How over is it with drone tech ?

Nope nope you convinced me already don't backtrack you already made your statement. Civis are incapable of such magical tech. Far beyond their abilities. No one has the equipment for it. Especially not if they have a car.

Where is the cope? I'm agreeing with you! No civilian could ever manage something like an EMP it is just impossible.

not in the next 5 centuries

Over how great of a distance will this drone operate? What are the limitations on the size of the population that this will work on? How close will your drone have to get to identify by facial features? What is its loiter time and how will it select candidates to facially scan? If it is unable to identify the target in the allotted time, what instructions are given to the drone? If it simply falls to the ground, you've wasted your drone. If you give it orders to return to home, now you're relying on GPS and hence - signals, which can be located.

How long will a drone flying around a metropolitan area with grenades strapped to it last as it hovers down to scan people's individual faces, before alarm bells go off?

And if you're near enough to the individual for this cockamamie idea to be a viable assassination plan, why don't you just shoot them with a handgun to begin with?

I could go on all night. I keep saying how it's not so fucking simple and people don't listen.

Truly.

They think this is like the bees from Black Mirror.

I’m not talking facial recognition. I’m talking about flying manually outside the range of jamming, locking on to a limo and press “auto”

You're just supporting my argument that missiles are better than drones.
Lmao, fucking scrub. We already went through an arms race from Optical Warfare. Drones are only good against poorfags and Slavs, worthless everywhere else

You're really not giving good arguments, so you're indirectly supporting me 先生.
Drones are easily neutralizable. They're worthless against ECM. At least a missile can be dumb if it's disrupted.
You're stupid, just like a drone AI

>stop conflating "bad" with "incomprehensible"
It's valid in the English language and in this case too.
You're giving too much credit to drones and I'm telling you you're silly. AI on drones are worthless if the enemy knows how to counter it. If a blanket can trick a drone's AI, it's futile.
>an argument has no bearing on the validity of that argument
ESL-kun, I....

>not considered synonymous in any context
Oh, I'm so ashamed and scared! Thankfully your incomprehensible dream drone will never catch me.

general battlefield C3I is where they shine
every unit should have an "AWACS" drone, from platoon size up

god your stupid, molten glass enters chat

ty anon for the spell check since i turned to joogle shit off you can be my israelite

thats spelled right ? joogle ...

aw yes ty noogle, play turkey in the straw plz

hey nooger, who sat on the pile straw Instead of the cow ?

>no proof
Post a video.

The main support beams are cut through shaped charges. Not thermite.

If you are talking about 9/11 and controlled demo's then there are better options available. If you are talking about destroying substation transformers, it's simply easier and more effective to directly drill into the transformer and then ignite the oil. The fire will burn for 3-5 days everything is cooked. Just make sure you wear long sleeved gloves and face gear basically a full covid suit because if the mineral oil touches your skin you die of various cancers. It's an incredibly powerful carcinogen it isn't a normal oil.

Blowing up 45+ transformers is iffy. They may not ignite. You need a lot of explosives. You need to shape them. Etc.

I had an idea for assassination drones. You take a FPV racing drone that can hit 100mph which is pretty standard for a racing drone. You then add some kind of spike to it, something that is light but strong enough maybe carbon fibre. You then crash the drone directly into your targets head.

Slicing a carotid artery can be difficult. Testing would need to be done but I believe a hit to the back of the head at that speed would pen the skull. The benefit of targetting the head is the size and ability to come from any angle.

>Backyard thermite will not melt a 1/2 inch steel plate
the thicker the plate the better it will dissipate heat
you need to contain the thermite somewhat

>Do you plan to equip every vehicle with one of those
no the idea is to have specialized vehicles
>in every direction?
contrary to popular opinion, light can be bent around corners, it's called fiberglass you should check it out

Let's use your numbers and assume we have a portable jammer with an output of 25 kW targeting the entire RF & microwave spectrum up to a frequency of 5 GHz. That jammer has an output of 5 uW/Hz. This is roughly typical of what can be carried in a small trailer or light truck.

Meanwhile let's assume your drone has a video feed with a bandwidth of 10 MHz and, being generous, an output of 5 W. That's 0.5 uW/Hz, or 1/10th the power of the jamming noise at that frequency.

The jammer can easily cover that entire bandwidth and nothing that's transmitting on fixed frequencies is going to have its signal break through the noise. To overcome that you could: 1) move away from the jammer; 2) increase power output; 3) increase gain with directionalized antennas; 4) use FHSS transmission over a greatly increased bandwidth; or 5) destroy or disable the jammer.

But in a head to head competition, the jammer wins. It would have to be a very small device not to.

Your claim is not accurate. Broadband jamming is old tech at this point.
http://www.sesp.com/VeryHighPowerBroadband.asp

IR laser guided drone packages.

Honestly that’s the best way of putting it. You’re operating on outdated information bro. You would have been right ten years ago, but not now.

lmao i gave you a link to a COTS product that works exactly the way I described. You're completely full of shit bro

>Those things have been around forever, they operate on sweeping.
Only if you have a very shitty low power ECM that can't adequately cover all of the necessary components of the spectrum at once. But there is no reason at the physical electronics level why this would be necessary.

The power output across the entire frequency range becomes so small that it can't jam effectively. If it was such a good jammer the government would make them highly illegal so you don't disrupt communications in a city. There's no magic blanket technology, it doesn't work like that, the transmitter could easily just boost their signal power to compensate.

It's not what they do because the transmitter could easily beat it by boosting their transmission power and take advantage of the locking property of FM radio.

If it can be beat by just turning up the output power a little on your transmitter it's not effective for jamming. Typically the jammer has to output intense power so the transmitter can't beat it this way, you need to sweep with a high power signal to do that.

Well on the plus side, the more they crank up the power, the easier it is to find them, so it’s a win-win lmao

In the realm of signals intelligence? Lurk the Skyking threads on this board to get comfortable with the basics if you’re aren’t already. For cheapies, just get an RTL-SDR and some basic spectrum monitoring software. Sceptre is the gold standard if you have money. If you have a little more cash look into the Ettus line of SDRs. I personally hate the ham community but if that’s your thing, some people like it. It depends on what you want to do after that. Do you want to learn about EW and jamming? Do you want to do sketchy shit like demodulate and create cell site simulators? It’s a big world.

Lurk the Skyking thread, king.

No man, you misunderstood. I was using those frequencies as examples, not what I’m limited to. It doesn’t matter where your Mavic goes anywhere between 100-6000MHz, I’ll see you. That’s the point. You change modulations? Get a different brand? I train a new model, now I can see that drone anywhere up and down the spectrum in the same way.

>Okay... so if your magic jammer works so well why can the US military operate their drones all over the world and have no worries about jamming.
They can't. Not only can they be jammed but Iran has managed to commandeer a few of them by spoofing GPS and control signals. Russian and Chinese capabilities are significantly more advanced.

The Iranians didn't use traditional jamming though, they used a spoof attack to trick the drone into believing it was getting safe signals. It was a major blunder by the US caused by being lazy naggers and just using the same software protocol with every new model.

I should reiterate also that my software isn’t looking at those frequencies because the neural net thinks a Mavic will be there. The NN is trained on the raw IQ energy your drone is putting out itself. It is not trained for frequency ID specifically for that reason.

You’d have to get decoys close enough to interfere, which would defeat the purpose of using a drone. Unless you’re talking about using a swarm of drones, and then it’s just a matter of scaling up the solution I’m talking about.

Correct.

Just saying that countermeasures will be developed in the future to beat my countermeasures isn’t a great argument. That’s the whole history of the world. I can’t tell you what will dominate tomorrow, I’m just telling you that what all these anons think is some super weapon ain’t all that, and a lot of what people think make them so invulnerable have already have countermeasures on the market today.

Anyway, thread limit soon. Someone make a new thread if you want to keep talking.

You keep saying the same thing. If you do a combination of switching frequencies, fast frequency hopping, changing modulation, etc. that you can’t be found. If you’re putting out any kind of signals emissions you can be found. In milliseconds.

No dude. Proprietary comms and encryption deal with modulation, not energy. The NN is trained on raw IQ. The physical layer energy it’s putting out. Literally energy itself.

I don’t know how many different ways to say the same thing. You’re operating on outdated information.

>It doesn't matter if you can triangulate and monitor
Keep saying that when the artillery is incoming

>The NN is trained on the raw IQ energy your drone is putting out itself.
What is IQ energy?

>If everything could just be jammed so easily the entire US drone fleet would be scrapped by now.
American drones usually fly at high altitudes away from ground based jammers. They also use directionalized antennas most of the time so that most of the RF output from the drone is directed into space. Still, all of this can be jammed by an advanced adversary.