Does Stirner's philosophy justify rape? Posted on May 20, 2023 by Anonymous Does Stirner's philosophy justify rape?
Definitely. It is the right of the strong to do what they will with the weak. The ego shall not be denied access to any person's orifices.
it justifies everything if its in the person's will and you'd know it if you actually read the book and stop making shit threads
I've tried reading the book but its nonsense. The whole thing is written like an argument but you forget to green text what your adversary was saying.
filtered by der stirn
try reading redbeard then
Justice is a spook. There is only the ego and its own.
the individual and its property*
read the book with ATTENTION and stop spewing buzzwords
yes it is a spook but you clearly have no idea what makes a spook a spook
You need to check your ego before you get owned again.
Rape is an inherent misjustice just like murder.
>raep makes me feel good
>I can exert my will on others because I'm stronger than them
>therefore raep is fine if you can get away with it
Would be the edgelord nihilist anarchist take on the issue. Not really compatible with existentialism, though, since you are what you do, and if you rape people, you're a rapist. Stirner would probably argue that if you can get away with it and live with the consequences from others also exerting their will on (You) (pepper spraying you in self-defense, beating the shit out of you, judicially penalizing you after the fact, etc), then do whatever you please.
MIKU WOULD NEVER DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS NO!!!
Miku is a slutty vocaloid built for slutty lewd babymaking animalistic sex, sorry anon
its not about being stronger than anyone, but not being afraid to act on your desires because of an imaginary concept
ego is the will and its natural, no construct there
Fallacy from nature
The ego is a construct of memory
no, the ego is the will, as schopenhauer said, and this will will always desire something. it being good or bad doesnt matter, because everything like that is a spook, a ghost which you create to avoid being free with your ego
The ego is not the will, they are opposites. Ego is memory, will is devoid of memory (or knowledge). Schopenhauer is fundamentally incompatible with Stirner, since Schopenhauer gets a lot of his ideas from vedic philosophy which is anti-ego.
i just connected will and ego in the hopes one of you homosexuals would understand where im getting to
>Ego is memory
Ego is memory. You have no ego until you start accumulating memories, which form your senses of self and a sense of others, that constitutes an ego. A separation between the observer and the observed.
stirner's ego is not the same as this ego. thats why that translation sucks
Then stirner's ego is what? If his 'desire' is not based on memory, I see no issue with it. It would be in complete agreement with almost all mystics, in fact.
>In The Ego and Its Own, Stirner discusses the important example of an avaricious individual who sacrifices everything in pursuit of material riches. Such an individual is clearly self-interested (he acts only to enrich himself) but it is an egoism which Stirner rejects as one-sided and narrow. Stirner's reason for rejecting this form of egoism is instructive. He suggests that the avaricious man has become enslaved to a single end, and that such enslavement is incompatible with egoism properly understood.
This makes me see Stirner in a new light and I might read his book,
The unique does have mystical undertones despite Stirner's proclaimed materialism. It's the "creative nothing" out of which Stirner himself creates himself. He also says that the unique always exists in relation to its property (everything in conscious experience is "property" to Stirner). The two have an interdependent relation like emptiness in Buddhism. Morally, he's probably most similar to Daoism.
>Raep is just a social construct. Get over it. Oh, and, uh, you'd better put some ice on that, sweetie.
Based and Bill Clinton pilled
Stirner is a retard because the ego is a spook and he failed at that basic realization
Poopie rapie! Poopie rapie! Poopie rapie! Poopie rapie!
You've been spooked.
Stirner doesn't justify anything nor does he really say anything about how things "should" be.
>op constantly buttfucked in this thread
would stirner be proud?
Never even read anything from Stirner and very little from Nietzsche and daoism but as I understand it these are not philosophies for the masses. They are primarily concerned with the individual. Not with morality or changing the world or politics. Everybody can effect reality according to their own will and potential. Rape exists. Violence, war, death and suffering exists. We are not concerned with whether it is right or wrong. We accept it is a possible form of expression. What are you going to do about it?
but WHY is all of that bad? isnt it just a representation of the will, that is, natural?
>What are you going to do about it?
I will, as per Daddy Stirner's instruction, participate in the wanton rape and killing of my fellow human beings. I will not be spooked into sitting idly by while warlords get to enjoy all the pleasures of the world. I will become a warlord myself. I will murder a local pawnbroker and her sister with an axe.
>he thinks stirner openly states being a homosexual is good
if you will get buttfucked by society if act on that, wouldnt it be smarter to just stay cool? thats literally how stirner lived
>I will become a warlord myself
you won't do shit
>I will murder a local pawnbroker and her sister with an axe.
What about the Divine Marquis?
justine and juliette were both great reads
philosophy in the bedroom added makes sade the destroyer of moral philosophy
it justifies everything
but its wrong, because morals are objective and god is real
to any nihilists or egoists, respond to this post
>YOU ARE WRONG OK YOU JUST ARE OK
>AI is becoming more useful
>THAT MEANS YAHWEH LIVES IN SPACE AND LOVES ME THIIIIIIIS MUCH!
A computer program becoming a better prediction engine does not correlate with the universe being designed by a "master".
Stop coping with a magic daddy that will justify your shit existence. Even if he's out there he didn't give you the capacity to reason so he's not your friend.