he's slowly starting to build things that work

he's slowly starting to build things that work

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning sir. Upload more core java tutorial.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      good morning sers

      > as-salamu alaykum
      doesn't sound pajeet to me

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        pakis and banglas are honorary pajeets

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Bengalis are Indian but not Muslim. Muslims in India are rape babies or converted homosexuals, fake Muslims

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Bangalas are Muslims. All Bangladeshis are Bengalis, but not all Bengalis are Bangladeshis.

            Its like all garden gnomes are White. But not all White are garden gnomes.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >all garden gnomes are White
              that's horrendously wrong.
              1. only ashkenazis can pass as whites
              2. they don't consider themselves white
              3. most garden gnomes are MENA shitskins

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >whitoid cope
                you vill be replaced

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                maybe, but one whites are low enough in numbers, humanity collapses back to stone age and survival of the fittest.
                guess what happens after that?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >garden gnomes
              >white

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >all garden gnomes are White
              Only about 49% of garden gnomes have white skin (and those Ashkenazi garden gnomes still have tons of Mediterranean and Middle Eastern admixture). The rest are predominantly Middle Eastern and brown (Sephardic and Mizrahi), with an extremely small black segment (who also have significant Semitic admixture).

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    JS actually lets you use the keyword "let" as a variable, but also gives you undefined. Amazing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      undefined is the return value of console.log dumbass

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why would it return undefined and not the string you’re passing it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why would you think it would be necessary to return the same string that was passed in? Normally a function without a return value should return an error or undefined if it was successful

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I dunno in my very limited programming experience with Java, system.out.println(x) returns the string you pass it so I figured this would be similar

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              no it doesnt

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the absolute state of LULZ

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [log in to view media]

        good morning sers

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      By Shiva, this is based

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      either actual retard or sophisticated bait

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      10/10 shitpost.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >let =
    please tell me javashit doesnt let you do that

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah i was surprised too but it does apparently.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >let =
        please tell me javashit doesnt let you do that

        confirmed the indian kid knows more than LULZ about programming

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah i was surprised too but it does apparently.

      let let = "let";
      var let = "let";
      const let = "neet";

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        brain = "let"

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        let let = function(let) { return let; };
        var let = let(let);

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      What the actual fuck lmao

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Let was added later on, so making it a restricted keyword regardless of context would be a breaking change.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [log in to view media]

          virgin JavaScript devs walking on eggshells because some fucking moron in some ancient code used the word let as a variable

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, it's just more funny this way.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know anything about JS but seeing as is was inspired by Lisp, and Lisp allows redefining built-in symbols, I'm not surprised this is valid

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [log in to view media]

        This kid is a JS guru bestowing enlightenment upon undeserving western Hylics

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      'use strict'
      now it doesn't :^)

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how dose it feel to know that in 10 years he'll be earning six figures at a FAGMAN, while you'll be broke from medical bills treating your morbid obesity and diabetes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >while you'll be broke from medical bills
      I don't live in a 3rd world shit hole called america, so this won't happen to me lmao

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    let var = let;

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    who? post link

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >who?
      the king

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is it more worth spending time on than LULZ shitposting?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that's peak shitposting

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >JavaScript
        >Java

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HELLO FRIENDS
    ASSALAM ALAIKUM

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sirs please do the needful

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The pennies he earns in ad revenue surely aren't paying for the electricity his computer uses, so can anyone explain why he's doing this?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He literally thinks "writing code" = programming. He doesn't understand what programming is.

      guys is this guy a new microcelebrity on LULZ ?
      I am out of the loop. Someone please explain

      Schizo Pakistani teenager who makes 5 hour long "programming tutorials" that's just him writing CSS attributes and mumbling.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I thought he was just hella autistic and playing with his IDE, was almost excited to see that he was actually starting to learn how to write proper python scripts. But today he did the real needful and shilled a "crypto miner" .exe so maybe he was just trying to build up a bullshit channel to get some malware out there.

      Typical little script kiddie jeet piece of shit, lmfao

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That still doesnt make sense because if that was his objective he couldve made bullshit but functional code tutorials or at least not several hours long ones filled with mumbling
        I dont think any of us know what his real end goal is, tiny pajeet is just way too far above our level

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >if that was his objective he couldve made bullshit but functional code tutorials or at least not several hours long ones filled with mumbling
          He wants to be sure his audience is retarded enough to download and run his crypto miner.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    guys is this guy a new microcelebrity on LULZ ?
    I am out of the loop. Someone please explain

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    Be good morning to you sirs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ngl the pajeet on the hero lowkey bussin with that business casual biker drip

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Learn FICO
      what does that even mean? are they scamming other jeets into learning how the FICO system is? Or how to game it with fake calculations?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not posting the real version

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ??

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is it really like that? you can just declare variables in js without specifying the type?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's called implicit typing. It's the opposite of manifest typing, in which you have to specify the type.
      Related concepts are dynamic typing, in which the only the runtime -- not the compiler, if any -- knows the type, and static typing, in which the compiler knows the type (and, in some cases, the runtime doesn't).
      LULZ usually confuses implicit typing with dynamic typing, and manifest typing with static typing.
      Other related concepts are weak and strong typing. Weak typing is when types are advisory and easily changed with implicit semantics. Static weak typing is usually weak mostly via bitwise reinterpretation, whereas dynamic weak typing is usually weak mostly via duck-typing and implicit conversion. Strong typing is when types are mandatory, and available features for type conversion are mostly explicit.
      LULZ mostly does not understand the difference between implicit, dynamic, and weak typing, nor the difference between manifest, static, and strong typing.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    >let =
    >string = 5+4

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    best programmer wins again, how can LULZ compete?

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    aww, our little poojeet is growing up so fast

Your email address will not be published.