>Posts redpill retardation to "own" westerners
Why doesn't he take himself seriously?
>Harvard grad. >Posts redpill retardation to "own" westerners
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Look at him
From what I've watched of him, he seems to be some sort of doomer who knows he is fighting a losing battle against liberalism and is just trying to hang to hope for as long as he can.
Other Muslim apologist I've seen revel in glee at the sight of Christianity collapsing in front of them, thinking that this proves the strength of Islam over Christianity and that they will win out in the end, but Daniel seems to know that Islam is already crumbling from within, just at a slower pace because the Christian world industrialized before the Islamic world.
Yeah he reminds me of Kaczynski. More interested in the practical retaliation of western liberalism and a lot of his videos seemed to be propaganda styled (narrativization, straw manning, etc.)
I've never seen him have a good faith discussion with anyone that isn't in his circle
I saw his true character in his debate with Aron Ra in which he basically admitted that even if Islam was false he would still think it offers the best model for societal happiness, he was arguing for Islam for practical reasons, not necessarily the truth found in the religion.
So just like any number of Christian apologists? Neat
you think christian apologists don't believe in their religion?
Did I say that?
I don't know thats what I asked what you meant
No, I just meant he’s following a well worn tradition and that he should be viewed in the same way.
Of course he doesn't. He's probably a tranny atheist
yet he doesn't live in an islamic society. hmm
It's really jarring to see from my point of view. He puts up this facade of being a tough Muslim defender not giving an inch against any non Muslim, but then you go watch his discussions with other Muslims and he has this personality change in which he is really down to earth and admits "yeah, we're pretty much fucked".
Nothing unusual here. Muslims are duplicitous little shits, arguing entirely differently 99% of the times in front of Western audience vs a domestic audience.
Most muslim scholars are blissfully unaware of their impending doom
they're literally taking over your nations already and outbreeding you in your own homes because your "liberal" ideology promotes "diversity"
Their kids and their kids’ kids will be assimilated into the western liberal hive-mind. I’ve seen it happen with all immigrant groups (except maybe the israelites, but they get to control the narrative). This is inevitable.
there's a good possibility that an a population average IQ above a say 95 or 90 is needed in order to sustain liberal democracy.
muslims might be able to protect themselves from liberalism through their countries' average IQs being so low that liberal propaganda isn't able to penetrate and gain enough marketshare of the society to take over.
Like how they attempted to spread liberalism in the middle east in the 60s and it only managed to get even slight subscription among a few very wealthy , cosmopolitan elites with high (for muslims) IQ, but there wasn't enough adoption of liberalism within the general population so it did not reach critical mass and was not self sustaining and the muslim world went back to being illiberal after the push in the 60s ran out of steam.
So muslims may be ok on that front.
Also , you can keep the corrosive effects of liberalism at bay by keeping your population under a sense of threat , like in Israel or china. Liberalism might collapse significantly in western countries themselves if there is total war in the future. That outcome relies on china being able to win.
traditionalists need to hope that china wins and becomes the dominant global power. since the chinese only require economic and geopolitical submission, not spiritual submission like the globohomo american-lead west does.
an IQ between 90 and 110 is required to sustain "liberal democracy" because it's the ideology of midwits who unquestioningly obey authority. you need them to be smart enough to think they're above an underclass of workers who you've painted as their political opposition, but not smart enough to realize--rather, not smart enough to break the chains of cognitive dissonance that you've bound them with--that the overclass who actually design and control society (including the elections in their "democracy") absolutely do not have their best interests in mind.
>muslims might be able to protect themselves from liberalism through their countries' average IQs being so low that liberal propaganda isn't able to penetrate and gain enough marketshare of the society to take over.
Propaganda comes in many forms. Sure, a low IQ may not care about individualism or tolerance, but they're as vulnerable, if not more so, to go along with things like casual sex culture and consumerism. If they cant appeal to reason, they'll go for emotion.
why does he look white?
Stop posting this khariji kafir on here. He needs to submit to the 'ulama and not CRITICIZEEE THE ROOOOLEEEERSS OF THE 'UMMAHHHH. HE IS A KAFIRRRRR
>so I heard you like Deobandis...
What's the problem anon? Adhering to the fiqh of Abu Hanifa (as) is the best one can do.
>The websites that speak ill of the religion of Allah and of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) are no different from the gatherings where people say similar things that constitute kufr. In both cases it is haraam to stay in such gatherings and it is haraam to visit such websites, except for one who will object to what they do and is able to put a stop to these offences. If he is not able to do that, and those people carry on with what they are doing, then it is not permissible to remain in that gathering and it is not permissible to visit those websites.
salafi site, stop taqliding MIAW and al-Albani and other people of the last 2 centuries and instead adhere to the traditional madhabs.
>help, I'm being oppressed by the authoritarian western government because they don't let me execute the gays
This guy is a walking caricature.
t. Pod living bug eater
>Not wanting to execute whores and gay people
is that supposed to mean something? besides some israelite gave him a fake diploma for being a good little goy? none of that shit represents any actual knowledge or skills.
he's live debating with christian viewers. you can join in and ask him yourself
He's btfoing christians rn on livestream kek
Fuck off Daniel, nobody gives a shit about your stream. Stop shilling it here.
Haqiqatjou (y’imakh shemo) attempting to portray Christians as polytheists w/ Jake (y’imakh shemo) is laughable since they’re Sunnis who believe in actual distinctions between the attributes of god. Jake’s debate with Khalil Andani where he legitimately said god had hands is a perfect example of this hypocrisy.
Yes he is laughable, I am not supporting him, but Jake’s arguments in the debate were ridiculous.
why he think some guy talked to an angel in a cave 1500 years ago?
His videos are actually pretty good