imagine giving drew segfault money when he was openly and proudly on the wrong side of the yt-dlp drama and said he'd have taken it down immediately based upon his weak understanding of the law
elaborate ?
git by itself isn't that bad (ignoring the fact that fossil is self-contained, actually records commits without any means of covering, and obsoletes git forges), but the ecosystem around it is
sometimes the unix philosophy is just irrelevant and actually leads to worse outcome
if GNU actually suceeded in developing GNU Hurd, then most of the relevant distros of GNU would be tied to proprietary services
not to mention that those services would be probably bloated and overengineered
I actually do use Emacs, and I'm certain Stallman is a pedo. But Stallman does not work on Emacs any longer, hasn't in decades. I just refuse to pay some git when his entire philosophy is opposed to my own.
got me
I guess I'm gonna have to stop caring
I was under the impression that most (if not all) of his recent contributions are pittances and don't really reflect what he really wants in Emacs. I think the last package that he really liked was Hyperbole, he didn't like much else.
network effects. If your project isn't on github, people are going to have a much harder time finding it.
>people are going to have a much harder time finding it.
People will not find it, period.
That can be a very good thing.
I don't pay for it either, I self host it, because I can. that is the whole point of it, that you can self host it, because it is open source
Options for non self-hosted remote repos:
1) Github
2) Gitlab
3) Codeberg
4) Sourcehut
Github is propriety Microsoft
Gitlab is open core
Codeberg fixes everything about the first two, is free as in beer (and always will be, probably), and is actually FOSS. However it copies the branch-merge flow of the above two, and is funded by some "non-profit" entity.
Sourcehut is truly FOSS, self-hostable, free as in beer to browse and contribute, has the most practical and efficient website, and uses email-patch style workflow for making changes (like the Linux kernel and emacs on GNU savannah). It also actually charges a pay-whatever-you-want fee in order to host projects yourself, which means it's actually funded by users and not trackers or "non-profits". It is developed by Drew though.
Drew will arbitrarily delete your repos and does actually micro manage shit like that. Try creating a large repo and don't be shocked when you get the boot. Nevermind he'll probably dox you if you wrong think in his presence.
it's made by a crazy dude who can sudoku over night because of his poor mental health.
I don't want to deal with the aftermath once the inevitable happen.
same reason I can't use grapheneos even though it's the best android iteration out there, leadership is too unstable for my taste.
no
No, and I never will. Fuck off Drew.
No, why would I pay someone (or even use a free service) to host git repos when I could do that myself?
You can self host sourcehut (which is the lightest git forge, see
)
and that also counts. I for one self host my own sourcehut
network effects. If your project isn't on github, people are going to have a much harder time finding it.
imagine giving drew segfault money when he was openly and proudly on the wrong side of the yt-dlp drama and said he'd have taken it down immediately based upon his weak understanding of the law
https://forgeperf.org/
Based
Who gives a fuck? Github/gitlab/codeberg/etc are free and these performances don't mean shit for most people.
fossil exists
>an alternative to git itself
disgusting. there is nothing wrong with git
elaborate ?
git by itself isn't that bad (ignoring the fact that fossil is self-contained, actually records commits without any means of covering, and obsoletes git forges), but the ecosystem around it is
sometimes the unix philosophy is just irrelevant and actually leads to worse outcome
if GNU actually suceeded in developing GNU Hurd, then most of the relevant distros of GNU would be tied to proprietary services
not to mention that those services would be probably bloated and overengineered
> if GNU actually suceeded in developing GNU Hurd, then most of the relevant distros of GNU would be tied to proprietary services
elaborate ?
>no gitea numbers
kek
What's the difference between the "Typical hackers" plan and the "Professional hackers" plan?
it says right there. there is not difference between any of the plans, they just expect you to pay according to what you can afford and use.
I wanted to but then I realized that Drew is a lefty homosexual. So now I won't
So you won't use emacs because Stallman is leftist as well? Lmao homosexual
I actually do use Emacs, and I'm certain Stallman is a pedo. But Stallman does not work on Emacs any longer, hasn't in decades. I just refuse to pay some git when his entire philosophy is opposed to my own.
I don't pay for it either, I self host it, because I can. that is the whole point of it, that you can self host it, because it is open source
>But Stallman does not work on Emacs any longer, hasn't in decades.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/log/?qt=author&q=Stallman
got me
I guess I'm gonna have to stop caring
I was under the impression that most (if not all) of his recent contributions are pittances and don't really reflect what he really wants in Emacs. I think the last package that he really liked was Hyperbole, he didn't like much else.
>people are going to have a much harder time finding it.
People will not find it, period.
That can be a very good thing.
But I don't want to self host
Yes, I am in the 5/month tier
bump
This board is full of DrewDogs, you can't expect this thread to stay up.
In all fields.
bump
Options for non self-hosted remote repos:
1) Github
2) Gitlab
3) Codeberg
4) Sourcehut
Github is propriety Microsoft
Gitlab is open core
Codeberg fixes everything about the first two, is free as in beer (and always will be, probably), and is actually FOSS. However it copies the branch-merge flow of the above two, and is funded by some "non-profit" entity.
Sourcehut is truly FOSS, self-hostable, free as in beer to browse and contribute, has the most practical and efficient website, and uses email-patch style workflow for making changes (like the Linux kernel and emacs on GNU savannah). It also actually charges a pay-whatever-you-want fee in order to host projects yourself, which means it's actually funded by users and not trackers or "non-profits". It is developed by Drew though.
Drew will arbitrarily delete your repos and does actually micro manage shit like that. Try creating a large repo and don't be shocked when you get the boot. Nevermind he'll probably dox you if you wrong think in his presence.
>he'll probably dox you if you wrong think in his presence
projecting kiwinagger
>Nevermind he'll probably dox you if you wrong think in his presence.
There's a group of people who have his full dox kek
I would do the free version if I did, the owner seems like a SJW type
bump
knock it off
sorry mom
just use github, gitlab or gitea.
why? sourcehut is faster and more memory efficient
Bump
no, because i'm not a tranny
lol no. github, gitlab if I'm working on something that could get me b&.
>micro$hart
>pay us to steal your data
Or just use shitlab/shithub and have your data stolen for free
>he doesn't know that SourceHut is run by free software knights of the modern era
>free software knights
You meant cuck.
no because I stay the fuck away from ludditeware, I don't have energy to waste on this bullshit
it has superior accessibility so it's the exact opposite of ludditeware
it's made by a crazy dude who can sudoku over night because of his poor mental health.
I don't want to deal with the aftermath once the inevitable happen.
same reason I can't use grapheneos even though it's the best android iteration out there, leadership is too unstable for my taste.