>Historical figure dies without a known love companion. >Historians assume he was gay

>Historical figure dies without a known love companion
>Historians assume he was gay

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    name 3 times when this happened

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Frederick the great, james buchanan, james I

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Frederick was most likely homo. The rumors about his preference for handsome soldiers was already around when he was a young prince.

        • 3 months ago
          AVE TARZANVS AZELON

          >doesn't want chuds to be responsible for representing and defending his realm
          >gets labeled gay
          you just proved OP's case, and revealed yourself as a tranny kike.
          big F

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Buchanan was just asexual and died a virgin, James I was bisexual, and Frederick the great was 100% a homosexual who fucked men

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Frederick the great was 100% a homosexual who fucked men
          Actually he was a bottom, known for selecting his favorite lieutenants to fuck him in the asshole. He was the effeminate type of gay.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            He was a top. If he was a bottom he would not won glory on the battlefield.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        You know that James I was married and had a son...right?
        Ever heard of Charles I...?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        James buchanan had a live in male partner and was referred to as "Aunt Nancy" by congress.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        James 1 had kids. Frederick fucked soldiers. James B. had a "partner"

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      me in a few years

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Alexander the Great, his childhood friend and practically a brother died and he mourned for him and everyone said that they were gay even though Alexander had son and queen

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes and Medieval people usually attributed it to a secret oath of celibacy. It's just people projecting, and it always has been.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Normies being incapable of even understand the idea of not being obsessed with SEXO SEXO SEXO
      a tale as old as time

      • 3 months ago
        [email protected]

        as someone whos had sex at 300% of any rate ull ever have and having been descended in straight yline succession of similar for 3 straight millenia i can assuredly reassert to you that we are not the same, sow

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >muh historians
      People in the past just assumed someone was a fag if they were unmarried. It's still like that today in some cultures.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everything Dover talks about

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Historical figures are described as fucking each other in the ass
    >historians say they were just friends

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Historical figure is recorded as maintaining a female harem and fathering at least 25 sons and 6 daughters but is described as "loving" a male figure in his personal following
    >Historians assume he was gay

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Historical figure has friends of the same sex they care about
    >Historians declare they can only be gay. No other options exist

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *