I wish there was a word for people attracted to feminity regardless of gender. Bisexual is too vague and implies an attraction to masculine men unless clarified.
I wish there was a word for people attracted to feminity regardless of gender.
I wish there was a word for people attracted to feminity regardless of gender. Bisexual is too vague and implies an attraction to masculine men unless clarified.
Chubby chaser?
gamp
I too wish gynephilic was a word
The world is gynosexual and finsexual I think.
Finsexual, retard call it gamp, mostly st self hating trannies and tranbians but it's almost an slur.
finsexual sounds retarded and money related, gamp at least has some studies behind it
None actually acepted by the psychology or psychiatric comunity.
they fell out of use because they ceased to have a useful purpose, doesnt mean the typology doesn't exist or that gamp isn't a thing. also psychology is barely less of a meme science than sexology is
Yeah I'm not going to acept pseudoscience because a self hating tranny is obsessed on an old dude.
im not self hating though lol i find agp to be something that should be accepted and celebrated. i think the current narrative of typical agp experiences being seen as shameful and not normalized is harmful to a lot of trans women, especially those pre or early transition. learning about agp made me feel a lot better and more normal about myself and my experiences.
Just call yourself straight and fuck whoever you want. Best of both worlds.
come on people what's wrong with straight and gay, there's no word to describe your attraction because we don't need one anyone who cares (no one does) can just ask
If you make a dating profile and put bi as a game, you're gonna attract a lot of normal masc men.
It doesn't matter who you attract it needs to be mutual for you to match with someone
stop describing yourself by your sexuality
it doesnt describe some people well and our modern view of sexuality is rooted in christianity rather than anything of actual substance. thats why you hear people sometimes say the ancient greeks and romans didnt have a concept of bisexuality and homosexuality when there was plenty of mlm
There was a concept of homosexuality and it was being a bottom.
they viewed sexuality through the lens of top/bottom or dominant/submissive, they didn't view it through the lens of agab. sure you can roughly try to make comparisons here and there as to what they viewed as homosexuality, but it's rough and doesn't exactly work one to one.
the point of what im trying to say is sexuality and how a culture sees sexuality varies very widely, and there can be useful terms past the ones we have now.
They made a separation between women and bottoms if you where an adult bottom you where worthless
not really, roman and greek society were hyper patriarchal, in that masculine men were really the ones who were viewed with any worth past sexual/political/birthing reasons. their entire view of gender was rooted in masculinity vs femininity (where you're feminine if you're the bottom), rather than man vs woman. trying to say our view of gender and sexuality is at all similar to the ancient greek and romans is weird and flat out wrong
Wouldn't it just be normal heterosexuality THOUGH
Categorizing sexuality only according to gender is kinda limited really, attraction to feminity/masculinity is just as important, but is typically implied with gender attraction.
>bisexual implies an attraction to masculine men
it implies attraction to people of both sexes and thats it, it doesn't mean you want to fuck everyone
Realistically if people hear bisexual they will assume you like average masculine men. That's just a fact. No one's gonna think of he only bangs tranners!
people can think whatever they want, it doesn't mean what they think is right