LULZ / Misc

If South Indians and Australian Aboriginals are both Australoids, why were the Australians unable to achieve the success of the south indians, who had...

If South Indians and Australian Aboriginals are both Australoids, why were the Australians unable to achieve the success of the south indians, who had empires colonization etc.? What are the political implications of the australoid ethnogroup?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    xX_N1GG3R_H4T3R_Xx

    Because aboriginals are stupid and dumb and retarded.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You got any of those abbo greentexts, Bruce? I fucking love those.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [log in to view media]

        Story I heard
        >truck driver
        >driving booze out to remote town.
        >stopped by abos
        >abbos pull shitty old looking gun
        >demand he gets the booze out
        >truck driver says no
        >they get all angry jumping up and down
        >still says no
        >they talk between themselves
        >offer driver gun for a case of beer
        >drives off

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Kek thanks here's one I saved about India

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Should've just ran them over, don't these people sleep in the middle of the road anyway?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You got any of those abbo greentexts, Bruce? I fucking love those.

      https://www.unz.com/article/meet-australian-aborigines-they-make-african-americans-look-like-a-model-minority/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The abos to South Indians are like native Americans and Polynesians to Asians
      Or whites to garden gnomes

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because whitoid geneticists are retarded

    they see a cluster of genes similar in 2 regions and their rapist colonizer brain thinks "oh yes, the whiter people made rape babies out of the darker people"

    its just a THEORY that south indians traveled to australia and became the "abbos" or that aryans traveled to india (the same genetic pattern could also suggest that indian aryans went out into europe and made rapebabies out of euros but because we live in this rapist colonizer whitoid world, no one will write about it)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dingos look exactly like a dog breed that is native to India.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think the loss of pre European dog breeds is one of the great disappointments of the last 500 years. Dogs that grow wool, can you imagine

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Kiwi licking his chops thinking about a dog that's also like a sheep
          Typical. Never leave your livestock with a new Zealander unsupervised

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The Dingo didnt arrive in Australia until about 4000 years ago, which is also probably when the indians did, the abos have inter bred with indians since then, but they're a different subspecies but with some shared DNA

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >indian aryans went out into europe and made rapebabies out of euros but because we live in this rapist colonizer whitoid world, no one will write about it)
      Do you know what Indo-European means?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Average IQ of an Australian Aboriginal is 62. This corresponds to the mental age of an 11 year old European, The Average IQ of India is 83.

      >By western standards 70 and below makes you retarded

      As it is impossible to get an accurate IQ of 'White' Western countries, all I can do is look up the Whitest Countries in Europe which are Ireland and Iceland to which it averages between the 2 at 98-100

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lmao
      Do some research on proto Indo European migration, language flow and genetics.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you have to admit your two languages SOUND similar to someone who speaks nor understands neither language...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hahahaha what

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >why were the Australians unable to achieve the success of the south indians, who had empires colonization etc.?
      Because they had no aryan blood

      Cope and seethe, poo

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was dravidans (south Indians) who traveled to australia and intermixed with the aboriginals. The number of south indians who migrated to australia were apparently small and it happened 4000 years back. This could be the reason that aboriginals never developed anything substantial.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because whitoid geneticists are retarded

      they see a cluster of genes similar in 2 regions and their rapist colonizer brain thinks "oh yes, the whiter people made rape babies out of the darker people"

      its just a THEORY that south indians traveled to australia and became the "abbos" or that aryans traveled to india (the same genetic pattern could also suggest that indian aryans went out into europe and made rapebabies out of euros but because we live in this rapist colonizer whitoid world, no one will write about it)

      South Indian's race mixed with the indus civilization, otherwise they'd be the same, carrying homo eructus genes.

      abos are mutant dravidians
      they were left too isolated too long in an empty continent
      so naturally became inbred and retarded while the ones back in India were developing further
      abos de evolved gradually

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly. Dravidians arrived on Australia around 50 thousand years ago. They had a limited gene pool and over thousands of years inbred to the point of devolving. It's pretty fuckin simple.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IVC was most probably proto Dravidian. AASI populated the whole subcontinent before the various west Eurasian migrations. Australian aborigines are very distant relatives of AASI at best.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ANI and ASI study was based on a limited sample. The indian govt. doesn't allow genetic research in india. If the IVC was proto dravidan, why aren't there many IVC archaeological sites in dravidnadu

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why don’t they? India is interesting for me, it’s like a whole world in itself complete with a bunch of races.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ANI and ASI are outdated models. IVC samples we have are IranN + AASI + WSHG and lack any Indo-Aryan ancestry. They form base population for all Indians.
          Like I said earlier dravidian midcastes are simply IVC + additional AASI.
          After IVC collapse the harrapans moved inwards into the subcontinent. The civilization was then limited mostly to some rural communities. I think there was some site Neolithic site on south india (kiladi or something) which has similarities to IVC. Sanghi government desperately tried to stop any further excavation at that site lol.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ancient indians and ancient iranians separated about 10000 years back. Since then we have no admixture from iranians. Niraj Rai and co. showed how it was indians who traveled to iran and there was admixute with iranian people.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              That paper was BS. Just an attempt at neo-OIT. Good luck to him finding IranN in mesolithic indian samples.
              DATES analysis of IVC samples have showed that even the oldest IVC sample has admixture date of ~ 5000 ybp.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Iranians have no admixture from us. Those Sanghi clowns are arguing for a para-IranN ancestry contributing to IVC. Eventually they will move to local origins of Aryans and Indian origin of Sanskrit.
              Geneticists everywhere are known to be neutral and politically correct but here in India we have direct Sanghi implants leading the country's archaeogentic research.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                david reich was involved in the study. And yes, Indian admixture was found in ancient iranians.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                IIRC Reich & team were confused when these clowns started their neo-OIT rant on a press conference & prof.Lazaridis didn't agree with the paper.
                IranN itself has some AASI like component ( 10% according to some estimates). Amongst present Iranians IranN peaks at around 45%. I remember a G25 run of Iranians and AASI peaked at 5% at max. The thing is it is quite possible that AASI occupied a much wider area prior to Neolithic maybe even approaching south west Asia.
                Or you might be referring to the IVCp samples (Shahr I shokhta ones), they are believed to be IVC migrants.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There's no such thing as Indian admixture. Indians are the mongrels who inhabit the subcontinent today.

                He must have been referring to Indo-Iranian admixture (R1a). My guess is that he used incorrect terminology. The Vedic civilisation was founded by the Medes. That's why Sanskrit is an Indo-Iranian language just like Median. It's just an early dialect. Then they intermingled with the indigenous population making filth like yourself.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >nt
            one or two historical IVC sites can't compensate for rakhigarhi

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              How has Rakhigarhi changed anything? It's a perfectly fine IVC site. Did they find any trace of IA ancestry in the sample? The Sanghi government are definitely trying to forcefully link Hinduism/Vedic people to the Harrapans.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it was a female skeleton. So r1a isn't possible on that skeleton.

                You can say whatever about the sanghi government. But majority of the south india follows hinduism. your languages are replete with sanskrit words. We don't have tamil words in our languages.

                There's a continuity between the IVC and hinduism. There is no denying of the link

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I was asking about autosome not uniparental markers.
                They aren't going to publish any Male sample which most likely would be J2, R2, L1a , H1/H3.
                Hinduism most likely formed from union of Vedic religion, whatever was left of IVC religion and local tribal animism. Both sanskrit and dravidian languages have influenced each other. Rig veda has some dravidian loan words (substrate?).
                I am not a Dravidian BTW.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    South Indian's race mixed with the indus civilization, otherwise they'd be the same, carrying homo eructus genes.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Indians are just a different type of semihuman sub breed. Arguably more destructive to a nation.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Indians had influence from the ancient Aryans, bringing technology, law&order, and religion to bring them out of the Stone Age. Simple as.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ukraine was the centre of civilization
      >didn't even exist before 30 years
      Fucking top kek

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        From this point of view, India appeared in 1947.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          just because it wasnt discovered, it does not mean it didnt exist.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Lmao you didn't even understand his argument, fucking braindead poojet

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes because Ukraine just appeared out of nothing 30 years ago, before that it was empty space

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It was called "Russia" before 1920.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    South Indians admixed with Neolithic Iranian natives, hence caucasoid features, Abos didn’t and are 100% abongo.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      strange that south indians have more r1a haplogroup than the iranians.

      you wanna look at the recent studies. Indian farming is indigenous, it was indians who traveled and mixed with iranians, Indians had no steppe ancestry

      https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/vagheesh/files/piis0092867419309675.pdf

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      strange that south indians have more r1a haplogroup than the iranians.

      you wanna look at the recent studies. Indian farming is indigenous, it was indians who traveled and mixed with iranians, Indians had no steppe ancestry

      https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/vagheesh/files/piis0092867419309675.pdf

      even non aryan South Indians like literal Dravidian tribes were classified as being dark Caucasoid by the British population census

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        These guys are north Indian (atleast in modern india) except possibly the first one. You won't find these phenotypes in south india. The darker skinned ones have abosih features (but not as monstorus as aftual abos) and lighter skinned ones have their own unique features, not typically indian and not caucasoid

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          not true. I am a north indian living in the south. And i see people here with darker skin and caucasoid features all the time. At least brahmins in tamil nadu/ kerala are as caucasoids as they get

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Brahmins are simultaneously the whites and garden gnomes of south india. There are atleast two radically different groups

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wtf happened to indians, these guys are literal chads. now they are a bunch of 4ft tall weak jawed balding simps that shit in a street and make a shrine to the one toilet in town. god i fucking hate indians

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        holy shit the top middle dude is a literal chad

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          wtf happened to indians, these guys are literal chads. now they are a bunch of 4ft tall weak jawed balding simps that shit in a street and make a shrine to the one toilet in town. god i fucking hate indians

          What foreigners, and MISC in general, does not understand is that a lot of India is race mixed into a mixture of aryan-dravidian races (along with some turko-mongolian blood). This results in various different phenotypes who are genetically similar. This is why there are a lot of Indians that look white.

          >
          wtf happened to indians, these guys are literal chads. now they are a bunch of 4ft tall weak jawed balding simps that shit in a street and make a shrine to the one toilet in town. god i fucking hate indians
          When the British found India, the great Indian civilization was already dying. The mughals had conquered large parts of India, and the Maratha empire (which had occupied 90% of India during its peak) was split ino varrious different factions, with the head of the main faction being a drunk weakling. He gave in to British pressure, but the rest of the Maratha empire (along with the rest of India) fought fiercely to defend their personal lands. The British then destroyed these armies, and erected an uncorrupted system in its place.
          The British literally rejuvenated India. At that point, the rulers in the various empires were corrupt, dishonest, and generally tyrannical. There was no progress. The British gave India
          >a judicial system
          >working government machinery
          >foreign technology
          >access to other countries and other ideologies.
          Mahatma Gandhi himself said, "I do not trust the British, but their judicial system."
          Now India is back on its track to becoming an actually good civilization. The "poo in the loo"
          meme is now redundant, as toilets have been built mostly everywhere in India.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the man in the center on the top row has an insanely good looks.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They all look human except the one in the middle on the bottom row has that blank animalistic n-word stare.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He was such a Chad, we did him so dirty. Death to ZOG.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Both South India and Australia should be nuked then

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Australia was always since time immemorial the dumping ground of undesirable people.

    It's not like the Australian anglos are high achievers comapred to the others.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    IIRC it is said that there was a rapid trifurcation that formed AASI/Onge, East Asians and Polynesians/Aborigines.
    South Indian midcastes are direct IVC descendants they are both IranN rich and AASI rich. In fact they have higher IranN than some North Indian populations.
    South Indian dalits and tribes, yes they have one of the highest AASI levels in the subcontinent.
    I think South Indian Brahmins are known to be the migrants from North.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Before I was racist, I rationalised how ugly and retarded aboriginals are by their history. They lived in small isolated inbred communities. Some so probative they had no spoken language. They would grunt and point. They would interact with each other from time to time to trade objects and women. But molesting their children is a proud tradition they have carried forward even to this day. If he surprised if some of these tribes understood how sexual reproduction works, let alone the dangers of impregnating family members.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >some didn’t have language
      Wut. This is new to me. Source?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Iranian and turkic and Chinese blood in indians.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    pol's obsession with dravidians is scary

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    holy shit is that jfk jr? q was right!

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [deleted post]

    so this tam brahmin is a dravidan or an aryan?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      define "aryan" in terms of haplogroup

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        R1a1 (mostly L657), probably some R1b too and probably piggybacked some L1a2 from BMAC too.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          r1b (yamnaya)
          people from entire europe to siberira, northern africa to china have r1a1 more or less, if something is inside everyone that doesn't make an indicator
          no, tam brahmins are closer to dravidians than to aryans

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes uniparental markers are not too useful in India. You can have a Brahmin with H1/H3 and a tribal with R1a.
            I think south Indian Brahmins have their origins in the north. They are more steppe shifted compared to the non-brahmin South Indians (this is the case everywhere except NW India)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Checked and confirmed.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Boosting
    the mass-produced garbage economy so I can quietly seethe when I see some daftie wearing shitty "merch" emblazoned with the slogan
    >Always was. Always will be.
    Go on then, take it back.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >South Indians, Australian Aboriginals
    >Australoid
    My reaction to that information

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >phillipine monkey expresses disgust against South Indians
      >The pot calls the kettle a n-word

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There is 0 genetic link between Australoids and subhuman streetshitting pajeets.
        You were invaded by nogs from Africa.
        You are honorary Africans.
        The pajeets will deny this.
        Subhuman cope.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          there is genetic research to show links between indians and aboriginals. Indians did travel to ancient australia

          https://www.sbs.com.au/language/english/audio/the-story-untold-the-links-between-australian-aboriginal-and-indian-tribes

          talking about subhumans, do filipinos have history of their own to show anything. I means, before spain, what were you?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >pajeet history
            You're just using this to justify your animal existence.
            Ancient Indians were white.
            You're an African rape mutt.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              so no history, huh. name one thing that filipinos ever invented.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ladyboys?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty sure they were in India first.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                not even ladyboys. Pathetic.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                who on fucking earth in his right mind would want to fuck a pajeet ladyboy, wtf, grosss

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >phillipine monkey expresses disgust against South Indians
        >The pot calls the kettle a n-word

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    did the austrailian aboriginals eat rice? i think it definitely has something to do with diet

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >south poos
    >success
    In what universe

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based on foreign aid from Britain. I'd love to see where these browns would end up without whites propping their asses up. Likely under Chinese colonisation.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Absoriginals are kind of retarded, they had less access to many resources (like decent soil), they are kind of retarded, and when they first made it to Australia they burned down all of the bush in the central mainland for food.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I heard the whole of Australia was lush and full of forests until the abbos turned the western half into the Outback just to flush out wild game easily ad infinitum

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So I've heard, too. It sounds about right and I've read a few texts that talk about it, though I'm sure the usual suspects would tell us it's been deboonked.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    South Indians should colonize Australia

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Aren't Indians already on that? Chinese are probably giving them competition though.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Literally looks like devolved neanderthal

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Indo-Aryans didn't conquer Australia and it's been proven that Dravidians are Australoids. Perhaps they have admixture from other hominids. That also proves white people are not Albinos. If we were we would have Australoid skulls.

    https://bmcgenomdata.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2156-7-28/tables/1

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you look at most animals that have evolved here they have made drastic adaptations to survive.

    Surviving sometimes comes at the cost of intelligence.

    The koala is a prime example, it adapted to eating eucalyptus leaves and let everything else slide. They basically eat, sleep, fight and fuck... there is literally no energy left to do anything more.

    The ancient aboriginals found themselves in the same situation and adapted to survive with fuck all resources.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Indians are majority Neolithic Iranian. They were getting bleached long before Sintashta showed up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Umm we don't have any Denisovan I think. You would always hear something like - 'Surprisingly Onge lack denisovan ancestry despite being closer to Polynesians/Aborigines'

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And that early OOA migrant would lie toward eastern Eurasian side of the split-(Onge, Polynesians, Aborigines, Jamon, East asians)

Your email address will not be published.