Community posts
Honestly, the better I dress the more I realize there really is no point in discussing fashion online.
Honestly, the better I dress the more I realize there really is no point in discussing fashion online.
I know what I like, I know that 99% of people on this board disagree with me because tbey have a different style, different life, different body, are poor etc. So why discuss fashion then, there really is no point.
I think that is why fashion, something that is really popular, isn’t often discussed online. Unless it is with people who dress really similar to you, which are most likely to be your friends in real life, you won’t agree. Not only on here, but also on YT, Reddit, everything. Fashion fora are always really slow.
>Honestly, the better I dress the more I realize there really is no point in discussing fashion online.
ok, stopped reading here
mhmhmh you bring up an interesting perspective but talking online has helped me realise what good quality clothing is what materials will serve me best and also certain styles have given me inspiration even though your style can be niche its fun looking at other peoples styles ya know (-w-)
my God i wonder how they look today lol
watcha mean bro
he means that
OP Pic was taken during 1980s so time passes
>its fun looking at other peoples styles
this
This is just to shit post and a safe place where recovering /pol/acks, trannies, /fashion/ggots meet and regurgitate insults toward eachother.
Recovering as in trying to limit time on /pol/ shit is addicting and depressing. It’s a masochists wet dream
Why are virtually no rich people fat and/or truly ugly? They marry other pretty people and have attractive children. I am faitly poor, and maybe a 7, and my wife is a 7. Our kid is an 8/10.
wtf everyone in OP’s photo looks exactly like the result of generation of inbreeding because that’s what happened
On second thought, the girl in the pink jumper is the only attractive one, but I can tell she’s not from a rich background just by her facial expression. Her eyes look warm and her face doesn’t exude the entitled confidence of the others (look at the other woman in the front row she’s probably 22 but looks 40). She’s probably dating the guy sat next to her and she’s dressed ultra preppy to try and blend in with his friends
>Her eyes look warm and her face doesn’t exude the entitled confidence of the others
And that is not a good thing. Having that kind of entitled confidence is my goal in life right now. I’ve spent enough time trying to blend in with the poorfags.
>OP’s photo looks exactly like the result of generation of inbreeding because that’s what happened
all White "posh demographic" at 80s UK event = [selective] generational breeding
Ftfy
OK /fashion/, list the reasons you can tell pic in OP is from a TV/movie
why you can tell or why you think that OP pic is from tv/movie….interesting
it’s not though, this was life before peak globalism for the happy few
You don’t see groups of people like this in real life because, mysteriously, in OP pic no one is wearing sneakers. No one is wearing sweaters/T-shirts with logos or writing. No guy dressed themselves in an "I don’t give a heck" outfit. SO MANY collared shirts underneath sweaters and cardigans. Not a single guy said "A sweater is fine, what difference does it make?" or "maybe it is warm enough for just a long sleeved shirt?". One person is wearing glasses, one person is bald. No one is overweight. All the women are heckable. Everyone is about the same height. The narrow age range is unbelieable, with no teenagers or adolescent looking college kids and no grey haired 45-90 yos
You can tell this was done in the 80s (aside from the hair styles) because everyone is white. In the 90s there would be blacks and maybe a hispanic. A movie or TV show from 2000s+ would have a wider variety of asians, africans, sexual orientations, etc.
LEGIT OG 1980s Sloane Ranger Scene:
No sneakers
No sweatpants joggers or chinos
No sweatshirts + logo tee-shirts
No IDGAF outfits
So many collared shirts + pullover sweaters -80s
So much denim – jeans as dressy casual look with collared shirts + sweaters -80s
Most men wearing hard-soled leather shoes or leather Sperry topsiders – 80s
Attractive people under ~40 – 45yo
Only 1 balding man in back
All White w/ exception of 1 Brown girl
The clothing is definitely "posh casual" for spectators at weekend match in the country, BUT the clothing is not production prop tier because the shoes and denim and genuinely personal and worn / rumpled.
80s UK predominantly White demographic pre-1990s
Conclusion: This is a legit picture taken by someone present at this Fall sporting match in the English countryside in the mid-late 1980s and NOT a film production shot.
Well, I guess I’m wrong and I’m suitably impressed. It does at least confirm my suspicion that it wasn’t a picture of a "normal" high school football game or something. If you stumbled onto a field event like this in 2022 you’d be shocked. I still don’t understand where all the bald heads and glass wearers are though.
stupid lol
no one who posted this image in /tip/ also dressed decently… fyi
>I still don’t understand where all the bald heads and glass wearers are though.
A) those aren’t the type of people to show up to a sporting event, even to spectate
B) there were legitimately less people balding early in life and less who needed glasses. Food full of endocrine disruptors and a lifetime of staring at screens less than a foot from one’s face has done this to the modern human.
B) is definitely interesting point about spectators in OP
B) is not related to screens at all. I believe it’s associated with the eyes exposure to sunlight in formative years.
this brings back so many cosy memories of growing up in the posh country subculture
>the smell of the wellies/barbour cupboard
>gunpowder and a thermos of tea on shooting days
>absurdly mannered families living in half fallen down regency houses
>people with stupid names like Hubert Manwaring-Andrews and Mabel Isles-Thaxton
>first kisses in the stables
>absolutely everything covered in tattersall check
>female brained
Ywnbaw
>YWNBAW
trans fixation disordered
JFC the pic on the right, look how hard she mogs everyone else even if it is just a simple outfit
Too bad her face looks cro-magnon. Wonder if she had to shave her unibrow before she went out in public.
she still mogs most women by the fact she isnt obese
Not a single brotha on that pic, wtf
Beam Me Waaay Baaack, Scott.
>I think theres no reason to discuss fashion, so let me create a thread discussing fashion
Okay bud, see you tomorrow
More please.
I don’t give a shit about fashion, never walked your board before now, I’m mostly on loan from /0 /diy /tv /etc. For whatever reason I’ve been listening to 80’s new wave and feeling very wang chung, and this interests me. Keep it up.
Captcha: ZERO JVAH
WANG CHUNG: Ramsey Hagar Ext’d. Remix
"Dance Hall Days" (1983)
Enjoy and
Feel the beat, Sloane Rangers.
>tfw born into a lower middle class family in Eastern Europe
>Will never be a preppy dressing highly educated man with a blonde wife and three children in continental Europe or in the US
>there really is no point in discussing fashion online
Exactly.
You should stop doing it.
Please leave.
>I’m not a WASP T:T
You should be glad about that.
>discuss fashion
Fashion is for poorfags and people with low self-esteem.
Fashion is for people who have the leisure and resources to enjoy it.
discussing fashion at all is hecking cringe because it’s a passive thing that for many degenerates into an outlet for conspicuous overconsumption.
DT0AD
Can someone post link to the Sloane Ranger Handbook? I can’t find it anywhere.