ATM used small packets and was intended for use on more reliable links. This let it have better latency because small packets means less data and less waiting and more reliable links means less retransmission on errors. But this means scaling it up for high bandwidth was costly and it was less tolerant of poor quality links. TCP/IP scaled better and worked where ATM wouldn't.
ATM is only "superior" because it solved a different problem. TCP/IP was the actual superior solution because it solved the problem we actually had. Not to mention it worked hand in glove with ethernet, the other "bad" standard that took the world by storm where the "good" one failed.
Absolutely. SCTP over IP was and continues to be better in every way. But people were too retarded to appreciate the advantages and switch to the superior protocol, so we're stuck with TCP and UDP forever.
>old protocols are doing just fine >Has TCP/IP outstayed its welcome?
honestly yes, i mean there's only 2 options? a bit reminiscent of the patriarchal gender theory of male and female right? so there at least needs to be a 5-protocol system implemented to replace it for the sake of progress
I couldn't tell you that you are a fucktarded homosexual without it
is that a plus or a minus?
obviously
No and I'm glad it's everywhere. No point in breaking everyone's software.
Yes. The future is UDP/IP.
we will never get a new protocol, it will be tcp and udp until the end of time
UDP is enough for anyone
Imagine how much better the world would be if ATM won.
If only.
I'm a retard, what is ATM and why is it better?
AT&T's competing protocol agaisnt Ciscos tcp/ip
> telephone lines work just well. direct link between two ends gives the most stable connection
Yes, we need Morse/Pidgeons.
It works on my machine and my other machine
ATM used small packets and was intended for use on more reliable links. This let it have better latency because small packets means less data and less waiting and more reliable links means less retransmission on errors. But this means scaling it up for high bandwidth was costly and it was less tolerant of poor quality links. TCP/IP scaled better and worked where ATM wouldn't.
ATM is only "superior" because it solved a different problem. TCP/IP was the actual superior solution because it solved the problem we actually had. Not to mention it worked hand in glove with ethernet, the other "bad" standard that took the world by storm where the "good" one failed.
No, but QUIC is better anyway.
Absolutely. SCTP over IP was and continues to be better in every way. But people were too retarded to appreciate the advantages and switch to the superior protocol, so we're stuck with TCP and UDP forever.
SCat TelePorter
whats better about SCTP?
https://http3-explained.haxx.se/en/why-quic/why-tcpudp
>old protocols are doing just fine
>Has TCP/IP outstayed its welcome?
honestly yes, i mean there's only 2 options? a bit reminiscent of the patriarchal gender theory of male and female right? so there at least needs to be a 5-protocol system implemented to replace it for the sake of progress
isn't FB just another blog