F35 can't detect russian missile radar signatures.

How's that billion dollar boondoggle working out?

https://archive.is/pv7hB

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >big old meatball hanging off the back
    >"stealth"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stealth also don't mean shit when there's a big IR signature out the back.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Also it don’t mean shit when every object no matter how stealthy creates a moving “hole” in the cosmic background radiation cbr imagers can see plain as day

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you don't understand anything if you think IR is strongly visible on that plane, but you're also a fucking aussie.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how do they even know it was S-300 and not S-400?
    S-300 has shitload of variants
    btw, Ukraine alone inherited thousands of S-300 missiles and dozens of S-300 launchers from USSR, if not 100+ (on top of other mobile anti-air such as Buk, Strela, MANPADS)
    that's before counting the Soviet shit they got from all over the world, including the same S-300 from the likes of Slovakia, Buk from Finland
    and what they got from the West: Iris, Patriot, thousands of Stingers

    a more interesting recent event was Russia allegedly shooting down 30-40 of Ukrainian aircraft at like 400km distance in a few weeks, where they thought they were safe
    hinting that those planned F-16 will be "very useful"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia allegedly shooting down 30-40 of Ukrainian aircraft at like 400km distance

      >allegedly

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stunning and brave.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i read the article and it did not detected the frequencies because the S300 could have be in "war reserve" mode when it is basically turned off, not emitting anything.. lmao

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, using different frequencies so the plane didn't identify it. "Unknown object" instead of "that's an S-300".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In reading famed homosexual OP's title I had assumed an s300 was fired at an F35. Not so. It's basically 'we saw the AA battery but couldn't identify it because it may not have been turned on'.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It works out quite well. The russian airforce is nonexistent and russian air defense systems are less effective than 40 year old nato surplus. Keep coping tho as country after country tests the F35 and buys them over all competition.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It works in our tests that we designed so that means it will work in a war
      lol
      lmao

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >https://archive.is/pv7hB
    >F35
    biggest piece of shit of all time, 2nd only to the biggest failure of all time the F22

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They painted it with WD-40 or what?
    I hope it will be on the next sanction list.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the F-35 didn't blow up if the missile made no sound.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >How's that billion dollar boondoggle working out?
    Working out great for lockheed. That's all tthat matters

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Didn’t they trick you aussies into buying like a trillion dollars worth of this garbage?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don't you mean weren't we required to provide kickbacks to our kike masters as zog's vassal state? In which case, yes.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You have to be brown to even be aware of that trash source.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >billion
    trillion

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >asia
    Good morning sir/chink

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    everytime i read a headline about this or that weapon, how much ammunition is where or what plane went missing i assume its a lie to deceive someone.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    F-35 is vastly inferior to the Su-75.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How many su75's are in service?

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You didn't even read the article you posted. Lol.
    Go to the bottom, where they talk about reserve frequencies. Also, Ching chong bing bong.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >https://archive.is/pv7hB
    >>>

    well thats what happens when you let naggers design your aircraft

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It does detect them, just not as an S-300 which is more of a failure of the ELINT glowies instead of the F-35 itself

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *