I need the opinion from a fellow schizo

Chainlink is making it so only OGs can stake. We've been under relentless assault for years now. Countless amounts of campaigns and suppression to try to make us sell.
I fear that they've finally given up on this tactic and decided to hurt Chainlinks reputation in the short term to steal those Link from us.
What are your thoughts?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Please tell me if I am misinterpreting something. But it looks like V.01 is going to be super limited. In other words probably something most LULZ holders wont be able to participate in. They say they are opening it up a little in the months following release, but not by much. So the average LULZ holder probably wont be able to get in until V 1.0 and there is no telling when that releases

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're limiting V.01 to early holders only, which are all LULZ holders. This is why I feel like we're being targeted here.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What do you mean early holders? Is it defined ?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The initial staking pool in v0.1 will be capped in size, offering distinct allotments to node operators, community members, and the coordinator of oracle networks. The pool will start with an aggregate size of 25M LINK tokens, with the planned goal of scaling to a pool size of 75M LINK tokens in the months after launch, based on demand. For future releases, it is planned for the pool size to further expand and for additional Data Feeds and oracle services to be supported.

          >To initially fill the community alerter allotment, a fair entry mechanism will be used to help ensure participation from a wide range of community members. This entry mechanism will aim to prioritize long-term token holders, who are most likely to actively participate in the alerting mechanism. Node operators that actively service Chainlink Data Feeds will be provided their own distinct allotments to fill. A third-party node delegation system is being explored and is currently planned to be supported in the v1 release.

          so when don't know they will define "long-term token holders". maybe those who held prior to mainnet (may 2019) and who still hold today or something

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They're limiting V.01 to early holders only
        source?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Allegedly it's in the blog post but I can't read either.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Allegedly it's in the blog post but I can't read either.

          Ctrl+f long-term

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That part is about how alerters choosing for how long they lock up their tokens in a pool.
            The longer you lock your tokens up, the higher your priority.

            It has nothing to do with how long you've been holding.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              esl?
              >To initially fill the community alerter allotment, a fair entry mechanism will be used to help ensure participation from a wide range of community members. This entry mechanism will aim to prioritize long-term token holders, who are most likely to actively participate in the alerting mechanism.
              key word is entry mechanism

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See

                That part is about how alerters choosing for how long they lock up their tokens in a pool.
                The longer you lock your tokens up, the higher your priority.

                It has nothing to do with how long you've been holding.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's wrong
                read slowly
                in v0.1 there isn't even a staking length option, you can't withdraw until v1

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >They're limiting V.01 to early holders only
          this means no 99.9% of linkies locked and out of the circulation supply
          price would drop

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >>They're limiting V.01 to early holders only
            lmao source?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              dude just stop posting and learn proper english first, it's becoming embarrassing.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"aiming to prioritize" long-term holders = early holders only

                This is an issue of logic, not language.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I see.
                How early depends on how long term.
                they have 25M to allocate for v0.1. with around 460m circulating that's about 5% of Link holders qualifying

                you can probably get data from a chain indexer to see what the cut off is for how long you should have held
                my guess is at least 2 years but I may be wrong

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and that's optimistic because node operators get a slot too, further pushing back the holder cut off

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >with around 460m circulating that's about 5% of Link holders qualifying
                lmao most of that is in exchanges.
                And you're also assuming all holders hold equal amounts of Link, conflating token numbers with holders.

                You're just a trainwreck of basic logic.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no? If the cap for staking is 25M (disregarding nodes) then it stands to reason 5% of the LINK tokens qualify
                in an indexer you can probably look up holders and rank them how long they have been holding, then cut off when you reach 25M LINK

                thought it was obvious what I meant even if I was admittedly not so clear
                not sure why exchanges are relevant, team won't look at exchanges either for qualification

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it stands to reason 5% of the LINK tokens qualify
                Yes, that is correct.
                Earlier you said 5% of Link HOLDERS qualify.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >with around 460m circulating that's about 5% of Link holders qualifying
                lmao most of that is in exchanges.
                And you're also assuming all holders hold equal amounts of Link, conflating token numbers with holders.

                You're just a trainwreck of basic logic.

                You're also assuming all participants will want to stake their entire holding.

                You're retarded on so many levels.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they won't want to but the team has to cut off where they're allowed to because otherwise more than 25M would be allowed (of course it is possible they put the cut off too high and make it first come first serve)

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To add to this it doesnt necessarily seem to me like its just "oh this guy has been holding 1k link since 2017" more so only big time whale wallets with tons of tokens.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      v0.1 will be gimped
      v1.0 would be opening the floodgates

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    big dad likes us, and we like him..
    the FUD is still from anons who bought OMG in the last bear market and never recovered their sanity from the money skelly

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think it was a bad idea to buy nfts, now I have no idea what to do with this shit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you might want to try again and look at lovelace, I think the sociopaths want to turn the nfts into "experiences"

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How well they know who the OGs are
    wallet transaction dates?
    cus I basically held my LINK on Binance until they kicked us burgers off the platform

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They will only take cold wallets not what’s on exchanges

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    It was the first thing I thought of. Specifically they want early token holders and specifically there's no loss protection. They want our linkies.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no racist incels threatening to shoot up crypto events if they take our linkies problem solved

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This was also my thought. They will have to pry my stinky links from my cold dead hands

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Makes me not want to put all my 4k links in the v.01 pool. Maybe 750 at the most.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      there is no slashing in v0.1 unless im misunderstanding something

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        likely they want to make sure there's no zero-day exploit that drains 8 million link from the pool

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is an impressive level of cynicism and distrust
      maybe sergey is just looking out for us
      he was a bitcoin guy from way back, he gets it and how we had a rough last year

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nice dubs but Sergey isn’t looking out for us. This was never our coin, it was Theirs. They don’t want us to make it. We only got this opportunity because of Their karmic beliefs. We have to stay vigilant.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >this is an impressive level of cynicism and distrust
        checked. and with good reason. they hate anons

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nice dubs but Sergey isn’t looking out for us. This was never our coin, it was Theirs. They don’t want us to make it. We only got this opportunity because of Their karmic beliefs. We have to stay vigilant.

          this is an impressive level of cynicism and distrust
          maybe sergey is just looking out for us
          he was a bitcoin guy from way back, he gets it and how we had a rough last year

          Wisdom of kek. I think most OGs would find it very suspicious. There is a chance we can loose our linkies

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Bullshit. Link breadcrumbs were dropped here for a reason.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is literally no slashing in v0.1 so Sergey is offering us free money. The loss protection in v1/2 is also not for stakers but stakers provide loss protection to other protocols as a service. You have everything literally backwards.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        based voice of reason

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Glad to see a few other anons as schizo as me.
    I think I'm going to wait until v1.0 to stake. I unironically think they're out to take my Link and are willing to shoot their foot to get it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      so wait until you can be slashed?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The main thing would be a back door on the contract to steal all the funds.

        What do you mean early holders? Is it defined ?

        Not defined yet

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    staking is coming, but sec got destroyed by cripple lawyers
    I don't know which schizos to trust

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So you're supposedly an OG and have been waiting for 4 years for exactly this to happen and now that it finally happens after ages, it's too good to be true? Do you actually think they would steal hundreds of millions of dollars and completely ruin the reputation of their staking system just to fuck over some autists? We don't matter in the big picture and this is why Sergey can afford to reward us. Also it makes sense from a publicity standpoint because obviously long term holders have the most conviction and understanding of the network, so they are the most likely to at least attempt to participate in alerting and all the other shit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How much were you paid to say this?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        based schizoid with paranoid delusions complex

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you actually think they would steal hundreds of millions of dollars
      Yes. We got in their club, and we weren't supposed to. Im so pleased that other LULZ OGs feel the same. Our schizobrains helped us find this asset early, and its going to keep our assets intact. They could do some shit like "oops this node fucked up and our 0.1 stakers lost eveything." Just to shake us out.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >OG
        >4k in LINK

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >OG
        >4k in LINK

        You're a brainlet and I probably hold the biggest and oldest bag in this thread. If Sergey wanted "us" out, which i doubt you are even part of, he would've just gave us a 10x in 2019 before mainnet dropped for financing the thing, said thanks and then forked it into another token held largely by node operators and institutions like HBAR or optimism in some semi private way. You have main character syndrome. Also schizoness wasn't what found link, it was autism and pattern recognition. All you had to do was understand what held blockchains back and that LINK or something like it was the key to all of this. The dot connection was blatant and out in the open.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think the only attack that would make sense is insiders or outsiders fudding OGs out of their bags at least temporarily. Maybe that's why there was so much fomo posting for other coins while LINK was stagnating and dumping against the market. They want old LINK to sell so more of the post mainnet whales can slide up the queue for the early pools. This would explain the relentless fud campaigns on this board specifically. Although i have to say i fud for fun too but the sheer amount of fud makes it a little hard to believe that it's all just us doing it for shits.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      actually I think the attack they will try is raising the watchdog alarm as much as possible to keep pausing the oracle service, since there is no slashing punishment yet

      most likely they will make the assessment smart contract blacklist your address from staking if wrong alarm. That's why it makes sense to only allow certain addresses to stake until slashing is live, so you can't keep coming back with new addresses

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see anything about only OG's getting to stake first. They say long time holders will be the initial alerters. W/e, I bought 12k link in 2017. I've moved 10k of it around though from nexo/bancor, still got 2.5k in a wallet I havent touched in 1000+ days. Hopefully they do the date link appeared in your wallet/total days of token held. We'll see I guess. At the very least I'll get to stake 2.5k and keep the other 10k on bancor. Sure would be nice to make 50 links a month again though. It's enough that I don't have to work anymore if we hold over $50 (3rd world fag ftw). /blogpost

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if we hold over $50
      in a bear/recession market?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Most bullish news in 5 years Chainlink and the price is barely up 40 cents 12 hours later.

      I wouldn’t get my hopes up reaching 50 again anytime soon, if ever.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [log in to view media]

        >if ever

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have 1k link and I honestly don't know if it's worth holding. Link will never go to $1000 or even $500 so i don't think it will benefit me much tbh. Maybe I should diversify more and just hold a few linkies

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You should sell and buy yourself a nice velvet rope you homosexual tranny

Your email address will not be published.