If hair loss is so ugly to women, then why isn't there a massive incentive to cure it?
> not profitable
But wouldn't there be a ton of male scientists who would have a personal stake in treating their own hair loss? This disease is crippling and I know guys who take experimental drugs to stop it.
LULZ / Love & Relationships
[log in to view media]
It's already curable, just not for poorfags like you.
Not really, if you are too far gone then the best you can do is get full coverage with maybe 25% density like in the pic above.
nah, there have been some pretty nice success stories but you have to have cash and try to treat it early. from what i've seen europe is also leading the way on hair restoration procedures.
Dontknowman. If Bezos is bald, I don't think money can do much to help.
Eugenics is again the perfect answer. Afaik male baldness pass from the maternal grandfather to son. So if you are a bald fuck make sure to only have male descendants.
Elon Musk is not bald, though.
Sure, the common factor is money, so the difference must lie somewhere else no?
[log in to view media]
For reference:
He used to be a big baldy
They shouldn't cure it just because I wanna see trannies off themselves en masse when they start to bald
It's entirely preventable with finasteride. You could easily get it prescribed online in a day or two. It's 2022 if you go bald it is by choice.
im taking it and am not sure if its helping or not. i started M'ing but it just, stopped. hair isnt going, or coming back. is this a widows peak or something?
Don't take this shit it will fuck your speem up. Heed my warning.
because women just choose those who don't go bald young
that begs the question how do bald people still exist if women don't choose men who are afflicted with the prematre balding gene?
Because women used to have children with men much younger than now. For example a guy who goes bald at 20 would still have kids at 18 or younger. Also women had less of a choice before the modern era.
>For the vast majority of human history most men had multiple children before the age of 25 which is where male pattern baldness usually starts to develop.
>Arranged marriages, the leading force of eugenics and socioeconomics tend to not really care about appearances.
>Women really don't care as much as you think. It really is all mindgames with these bitches. Which is good because if you are up for the game they usually really suck at them.
Women care about good genes. If anything there is a disincentive in a matriarchal society for science to come up with solutions to mens aesthetic weaknesses.
The point is that women dont necessarily want to increase the dating pool by giving a way for the mid tier men to rise up, they just want more men so the 20% of men they pursue is a bigger 20%.
>Women care about good genes.
Objectively wrong. Almost all females of all species, humans included care for arbitrary "sexy" genes which a lot of the time are actively debilitating to the survival of the species. Huge feathered tails, Monstrously big beaks and asses, psychopathy etc.
Correct. Females select for sexually dimorphic ornamentation, even to extent that it is detrimental to fitness.
Almost makes sense that a species with developed reason would try to control female sexuality for its own sake.
males did this too when they selectively bred boobs into existence
No. Males don't choose female partners. They just fuck everything available. The sex that bares the greater energy burden for reproduction is the picky one.
Human breasts are a fucking mystery but the most probable theory is the one that attributes it to female subterfuge. A way to hide when the woman is actually fertile or not. Big breasts are a sign of (temporary infertility/unavailability) in mammals. Big breast allow a woman to choose for herself when she will appear sexually available/unavailable.
>Big breast allow a woman to choose for herself when she will appear sexually available/unavailable.
That makes absolutely no sense
Sure it doesn't if lack any and all knowledge in zoology. But one should expect a total lack of understanding of mating habits in this board.
A full head of hair is almost every woman's preference, but it's not a dealbreaker for enough of them for the gene to die off. I started going bald and shaved my head in my mid-20s, and I've had plenty girlfriends, hook-ups etc. since. I even do decently on dating apps.
Gene will never die off as it is carried by women. Your mothers father is the greatest indicator of whether you will go bald.
Why offload the responsibility to femoids. Femoids can't handle responsibility. If you are bald be a man and kill your female offspring. Or don't have any if you lack the balls. Do your part, save our species hairline.
This so much this. Every baldie or disabled should be sterilized.
Let our race evolve
hair loss is a signal to women that you're an older man with presumably more resources and life experience available
you going bald in your 20s can mean that men with hair loss had reproductive success in the past
>If hair loss is so ugly to women,
It's not "ugly to women", it's objectively disgusting and highly demoralizing when you see it in the mirror
>then why isn't there a massive incentive to cure it?
Because nobody gives a shit about men and their problems
Yes, that includes other man, just watch how many guys ITT will tell you to just stop being a pussy and take it
[log in to view media]
Purely cosmetic problems are the definition of "suck it up and stop being a pussy" kind of problems. It's not like you lack a face because you got mauled by a bear. You are not in the uncanny valley. You just look like an old man.
The Fallacy of Relative Privation.
>then why isn't there a massive incentive to cure it?
There is? A disproportionate amount of money (compared to actual lethal or debilitating diseases) goes into baldness research because the first company to find a proper cure will make bank beyond your wildest imagination.
The cure is a 100% carnivore diet plus megadose nutritional supplements (see Bruce Ames).
They said causing hair follicles to start growing again after they have completely stopped is like growing a limb back.
There is a massive incentive to cure it, and it's called profits.
Lol finasteride and minox are actually god sends compared to the past but yeah sucks. All you can do is hope there is cure in the future and keep it as long as possible.
Theres not a conspiracy theres not even a lot of money in current treatments
every drug is experimental, dumbass
when are you going to wake up and realize humans really don't know what the fuck they're talking about and prescribing after all?
No hollywood stars go bald anymore. It is curable. Take dutasteride and your hair wont fall out anymore. Ashton kutcher took it for 10 years straight.
>Dutasteride, sold under the brand name Avodart among others, is a medication primarily used to treat the symptoms of an enlarged prostate. A few months may be required before benefits occur. It is also used for scalp hair loss in men and as a part of hormone therapy in *transgender women*. Wikipedia
Pumping your buddy full of hormones not meant for it is never the answer anon. You have a real problem with male pattern baldness? Eugenics is answer. Tranny shit peddled by Trotsky-wood is not. You retards still think that pharmaceutical corpos are your friends?
If my body makes body hair or makes my hair fall out then its not producing the right hormones to begin with
Trannies take it because DHT lowers your voice and develops your beard. As such taking dutasteride before your beard develops and before your voice drops could potentially keep it more feminine. It doesnt stop testosterone in any capacity
Does it make it regrow too?
it's a process of aging and genetics. people have been trying to find the secret to eternal youth since forever, anon. but it doesn't exist. when you hit the wall, you hit the wall. best thing to do is enjoy your life and don't think too much about it.
[log in to view media]
I hope this image helps you out OP, I worked hard on it