I have seen a leprechaun and know them to be real. There is also extensive historical documentation on leprechauns. Apparently leprechauns are responsible for rainbows and I'm sure you've seen a rainbow. How can you deny the evidence right before your eyes?
>Are you agnostic to leprechauns
Yes. I don't believe they exist, but I can't disprove their existence. If pressed in a debate with someone who genuinely believed in leprechauns I would admit as much, while still arguing that it's a silly thing to believe in.
Of course the real reason I say I'm agnostic rather than atheist is to make sure i'm lumped in with the cynical crypto-catholics instead of the fedora tippers. Really it's a purely connotative distinction; the overwhelming majority of atheists/agnostics both don't believe in a god and recognize that they can't disprove the existence of a god.
I mean that I'm closer to the anti-religion crowd than more conciliatory agnostics.
Personally I am not anti-religion but I am more cynical about religion in practice and about Abrahamic faiths.
I study the Bible in my free time and find it quite interesting, and not in a "quote mine the Bible to own the christ-tards" kind of way.
>Are you agnostic to leprechauns?
No.
>If not, why not?
Because there's no evidence for leprechauns.
>Because there's no evidence for leprechauns.
Is eyewitness testimony not evidence?
It depends. When it comes to things like this, generally it's not, or at most it would be very weak evidence.
>no evidence of leprechauns
>what are Irish people
The absolute state of /his
I have seen a leprechaun and know them to be real. There is also extensive historical documentation on leprechauns. Apparently leprechauns are responsible for rainbows and I'm sure you've seen a rainbow. How can you deny the evidence right before your eyes?
Yes. I am a platonist.
>Are you agnostic to leprechauns
Yes. I don't believe they exist, but I can't disprove their existence. If pressed in a debate with someone who genuinely believed in leprechauns I would admit as much, while still arguing that it's a silly thing to believe in.
Of course the real reason I say I'm agnostic rather than atheist is to make sure i'm lumped in with the cynical crypto-catholics instead of the fedora tippers. Really it's a purely connotative distinction; the overwhelming majority of atheists/agnostics both don't believe in a god and recognize that they can't disprove the existence of a god.
I go by an atheist instead of agnostic for the exact opposite reason lol. totally agree.
>the exact opposite reason
you want to proudly wave your fedora while “owning” religious people?
Yes
wearing a funny hat > pedophilia
I mean that I'm closer to the anti-religion crowd than more conciliatory agnostics.
Personally I am not anti-religion but I am more cynical about religion in practice and about Abrahamic faiths.
I study the Bible in my free time and find it quite interesting, and not in a "quote mine the Bible to own the christ-tards" kind of way.
No, because everyone knows they're real.
Leprechauns are more real than yahweh or his imaginary son.
Yes
Better ask atheists
This is a racist stereo-type or characture, I am offended.
A leprechaun fucked my girlfriend