Does the Bible really forbid homosexuality?

Does the Bible really forbid homosexuality?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the line from Leviticus was taken out of context

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it forbids gay sex.
    gay people are too promiscuous to have a relationship in chastity
    t. fag

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The two commandments on which everything in the bible depends are love god and love your neighbor
    having homosexual sex isn't loving god
    having homosexual sex isn't loving your neighbor because it is for your own pleasure and achieves nothing besides your own pleasure
    therefore, don't have homosexual sex

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is eating loving your neighbor?
      Is breathing loving God?
      Are you going to stop eating and breathing?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Both of those honor God.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Jacob Fish would in fact blow that dude and physically he could and would get aroused by it because the pubes on his head stood on end,.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The two commandments on which everything in the bible depends are love god and love your neighbor
      Evangelical horseshit, lame sophistry, word games. Selective application of critical thinking and leaps of logic. The Bible does not wholesale condemn everything that some fat kid can't qualify as either "loving god" or "loving neighbor." If it did, there would be no point in mentioning all the other things that the Bible mentions.

      In the OT it is referred to as an abomination along with eating shellfish and wearing clothing made from more than one material. If I understand correctly, these were cultural violations(un-Hebrew behavior) to the ancient Hebrews but were not considered "sins".
      Paul condemns it explicitly in the NT.

      >In the OT it is referred to as an abomination along with eating shellfish and wearing clothing made from more than one material. If I understand correctly, these were cultural violations(un-Hebrew behavior) to the ancient Hebrews but were not considered "sins".
      This is great can't wait to read the OT scriptural context that establishes the distinction between things that are abominations and things that are sins and where exactly gay sex is adjudicated.
      Oh no it doesn't exist? It's just nonsense from fat kids running laps trying to justify what their hick parents taught? Well that's a shame.
      What else do we have? Maybe we could consult the text and interpret it in the most direct way possible?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >This is great can't wait to read the OT scriptural that establishes the distinction between things

        It’s already long been done. It’s divided between ritual, ceremonial and moral laws. Ritual and ceremonial laws only apply to israelites. The moral laws still apply to gentiles and that includes a ban on gay sex.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I’ve seen homosexuals conflate love in the bible with sex. To them love = sex. Of course bible God wouldn’t have anything against two men loving each other, but it’s the sexual acts between them that he has a problem with.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        au contrare. you are the one conflating sex with romantic relationships. can you not acknowledge there's difference between platonic and romantic relationships, and that difference is deeper than just sex?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Dirk

    Romans 1
    1 Corinthians 6

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In the OT it is referred to as an abomination along with eating shellfish and wearing clothing made from more than one material. If I understand correctly, these were cultural violations(un-Hebrew behavior) to the ancient Hebrews but were not considered "sins".
    Paul condemns it explicitly in the NT.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To my understanding, it only condemns gays.
    As in, lesbians are never mentioned so they must be A OK

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're mentioned in Romans 1:26.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, it only condemns sodomy

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn’t matter. Even if there was a verse that directly said “ALL MONKEYPOX SPREADING homosexualS SHALL GO TO HELL” there would still be pozzed people trying to claim it didn’t really mean that.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >God creates Adam alone, wants Adam to only talk to God every day for eternity, has a great time for 120 years
    >Adam gets lonely, God creates a Woman
    >Woman disobeys God, Adam dies for her and disobeys with her and is kicked out
    >God commands man to be under a curse for disobedience to be forced to cling to his wife and she to him

    >God floods and kills all sinful flesh (homos, pedos, incest that wasn’t blessed, etc)
    >thousands of years later commands to kill homos by stoning or by fire
    >burns homos turning them to salt from fire from heaven

    Not that many years ago, modern society used to torture and kill homos. Homos were lucky to survive in America if found out. They could get murdered and traps often were murdered.

    It’s only in post-9/11 times that there is a new push from democrats to keep them alive and to even promote it, indoctrinate children, groom them and teach them that all sexuality is wonderful and good. Pornography is also somewhat new in its ability to reach children through internet. So probably likely why.
    World of Warcraft man and woman.jpg

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >incest that wasn't blessed
      >implying there is blessed incest
      If anyone ought to be killed, it's you.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How did you think Adam and Eve and all the kids made people?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >what is pre adamic humanity
          Just because you're retarded doesn't mean you have to defend incest. Yet you still do it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Incest is allowed in the Bible under certain conditions like Adam and Eve, yes this was incest. He called her none of my bones, flesh of my flesh. You seem to know more than God though, how many Man and creatures and universes have you created yourself by speaking The Word?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Incest is allowed in the Bible under certain conditions like Adam and Eve, yes this was incest. He called her none of my bones, flesh of my flesh. You seem to know more than God though, how many Man and creatures and universes have you created yourself by speaking The Word?

          It literally says in plain black and white text where Adam and Eve's sons' wives came from and I suggest you read it some time so you understand how silly all this is.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes it says Adam and Eve had sons and daughters and that makes it incest.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ha ha you're just never going to read it
              it takes effort so it's just not a possibility for you
              it's like how every day you wake up is going to be the day of your life you weigh the least, forever
              lol

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It’s like goats, farmers just set two loose even that are related and they just multiply. Not a big deal. For humans though it can be.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It’s only in post-9/11 times that there is a new push from democrats to keep them alive

      lol you think 9/11 was a long time ago
      there's like 50 boards where they want input from fat middle school kids and this ain't one of them

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Go away glowie troll.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are LGBT people so desperate to demand that Christianity needs to accept them and that ackchyually Jesus never taught to be anti-gay? Most LGBTs aren't Christians anyway, or even religious at all, so why do they care? Why not just leave Christians to believe what they believe, rightly or wrongly, and then go do your LGBT things somewhere else?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I guess because only israelites taught to be anti gay in their own people, nation, and borders.

      It wasn’t like a decree from God to go out and find every gay in every corner of the earth. They could hide and be cursed over there if they wanted.

      Garithos in Warcraft is who that reminds me of.

      Jesus Christ taught that all you needed was to be saved, and works shall follow the believer wherever they go as long as they are saved.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you want me to be honest, i think this is one of the things that would have been really controversial for jesus (if it was a common thing among them, which it isnt because of their culture) because it is part of tradition but not law

    law really forbids immoral behavior, this means things like lusting after another mans wife or property, letting envy get into you and allowing you to make bad decisions instead of choosing the way of the lord (righteousness)

    in the "heaven" jesus talks about homosexuality wouldnt really be a thing because no one sees each other like a "thing" and things would be at such high base that someone doing something that at most would lead to exclusion (because of disease risk)

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Bible forbids divorce and men wearing women's clothes but that didn't stop Philip.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Israelites had a strong fear of homosexual rape which made them hate all homosexual acts as a result

    > > v. 22, for ancient Israelites homosexual rape is as quintessential an expression of anti-social behaviour as cannibalism is in the Greek tradition. Strangers in need of succour in the Odyssey find themselves being eaten, whereas Israelite strangers are threatened with homosexual rape. A number of threads in the Israelite tradition indicate special disapproval of homosexuality as a form of relationship that blurs neat categories of creation as the Israelites understood them (see e.g. Lev 18:22; 20:13, and Deut 22:5 in context). This negative attitude even to consensual relations between men blends in Gen 19 and Judg 19 with the frequently found theme of the womanization of the enemy Other, as discussed at f UDG 16:19, 21 (Samson) and 4:27 (Sisera) - Oxford bible commentary

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This thread again, OP? It's been like, what, three weeks since the last one. Give it some breathing room.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published.