Holy shit. Just how evil were the anglos?

Holy shit. Just how evil were the anglos?

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They truly were evil, only doing that many.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: apologists will claim that imperial policies did not seek to force self-sufficient farmers into growing cash crops, that the profits of a positive trade balance during the British Raj which could have been given to famine stability programs were instead funneled into the army for internal suppression and external expansion and back to Britain as capital for its own industry. When these claims and others have been overturned, they will fall back on the worn out tropes that the British Raj was not a coercive regime because they built railroads (albeit to make their export of ill-gotten material gains out of the country more efficient, not primarily for the direct benefit of the natives) and they gave the English language, which was later used by the INC as a unifying tool. This thread is just a waste of time anon

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Basically this.

      Honestly it’s insane to see the Indian subcontinent in such a sorry state nowadays. If you asked anyone from 500 BC to 1600 AD, they would have laughed if you suggested that the Hindu would become poor and weak at some point.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        India was always poor and shitty for the common man, the only difference now is that industrialization in the 1800s made things less shitty for plebs in industrialized societies.
        Having a lot of people made Indian empires "rich" for the same reason China nowadays is "richer" than Norway or Switzerland

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        They've always been poor and weak. It's why they've been subjugated by outsiders (Aryans, Persians, Greeks, Kushans, Scythians, Arabs, Turks, Afghans, Europeans, etc) throughout their history. Pajeets are simply a weak, submissive, and servile race.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Indians are meant to serve their anglo masters though.nvskn Literal slave race.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >force self-sufficient farmers
      Good. Fuck them. Kulak scum.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is a good post. I'm not 100% convinced but this definitely shifts the balance in my mind.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not evil enough given that India is pretty much standing room only these days.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    who cares

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The correct answer is not enough.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Let me guess. They've taken a page of the Covid's book and are treating every single death during that period of 40 years as a result of colonialism?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes the old Marxist trick.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's how capitalists count deaths in socialist countries.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Coping
    Seething
    Shidding
    Farding

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    theres a billion of them 100 million was nothing
    literally an irrelevant number

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1920
    Weird date to stop at, I mean the Bengal famine burong ww2 is such an easy win why ignore it?

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    WTF, I love the Brits now?

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    save the planet

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Be southern Brazilian
      >swimming normalize
      >suddenly you taste it

  15. 3 months ago
    [email protected]

    could have had a tripple europe(with rus) level of development in india and china and be 60 years ahead of where we are without anglo chromo wars/existence. terminal. 0%. perma downs. 0%. dclxvi. .5b genocide dclxvi

  16. 3 months ago
    [email protected]

    schizo gene pool tard noggered at all levels you see. 0%. terminal non intentional permenent non personhood eugenocide eradication dclxvi

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Europeans' only mistake was not being as cruel as thirdies thought they were.

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Feudalismbros...We win!
    Fuck OP for not putting a link to the article/paper
    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/12/2/how-british-colonial-policy-killed-100-million-indians

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169srkgd4

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >aljazeera

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      And your sciencedirekt link gives page not found. You didn't even check your own source.
      You are literally brown.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oops
        https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Al Jazeera
      Gotta love how they peddle this Liberal Hippy stuff to English audiences while their owners are a literal monarchy with slaves

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    not enough

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Screenshot thread
    >No source
    >No link to website, no author name, not even the article itself
    >Just a headline
    I fucked OP's mother and he is my bastard son btw

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    baby eaters dude

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    its much worse than that. the britishers killed a total of 1.8 BILLION indians

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >britishers
      kek

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >anglos
    mostly israelites, germs and scottish(who were also a israelites)

  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    All you had to do was the needful and redeem the silver with tea, Ram.

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN' PAJEETERINOS!!!!!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *