LULZ / Misc

I know EVERYTHING about the Russia-Ukraine conflict from the beginning to the end except for the end date. ASK AWAY!

I know EVERYTHING about the Russia-Ukraine conflict from the beginning to the end except for the end date.

ASK AWAY!

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based. I can tell without reading it's gonna be some shit like, 'muh Russia man bad, Ukraine Nazis good, need gibs, fight for globohomo' etc
      I give OP some herb now oh & fuck Nato

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm lukewarm about globohomo, I have no interest in this game, I'm just telling it how it is

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are you gnomish by chance?

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why didnt they bomb this whore?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because she's too hot to die.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        is time to nazimaidan this ugly garden gnome bitch

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Kill flag or kill self

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "politics is show business for ugly people"..

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          who the "cutie" in the middle?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer(sic)!

            merkels would be crown-prince, totally failed quota waman.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thy actuali shipped her to Brussel thinking she wont do any damage as an EU birocrat. Elites are retarded.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will it expand ?
    Will Poland get directly involved ? Will they take a chunk ?
    Will Hungary get directly involved? Will they take a chunk ?
    How much of Ukraine will be left at the end of this ?
    Why are ukrainians this stubborn, when the EU wants their economic ass and will in the long term be detrimental for them ?
    How much grain was burned and lost ?Will grain trade stop completely ?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Will it expand ?
      Outside of Ukraine-Russia? No.
      >Will Poland get directly involved ? Will they take a chunk ?
      If Belarus intervenes it might. But Belarus won't intervene, they're just there as a threat to keep a part of the forces pinned that could otherwise relocate to the East or South.
      >Will Hungary get directly involved? Will they take a chunk ?
      That is not even a question. No they will not.
      >How much of Ukraine will be left at the end of this ?
      Entirely depends on the West's willingness i.e. on what's playing out in the heads of Western officials. I cannot know that, but, what I am certain of, is that the war will end up with a status quo ante at worst and Ukraine retaking Crimea and Donbas at best.
      >Why are ukrainians this stubborn, when the EU wants their economic ass and will in the long term be detrimental for them ?
      Because Ukrainians want to be like Poland and not like Bulgaria. Problem is, Poland isn't the way it is because of the EU but because it's of superior societal stock. Ukraine's societal stock is the same as Bulgaria. So it won't end up as Poland 2.0 but as Bulgaria 2.0. Only they don't know it, because people generally overestimate themselves.
      >How much grain was burned and lost ?Will grain trade stop completely ?
      No mass global crisis will occur. Currently the world economy is in a rough spot but the supply issues underlying it all are transitory and will not last beyond 2023 for simple reasons--the supply issues are already being solved, with the chip shortage already going away.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Will you give a speech with your awesome analytics in Russian Kharkov or Odessa?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Bro, Donetsk is already being shelled by Ukraine from more than 1 direction, which means your front is collapsing. For you. You have to forget about Donetsk, let alone Kharkiv or Odesa

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            just 2 more sanctions
            just 2 more weeks

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > which means your front is collapsing
            Which means hohols decided to use some ammo for some good old terrorism. How's Severodonetsk-Lysychansk front doing? Still waiting for the MASSIVE counterattack promised like 2 weeks ago?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              DNR politicians are already coping that they're shelled by their own people themselves because they don't want to admit that the front has collapsed. Look it up. Why would you shell your own city? I'm talking about the fact that Donetsk isn't being shelled from just 1 direction now.

              Means Ukrainian forces have already entered, not just commandos but armor as well. It's looking really bad as the southern push intensities; if a single UA tank can wipe out the power pylons it will sever the railroad power system holding Russian logistics together. It could also spawn a regional power blackout if the main grid is unprotected against AC desynchronization. I hope Russia upgraded the power lines during their occupation otherwise things are about to get very gnarly as Russian wire communications go down. Maybe they should have built radio communications like the west did?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go ahead, link your amazing garden gnomernalist source where you read such nonsense

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >1 hr
                >no response
                Yeah, op is retarded.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pic related is my source. 2 seconds delay between the sound of arty and impact. Not coming from the West.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Twatter
                Kys. Take some other plebbitors with you while you do

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Good ol terrorism
              Says the russian whos people have been raping and pillaging in every war you've been in, just like the Mongols taught you. Your whole entire system is based on the khanates, till this day.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh rape
                Ukraine fired the woman that was the source of all the "Russian soldiers rape children" claims
                I'll leave it to you to find out why, brainwashed moron

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I was referencing WW2 and Afghanistan imbecile. I have family members that served there in the 80s, I'm not some random "American", your garden gnome ruski subversion isn't going to work on me you ass backwards cunt. You should really check the news on the rape situation and stop listening to RT you channel 1 cuck.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You should really check the news on the rape situation and stop listening to RT
                Retarded burger that trust his alphabet news agencies.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >omg u freakin evil unwholesome chuds, just watch CNN and trust them, like, do you really think CNN is lying, like, wtf??!?!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Captain Sage

                >Afghanistan
                takes one to know one, huh? Didn't your soldiers report of locals doing some gacha-gazi or whatever?
                >ww2
                Not sure about that one, it probably can't even be tested properly because Russians lived in East Germany for long period of time and definitely got mixed with locals.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Captain Sage

                >muh rape
                Seriously? After that bitch got fired? After hohols admitted she was too fucked up in head even for them?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Bro, Donetsk is already being shelled by Ukraine from more than 1 direction, which means your front is collapsing.
            Lol you delusional retarded homosexual

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Ukraine retaking Crimea and Donbas at best
        Oh yes, the return of Crimea and the Donbass, which is part of Russia, which has nuclear parity, which implies the use of nuclear weapons if the integrity of the country is threatened

        I'm really struck by such imbeciles. Are all of you really that stupid over there?
        Hell, if it's so easy, why doesn't the west take Kaliningrad? What's the matter, are nuclear weapons in the way?
        How the hell is Crimea different from Kaliningrad?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          2 things are certain:

          Crimea and Donbas are internationally recognized as part of Ukraine. Crimea is recognized by NO ONE as part of Russia. Not a single country.

          Ukraine will destroy the Kerch Strait bridge and sever your connection with Crimea unless you're planning to do a lot of landings.

          These 2 things are certainties. How you want to cope with them is your choice.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Crimea is recognized by NO ONE as part of Russia. Not a single country.
            Even Google Maps recognizes Crimea as part of Russia.
            >Ukraine will destroy the Kerch Strait bridge and sever your connection with Crimea
            Lol. They'd have to get there first (which they can't).

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Even Google Maps recognizes Crimea as part of Russia.
              then drop the vpn because only russian Google Maps shows that
              >Lol. They'd have to get there first (which they can't).
              They will.

              >Crimea is recognized by NO ONE as part of Russia
              Crimea is recognized as Russia by Russia, which is sufficient

              As I said, how you cope with reality is your choice. Kerch Strait bridge will be destroyed. If you want to respond to that with a nuke, so be it, but lemme tell you, the end will not be favorable for you.

              Russia has a """no first strike""" doctrine except for when its very existence is at stake. If you think losing Crimea means your existence is at stake, again, what I said in the paragraph above. If you don't, good job, because it isn't.

              Realistically, the provision is there so that no one conventionally strikes Moscow. You do recognize the orders of magnitude we're talking about here now then? Crimea. Moscow. I can understand committing a suicide instead of handing over Moscow to your enemy, but nothing else.

              • 2 weeks ago
                CrumblingHerbs

                >only russian Google Maps shows that
                Why would you lie about something so easily verifiable by everyone?
                It just makes you look retarded and delusional.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Agreed. Google maps are super worried about not being controversial so they don't lose a whole country as a customer base. So in cases of territorial disputes they will always appear to side with the country who claims that territory when the service is accessed from that specific country. If the maps are checked from a third country there'll just be a shit ton of dotted lines. Check China, India, and Pakistan borders.

              • 2 weeks ago
                CrumblingHerbs

                The dotted line around Crimea has been there since 2014 though.
                Google also needs to update the whole India/Bangladesh border, because a lot of those enclaves have been resolved but still show up on this toothpasteland-IP.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why would you lie about something so easily verifiable by everyone?
                It just makes you look retarded and delusional.

              • 2 weeks ago
                CrumblingHerbs

                Jannies, please rangeban this pole for being completely retarded.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>Even Google Maps recognizes Crimea as part of Russia.
                >>Why would you lie about something so easily verifiable by everyone? It just makes you look retarded and delusional.
                "On April 12, 2014, Google Maps was updated to reflect the 2014 Crimean crisis. Crimea is shown as the Republic of Crimea in Russia and as the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in Ukraine. All other versions show a dotted disputed border.[33]"

                Why would you lie about something so easily verifiable by everyone? It just makes you look retarded and delusional.

                Jannies, please rangeban this rusn-word's VPN for being completely retarded.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                n-word, your English skills are absolutely retard pole-tier shit. I don't know what you mean by the quote but all it is saying is that crimea is shown as this and as that to reflect the other.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, Crimea is only shown as Russian in Russia. So I'm right. As always.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                An idiot who blatantly contradicts himself will obviously think he's right.
                Quit talking and go back to toilet cleaning, fucking trash.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nothing will happen. you know nothing about the situation. stop embarrassing yourself

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you claim to know Ukrainians more than me?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                flag

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're just the Crimean tard then. How many Crimeans still keep their old Ukrainian passport around? Why?

                😉

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not a Crimean, I'm from Kiev actually. You come across as an extremely naive zoomer who doesn't have the slightest idea about the pro-russian sentiments people on those territories harbor. Not mentioning them actively receiving Russian passports as we speak. Ukraine won't lay a finger on those territories, it's a done deal. And if it does, then a rain of hell fire will be unleashed on Bankova street, and the war will be over. There's no scenario where Ukraine wins this war. Heavy concessions will be made and they are well underway

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You come across as an extremely naive zoomer who doesn't have the slightest idea about the pro-russian sentiments people on those territories harbor.
                There is an easy way to measure it. Only pro-russians are left in abandoned towns and cities on the eastern front. the population of Severodonetsk the easternmost city of Ukraine right now was 100k before the war and is in the thousands now.

                So that's how many pro-russians there have been in the easternmost city of Ukraine

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                oh, you were only talking about Crimea. but you're from the capital. why do you act like an expert on the locals there? i frankly couldn't say much about my own compatriots from the most distant regions

                What I do know is that many if not most Crimeans still hold onto their Ukrainian passports, which only means one thing.

                My point is, when the time comes, the population won't do shit. Russians are slave cattle. The law of the steppe prevails in ther mind--if you manage to break me, I will serve you loyally (chechens also follow it).

                When you cut Crimea off from Russia and take the Russian army there as POWs, what do you have left? Old people, children, women. They won't do anything. The men are poor and have no arms. Crimea was part of Ukraine since 1957 and in the 1991 referendum voted to remain in Ukraine.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Shouldn't you be in ukraine fighting?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >why do you act like an expert on the locals there?
                Common knowledge + I regularly talk to people who live there. You are truly delusional if you ever had doubts about their allegiance to Russia lol.
                >when the time comes
                it won't

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I never said that Crimeans consider themselves Ukrainian. Only that they won't do shit when Ukraine returns it.
                >it won't
                Well, since at least you're Ukrainian, that means you do understand that your country will zealously fight for Donbas and Crimea? it already is. It's not like Ukraine can rest claims to Crimea either because Crimea is a major security threat for Ukraine

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >they won't do shit
                They won't have to, the Russian army will
                > will zealously fight for Donbas and Crimea?
                zeal has a tendency to run out. we are not ISIS, Ukrainians long for normalization.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Russian army will what? When the land corridor is severed and the Kerch strait bridge destroyed?

                >zeal has a tendency to run out. we are not ISIS
                I know Ukrainians. You are ISIS.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                #
                Exactly this. Looking at the demands of Russia and checking their geographical importance as well as resources (especially farmable land), the reasons become quite obvious. They’ve been invading some less important territories, but occupying those costs more than it is worth, just like the rest of the Ukraine - even the more western land that’d create value is too close to the NATO countries, which means an increased defensive budget and interferences.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he thinks crimea still gets ukrainian flags on pol
                lol

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                On /int it does tho

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Crimea is recognized by NO ONE as part of Russia
            Crimea is recognized as Russia by Russia, which is sufficient

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I thought they were autonomous republics? Russia isn't nuking anybody over donbas or crimea. Besides if they did, the entire world would turn against them.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think you understand, Russia will absolutely throw nukes around if they get cucked hard enough in Ukraine. They've chosen the schizo path.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Ukraine destroys crimea bridge

            I have a feeling that if ukies would attack a bridge, which is Vlad brainchild, the consequences will never be the same.

            Im not talking Kiev. Im afraid some airports in Poland might be struck.

            >But muh article 5!

            Shut up n-word. Noone gonna eleminate Whole world becouse of Poland.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I have a feeling that if ukies would attack a bridge, which is Vlad brainchild, the consequences will never be the same.
              Here's the deal: you use a nuke in Ukraine, NATO lands in Ukraine. Escalation goes both ways.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you use a nuke in Ukraine,
                >NATO lands in Ukraine.
                >NATO gets cancer

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Outside of Ukraine-Russia? No.
        in case you missed it, there was essentially an ultimatum in December, where Russia demanded NATO to go back to 1997 borders
        iirc, someone at the top also said that a "military-technical" answer would follow in case of a no, which is open to interpretation
        and that NATO being close to Russia's border is a long-term existential security risk
        therefore Ukraine is just the beginning

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, and Iran wants to destroy Israel.

          You didn't think you were superior to Iran, did you? Ohnono

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the main difference is that Russia can send your country into stone age by just targeting electric grid with conventional missiles
            again, only Russia decides what is a security threat for it
            it decided that Poland being in NATO is a long-term existential threat
            it never made such ultimatums before until now
            so I doubt it would do it and then not have a plan B in case of a "no"
            and you have an illusion that "the white man" is willing to sacrifice himself to defend your NATO membership
            again, since US military extension so close to Russia is a long-term existential threat
            it will do whatever it takes to secure its future
            and I think you will not like it
            Russia's hands are untied now
            it will go all the way

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Existencial threat
              Kek

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              have fun fighting against NATO then. except you won't because Putin isn't as retarded as you. though he is quite retarded for starting this war

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                NATO is a paper Tiger. Underequipped and not homogenous with lots of infighting and different goals for every member country. US army is tranny diverse and tired of war after nonstop participating or causing conflicts all over the world. Better let Russia join the EU or NATO if they want and be done with it. This whole thing is just retarded.
                Russia has war with Ukraine for similar reasons Germany attacked Poland 1939.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                NATO is too busy doing shit like Gladio.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I cannot know that, but, what I am certain of, is that the war will end up with a status quo ante at worst and Ukraine retaking Crimea and Donbas at best.
        Poletard toilet cleaner having his fantasies on the morning, lol

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>Will it expand ?
        >Outside of Ukraine-Russia? No.
        >>Will Poland get directly involved ? Will they take a chunk ?
        >If Belarus intervenes it might.
        Toilet n-word contradicting himself in the next statement.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > No mass global crisis will occur.
        Yeah, keep believing that.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You've proven to not know shiht and you're just high on refugee copium

      • 2 weeks ago
        Captain Sage

        >and Ukraine retaking Crimea and Donbas at best
        >at best
        kek

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          To retake Crimea they just need to sever the land corridor which is as hard as retaking Volnovakha. The kerch strait bridge is a formality.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Captain Sage

            >to retake Crimea they need to sever the land corridor
            >somehow Crimea wasn't lost before land corridor was a thing
            Are you retarded or what? Right now Ukraine has 0 fleet to stop sea shipments. They might use some of their missile systems, but they have limited supply of that and can't make more because Kalibrs destroyed their entire military industry.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Ukraine sank your flagship (and 3rd largest warship) without a fleet you dumb vatn-word ahahaha what was that about the buoyancy?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Captain Sage

                >muh Moskva ship
                They damaged the ship. Then the storm came and Moskva slowly sank. Reputation damage is indeed high, but for operation itself losing a floating missile launcher with radars isn't critical. Russian army just settled their radars on Snake island and that's it.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [log in to view media]

          You don't have the balls to keep fighting and hold onto Crimea though.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Captain Sage

            чoмy нe нa фpoнтe, Tapac? Зeлибoбa yжe и бaб гpeбёт.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Can you repeat that in a human language?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you got from the correct source, you should know the end date. Fake and gay.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are European leaders as retarded as they've come across?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      worse.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are we witnessing a molotov-ribbentrop like pact between putin and the usa to split ukraine between the east and the west, like what happened to poland before ww2?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope so. Fuck Ukraine!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      letting western Ukraine remain under US would be akin to a big Minsk 3
      another frozen conflict with the same outcome as current conflict
      and since Russia's aim is to denazify and demilitirize all of Ukraine, there won't be such scenario
      only full capitulation is acceptable
      there will not be Bandera parades, everyone involved in war crimes since 2014 will be brought to justice or will be forced to flee

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >only full capitulation is acceptable

        Russbro i have a sad news. Your army is incapable of achieving it. After three months the frontline is stalled and you had to lift the siege of kiev because you hadn't enough numbers. You will have to compromise and take donbass and the land bridge to crimea

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russbro i have a sad news. Your army is incapable of achieving it.
          you have a false assumption that the aim of forces by Kiev was to capture it (without Zelensky and other elites being there)
          if you didn't notice the shift in the media about the conflict, I can't help you

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Holy shit will you faggets ever face reality and just be fucking truthful. Your entire state media did a 180 on the occupation of kiev. Every single top military brass in russia guaranteed a quick take over. It wa so pathetic they still cope about it on russian TV now.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Every single top military brass in russia guaranteed a quick take over.
              source me up

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ciao scemo piddino, mi raccomando la quarta dose del vaccino a settembre eh!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia didn't call its conscripts to war and not even half of their regular soldiers and they didn't unleash all of the arms and weapon systems they have.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If there was maidan of independence, why Ukraine fired prosecutor when Biden told them to.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If there was maidan of independence
      There was, for it was not a coup but a wave of massive protests that turned violent and ended with Yanukovych fleeing to Russia BEFORE getting impeached.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Question is, if they wanted independence, why they fired prosecutor who was looking into corruption scheme when foreign political figure told them to ?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          oy vey, stop asking goy

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >for it was not a coup but a wave of massive protests that turned violent
        Were you in Kiev when it happened? (Because I was, and I can tell you it wasn't a protest).

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pic related isn't a protest? There were 500k+ demonstrations regularly from December to February 2013. A total of a few million people participated in them.

          Dumb Yanukovych opened fire on students first, and used Berkut and Titushki. A total of 108 civilians died, more than during infamous martial law in Poland between 1981 and 1983.

          0:50

          not to mention this report and the fact that BOTH protesters and police were killed (who was shooting at police?):
          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266855828_The_Snipers'_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

          just before the coup, Yanukovich signed an agreement with the opposition and a few western powers where he agreed to hold new elections by the end of the year
          he left for Kharkov, removed forces from Kiev and the next thing he finds out is that the coup happened and he can't return to Kiev safely
          and before all this, EU was sanctioning politicians from his party

          you have no clue about the conflict

          Snipers only killed 12 people when 108 civilians were killed in total by the authorities. The phone call was about Paet reporting to Catherine Ashton the rumors he had heard on the ground. To me it makes no sense for the snipers to be related either to the Ukrainian population (there was no need for them to escalate) or the Russian government (no need to escalate either, Russians would've prefered the protests to die down than stoke them) so my theory is that the snipers were used by Yanukovych in a tactic to terrorize civilians on Maidan and make them flee in panic.

          • 2 weeks ago
            CrumblingHerbs

            >Dumb Yanukovych opened fire on students first
            He's completely fallen for the pilpul. What else could I have expected from such a retarded & delusional pole?
            Time for you to go pick lettuce, pole. And don't forget to clean my toilets.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why does a rusn-word who was caught redhanded on lying

              >>Even Google Maps recognizes Crimea as part of Russia.
              >>Why would you lie about something so easily verifiable by everyone? It just makes you look retarded and delusional.
              "On April 12, 2014, Google Maps was updated to reflect the 2014 Crimean crisis. Crimea is shown as the Republic of Crimea in Russia and as the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in Ukraine. All other versions show a dotted disputed border.[33]"

              Why would you lie about something so easily verifiable by everyone? It just makes you look retarded and delusional.

              Jannies, please rangeban this rusn-word's VPN for being completely retarded.

              keep on yapping? Mods I've already asked you to ban his VPN 🙁

              No (You) for (You) either 🙁

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it doesn't chance the fact that police was killed by gunshot wounds
            who killed them?
            by that time Euromaidan was dying out
            then the killing started
            and what do you know
            soon after we a see a coup
            so who benefited from these killings?
            certainly not Yanukovich or Russia

            >Paet reporting to Catherine Ashton the rumors
            it wasn't some rumor, he talked to a "medical doctor"
            was there ever a proper investigation on who shot the police?

            again, feel free to read the "scientific report":
            "This mass killing of the protesters and the mass shooting of the police that preceded it led to the overthrow of the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovych"
            "This study establishes a precise timeline for various events of the massacre, the locations of both the shooters and the government snipers, and the specific timeline and locations of nearly 50 protesters’ deaths."
            "This academic investigation concludes that the massacre was a false flag operation, which was rationally planned and carried out with a goal of the overthrow of the government and seizure of power."
            https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266855828_The_Snipers'_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the killing started when Yanukovych opened fire on students remaining at Maidan when the protests were dying down

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the killing started when Yanukovych opened fire on students remaining at Maidan when the protests were dying down
                Berkut was literally standing there taking hits from Molotov cocktails through out the Euromaidan
                and we are to believe that Yanukovich would order not to arrest the stundends or disperse, but to kill them
                and which would still not explain how the police died from gunshot wounds
                I think you should go back to plebbit with your blue pills
                you are right at home there

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Berkut was literally standing there taking hits from Molotov cocktails through out the Euromaidan
                Standard practice at angry mass protests. Have you seen France?

                Glad we've come to agreement then. So will you have a nice day now that I've dismantled every pro-Russian argument there is?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Source Russian Shill
              Should of check the name, Ivan Katchanovski, instead of acting like a lying, subversive fucking garden gnome.

              Go on youtube, there's hundreds of videos proving you faggets were behind that, from russian sources themselves none the less.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Should of check the name
                learn english, fucking subhuman
                > Ivan Katchanovski
                So what?
                > there's hundreds of videos proving you faggets were behind that
                Show them.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pic related isn't a protest? There were 500k+ demonstrations regularly from December to February 2013. A total of a few million people participated in them.

          Dumb Yanukovych opened fire on students first, and used Berkut and Titushki. A total of 108 civilians died, more than during infamous martial law in Poland between 1981 and 1983.

          0:50

          not to mention this report and the fact that BOTH protesters and police were killed (who was shooting at police?):
          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266855828_The_Snipers'_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

          just before the coup, Yanukovich signed an agreement with the opposition and a few western powers where he agreed to hold new elections by the end of the year
          he left for Kharkov, removed forces from Kiev and the next thing he finds out is that the coup happened and he can't return to Kiev safely
          and before all this, EU was sanctioning politicians from his party

          you have no clue about the conflict

          Snipers only killed 12 people when 108 civilians were killed in total by the authorities. The phone call was about Paet reporting to Catherine Ashton the rumors he had heard on the ground. To me it makes no sense for the snipers to be related either to the Ukrainian population (there was no need for them to escalate) or the Russian government (no need to escalate either, Russians would've prefered the protests to die down than stoke them) so my theory is that the snipers were used by Yanukovych in a tactic to terrorize civilians on Maidan and make them flee in panic.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I was there and it was a protest. There's whole videos exposing the snipers firing on the crowd and how they planted counter protesters to encite violence. Russia uses these same tactics today thru countless leftist movements. Russia had a field that with the whole George floyd shit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        0:50

        not to mention this report and the fact that BOTH protesters and police were killed (who was shooting at police?):
        https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266855828_The_Snipers'_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

        just before the coup, Yanukovich signed an agreement with the opposition and a few western powers where he agreed to hold new elections by the end of the year
        he left for Kharkov, removed forces from Kiev and the next thing he finds out is that the coup happened and he can't return to Kiev safely
        and before all this, EU was sanctioning politicians from his party

        you have no clue about the conflict

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >If there was maidan of independence
          There was, for it was not a coup but a wave of massive protests that turned violent and ended with Yanukovych fleeing to Russia BEFORE getting impeached.

          at least find and watch "8 months in Ukraine" first part

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The guy was so clean and innocent he fled the country back to his sponsors, not even his home of donbas.

          And the russians were never planning to take kiev to right ? They just had yanukovich sitting in Belarus for nothing.

          Why are you faggets such open fucking liars? Atleast us Americans own up to the fuck shit we did in Iraq and Palestine but you faggets think you're incorruptible servents of law and justice. Thats how rotted your countries is.

          Check the names behind those sources by the way, real fucking credible, kek.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >how rotted your countries is.
            learn english, non white subhuman

            >And the russians were never planning to take kiev to right ?
            All in due time, don't worry

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Ivan Katchanovski"

          Blow a fucking dick and kys.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It wasnt a coup.
        >We just used violence to oust the elected leader
        >But it wasn't a coup
        >Oh and we burned people alive in odesssa for disagreeing
        >But it still wasn't a coup
        >Oh and the cia pushed and encouraged this
        >But it wasn't a coup

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Using violence to oust a leader isn't a coup. It's called a revolution. It usually happens after the leader uses violence against the population. Shit happens.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Using violence to oust a leader isn't a coup. It's called a revolution
            A revolution is just what a successful coup is called by the victors, you utter mong

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No, a coup d'etat is when a junta takes over a country.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >A coup d'état (/ˌkuːdeJˈtɑː/ ( listen); French for 'stroke of state'), often shortened to coup in English (also known as an overthrow), is a seizure and removal of a government and its powers. Typically, it is an illegal seizure of power by a political faction, rebel group, military, or a dictator.
                >a seizure and removal of a government and its powers
                >by a political faction
                Go back to cleaning toilets

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, and that seizure is always accomplished by military means. A political faction leading the masses to overthrow the leader isn't a coup but a revolution. Maidan was absolutely massive in scale.

                He also wasn't forced to flee to Russia. It was his voluntary decision. He probably expected a Russian intervention to sort everything out. Little did he know.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >and that seizure is always accomplished by military means.
                That describes 2014 coup, which paramilitary organizations were key to its success
                >A political faction leading the masses to overthrow the leader isn't a coup but a revolution.
                Next thing this poletard is going to say that Maidan was ordained by God himself and every Ukrainian child shed a tear once they learned they were free.
                Maidan coup was a CIA operation, not a mass proletarian revolt like you are trying to claim.
                >He also wasn't forced to flee to Russia.
                Pretending to be retarded/naive is such a feminine trait, dumb poletard toilet cleaner

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >paramilitary organizations
                yes, called Berkut and Titushki

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >called Berkut and Titushki
                Aha, so you are retarded one. Berkut is basically SWAT, Titushki are typical "concerned citizens" of authoritarian state.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Coup d'état: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics
                especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group.
                Toilet n-word wrong again.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The small group in the picture:

                Pic related isn't a protest? There were 500k+ demonstrations regularly from December to February 2013. A total of a few million people participated in them.

                Dumb Yanukovych opened fire on students first, and used Berkut and Titushki. A total of 108 civilians died, more than during infamous martial law in Poland between 1981 and 1983.
                [...]
                Snipers only killed 12 people when 108 civilians were killed in total by the authorities. The phone call was about Paet reporting to Catherine Ashton the rumors he had heard on the ground. To me it makes no sense for the snipers to be related either to the Ukrainian population (there was no need for them to escalate) or the Russian government (no need to escalate either, Russians would've prefered the protests to die down than stoke them) so my theory is that the snipers were used by Yanukovych in a tactic to terrorize civilians on Maidan and make them flee in panic.

                (there were dozens such small groups between dec 2013 and feb 2014)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your toilet n-word asss said by a junta, you disgusting liar. And as if any color revolutions was bottom up, you retarded subhuman. They were all orchestrated by a small group of political actors in some geo-political plan.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >>Oh and we burned people alive in odesssa for disagreeing

          when will this meme die? rusn-words blockaded themselves, and when fire started could not escape, people outside shouted to them that fire has started and tried to get them out of there, while rusn-words bombarded people below with furniture and bottles because they believed that they wanted to get them by lying about the fire. when rusn-words finally got that there is a fire it was too late to do anything.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Truly a comic end to these commie rusn-words

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    will open society hq be destroyed

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hi! One question has been bugging me for a long time, why didn't it start sooner?

    I protested even in 2016 (after the genocide of 2015, the second wave of refugees in Russia), people around me heard refugee stories and volunteered. Why didn't Europe deploy troops against Ukraine after 1-st genocide of russians in east ukraine, himan rights and so on...? Why did Russia do the same (do nothing for 8 years) ?

    Does this look like a pact to exterminate the Slavs?

    This will forever remain a mystery to me.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why didn't Russia interfere for 8 years?
      the main understanding is that Ukraine, the west and Donbass republics signed Minsk 2, which was a path to peacefully resolve the conflict
      Ukraine sabotaged it, leaving only one options

      but it looks like the main reason why Russia didn't act back than as it is now is that Russia was not ready:
      neither for all out sanctions, neither to deal with NATO
      neither Kinzhal was ready and many other missiles and stuff in needed numbers
      neither was there agreement with China that it wouldn't turn against Russia
      now the main stuff was ready and there was no time

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Better late than never

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How did ukraine sabotage it ? Russian soldiers were in donbas since 2014 and didn't pull out after the agreement, while also funding rebels, therefore breaking the agreement. Thats not evening mentioning that russia are known for back stabbing every agreement they sign. Forcing ukraine to sell the majority of its natural gas export in order to have some peace is the definition of sabotage. For the russian its their way or no way and everyone is a pawn to be used. The Kremlin is by far one of the most untrustworthy governments in the world.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why do you suck on penises of homeless people many times every day?

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ok!
    Sure!

    I often wonder observing things... does Rjssia really comprehend fully and accept things as they are given their survival depends on it?

    I have concluded that neither US or Russia do so!
    I cant decide which is worse in that aspect!
    But cabal is their enemy, and deals can't be fully made to aid eachother... and hope thus far lead to severe loss, reality is grim and it appears goals are not set in stone as they should be on either side ro ensure reasonable survival of civilization as opposed to just humanity!

    So, really, in your opinion do you think Russia understands truly and accepts truly the reality in order to ensure they don't miss this whatever it is, call it barly opportunity?
    Ehich may swayUS to take their opportunity and save civilization, or cause hell, either way hell is coming so trying will be risky, but it would take full comprehension and acceptance of the state of things, but do you this Russia understands and accepts the reality?

    lol
    Nah, but I will hear you out, but nah, all sides are Idiots.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I often wonder observing things... does Rjssia really comprehend fully and accept things as they are given their survival depends on it?
      Russians are ruled by emotion, wishful thinking and an deep seated inferiority complex which makes them overly ambitious and eager to prove themselves to the world.

      They get very zealous about this ambition, until they suffer a humiliating loss and forget about it.

      Case in point:
      Crimean War
      >ambition to retake Constantinople because muh russian empire so powerful third rome DEAD
      Russo-Japanese war
      >ambition to show to the world that at least you're more powerful than Japan who are totally subhumans compared to you DEAD
      Polish-Soviet war
      >ambition to extend communism from Lisbon to Vladivostok DEAD
      Soviet times
      >ambition to defeat the US and enable world revolution DEAD

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the end date is the one thing your should know

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hey volodymyr

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is the Ghost of Kyiviv real?

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here is my prediction

    USA gets nuked but only leftist cities
    EU politicians will hang and then comes massive ethnic civil war

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Zelensky was an idiot for trusting the Americans, who as we speak are beginning to throw him under the bus.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He trusted anglos and garden gnomes, the two groups one should not trust under any circumstance. Or maybe he knows they will protect him, because no matter how untrustworthy garden gnomes are, they will cover for one of their own, and he is using white Ukrainian lives as a way to endear him with international garden gnomery

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it true that Zalensky baited a Russian invasion by pushing away from a treaty back in 2019, knowing that the destruction a russian invasion would cause would make Ukraine unattractive as a NATO partner, and make the UN stop pressuring him to join? I heard that was his plan, only the second part fell through: he was unable to get the US to come in and do the fighting for his country while he enjoyed the free money and goods.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The amount of russian subversion, lies, disingenuousness, and cope in this thread is marvelous.

    This is why everyone hates you, this is why all your neighbors hate you. You really act like fucking garden gnomes, and russian garden gnomes are the worst to deal with. Guess who holds all the power in your country too, the russian garden gnome.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      seethe more non white subhuman. Learn english first

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What are the goals of Germany and France? Why they tolerate current treatment from US and UK?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What treatment? The division between France and Germany and America and the UK is Russian wishful thinking. It's the same team, just different tenacity.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I asked question first, then understood that you are low intelligent or misinformed person. So I wouldn't bother you explaining how this conflict damaged France and German spheres of influence.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Their sphere of influences were only damaged through their own timid actions. If you don't lead and don't even want to lead, you won't be seen as a leader. How is this surprising? And I repeat, what Western treatment?

          Your toilet n-word asss said by a junta, you disgusting liar. And as if any color revolutions was bottom up, you retarded subhuman. They were all orchestrated by a small group of political actors in some geo-political plan.

          the voice in your head told you that? and why is a russian vpn or gastarbeiter in the netherlands calling me a pole in poland a toilet cleaner? puzzling

          >called Berkut and Titushki
          Aha, so you are retarded one. Berkut is basically SWAT, Titushki are typical "concerned citizens" of authoritarian state.

          >Berkut is basically SWAT
          since when is SWAT used to gun down mass protests with live fire?
          >Titushki are typical "concerned citizens" of authoritarian state.
          so a paramilitary

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What are the goals of Germany and France?
      What is the goal of my dogs? Do the bidding of their masters

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because we are occupied by US since 45 and ex-DDR since 89.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol this guy thinks Ukraine can take back Crimea. Good luck fighting the entire population

    Poles are so fucking delusional. Worst case is Crimea plus dpr/lpr cede to Russia. Best case we get novorussia. From a common sense standpoint of looking at relative strength.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Lol this guy thinks Ukraine can take back Crimea. Good luck fighting the entire population
      Once you cut through the land corridor and destroy the Kerch Strait bridge, Crimea is up for grabs.

      So to capture Crimea, Ukraine needs to sever the land connection, that is the challenge here, nothing else.

      And that Ukraine will achieve.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Once Russia cuts through Ukraine, Moldove, Romania, Hungary & Austria, Germany is up for grabs.
        >So to capture Germany, Russia needs to destroy 5 countries. That is the challenge here, nothing else.
        >And that Russia will achieve
        Clinically insane. Meds. Now.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There's a difference between cutting through Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, Hungary & Austria, and simply retaking the town of Volnovakha (and then Mariupol)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There really isn't. There's about the same amount of resistance.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Right now yes. Do you expect the flow of arms to stop? It certainly would be convenient for Russia, but not so much for the West, so why do you assume the flow to stop?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Flows usually stop when the source is drained.
                > "The depleted stockpiles resulting from the military support we provided to Ukraine are the most obvious example of our shortfalls," - Josep Borrell
                > "It will take years to rebuild the Javelins we shipped to Ukraine" - Antony J Blinken

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Only Javelin and Stinger stockpiles are depleted and America doesn't rely on them at all in the way they conduct warfare.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, it is much more likely that Russia will be in Berlin. Like someone already told you, Russia considers Crimea to be a integral part of their country, and it is part of the nuclear deterrence strategy of Russia to deploy nuclear weapons to protect their territorial integrity.
            Even if captain Zelensky wielded the hammer of Thor, Ukraine would still lose because they would get nuked.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Already explained:

              >Even Google Maps recognizes Crimea as part of Russia.
              then drop the vpn because only russian Google Maps shows that
              >Lol. They'd have to get there first (which they can't).
              They will.
              [...]
              As I said, how you cope with reality is your choice. Kerch Strait bridge will be destroyed. If you want to respond to that with a nuke, so be it, but lemme tell you, the end will not be favorable for you.

              Russia has a """no first strike""" doctrine except for when its very existence is at stake. If you think losing Crimea means your existence is at stake, again, what I said in the paragraph above. If you don't, good job, because it isn't.

              Realistically, the provision is there so that no one conventionally strikes Moscow. You do recognize the orders of magnitude we're talking about here now then? Crimea. Moscow. I can understand committing a suicide instead of handing over Moscow to your enemy, but nothing else.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why would they want Germany? To get access to Turkish and Syrian welfare receivers? The only halfway relevant thing in Germany would be the Hamburg port to get access to North Sea. Can't think of much else.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And the ghost of queef will transport captain Zelensky and pickle jar babushka to vladivostok to attack it in a pincer move, to force Puthanos to come out of his lair and kill him in a epic duel

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          imagine joking about the ghost of kyiv not existing and not downing a few planes when the ukies sunk your fucking flagship (and 3rd biggest warship overall)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't have to imagine, i am currently doing it, poletard toilet cleaner
            What the sinking of Moskva told us, the smart ones that lay off their emotions and analyze things more clearly, is that surface ships are increasingly relevant, mostly because of the development of anti-ship missiles. Which makes the traditional power projection of your overlords, the US Navy with its carrier forces, increasingly irrelevant.

            Already explained:
            [...]

            Not really, all you are saying is that captain zelesnky will pick up the hammer of Thor and somehow turn back the tide of the orcs. But reality says otherwise. And again, Russian nuclear deterrence policy says that nuclear weapons will be used if the Russian territorial integrity is jeopardized.
            Your posts are just emotional wishful thinking and Marvel tier turnarounds

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >What the sinking of Moskva told us, the smart ones that lay off their emotions and analyze things more clearly, is that surface ships are increasingly relevant, mostly because of the development of anti-ship missiles.
              Yes, Russia is only winning, even if it loses, because it means it's taking lessons to be better in the future! Or so they said after losing the Crimean War and undertaking a military reform... and then losing the Russo-Japanese war.
              >Not really, all you are saying is that captain zelesnky will pick up the hammer of Thor and somehow turn back the tide of the orcs
              No, they've already laid out what they need. 1000 howitzers. America has already supplied 108 m777s and that's just 1 model. 1000 howitzers is 33 howitzers per each NATO member.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                when nukes

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                mah nook is a spook

                literally

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >
                you fool. everyone knows nukes dont exist

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                in general i don't get why LULZ (of all places) still peddles the purely emotional nook argument. must be russian shills

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >even if it loses
                But Russia is winning.
                >because it means it's taking lessons to be better in the future!
                I'm telling you that your master main source of international power projection, its navy, is increasingly obsolete
                >1000 howitzers is 33 howitzers per each NATO member.
                Which will be coming any day now. And btw, hohols had these numbers of military equipment pre-war, and it still didn't matter all that much.
                And there is the issue that hohols don't know how to use these weapons, and even if the west trained tens of thousands of hohols to use them, the Ukrainian army military doctrine would have to be reformed to use these weapons effectively, and hohols do not have the manpower or the time to do this

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >But Russia is winning.
                Winning how? It hasn't gained new land since 1 month ago. Ukraine has. That's a net loss. Russia is losing.
                >its navy, is increasingly obsolete
                Russia's navy is obsolete, yes, that much is obvious. To everybody. How that relates to U.S. Navy, I'm not sure.
                >Which will be coming any day now
                Sure. What obstacles do you see? NATO's only apprehension is not to be seen as a party/co-combatant to this conflict. It's succeeding at this. That's the only apprehension. Nothing else. You do realize this?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > Winning how? It hasn't gained new land since 1 month ago. Ukraine has. That's a net loss. Russia is losing.
                Literally the opposite of everything you say is true. Russia is making steady progress in Donetsk and Lugansk

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The steady progress:
                (no gains since the gif ends btw)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Winning how?
                Killing hohols, taking hohol territory...
                >Ukraine has.
                ahahahhaha, delusion. The great kherson offensive, lead by ghost of kiiiiiiiiiiiv, is getting near Moscow right now
                >Russia's navy is obsolete, yes, that much is obvious. To everybody. How that relates to U.S. Navy, I'm not sure.
                Poletard subhuman playing dumb to avoid facing arguments. Such a feminine behavior....
                Stop sucking mutt cock, toilet cleaner
                >What obstacles do you see?
                reality
                >NATO's only apprehension is not to be seen as a party/co-combatant to this conflict. It's succeeding at this.
                Wrong and delusional. Everyone other than feminine westerners who love to hide behind wordplays and definitions understand that this war is Russia vs NATO

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                implying the war wasnt planned out by all parties involved beforehand. jwy0r

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                on top of this does anyone actually think putin would say the word "denazification" who else than american garden gnomes would say that. he was instructed to say that about the invasion

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >losing the Russo-Japanese war
                we lost that war and ww1 to the tsar being a fucking moron and not keeping the population in check. There’s only so much you can achieve if you don’t crack down on protests with an increasingly brutal iron fist. Without a revolution we could easily continue said war because there were a lot of unused reserves the military could go through, while japan was all but depleted. Okhrana should have just eliminated every single commie/socialist scum in the country by shooting them in their heads, but didn’t do it. They even funded bolsheviks who ended up taking over in 1918 because okhrana was that stupid. When libshits can speak in public freely, revolutions happen.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they did crack down on protests tho. but that only fueled them. you didn't study your own history?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Kurwa please, revolution of 1905 was crushed so hard Lenin did not expect anything to happen in his lifetime.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was crushed but the first attempt at crushing it was so retarded it actually caused the whole thing is my point

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine hasn’t taken any territory so far. Russia has barely touched Ukrainian infrastructure. Let’s say Ukraine destroys the bridge. Russia can, in a few hours, destroy every power plant in Ukraine as well as put holes in every major road and rail. Suddenly Ukraine has no transportation and no power for tens of millions.

        Russia has been playing nice and Ukraine isn’t exactly on the offensive.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good place to drop this:

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its like you poles dont learn a fucking thing, read some fucking books on the russia/german conflict ape.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is Russia imperialist in your point of view? Are they stealing resources include pipelines and nuclear power plant because they're corrupt fuckers?

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    when is your gender transition surgery

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why did Interpol remove Tymoshenko from its wanted list?

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You think you know something but you just know what american narrative tell you because poland is just a rump state, germs will rebuild an army and join russia and you will get fucked as usual, russia and germs maybe even france will be the 22nd century superpower thats simple math, your all dazed with ideology and fairy tale but realpolitik is the only thing that matter, ideology serve to orient you in some predefined path by those who created it, real life is very simple, but they will always be idiots like you that overthink and self-approve, at the end you end up on your knee full of tears.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      blablablablabla

      >Winning how?
      Killing hohols, taking hohol territory...
      >Ukraine has.
      ahahahhaha, delusion. The great kherson offensive, lead by ghost of kiiiiiiiiiiiv, is getting near Moscow right now
      >Russia's navy is obsolete, yes, that much is obvious. To everybody. How that relates to U.S. Navy, I'm not sure.
      Poletard subhuman playing dumb to avoid facing arguments. Such a feminine behavior....
      Stop sucking mutt cock, toilet cleaner
      >What obstacles do you see?
      reality
      >NATO's only apprehension is not to be seen as a party/co-combatant to this conflict. It's succeeding at this.
      Wrong and delusional. Everyone other than feminine westerners who love to hide behind wordplays and definitions understand that this war is Russia vs NATO

      and hohols are killing russians. seems like both parties are satisfied.
      as for taking territory:

      The steady progress:
      (no gains since the gif ends btw)

      Strategically, Russia has achieved 0 objectives since it started the grandest offensive since ww2 two months ago.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and hohols are killing russians.
        But nowhere near enough
        >as for taking territory:
        Ukraine took none, and keeps losing steadly
        >Strategically, Russia has achieved 0 objectives since it started the grandest offensive since ww2 two months ago.
        Land bridge towards Crimea is restored, Denazification is progressing, demilitarization is also progressing, and the republics are also being liberated. Lugansk is almost fully liberated, Donests is progressing, fighting in bakhmut as already started, siege of sloviasnk also started, Northern Donestsk is starteing to get liberated...

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Ukraine took none
          report status of kharkiv offensive

          2 more weeks?

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all [these things] must come to pass, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these [are] the beginning of sorrows. 9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. 11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. 13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. (Matthew 24:6-14, KJV)

    To those who are not saved; Know that the end is nigh and thus not much time remains. All who do not believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour are doomed to end up in the land of fire and remain condemned. If you wish to avoid such a fate, repent, believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour for your Salvation and He will deliver you from evil and save you from burning in the lake of fire forever.

    Also I suggest caution regarding other denominations that call themselves Christians. What my faith led me to is non-denominational Christianity but for you God might have a different plan so go where God leads you.

    catholics beware as you are in danger of damnation: http://granddesignexposed.com/sun/baal.html

    Something worth watching if you have the time:

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dumb christcuck, all of this applies to every single point in recorded history, which is why there are always some retards shouting how the world is endijg and guess what? Nothing ever happens

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        God flooded the world. Then He destroyed babylon. This time He will destroy almost everything and send people to the everlasting lake of fire if they remain damned.

        I would suggest you see to it that you do not end up there for your sake and Repent and Believe on Jesus for Salvation.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Say something good about Russia.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brothers Karamazov is a good book and Stravinsky was a good composer

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    >ASK AWAY!
    kys hohol

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What the end date?
    Do you know everything about the Ukr war from the beginning?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As I said, the certainty is that the outcome and duration of this war depends solely on the West. The West is kind of the mastermind here. As it's always been everywhere on Earth since the beginning of time.

      With determination and supplies, this war can be finished within 1 year.

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I know EVERYTHING about the Russia-Ukraine conflict from the beginning to the end
    >Polish flag
    Pass. You're probably extremely biased.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [deleted post]

    Why do you bother larping for over 50 posts if you cannot even keep frame?

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [deleted post]

    >when Ukraine returns it.
    With what army? With what resources? With what economy?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not with yours, that's for certain.

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How will it end?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Likelihood:
      >status quo ante: 15%
      >donbas but not crimea: 40%
      >donbas and crimea: 45%

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >another coping butthurt belt intellectual

    Get in the empire, pawel.

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ((ABC's)) had a coupe and installed gnomish actor as leader. Zionists terrorist militias evacuated garden gnomes, breedable women and foreign minorities out of danger and at gun point pushed none gnomish Ukrainian natives into bombs and bullets. Just more garden gnomes murdering goes. There's nothing more to it. You have no interesting information.

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Where is Zelensky like 80% of the time?

Your email address will not be published.