Proto Na-Dene Tribes and Proto-Ainu Tribes mingled in Southeastern Alaska to create the Lingít. Possibly also contributed to the X̱aayda ancestors as well.
Fact.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
And what are the political implications of that fact?
That Amerindians and Japanese peoples are linked.
Japanese aren't the Ainu, they're settler-colonists from the Korean Peninsula who destroyed the proto-Ainu Jomon civilization. You're basically claiming that Cortes built Tenochtitlan.
Only partly. Actual Japanese do have a significant percentage of Jomon DNA especially Late Jomon. Wasn't going to be pedantic but I mean Pre-Yayoi groups.
Those who have Ainu ancestry hide it to avoid the settler-colonial racism inherent in Japanese society.
That only applies to Hokkaido. I think Japanese are native to Honshu by means of ethnogenesis of Yayoi groups with Jomon and Kofun peoples.
Japanese are Ainus ruling over Yayoi slaves.
In the same way indians and swedes are maybe.
Could be interaction between yeniseans and ainu.
What proofs do you have for it to happen in alaska.
Though siberian connection among ainu are well known, I'll admit that.
I believe the Proto-Ainuic migration happened after Na-Dene and Yeniseian split after Beringia sunk.
And then they came back to the old world until they reached japan?
Also what has led you to believe this
No they developed first in Japan, migrated along the Kuril and Aleutian Islands to Maritime British Columbia/Alaska and became isolated and eventually Na-Deneised/Eskimoised. The latter resulting in the Aleutian ethnogenesis. The migration was one way from Japan and didn't effect the Jomon in Honshu/Hokkaido.
Oh I get it now, thanks.
However why do you think the final result of this migration created the tlingit.
My proofs are based on DNA, Archaeological and Anthropological links. I do believe this is limited to the British Columbian/Alaskan Maritime peoples post Clovis and not a general Native American thing.
This doesn't really make sense.
If you had said that some early peoples that may have been related to the Na-Dene and Ainu mingled with other, earlier peoples in the Pacific Northwest of North America, and contributed to the linguistic diversity there, then I would have agreed.
There's no value in trying to be more specific than that.
The Pacific Northwest was surely one of the earliest areas in North America to get human habitation, and has always been rich in food resources. The people that were there at the time of European contact were almost certainly descended from the earliest human settlers as well as later arrivals.
Notice similarities in straw hats of Haida and Ainu.
>It is a fact because I made a post about it