>Germans have skulls on their caps
>omg they're evil
>Americans have skulls on their uniform
>...
Why the double standard?
>Germans have skulls on their caps. >omg they're evil. >Americans have skulls on their uniform. >...
>Germans have skulls on their caps
>omg they're evil
>Americans have skulls on their uniform
>...
Why the double standard?
The uniform is blue, it's not some all black or dark gray BDSM outfit.
Yeah, it looks like shit compared to german ones, true.
>Surely the beautiful glorious German uniforms will be widely adopted by dict-
Does the color really determine if an outfit is BDSM or not?
Doesn't help with the tall boots and so forth.
They were pretty common on uniforms of that era.
>and so forth
What else? Belts made out *gasp* leather i.e. the stuff that belts have been made for thousands of years?
Easy. The US military is also evil.
This. The US could have easily warbed Japan of its nuclear capabilities instead of killing hundreds of thousands of civilians
Alternatively, they could have dropped it on an uninhabited area as a warning shot. There was a forest near Tokyo that some officials proposed for that purpose. Instead, the military decided to drop it on civilian targets because they wanted to study its effects.
The Americans firebombed Tokyo to ashes and the Japs autistically refused to surrender. What's make you think they'd surrender just from seeing a nuclear explosion?
>just surrender bro
>it's what we would do
Americans are surrender monkies now?
They did ask to surrender, on the condition that they do not execute the Emperor.
America refused. Policy was 'unconditional surrender only', which is a war-crime per se.
The Japanese could also have surrendered and spared their civilians life’s-especially since they’d known for years they had an absolutely 0% chance of winning the war-that they’d started.
Would America surrender so easily if the situation was reversed?
Doesn't matter, this is called an Ad Hominem. It doesn't matter if the other team wouldn't do the right thing, it's still the right thing to do. It's irrelevant what Americans may have done in an impossible alternate situation. Anyway for all you know they absolutely would have done.
>Policy was 'unconditional surrender only', which is a war-crime per se.
Fucking cretin
two sides can be bad in wars (and usually are), it's ordinary Japanese people who suffered because of both their government's idiotic decision to start a war and America's reckless disregard for civilian life in finishing it
It's okay when my side does it. Seethe.
It's okay when pirates do it, or when 19th century people put deathheads on tombstones of civilians, but it's just too far when Germans get inspired by the deathhead Hussars.
Bonus points for when the Gott Mit Uns belt buckles get projected as some kind of religious fanaticism, despite it being popular among Swedes and Prussia for the past 300+ years.
>don't study history
>ask historical questions
>have 0 understanding
why the retardation?
>Have a skull on your uniform
>Be a regular soldier
vs
>Have a skull on your uniform
>Participate in mass murder
Which is which?
this guy looks 100% yamna
Thats a plastic doll you retarded homosexual and he look 100 % sissy homosexualoid
>muh yamna
Another retarded larper who know nothing about the yamnaya
It was a yamna reconstruction for sure
Maybe anyway it look faggy as hell
what about caps on their skulls?
That's a morale/friday patch for a specific squadron, not the distinguishing emblem of an entire paramilitary organization responsible for horrific atrocities.
>organization responsible for horrific atrocities.
Again, I can't tell which you are talking about.
Who is this chad
>Cocksucking sissy fag
>chad
That skull looks friendly