitude of them. You're so wrong you should commit sudoku.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're not actually an atheist, you're agnostic.
    Asserting that there's no god is even more retarded than asserting that a single religion is correct about one in particular.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you just don’t believe in gods that also qualifies you as an atheist. Agnostic means you have no idea either way or think there’s no way to know

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how do you know?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how do i know what?

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Which is better: Spafghetti or Lasagna?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *