Holy shit. Just how evil were the anglos?

Holy shit. Just how evil were the anglos?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They truly were evil, only doing that many.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: apologists will claim that imperial policies did not seek to force self-sufficient farmers into growing cash crops, that the profits of a positive trade balance during the British Raj which could have been given to famine stability programs were instead funneled into the army for internal suppression and external expansion and back to Britain as capital for its own industry. When these claims and others have been overturned, they will fall back on the worn out tropes that the British Raj was not a coercive regime because they built railroads (albeit to make their export of ill-gotten material gains out of the country more efficient, not primarily for the direct benefit of the natives) and they gave the English language, which was later used by the INC as a unifying tool. This thread is just a waste of time anon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Basically this.

      Honestly it’s insane to see the Indian subcontinent in such a sorry state nowadays. If you asked anyone from 500 BC to 1600 AD, they would have laughed if you suggested that the Hindu would become poor and weak at some point.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        India was always poor and shitty for the common man, the only difference now is that industrialization in the 1800s made things less shitty for plebs in industrialized societies.
        Having a lot of people made Indian empires "rich" for the same reason China nowadays is "richer" than Norway or Switzerland

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They've always been poor and weak. It's why they've been subjugated by outsiders (Aryans, Persians, Greeks, Kushans, Scythians, Arabs, Turks, Afghans, Europeans, etc) throughout their history. Pajeets are simply a weak, submissive, and servile race.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Indians are meant to serve their anglo masters though.nvskn Literal slave race.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >force self-sufficient farmers
      Good. Frick them. Kulak scum.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is a good post. I'm not 100% convinced but this definitely shifts the balance in my mind.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not evil enough given that India is pretty much standing room only these days.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    who cares

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The correct answer is not enough.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Let me guess. They've taken a page of the Covid's book and are treating every single death during that period of 40 years as a result of colonialism?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes the old Marxist trick.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's how capitalists count deaths in socialist countries.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Coping
    Seething
    Shidding
    Farding

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    theres a billion of them 100 million was nothing
    literally an irrelevant number

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >1920
    Weird date to stop at, I mean the Bengal famine burong ww2 is such an easy win why ignore it?

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WTF, I love the Brits now?

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    save the planet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Be southern Brazilian
      >swimming normalize
      >suddenly you taste it

  15. 1 year ago
    daymonklotz@insta

    could have had a tripple europe(with rus) level of development in india and china and be 60 years ahead of where we are without anglo chromo wars/existence. terminal. 0%. perma downs. 0%. dclxvi. .5b genocide dclxvi

  16. 1 year ago
    daymonklotz@insta

    schizo gene pool tard noggered at all levels you see. 0%. terminal non intentional permenent non personhood eugenocide eradication dclxvi

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Europeans' only mistake was not being as cruel as thirdies thought they were.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Feudalismbros...We win!
    Frick OP for not putting a link to the article/paper
    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/12/2/how-british-colonial-policy-killed-100-million-indians

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169srkgd4

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >aljazeera

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And your sciencedirekt link gives page not found. You didn't even check your own source.
      You are literally brown.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Oops
        https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Al Jazeera
      Gotta love how they peddle this Liberal Hippy stuff to English audiences while their owners are a literal monarchy with slaves

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    not enough

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Screenshot thread
    >No source
    >No link to website, no author name, not even the article itself
    >Just a headline
    I fricked OP's mother and he is my bastard son btw

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    baby eaters dude

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its much worse than that. the britishers killed a total of 1.8 BILLION indians

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >britishers
      kek

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >anglos
    mostly israelites, germs and scottish(who were also a israelites)

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All you had to do was the needful and redeem the silver with tea, Ram.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN' PAJEETERINOS!!!!!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *