Good Spanish Civil War docs?


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

I feel like there's barely any media on the SCW and if there is its just lightly touched on. Is there any good documentaries I can watch about it?

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5eh47a
    First film to record warfare in original colour

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Docs are biased, read books

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Paul Preston ones

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >paul preston
        >unbiased
        lmaooooooooo what a shit attempt at sophistry

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stanley G. Payne*

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is the only document you need to read:
      https://lxoa.wordpress.com/2011/06/11/joint-letter-of-the-spanish-bishops-to-the-bishops-of-the-whole-world-concerning-the-war-in-spain-july-1st-1937/

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Checked
        Ty anon, very interesting

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      You only call it biased because it doesn't agree with your rightoid worldview

      Just remember that Franco preferred to cave in and accept democracy (a system he had no faith in) than to let rightoids be in charge

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        When did Franco accept democracy? As far as Im aware he appointed Carrero Blanco as his head of government and Juan Carlos as head of state. Did I miss the part where he called for elections?
        You wouldnt be lying in order to further your idiotic ideology now would you...?

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous
          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            ?
            Is this your concession? If so I graciously accept.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      dont be a homosexual anon. Recommend some.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >implying books can't have their own biases

      Anon, please stop.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >read books
      like For Whom The Bell Tolls? from literal Soviet spy Ernest Hemingway?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >soviet spy
        What

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        No. Mine Were of Trouble by Peter Kemp, silly

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Read
          >Stanley G. Payne - The Collapse of the Spanish Republic, 1933-1936
          >E.R. Hooton - Spain in Arms: A Military History of the Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939
          >
          >George Orwell - Homage to Catalonia

          tl;dr The republicans were malicious, incompetent fucks and had it coming

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Are you that book account on twitter?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Docs are made by people, so are books
      Books can be just as biased as docs

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    do you speak spanish?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, but I’m fine if it’s subtitled

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    This series

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      There was a good doc on YouTube, it was made by English so it's a bit pro republican.

      This anon already posted it

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      It was pretty good. But you could tell the Republican bias

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://odysee.com/@LoveLifeAnarchy:d/TheCaseAgainstBreadtube:2

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Looks great, is there a place where I can watch it? I can’t find anything

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.tokyvideo.com/es/video/espana-en-dos-trincheras-la-guerra-civil-en-color-2016

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nice, is there any subtitles around? Good footage regardless

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >give all your gold to the soviets
    >Lose anyway
    >Franco still manages to somehow keep the nation together and prosper
    >Cuck king gives control over to the republic again
    >Become a poor backwater nation again (everytime the republic is in power for some reason)
    >Never return to prosperity of Franco era

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      but don't call them EuroMexico. they hate that

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      how prosperous was the Franco era? You can't just say it was. How did it fare compare to everyoen else?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        [...]

        >Verification not required

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Now compare with BRICS

          And post some documentaries about the spanish civil war

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            It was the 8th world economy growing at the 2nd fastest pace behind Japan.
            All without a single dollar in foreign aid, unlike western Europe.
            I compared it to other developed EU countries such as Italy and France because comparing it to BRICS makes no sense, theyre not even in the same league.
            If you want a docu with real war recordings in colour I recommend

            https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5eh47a
            First film to record warfare in original colour

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              Treaty of Madrid (1953)

              The Treaty of Madrid or 'Pact of Madrid' was signed in 1953 by Francisco Franco and US President Dwight Eisenhower. For Spain, the Treaty meant the end of years of diplomatic isolation following the Second World War. Spain had previously been excluded from the United Nations and unable to receive Marshall Aid due to Francisco Franco's close relationship with the Axis Powers during WW2. The Treaty granted Spain more than $1 billion worth of US loans and investment in return for allowing the US to set up military basis on Spanish territory. In 1955, Spain was admitted into the United Nations thanks to US support.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >in return for
                So not like the marshall plan at all? You really thought you did something lmao
                Not to mention, youre just furthering my point of how spectacular the "Spanish Miracle" was, considering they endured a decade of commercial blockades by the NATO folks.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pues vale

                Para ti la perra gorda

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lo que has posteado no tiene asemejanza alguna con el plan Marshall. Siguiendo esa misma logica, un tratado comercial tambien es igual que el plan Marshall.
                Eso ya sin contar que ese acuerdo le dio a España 1/3 parte de lo que recibieron RRUU y Francia con el Marshall.
                No es un cuestion de opiniones, es que lo que has puesto no es relevante, en absoluto.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Si dices "All without a single dollar in foreign aid, unlike western Europe" yo entiendo que quieres decir "without a single dollar in foreign aid". Si te refieres EXCLUSIVAMENTE al plan Marshall yo no digo nada.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pero vamos a ver, que en el tratado que has puesto no trata en ningun momento el "foreign aid". El dinero que se le da a España es a cambio de poder usar unas tierras y unas instalaciones para las bases americanas (el uso de las cuales tenian que pagar al no ser España un pais OTAN)
                Si para ti esto es foreign aid creo que deberias de volver a leerte el significado del mismo. Si la definicion fuera tan amplia como pretendes insinuar entonces hasta un tratado comercial seria foreign aid.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                stfu spic.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Such a disgusting fucking language, actually so gross to listen to. Spics are fucking abominable.

                Pathetic attempts at insults lmao I can tell youre not European the IQ gap is painfully evident.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Who? We here on Sunday histories.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Such a disgusting fucking language, actually so gross to listen to. Spics are fucking abominable.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >So not like the marshall plan at all?
                ??? the marshall plan wasn't for free either lmao

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the marshall plan wasn't for free either
                It was literally for free. It consisted in a series of loans that they never had to repay. How else would you define it?

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                dumb

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          [...]

          bruh you were coming out of a civil war, of course there's gonna be rebuilding, more jobs available, higher salaries and less migration

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >coming out of civil war
            >1960-1975
            >still outperforming EU nations without marshall plan
            What a weak reply

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >coming out of civil war
            >1960-1975
            >still outperforming EU nations without marshall plan
            What a weak reply

            And also, coming out of a civil war doesn't intrinsically mean the country will do better economically. What a moronic argument. If that were the case late 19th century Spain would have industrialized and become a 1st world country. Which it obviously didn't.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Thread about Spain
    >Complain that people are speaking in Spanish
    Just use fucking deepl if you want to read what they're saying

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Theyre assblasted non-Europeans (mostly south americans and nafris) that migrate from /int/ to show off their inferiority complex. Any mention of Spain sends them into an uncontrollable frenzy of shitposting and insults. Very sad.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        seeth. Its just funny calling rapeberians spics. Don't take it personally homosexual. You support the guy that let women get rapped by Moroccan muslims.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Im sure all the other mouthbreathers on /int/ find it hilarious. You can go back now.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Source?
          And as opposed to the other side that were..raping and killing women/nuns?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            First time in LULZ?

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              Eh, I don’t come here ever if at all

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            see

            Theyre assblasted non-Europeans (mostly south americans and nafris) that migrate from /int/ to show off their inferiority complex. Any mention of Spain sends them into an uncontrollable frenzy of shitposting and insults. Very sad.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            "Moroccan troops were granted the right to loot and pillage. From Seville Union Radio, Franco’s General Queipo de Llano promised that the ‘castrated’ Republican soldiers’ women would soon know about the ‘virility’ of those Moroccan troops."

            Im sure all the other mouthbreathers on /int/ find it hilarious. You can go back now.

            I do. And will continue too do so. Enjoy 20+% of unemployment.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Seville Union Radio
              so a communist radio says that the enemy will mistreat people after their side has already done so
              and you take that as a reliable source?
              some wignat you are taking commy propaganda as gospel

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                You dense motherfucker

                Queipo de Llano, him, in person, say it in the radio after taking the city.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                "Moroccan troops were granted the right to loot and pillage. From Seville Union Radio, Franco’s General Queipo de Llano promised that the ‘castrated’ Republican soldiers’ women would soon know about the ‘virility’ of those Moroccan troops."

                [...]
                I do. And will continue too do so. Enjoy 20+% of unemployment.

                >other side that were..raping and killing women/nuns?
                Extremely localized to the most radical areas or places with lack of police force. By and large republican areas were more peaceful and rape free than nationalist zones. you can try to make an equivalence but it was literally policy for the nationalist to kill and hurt as many people as possible.

                As far as I can remember, it wasnt the nationalists who had prison/torture/death camps for civilians before the war started...
                Quiepo de llano was using fear tactics, he has numerous messages that are comical in how crazy he sounds. This was intended to cause fear. Every single war has had these occurrences, if you believe them at face value you either want to believe them for some ulterior motive or are, simply put, stupid.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >prison/torture/death camps for civilians before the war started...

                Explain

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Google "las chekas"

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >chekas
                Before the war? Are you sure?

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Actually no youre right I was under the impression that some had begun weeks before the war broke out, but it seems the first ones popped up just a few days after the fact.
                The point still stands, the republican repression of civilians began before the nationalist equivalent.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The point still stands, the republican repression of civilians began before the nationalist equivalent.
                Thus the nationalist repression of civilians continued a long time after the end of the war. That's THE, so much important, point. Don't justify a dictadure because of your philias.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >This was intended to cause fear.
                Except we have first hand accounts of rapes where Quiepo de llano operated. So this is a little more than just "fear tactics". The lack of sources is mainly bc rape is hardly ever discussed and especially in a time where the sid3e who did it won and reigned with an iron fist for 30+ years.
                >the republican repression of civilians began before the nationalist equivalent.
                Isolated to the most radical areas and only for a couple months. vs the nationalist who consistently across every where they operated committed crime against anyone they deemed "reds"

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao, why do communists try so hard with the historical revisionism? You guys were calling everyone fascist while burning down businesses and churches like you do now

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                why does your mom love sucking my dick?

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >theres rapes in war
                >therefore there are mass rapes during the same war
                You just made a massive jump in logic and provided no evidence for it. And don't bring the censorship excuse, the war lasted 3 years. If there had been mass rapes the republican papers could have reported on it and brought hundreds of witnesses. They didn't because everyone at the time knew it didn't happen.
                Were there rapes? Yes. Was there a coordinated campaign from the top-down to commit these rapes? Absolutely not.
                On the other side you have republican government officials sending ordinary citizens to chekas to be raped and killed, with documents to prove it.

                >The point still stands, the republican repression of civilians began before the nationalist equivalent.
                Thus the nationalist repression of civilians continued a long time after the end of the war. That's THE, so much important, point. Don't justify a dictadure because of your philias.

                The side who won killed the side that lost? Woah my guy, you really just discovered the wheel on that one. Try googling what happened to the Germans living in the baltics and the netherlands after WW2.
                Even with that, Franco was much more merciful than anyone else in his position would have been. He gave the war captives the chance to reduce their sentences with public works programs, while being paid for it in order to provide for their families, released a good chunk of them, and then granted all crimes committed before march 31st 1939 amnesty.
                It sounds like you're the only one with "philias", since your mind can't process the idea that dictatorships aren't inherently better or worse than any other form of government. In fact, Franco's rule was objectively the best period for the average spanish citizen since the 16th century golden age. Much better than any of the "democratic" periods that preceded and succeeded it.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Franco's rule was objectively the best period for the average spanish citizen since the 16th century golden age. Much better than any of the "democratic" periods that preceded and succeeded it.
                >It sounds like you're the only one with "philias"

                Le dijo la sartén al cazo.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                [...]
                >Verification not required

                [...]

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Si el que ha hablado de filias ha sido el otro anon. No das una en este hilo, ¿eh? La costumbre en estos foros para un novato es observar primero, y postear despues de haber aprendido lo basico sobre su funcionamiento y su "cultura". Si no lo haces, acabas pareciendo un turista. Te aconsejo que te pases unos cuantos meses sin postear para evitar este tipo de situaciones.
                Por cierto, lo que he dicho es cierto en todos los sentidos. Analizalo como quieras, sigo teniendo razon. La verdad es un muro de roca, por mas cabezazos que te pegues contra ella no vas a cambiarla.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Llevo años por aquí, leyendo. Y viendo que sois unos flipados. Ese fetichismo por los malotes es malsano. Y no lo entiendo, la verdad.

                Los datos están ahí, no todos porque vas a usar las fuentes que te interesen y obviar lo que contradiga tu punto de vista, y lo entiendo. Y según tu punto de vista tienes razón, que tus pedos no te huelen mal, vamos.

                No voy a seguir porque te veo muy creido, y lo eres. O eres un chavalín en la edad del pavo, o un veintañero que se piensa que lo sabe todo. O peor, tienes una edad y te has convertido en un tio lleno de certezas.

                ¡Ale sigue poniéndosela dura, con tus datos, a los flipados de LULZ! ¡Has ganado!

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >¡si no estas de acuerdo conmigo es que eres malvado o un perdedor!
                Argumento rotundo. Por cierto, hablas de datos, pero no has subido uno. Ni uno. Venga, vuelvete calentito a reddit y les cuentas lo horribles que somos aqui en LULZ. Que no vengan mas porque somos muy muy malos.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                dios mio...el espaciado de reddit...

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                meds

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >theres rapes in war
                >therefore there are mass rapes during the same war
                Did I put a number retard? can you point to where I said "mass rapes"? I said there were rapes, first hand accounts of it, in the areas where Quiepo de llano> The general who led moorish troops and said they would show republican women their virility. I'm contending the fact that you think it was all rhetoric too scare people.

                >Was there a coordinated campaign from the top-down to commit these rapes? Absolutely not.
                >Says moors can rape women
                >led moors
                >women get raped
                >not coordinated from top down
                ok bud.
                >If there had been mass rapes the republican papers could have reported on it and brought hundreds of witnesses. They didn't because everyone at the time knew it didn't happen.
                Were there rapes?

                Its literally a huge part of republican propaganda. So yes they defiantly did get these reports from somewhere.

                >On the other side you have republican government officials sending ordinary citizens to chekas to be raped and killed, with documents to prove it.
                Source and numbers. The nationalist consistently killed more people every where they operated for years than the republicans. Not even comparable.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >nationalist consistently killed more people every where they operated for years than the republicans.
                because they were successful

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Im not talking about just the casualties of conquest/heat of battle anger. But literally behind the lines. Per capita, more people. You would think the republicans, as their loosing would erratically kill everyone they accuse of being "facist"

                Also being more successful dosent mean more civilian casualty. The allies were incredibly successful on the western front and didn't compare to the death and destruction the germans/soviets did too civilians when they were winning.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                behind the lines they were more successful too, homosexual

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Bro every executed prisoner was a soviet spy!
                Retard kys.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, there were regular criminals too

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Did I put a number retard?
                So you're argument has been to reduced to there were SOME rapes committed during the war by nationalist troops? Wew lad. I accept your concession then, I guess.
                >in the areas where Quiepo de llano> The general who led moorish troops
                The moroccan guard was part of the ejercito de africa, not the ejercito del sur. You might want to check your basic facts, it would help you avoid these embarrassing situations where you're proven to not know what you're talking about. So your link between Queipo de Llano and the moroccan troops is non-existant, much like you're argument.
                >>Was there a coordinated campaign from the top-down to commit these rapes? Absolutely not.
                >>Says moors can rape women
                >>led moors
                get raped
                Except, again, he had no moors under his command. How could he give orders of rape to troops he did not even lead?

                So, essentially what you have is a lone commander, giving inflamatory speeches over the radio, promising threats that he couldn't physically go through with, as your only argument? Wew lad. If anything, the moroccan troops were the least likely to commit any sort of rape, considering they were personally led by Franco, who throughout the war was the cleanest General in terms of civilian casualties.

                Im not talking about just the casualties of conquest/heat of battle anger. But literally behind the lines. Per capita, more people. You would think the republicans, as their loosing would erratically kill everyone they accuse of being "facist"

                Also being more successful dosent mean more civilian casualty. The allies were incredibly successful on the western front and didn't compare to the death and destruction the germans/soviets did too civilians when they were winning.

                >Source and numbers
                The republic in its brief existence sentenced to death 50,000 civilians, including over 5,000 members of clergy. In just 8 years. Franco's entire regime is estimated to have killed around 120,000 people. In 39 years. Since you love your "per capita" so much, work that one out will you.
                source (i actually picked a leftist paper, just to skew the numbers in your favour): https://diario16.com/guerra-civil-espanola-el-enigma-sin-resolver-sobre-el-numero-de-muertos/
                And I'm not even taking into account all the killings done by rogue actors such as Companys, that, with the consent of the republican government, killed almost another 10,000 people in Cataluña. Many like picrel.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >he had no moors under his command.

                He did retard his army was reinforced by the army of Africa by his own admission. Servulle was located in southern spain. Which was literally where the army of africa was concentrated in early in the war. He did not say moors could rape as much as they wanted for nothing.
                >So you're argument has been to reduced to there were SOME rapes
                >BRO YOU DONT HAVE THE EXATC NUMBER SO JUST TRUST ME THE GUY WHO ALLOWED RAPES TO HAPPEN WAS JOKING.
                >Franco's entire regime is estimated to have killed around 120,000 people.

                95% of which was during the war. IDK why your skewing it by including francos entire regime. When you dick suck him hard by saying he was extremely merciful after the war. This is a dishonest argument. Considering all republican deaths happened in the first 4 months while nationalist consistently killed people throughout the war. Retard logic i know you probs study in some shitty franoist propped uni no ones heard of. But it barley passes as education even in this board.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >He did retard his army was reinforced by the army of Africa by his own admission.
                Army of africa =/= moroccans. You're making an ass out of yourself. The moroccan guard was under direct command of Franco.
                >He did not say moors could rape as much as they wanted for nothing.
                He did it as fear propaganda. He has other message where he says that national troops are bests that walk on all fours and that drink the blood of their enemies. I suppose you also believe this to be an accurate description of their tactics, rigjt?
                >>BRO YOU DONT HAVE THE EXATC NUMBER SO JUST TRUST ME THE GUY WHO ALLOWED RAPES TO HAPPEN WAS JOKING.
                I just asked you to provide numbers. I never denied that rapes occurred, just that there was no organized, top-down campaign to encourage rapes. You still haven't provided a single point of evidence to contradict me.
                >95% of which was during the war.
                Flat out wrong. Most of the 120,000 executions occurred after the war, namely of communists and anarchists that had committed crimes "of blood" during the war.
                >Considering all republican deaths happened in the first 4 months
                Prove it. Companys and the chekas in Madrid operated until the end of the war. Seems like you're just making shit up at this point.
                >Retard logic i know you probs study in some shitty franoist propped uni no ones heard of. But it barley passes as education even in this board.
                Pottery. Don't need to add much else. You sound like you're underage tbh. I recommend that you read Stanley Payne or Pio Moa, like other anons have recommended. That way you'll avoid such an embarrassment in future threads.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                A great example of why one shouldn't phone post. I think my point got across though.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Army of africa =/= moroccans. You're making an ass out of yourself. The moroccan guard was under direct command of Franco.
                Not all morrocan regulares were royal guards. The regulares were part of the army of africa retard. Not all of them fight just under Franco. I know you want to act like no Moroccans fought for a guy who said rapes are allowed by Moroccan Muslims. But now your just dishonest.
                >You still haven't provided a single point of evidence to contradict me.
                >general says rapes are allowed.
                >Led armies and was reinforced by morrocan soldiers.
                >Rapes recorded.
                >not top down.

                >chekas in Madrid
                >don't mention concentration camps in spain after the war.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Prove that moroccan regulares from the army of africa reinforced the ejercito del sur. I'm not aware of any such thing.
                >I know you want to act like no Moroccans fought for a guy who said rapes are allowed by Moroccan Muslims
                I don't act like anything. You keep making the same argument but still haven't posted a single shred of proof as to whether Queipo de Llano had a single moroccan under his command.
                >>Led armies and was reinforced by morrocan soldiers.
                Prove he was reinforced with moroccan soldiers.
                >>don't mention concentration camps in spain after the war.
                I literally did. I also mentioned how Franco executed 120,000 people during his rule, and how the ones who weren't executed were given reduced sentences, even amnesty. You're intentionally moving the goalposts, because any objective observer can tell that the republicans were by far the more brutal and oppressive faction when it came to civilians. Read Stanley Payne or Pio Moa.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm not aware of any such thing.
                Literally admitted he had some. Right from the horses mouth "MUH PROPOGANDA"

                We know regulares operated under other generals. Franco wasn't the only guy who had regulares. Do you seriously believe that? It logically follows that the man who was in the area regularess operated under had some at his disposal. The guy admitted it himself. Retard moment.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I do
              Fair enough. No need further discussing anything then.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >other side that were..raping and killing women/nuns?
            Extremely localized to the most radical areas or places with lack of police force. By and large republican areas were more peaceful and rape free than nationalist zones. you can try to make an equivalence but it was literally policy for the nationalist to kill and hurt as many people as possible.

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Queipo de Llano was one particularly fucked up schizo but he doesn't represent the whole Nationalist forces. It's like reducing the Wehrmacht to Dirlwanger

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    And read Stanley Payne's books on the war

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    FRANCO
    CAUDILLO DE ESPAÑA POR LA GRACIA DE DIOS

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      EL HOMBRE QUE DIÓ SU VIDA POR EL PUEBLO

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      EL HOMBRE QUE DIÓ SU VIDA POR EL PUEBLO

      EL GENERAL DE LA ULTIMA SANTA CRUZADA DE OCCIDENTE

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Libs

  13. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me it's Franco

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *