HOLY KINO
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
>compilers & types are complexity
It's the fucking opposite. This guy is a brainlet
To a developer, they are. JS' duck typing makes it "simpler" to work with. X is 9. Now x is "retarded". Now x is a function.
This causes a myriad of problems down the road, but he doesn't even brush up on that. That's what makes him a retard, a presentation on complexity as if every code was <50 lines long and any kind of groundwork at all is just an annoyance. A decade spent listening to retards -- without touching production code even once.
>To a developer, they are.
I am developer shut the fuck up lab monkey. Go play with your toroidal homomorphisms
>X is 9. Now x is "retarded". Now x is a function.
works on my machine
I have never needed types for anything I've ever made.
Why bother? It'll just be converted to JS. Plus JS often comes with so many bad practices from what I see of others' JS code. Frankly, if you're compiling, JS isn't what you should use anyway.
Bad practices aren't a problem in javascript, because it runs on the user's computer.
I'm glad to see more and more developers standing against bullshit cargo cults and soidevs.
All devs are soi. This shit doesn’t happen in any other industry
this. i can't even imagine an analogy to this in electrical, mechanical or chemical engineering.
good
Im using react at work, and after a while you do get tired of the magic. It feels so unsatisfying, instead of thinking, all you do is guess the right incantation. I want to become a cnile and go back to monke
Have watched Blue Zima?
>have you
Fixed
>reeeeeeee static types is hard
Not giving your video views
Not giving you ad revenue
Take your meds retard
Bear in mind his experience is with Javascript. Nobody's found a good way to add static types to Javascript, instead you have half-working kludges like TypeScript and Flow. But I agree that static types plus type inference makes a language nicer to work in.
nobodys has ever watched more than 30 seconds of a video with bad audio
That's because it's not an Indian reciting some article he read on Google.
>Look at thumbnail
>Types are in the trash can
lmao
>I like it simple without many abstractions
>so I like JS which is just like C in that regard
Without fail it splits my sides when people talk like there's a language that dispenses with abstraction
Literally anything other than the actual state of the actual transistors is an abstraction and anyone who disagrees with that is delusional
There's still different levels of abstraction retard
Abstraction is not a quantity measurable in exactly one dimension, chucklefuck
>2.7k views
Fuck you OP. I hope you get fired for being an incompetent moron who wastes his time making shitty bait youtube videos in the unlikely chance you're not a NEET.
>activate windows
activate windows jamal
Vanilla JavaScript is literally all you need for anything that isn't a high performance back end system
Need a high performance backend? TypeScript + tsc -> js to asm compiler. Easy.
>It's just a quick fix, it'll probably take me 3-5 days to find it
kek lost
I can't believe how much healing is happening right now
>You are not a set of keywords.
>avoiding complexity
>recommends javascript
What a fucking idiot. He's just an average webdev who's oblivious to the gargantuan tech stack that JS sits on, except he's so arrogant that he thinks he knows better than everyone else.
JS is a so convenient because web giants (e.g. Google) poured millions of dollars and man hours into standardizing it, developing it and writing optimized engines for it, plus all the volunteer work done by package creators. He has no fucking idea how much complexity goes into writing an optimized JS engine, let alone implementing all the fucking standards and putting everything into a web browser or runtime.
He's not avoiding complexity, he's outsourcing it. That's why most webdev are fucking monkeys, they think software is simple because they don't see all the pipework going on below their feet.
>I'M PROGRAAAAAAAAAMING
name something thats not complex then
That's exactly my point, you simple-minded peepo, simplicity really is outsourced complexity.
Forth, Lisp, Prolog, C (in a way)
you can make a simple but working compiler, look at tcc
lliterally anything you can think off can be made in a non bloated way
5m40
>I'm principally interested in UI developpement
>I mean I'm a fullstack developper, but my main focus is UI
holy shit it gets worse
turns out that by TYPE is in fact talking about front end framework COMPONENTS
>tcc
Fabrice Bellard also has written a toy javascript interpreter that is compliant with the ECMA spec.
If you're complaing about things like V8 complexity you should also be complaining about gcc, linux, glibc, GNU coreutils etc. The latter is many orders of magnitude more complex.
JS itself is also not a complex language. I wouldn't say it's any more complex than lisp.
90% of people who go
>javascript le bad
have no fucking idea what they're talking about or they have PTSD from having to write JS for a living.
>Fabrice Bellard also has written a toy javascript interpreter that is compliant with the ECMA spec.
Yes so?
>If you're complaing about things like V8 complexity you should also be complaining about gcc, linux, glibc, GNU coreutils etc.
True, and I do too.
you original comment
>name something thats not complex then
yes, you look at every software in use and they are complex but so what? the argument is that everything you can want to do software wise can be made with a much much simpler software. The existence of a ton of complex softwares is not a counter argument to this fact.
You're the one bringing up toy implementations as a testament to simplicity buddy.
Note that this has stopped being about the comparative complexity of JS and the web which was what you were complaining about.
Now your argument seems to have turned into
>all software is unnecessarily complex
Well yeah I don't care about arguing with that. You're free to go use minix or whatever.
>Note that this has stopped being about the comparative complexity of JS and the web which was what you were complaining about.
another anon
Talking to you is fucking pointless.
you said to name something not complex, I gave you 5 examples and now you're complaining about I don't know what, you have no point
3
The existence of 3 implies the existence of numbers which gets very complex very fast once enough autists get involved
PHP
So he's saying keep frameworks in fagman where thousands of devs are working on one website but using them in much smaller orgs is complicating shit for no reason. Nope, the entire industry will use react for personal sites.
React isn't a framework.
>Fortran is not even in use anymore
this guy is breaking every record
9m20
>reusability is a myth
>because you can't reuse UI buttons
we have a winner here
9m55
>most of these apps are very simple
>they're just made up of div-s
>don't give them a type though, everything can be a div
>var
>div
>index.html
let me guess you need more?
Activate windows
Got just the programming language for you king
I truly don't get the hate that types get. Maybe it's because I was born on C.
>I truly don't get the hate that types get.
Types are fine, but people can't agree on whether they are best put on values or variables.
variables, no question
also union type is your friend
Corporate dishonesty, Google, ignorance and JavaScript go together like a new fancy meal recipe, spices, a little bit of shit and a menu.
Most people love it, but after they find out that they are getting sick because of the food they are eating, then they start asking questions.
Yeah they start asking questions like "why is my wifi making me sick?"