How diverse of a place was medieval England?
How diverse of a place was medieval England?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Bait.
I'm sorry?
not diverse at all, it was 100% black
Modern scholars love to call it multi ethnic but won't elaborate that it was Danes, Norwegians, Anglos, Saxons, Normans
so, multiethnic
Is there really an ethnicity difference between a Dane and a Saxon?
Not denying it's multiple ethnicities but let's be a bit more forthcoming with the information.
The romans didn't really think about race as we did.
But not very black
Not diverse it was nothing but Anglos barely any other British ethnicity let alone West Euro
the duality of man
More diverse than other places in Europe. You had French nobles, anglosaxon people, people with Viking heritage, ancient Celtic people. Probably one of the more diverse regions of Western Europe
RIP Roger Scruton
It was 100% white. Since lords were private property holders of their territory they had a vested interest in increasing the value of their property. Which means they were never going to bring in a bunch of worthless naggers to destroy their social and economic capital. This is the complete opposite to "public" ownership of land by the state where land is administered by bureaucrats with no skin in the game. Just as capital was administrated in the soviet union by bureaucrats who let it go to ruin because they had no skin in the game.
It was 0% white. "White" did not exist in the Middle Ages.
>white
Modern perception of race
Private companies love diversity because the conflict prevents the creation of unions. And your typical lord was a foreigner (Norman in England) that hired other foreigners to deal with the peasantry, usually israelites, his skin in the game was ensuring the israelites brought him the taxes so he could pay his own taxes.
>Private companies love diversity because the conflict prevents the creation of unions.
Land is "publicly" owned so people who advocate immigration don't incur the costs.
>Since lords were private property holders of their territory they had a vested interest in increasing the value of their property. Which means they were never going to bring in a bunch of worthless naggers to destroy their social and economic capital. This is the complete opposite to "public" ownership of land
Land owners all over the Americas imported naggers, curious.
Britain has always been a hub of immigration. The indigenous there were bred out by Anatolians in the neolithic, and then Steppe nomads, then Celts, etc.
Brown Kids at a brown school doesn't mean Britain is finished, it's just another cycle. What makes it notable is that this is a direct consequence of Britain's colonial exploits. It's coming back to bite them and they don't want it to. Somehow Brits expected that they'd be able to get rich and powerful but that it had no downsides.
As long as the upper class remains white it doesn’t matter what the lower classes consist of.
Have you ever heard of a little place called Haiti?
Modern weapons and private security companies make that implausible to happen again
>surely the praetorian guard will protect m- *ACK*
praetorian guards werent private security, they were a State apparatus like JSOC.
like latin america?
Theres been many colored presidents in latin America, that ship has sailed
>retard thinks upper class military officers and caudillo land owners were exclusively Spanish
Not even by the mid 18th century. Spain gave up the caste system and allowed rich landowners like caudillos trace their ancestry to prominent men regardless of ethnic background. Lots of independence leaders were mestizos and mullato.
I suspect you are a beaner yourself, given their proclivity for insisting their countries are whiter than they really are.
minority rules never lasts
>haiti
>latin america
>south africa
>mughal empire
Times have changed, few soldiers can mow down endless unarmed people unlike before
The british wont do shit
He’s integrated.
Until the upper class is slowly infiltrated.
He’s been banished for it
I thought it was just for being a massive twunt.
>What makes it notable is that this is a direct consequence of Britain's colonial exploits
It's a direct consequence of the government inviting them over as a conscious policy to exterminate the natives.
>this is a direct consequence of Britain's colonial exploits
How is this allowed to be so retarded?
>Be imperialist nation
>Get rich and powerful off of economically raping other countries of all of their resources (colonialism is economic exploitation by definiton)
>Develop massive industry, wealth and political power
>Colonial empire collapses
>In order to maintain the current level of economic growth/boom, immigration is required
>take in migrants from your former colonies who are familiar to your economic system and industry, language and allow you to maintain business relationships with your former colonies
>Current situation
If they didn't have to take them they wouldn't. Reality is, people from other 'white' countries aren't chomping at the bit to migrate to other 'white' countries. Thirdies are.
Examples of countries taking massive amount of immigrants they were completely unrelated with are not few
Migration is not a direct consequence of falling empires
Post-imperialism/globalism immigration is. We've never had that scale of economic activity before
And they're not completely unrelated. France gets lots of African immigrants from ex-French colonies. Britain, Spain and Portugal the same. Colonial countries like Aus, Canada and the US were always immigrant hubs
Sweden get negroes from Somalia, Germany get turks and arabs, Belgium and the Netherlands get nafris from Mooroco
Majority of those are refugees
Yeah they're fleeing their civilizational inferiority
But sadly they bring it with them
I wouldn't consider Europe culturally superior lol. Europe isn't even at the top of the Western hierarchy
Your timeline is off by more than a few decades.
>In order to maintain the current level of economic growth/boom, immigration is required
Where do people get this horseshit?
>In order to maintain the current level of economic growth/boom, immigration is required
We're currently in an economic slump yet the solution from these same "experts" is, you guessed it, import hordes of IQ 80 third worlders and pay them to vote and breed. It seems the only thing hordes of browns can't solve is their own countries.
We're in an economic slump because of two fuckeit counties causing global issues with supply chains. Russia and China stepped of line and were having to scale back globalisation because of it
The problem isn’t with importation, it’s importing the wrong people. Asian people have an amazing ability to assimilate to the local culture.
People who understand the situation. Yeah bro just go tell your government and big business you'd rather have negative economic growth than a few Indians in your country
>negative economic growth
The numbers in the spreadsheet have to keep going up! The average person's quality of life doesn't matter. It's the numbers in the spreadsheet that matter and they have to keep going up.
Capitalism baby!
Whites don't want to immigrate to other white counties. I'm Australian and I would never consider moving to Europe or America
>a few
LoL. Look I don't mind open borders for whites and fertile age females, that sounds like a fair compromise to me but you leftoids chimp out whenever I suggest it. Which means you don't really give a shit about the economy. You just want to destroy white countries by burying them in genetic garbage.
>In order to maintain the current level of economic growth/boom, immigration is required
The UK was so short of labour that they sent 1.5 million whites to Australia for subsidised fees under the £10 Pom scheme.
Untold hundreds of thousands, possibly over a million were sent to settle in other colonies, again for subsidised fees.
Yeah makes sense
Australia was having a post-war economic boom and was in high demand for immigrants. So much so that we lightened our whites only policy and began taking in continental Europeans, who were previously considered non-white, including Germans, Italians and Slavs
>germans weren't considered white
Stop lying your ass of you marxist kike.
>let me tell you about your country
>Brown Kids at a brown school doesn't mean Britain is finished, it's just another cycle.
Brown people are inferior so yes it will lead to collapse
>What makes it notable is that this is a direct consequence of Britain's colonial exploits. It's coming back to bite them and they don't want it to. Somehow Brits expected that they'd be able to get rich and powerful but that it had no downsides.
It's a consequence of leftists allowing mass immigration
Egypt colonized Sudan yet you don't see them allow Sudanese negroes to ethnically replace them in their land
>Brown people are inferior so yes it will lead to collapse
says who?
History
cares
>Britain has always been a hub of immigration.
No more so than anywhere else in the world.
>this is a direct consequence of Britain's colonial exploits.
No it isn't. The same thing is happening all across Western Europe, even in countries that had no significant colonial empire outside of Europe.
>It's coming back to bite them and they don't want it to
Wow no shit people don't want what is bad for them.
atleast they aren't speaking german
It literally doesn't matter because in the next 100 or so years when England becomes a brazil-tier muttopia the mutts will just rewrite history and say it used to always look like that and George Washington was African
Britain totally deserves it though and its muttification is a great thing
>It literally doesn't matter because in the next 100 or so years when England becomes a brazil-tier muttopia the mutts will just rewrite history and say it used to always look like
It's literally what they're doing in France right now
When presented with the evidence that France is getting more and more violent ever since the arrival of nafris in the 60s, leftists claim it was always a violent shithole and cite 19th century offenders known as "apaches" (who were actually mainly arrested for vagrancy)
What does this have to do with history and humanities
Evolution of criminality rate across time is related to both history and humanities
I feel like you’re kinda just racist
>Britain totally deserves it though and its muttification is a great thing
Why?
Here's an accurate reconstruction of a medieval English village
Haha nooo France has totally never been violent
>Except for that massive civil war and revolution which then led to the Reign of Terror
>Or when France tried to conquer all of Europe
>Or when France butchered a bunch of Algerians
>Or when the French have those big strikes every year where they attack police and firebomb cars
Yeah really convincing argument that it's the nafri minority that is making France violent. That whole country is a hellscape.
Look apart from the Albigensian genocide and the war in the vandee France has never been internally violent
What about the Protestant pogroms?
Yeah if you go back to middle ages or earlier, I guess you can find a point when it was already shithole
I guess it means the massive shitholification that occured between the civilized and pretty much crimeless 1960s France and the current Africa-tier 21st century France is nothing to complain about then
I guess it would be fine if Japan turned into Brazil in the future, because after all, if we go back 2,000 years earlier, Japan was already an unsafe shithole
We're discussing crime rates, not foreign policy
>Or when the French have those big strikes every year where they attack police and firebomb cars
Burned cars are 100% nafris
As for the monthly protests, they usually consist in a bunch of weak effeminated leftist hippies parading in the streets
Only when nafris join up with their "free palestine" signs do the whole affair turn into violent riots
No, you were discussing whether France was 'getting more and more violent recently instead of throughout history. France has always been full of violent ferals, that's why Caesar had to pacify Gaul
True. Japan has always been a thirdie tier shithole. People don't change.