here's a CRT doing 4k

here's a CRT doing 4k
whats the excuse now, LCD cucks?

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    nice dead pixels homosexual hahahahaha

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not OP.

      But it's my picture.

      Yes it's a 2003 $800 CCD, the dead pixels add soul

      >2880x2160
      You're nearly 1000 columns short of 4K
      >interlaced
      You're also only displaying half the pixels at a time

      Also that text looks horrendous, looks like the monitor cannot cope with displaying such fine detail despite taking the signal you're force-feeding into it.

      It's interlaced only because I don't have a DAC capable of 550mhz. This monitor can sync to proper 2160p60hz, but interalced 84hz doesn't flicker so it's better anyway.
      >You're also only displaying half the pixels at a time
      Doesn't really matter, you see it in full fidelity. You can call it 42hz if that makes you feel better.

      As for the seething about quality, it's a 20" monitor from 2002, give it some slack holy crap, though fuck you OP for making this thread.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Pointing out an extremely obvious flaw is "seething?" How butthurt are you?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          The picture doesn't do it favors, but it still looks much better than I could have imagined. Cramming 4k to a CRT and tiny bitmap fonts are still perfectly legibile? That's crazy.
          Complaining it's not as sharp as your LCD is like calling Cirno dumb, no shit Shiki!

          >I'm not OP.
          Funny it didn't show a fresh IP in the thread when you posted that.

          I have a (6) on my screen on my post. I know I can't expect any benefit of the doubt here, why would I post this? OP is a massive baka

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm not OP.
        Funny it didn't show a fresh IP in the thread when you posted that.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the dead pixels add soul
        >the dead pixels add soul
        >THE DEAD PIXELS ADD SOUL

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          CRTs don't have pixels you retarded zoomer homosexual

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >the dead pixels are these to add soul
            >CRTs don't have dead pixels idiot
            Pick one

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              I pick the 2nd one since CRTs don't have pixels you retarded zoomer homosexual

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are CRTards always coping about LCDs? You don't see LCD/OLED fags starting these threads.
    Why can't they just enjoy their tech without having to seek confrontation?

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >2880x2160
    You're nearly 1000 columns short of 4K
    >interlaced
    You're also only displaying half the pixels at a time

    Also that text looks horrendous, looks like the monitor cannot cope with displaying such fine detail despite taking the signal you're force-feeding into it.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You're also only displaying half the pixels at a time
      are you claiming you can see the individual interlacing fields? wow, whats next? that you can hear above 25kHz?

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like shit

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >i'm not here to shitpost, just to talk about crts 🙂
    >*constantly shitposts and stirs up shit*

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nice blurry image, homosexual. Enjoy your cancer, cancer.

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >CRTs are superior

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    delusional biased crt posters are the best entertainment
    they post like they get paid for it and their posts are just as dumb as what marketing people spew out

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Here's your CRT bro

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >4k analog vaseline
    no thanks brah

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can you even read the text at all?

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    It is blurry and flickering shit. CRT-fags never bothered with 2048x1536 on their high-end 22" units. They went with 1600x1200 to take advantage of 85-100hz refresh rate. They even went with 1280x960 to get simply get 120hz (Provided that their video card could handle it)

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >flickering
      (And that's a good thing)

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine a world where, in the modern day, one of those beasts was the typical display experience. imagine that the highest end tubes had 250khz refresh rates and could reach 6400x4800 resolution. we got fucked hard.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      what's the best crt ever made?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        depends who you ask. there's a few contenders commonly mentioned, each of which has its own benefits:
        >iiyama vmp 514
        >sony gdm-f520
        >nec rdf225wg
        and probably lots of others i can't remember off the top of my head

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Eizo F931 and T965

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you do that, best CRT resolution is none for office work and movies and 1024x768 for gaming.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why though, the higher resolution just eats up fps.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          I have a decent computer, not an issue.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >runs literally decade old games
            oh nevermind, it is a toaster

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              I play new games too (lower res since it's before i got a better tube)

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Protip: For games that support internal resolution scaling you can go lower res+high refresh and still get high res+high refresh like results

Your email address will not be published.