We're not scared about his lame Roman chicken, we're scared because LGBTQBBQ+ is being crammed down our throats day by day and he's part of the problem.
The only things crammed down your throat are the historical foodstuffs you choose to make.
Why would you be scared of homosexualry, unless you're afraid you might like it?
>Why would you be scared of homosexualry, unless you're afraid you might like it? >Why would you be scared of shit , unless you're scared you might like it?
Why do fag-enablers insist on confusing disgust with fear?
Except i'm not scared of shit as an inanimate object. homosexualry is an active process, and you're putting yourself into it.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Except i'm not scared of shit as an inanimate object
Yeah that's my point.
Nobody is scared of Max being gay. People just find it disgusting.
Max being gay, is like if Max always had a smear of shit on him in his videos. Sometimes it's a big smear, sometimes it's a small smear, sometime it's on the sleeve of his shirt sometimes it's across the bridge of his nose, but it's always there.
Then when people point this out and express their disgust, people like you come along and insinuate that secretly they also like shit and they're just scared that they'll like realize that they like being smeared with shit too.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>People just find it disgusting.
And yet it's only ever the closet cases who feel the need to bring him up, since for everyone else it's an absolute non-issue, and impacts on no one else's life.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>If you express discomfort with gay people that means you're gay
You're doing it again.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
it's more due you being obsessed with it
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>If you always point out that I always have shit smeared on my shirt, that means you're obsessed with shit, and secretly you wish you had shit smeared on your shirt too.
You're still doing it.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
where did Max kept shoving that he is gay ? and how he being gay is in any way comparable with shit smearing ?
>I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with gays is that they exist at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh grooming' >I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with cancer is that it exists at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh carcinogens'
What's the difference?
the difference is that "muh grooming" causing people to turn gay is false and have no evidence behind it
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>where did Max kept shoving that he is gay ?
He doesn't, Max is relatively harmless. However all the signs are there for those with eyes to see and that'll enough. He's not exactly keeping it a secret either. >and how he being gay is in any way comparable with shit smearing ?
Both provoke semi-irrational instinctual feelings of disgust .
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>the difference is that "muh grooming" causing people to turn gay is false and have no evidence behind it
Doctors paid off by Big Tobacco said the same thing.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
still no evidences or data supporting that leftist tier meme
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Source? >A source. I need a source. >Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. >No, you can’t make inferences and observations from the sources you’ve gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you’ve gathered. >You can’t make normative statements from empirical evidence. >Do you have a degree in that field? >A college degree? In that field? >Then your arguments are invalid. >No, it doesn’t matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. >Correlation does not equal causation. >CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. >You still haven’t provided me a valid source yet. >Nope, still haven’t. >I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I’m debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
seethe and dilate
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Straight people don't feel the need to bring it up like you have.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
He's a Disney employee with connections to tV production through his husband, it's why people hate him.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Why do people shill for this homosexual? He's part of the problem, grooming is not something to be normalized.
His husband runs streaming on Disney+ and makes his videos for him, so yeah definitely cancer.
you must have had a typo there pal
this thread is about a guy, why are you talking about 'husband'?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>you must have had a typo there pal >this thread is about a guy, why are you talking about 'husband'?
Max is a laid off Disney employee married to another man who just happens to be a TV producer at Diseny Plus who helps make his videos fr him. So by watching his videos, you aren't supporting indie content, you are supporting video content of a gay and very rich Diseny employee family already in television that already has all the shortcuts necessary to produce video content. They don't need that ad content, it's just extra to support their already wealthy lifestyle. I don't know, when I go to YouTube I'm not trying to support the beneficiaries of corporate establishment television like the fucking Disney Corporation. I'm not a consumer whore. I'd rather support people that need that income, not some already rich fag married to another rich fag with a huge job in streaming that will use that money to go on even more expensive European vacations.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Did Mickey Mouse steal your girlfriend?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>you're not a consumer whore Disney adult who supports a soulless corporation that gobbles up market share and still destroys everything it touches, well, that's weird!
Yeah, okay, toolbag. If people knew that by watching Max's videos, you were supporting some guy who helps run Disney Plus, they wouldn't watch his fucking videos.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I don't like Disney, and I don't have a subscription to their services, but Max didn't do anything except make garum
Have you made garum?
Oh, you haven't?
Shut up then
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>ads
Huh? And they were both video editors, not producers.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
That seems like an extreme disgust reaction. I don't think it necessarily makes you gay, but it is psychologically unusual. I get that part of it might be having a high disgust response generally.
I will say that not everyone has that kind of reaction. Myself, I personally am more interested in history than whether the historian bites the pillow.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
He's putting himself into Jose if you get what I mean
We're not scared about his lame Roman chicken, we're scared because LGBTQBBQ+ is being crammed down our throats day by day and he's part of the problem.
>He is a man who enjoys have another man enter his anus [which is designed to push fecal matter out] as something that's good.
Lmao, dudes really enjoy shit play and acting like there isn't thing wrong with it.
What the fuck is wrong with you? I hope someone sends this to Max so he can beat you with a hardtack.
>Why do people shill for this homosexual? He's part of the problem, grooming is not something to be normalized.
His husband runs streaming on Disney+ and makes his videos for him, so yeah definitely cancer.
A little bit. I sometimes like to recollect things like how peasants used to live as a means to keep frame about how fortunate I am, as it were, to live in [current year]
>He is a man who enjoys have another man enter his anus [which is designed to push fecal matter out] as something that's good.
Lmao, dudes really enjoy shit play and acting like there isn't thing wrong with it.
Max easily. Townsends is kind of sympathetic in the way you can't really be too hard on any historical reenactor, they're so openly dorky and putting themselves out there you can't dislike them.
But if you actually enjoy cooking Max has food you can make and with a little spin make taste good. Townsend give you shit you either can't make or its just like butter and cabbage and rabbit.
i like watching Townsends because his videos are always comfy and i like how he tries to cook the food like they were originally meant to be. Max is nice because he changes the recipes a bit to make it easy for someone to make at home. But i'd say Townsends is better because his videos are all gems and he seems like a really cool guy to hang out with plus he does videos on food that usually get overlooked
As a Michigander, I do have some enjoyment of my land’s history. We have English, Irish, Finnish, Polish, French, and native influence from several groups. I like how we were a major state for car manufacturing and logging, or at least find those aspects interesting. Here is a nice song relating to Michigan history; specifically the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald. Oh! I forgot to mention that I like Michigan folklore such as that of the bear dunes or Paul Bunyan using lake Saginaw as a bathing spot. https://youtu.be/9vST6hVRj2A?si=MsjveGaBo7UeBnS1
Sort of, but I do really like the history of foods and cuisine for some reason. I don't even cook or anything myself. I also like the history of crafts and industry if that counts. This interest makes more sense since I am a machinist who does wood working, some leather, and forging as hobbies.
Noice.
I was a chef when I encountered his videos. I used to make my family something different every week - a full course meal from a different part of the world. So it was cool to be able to do a different time (the Roman empire).
Yeah, this and Townsends makes me feel like I can get a glimpse of how these people lived. For some reason, especially when I see them make poorfag food.
Wait... so the history cooking guy is gay? I've been watching his videos for a while now. Now that I REALLY think about it, he does seem a little fruity. A tad bit zesty.
Imagine watching a man and knowing that when the camera's off he bends over, spreads his shithole and moans like a bitch while being fucked by another man
They are upset because gay men are well groomed and are a threat to the idea that men will be men and not shower for 3 days straight and otherwise be total slobs.
My problem with gays is that they're walking biohazards and mass spreaders of STDs and literally the sole reason why HIV exists as a public health concern
>gay=hepB/HIV
it literally is, about 80% of the time
sometimes it's the full package with hepB, HIV and syphillis in one gaping asshole turbohomosexual
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>about 80% of the time
only in your totally legit /misc/ info graphs
>where did Max kept shoving that he is gay ?
He doesn't, Max is relatively harmless. However all the signs are there for those with eyes to see and that'll enough. He's not exactly keeping it a secret either. >and how he being gay is in any way comparable with shit smearing ?
Both provoke semi-irrational instinctual feelings of disgust .
>He's not exactly keeping it a secret either.
and?
>Both provoke semi-irrational instinctual feelings of disgust .
not in most people
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
cope and don't forget to come visit when you get an anal fissure or prolapse
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
keep fantasying about it
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
why do you keep up the pretense in front of anonymous losers when we both know i'm right?
lol
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
what pretense ? the only one right here is me
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
So 7,6% of the gay population on the US
very far from the "80% of the time" you are claiming
you should go back to school
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>7,6% of the gay population on the US >63% of all HIV pozzed >umm yeah what's wrong with that, CHUD
kek
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>moving the goalpost and trying to pull a moat and bailey
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>being a walking petri dish for multiresistant STD mutant strains
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>trying to move the goal post again
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
that was not the claim you were making
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not in most people
Oh no...
He doesn't know!
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
If you don't like helping patients, then medicine isn't for you, murse.
>I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with gays is that they exist at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh grooming' >I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with cancer is that it exists at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh carcinogens'
What's the difference?
Homosexuality is unnatural, that's my problem. The penis evolved to fit inside the vagina, not inside another man's butthole where fecal matter comes out.
The penis is evolved to scoop other men's cum out of a woman's vagina. It's designed so that you can have sloppy seconds and still have the child be yours.
That doesn't mean nature has decreed you go fuck other men's semen out of women.
>The penis is evolved to scoop other men's cum out of a woman's vagina.
No, it isn't. Humans aren't dragonflies ajd don't have barbed dicks or anything like a scoop.
And if you dispute that another easy way to find out that humans aren't meant to be competing with one another that way: horrible sperm motility. Creatures that do actually scoop sperm out of another creature typically compete a lot and have highly mobile sperm. Human sperm motility is barely above non-motile. Humans aren't and were not designed to just be gangbanging bitches so much that the penis evolved into a scoop. That is retarded.
>Species differences in genital morphology can arise by sexual selection Dixson, 1987, Eberhard, 1996, Verrell, 1992. Thus, the morphology of the human penis itself may have been influenced by sperm competition. Relative to other primates, the human penis is larger in both width and length, roughly twice as long and wide as that of our closest living relative, the chimpanzee (Short, 1980). The shape of the human penis also differs from many other primates because the glans is more exaggerated and uniquely configured (Izor, Walchuk, & Wilkins, 1981). The diameter of the posterior glans is larger than the penis shaft itself, and the coronal ridge, which rises at the interface between the glans and the shaft, is positioned perpendicular to the shaft. The human penis may displace seminal fluid from other males in the vagina by forcing it back around the glans. The effect of thrusting, according to this analysis, would be to draw foreign semen back away from the cervix. Because of its elasticity, the vagina expands around the penis during intromission creating suction that may further enhance this effect. If a female copulated with more than one male within a short period of time, this would allow subsequent males to “scoop out” semen left by others before ejaculating (Baker & Bellis, 1995)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513803000163
Is it that though, or is that an intellectualisation of a disgust/anger reaction?
The penis is evolved to scoop other men's cum out of a woman's vagina. It's designed so that you can have sloppy seconds and still have the child be yours.
That doesn't mean nature has decreed you go fuck other men's semen out of women.
That's what you say.
>Species differences in genital morphology can arise by sexual selection Dixson, 1987, Eberhard, 1996, Verrell, 1992. Thus, the morphology of the human penis itself may have been influenced by sperm competition. Relative to other primates, the human penis is larger in both width and length, roughly twice as long and wide as that of our closest living relative, the chimpanzee (Short, 1980). The shape of the human penis also differs from many other primates because the glans is more exaggerated and uniquely configured (Izor, Walchuk, & Wilkins, 1981). The diameter of the posterior glans is larger than the penis shaft itself, and the coronal ridge, which rises at the interface between the glans and the shaft, is positioned perpendicular to the shaft. The human penis may displace seminal fluid from other males in the vagina by forcing it back around the glans. The effect of thrusting, according to this analysis, would be to draw foreign semen back away from the cervix. Because of its elasticity, the vagina expands around the penis during intromission creating suction that may further enhance this effect. If a female copulated with more than one male within a short period of time, this would allow subsequent males to “scoop out” semen left by others before ejaculating (Baker & Bellis, 1995)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513803000163
Womens' loudness during sex would also indicate that they're hollerin' for a gangbang on an evolutionary level.
If he was doing this and a pedophile, would that make it ok? Even if he didn't mention it? No it wouldn't. Despite what society tries to say homosexuality is not ok. It's disgusting.
I mean, not to edgepost, but aside from the access to children issue, yeah. There's no point in restricting people from doing good in one way because of their capacity for doing bad elsewhere. To counter-example, if a pedophile invents a cure for cancer it's not on us to not use it.
>max miller on LULZ >whyyy are people being /misc/
Because the homosexual is about as historical as crab rangoon is traditional chinese cuisine.
This not being LULZ, the only other valid topic about him is his homosexualry, therefore /misc/.
Every video I've seen of that guy just calls the recipe something people ate in the past, then give some pointless and often wrong pop-history commentary, so he can finally make the dish, only it's too hard to properly research it so he changes it in a billion ways so "modern kitchens can do it too".
Why the fuck would I bother with this retard if I wanted history content? The guy is only good for theme parties. And if you're looking for theme party cuisine go to LULZ.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>wrong pop-history
Such as? >only it's too hard to properly research it so he changes it in a billion ways so "modern kitchens can do it too".
Okay? Are you expecting him to break out a set of Aramaic measuring cups or something? >Why the fuck would I bother
I dunno, but it sure does make you butthurt.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Such as?
Off the top of my head he had a whole spiel about gladiators that was straight out of the spartacus tv series. >Are you expecting him to break out a set of Aramaic measuring cups or something?
I expect him to not make unnecessary changes. I expect him to give me HISTORICAL recipes, not his lazy adaptation.
But of course when you just want to ride trends and jump through 2500 years of history you can't afford to actually put effort in your research. >your partecipation to this thread makes you butthurt
Lmao projection.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>he had a whole spiel about gladiators that was straight out of the spartacus tv series
Not sure which one you were talking about, but i don't remember any of them being incorrect. So maybe this tv show is also just correct? >I expect him to give me HISTORICAL recipes
Which he does, you ADHD retard. And then he translates it into modern terms, then if necessary allows for the nearest practicable modification for it to be recreated in the modern world, and acknowledges the discrepancy.
Your parents must have been twins to whelp the kind of mongoloid who expects history themed youtube chefs to use silphium. >projection
???
You're the one proceeding to bother with something you pretend to not care about, home slice.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>So maybe this tv show is also just correct
Lmao you gotta be trolling me. >And then he translates it into modern terms
Making his whole video pointless. Might as well stop at giving the source, everything else is useless. >bother with something you pretend to not care about
This thread is about domestic history. I care about it and don't pretend otherwise.
You on the other hand pretty clearly care about the homosexual.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Lmao you gotta be trolling me.
From your tone, i'm assuming that your show is not in fact historically accurate. But as it stands, you have yet to explain what he got wrong in this one instance. >Might as well stop at giving the source, everything else is useless.
Quite a dull library you must have; purely citations to other works. And Heaven forfend if they're translated into English. >I care about it
My mistake, i thought
Every video I've seen of that guy just calls the recipe something people ate in the past, then give some pointless and often wrong pop-history commentary, so he can finally make the dish, only it's too hard to properly research it so he changes it in a billion ways so "modern kitchens can do it too".
Why the fuck would I bother with this retard if I wanted history content? The guy is only good for theme parties. And if you're looking for theme party cuisine go to LULZ.
was you. I apologise for being so uncharitable as to confuse you with such a spectacular moron.
Did anyone else think that April Fool goodbye video name was a really dumb idea? I seriously thought he was ending his channel but later learned the joke was he quit his day job to do the channel full time.
I just learned from this handsome man that there was a slight rain early in the morning before the JFK assassination, and if it didn't stop, then the car likely would have its roof on.
What the fuck.
Yes. History isn't just numbers and maps, it's about humanity in the past. We have a habit of studying aspects of history that actually affected very few people.
Autistically memorizing border changes and generals and battles is historically only a small aspect, 99% of people in history were more concerned about what's for dinner. They just live their lives and sometimes who they pay taxes to changes.
Yes, the holy scriptures contain many precepts about domestic life, including about the kinds of relationships that are permitted. My favorite one is Leviticus 20:13 🙂 >If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.
no i mean besides the guy in question; all the posters rabdily defending homos here rather than being indifferent/laughing at the idea of men getting fucked in the ass by other men
>still caring about which gender people fuck, even tho he didn't mention it one single fucking time in his channel & isn't even relevant to its content
You retards really are chronically online.
If he was doing this and a pedophile, would that make it ok? Even if he didn't mention it? No it wouldn't. Despite what society tries to say homosexuality is not ok. It's disgusting.
>incorrect
Except you're wrong.
Pedophiles and homosexuals are analogous. Every homo wants to seduce and corrupt young boys.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Probably. All humans prize youth in their mates.
But an act between two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home/truck stop bathroom is of no relevance to anyone else.
Well I got the WW2 obsesses autist debuff so I only enjoy WW2 German and German occupied home-front, if that counts.
I even bought an original 1941 copy of Schönheit des Wohnens furniture/interior design book.
If you mean the history of how households worked, sure. Social history in general is extremely interesting to me.
I don't even mind culinary history specifically, but that homosexual is a low tier youtuber.
And not because he's a homosexual, because he's extremely superficial for the sake of shitting out as much content as possible.
Yes
One of the best facts I learnt about domestic history is about serfs from the time of Kievan Rus all the way to the modern russian empire
In most houses you would have an heater and a chimney
The chimney would direct the smoke from the heater, this meant you could heat a house and cook food without the entire room being filled with smoke
Well for the serfs they didn't have chimneys and so it meant that their houses were perpetually full of smoke
This led to a thick layer of smog covering all surfaces in the home
Apparently this was due to the need for capturing all the heat from the heater but I'm not sure why the serfs in Eastern Europe were alone in doing this
The life of a serf was one in which they were constantly inhaling smoke
Yes.
Why do people shill for this homosexual? He's part of the problem, grooming is not something to be normalized.
What problem? Grooming people to cook?
/pol/tards are scared of Parthian chicken lmao
We're not scared about his lame Roman chicken, we're scared because LGBTQBBQ+ is being crammed down our throats day by day and he's part of the problem.
Ive watched a ton of his videos and I don't recall a single mention of that subject.
The only things crammed down your throat are the historical foodstuffs you choose to make.
Why would you be scared of homosexualry, unless you're afraid you might like it?
>Why would you be scared of homosexualry, unless you're afraid you might like it?
>Why would you be scared of shit , unless you're scared you might like it?
Why do fag-enablers insist on confusing disgust with fear?
Except i'm not scared of shit as an inanimate object. homosexualry is an active process, and you're putting yourself into it.
>Except i'm not scared of shit as an inanimate object
Yeah that's my point.
Nobody is scared of Max being gay. People just find it disgusting.
Max being gay, is like if Max always had a smear of shit on him in his videos. Sometimes it's a big smear, sometimes it's a small smear, sometime it's on the sleeve of his shirt sometimes it's across the bridge of his nose, but it's always there.
Then when people point this out and express their disgust, people like you come along and insinuate that secretly they also like shit and they're just scared that they'll like realize that they like being smeared with shit too.
>People just find it disgusting.
And yet it's only ever the closet cases who feel the need to bring him up, since for everyone else it's an absolute non-issue, and impacts on no one else's life.
>If you express discomfort with gay people that means you're gay
You're doing it again.
it's more due you being obsessed with it
>If you always point out that I always have shit smeared on my shirt, that means you're obsessed with shit, and secretly you wish you had shit smeared on your shirt too.
You're still doing it.
where did Max kept shoving that he is gay ? and how he being gay is in any way comparable with shit smearing ?
the difference is that "muh grooming" causing people to turn gay is false and have no evidence behind it
>where did Max kept shoving that he is gay ?
He doesn't, Max is relatively harmless. However all the signs are there for those with eyes to see and that'll enough. He's not exactly keeping it a secret either.
>and how he being gay is in any way comparable with shit smearing ?
Both provoke semi-irrational instinctual feelings of disgust .
>the difference is that "muh grooming" causing people to turn gay is false and have no evidence behind it
Doctors paid off by Big Tobacco said the same thing.
still no evidences or data supporting that leftist tier meme
>Source?
>A source. I need a source.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>No, you can’t make inferences and observations from the sources you’ve gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you’ve gathered.
>You can’t make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>Do you have a degree in that field?
>A college degree? In that field?
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>No, it doesn’t matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
>You still haven’t provided me a valid source yet.
>Nope, still haven’t.
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I’m debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
seethe and dilate
Straight people don't feel the need to bring it up like you have.
He's a Disney employee with connections to tV production through his husband, it's why people hate him.
you must have had a typo there pal
this thread is about a guy, why are you talking about 'husband'?
>you must have had a typo there pal
>this thread is about a guy, why are you talking about 'husband'?
Max is a laid off Disney employee married to another man who just happens to be a TV producer at Diseny Plus who helps make his videos fr him. So by watching his videos, you aren't supporting indie content, you are supporting video content of a gay and very rich Diseny employee family already in television that already has all the shortcuts necessary to produce video content. They don't need that ad content, it's just extra to support their already wealthy lifestyle. I don't know, when I go to YouTube I'm not trying to support the beneficiaries of corporate establishment television like the fucking Disney Corporation. I'm not a consumer whore. I'd rather support people that need that income, not some already rich fag married to another rich fag with a huge job in streaming that will use that money to go on even more expensive European vacations.
Did Mickey Mouse steal your girlfriend?
>you're not a consumer whore Disney adult who supports a soulless corporation that gobbles up market share and still destroys everything it touches, well, that's weird!
Yeah, okay, toolbag. If people knew that by watching Max's videos, you were supporting some guy who helps run Disney Plus, they wouldn't watch his fucking videos.
I don't like Disney, and I don't have a subscription to their services, but Max didn't do anything except make garum
Have you made garum?
Oh, you haven't?
Shut up then
>ads
Huh? And they were both video editors, not producers.
That seems like an extreme disgust reaction. I don't think it necessarily makes you gay, but it is psychologically unusual. I get that part of it might be having a high disgust response generally.
I will say that not everyone has that kind of reaction. Myself, I personally am more interested in history than whether the historian bites the pillow.
He's putting himself into Jose if you get what I mean
Who cares if he's a fag if he's a nice enough person and makes good food?
Whiny bitches need to make everything about themselves.
holy shit you're a fucking retard
>LGBTQBBQ+
Max needs to do an episode on BBQ now
>TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES
Actually mind broken holy shit.
nice bait, you really know how to get (you)s from LULZ pseudo intellectuals
This board's entire identity is built around countersignaling /misc/
You shut your mouth. Max is a gem.
How do his videos harm you?
What the fuck is wrong with you? I hope someone sends this to Max so he can beat you with a hardtack.
CLACK
L
A
C
K
>Why do people shill for this homosexual? He's part of the problem, grooming is not something to be normalized.
His husband runs streaming on Disney+ and makes his videos for him, so yeah definitely cancer.
A little bit. I sometimes like to recollect things like how peasants used to live as a means to keep frame about how fortunate I am, as it were, to live in [current year]
I don't remember her name, who's the Polish chick that does videos about the history of clothing?
Horseface Przmyzyzkwski?
Zebrowska
>He is a man who enjoys have another man enter his anus [which is designed to push fecal matter out] as something that's good.
Lmao, dudes really enjoy shit play and acting like there isn't thing wrong with it.
I don't care. Have some hard tack.
>CLACK CLACK
It doesn't matter how many times he does it. The joke gets me every fucking time.
I wish he recorded a new clip every time
With the same hardtack
Who the fuck brought that up, cakeboy?
Townsends vs Max who wins
Orange fool
Personally I prefer the greater emphasis on historical reenactment with Townsends.
But then Max is hotter.
>Max is hotter
Not clean shaven Max though
Max easily. Townsends is kind of sympathetic in the way you can't really be too hard on any historical reenactor, they're so openly dorky and putting themselves out there you can't dislike them.
But if you actually enjoy cooking Max has food you can make and with a little spin make taste good. Townsend give you shit you either can't make or its just like butter and cabbage and rabbit.
Max is for people who think "I like history" and Townsends for for people who think "I was born in the wrong era"
i like watching Townsends because his videos are always comfy and i like how he tries to cook the food like they were originally meant to be. Max is nice because he changes the recipes a bit to make it easy for someone to make at home. But i'd say Townsends is better because his videos are all gems and he seems like a really cool guy to hang out with plus he does videos on food that usually get overlooked
Townsends got that old man strenght so he would break Max's balls as if they were made of nutmeg
>I’ve got something to say…. I’m frustrated.
I love it and find it more interesting than endless autism about wars. Unfortunately it didn't get recorded nearly as much.
As a Michigander, I do have some enjoyment of my land’s history. We have English, Irish, Finnish, Polish, French, and native influence from several groups. I like how we were a major state for car manufacturing and logging, or at least find those aspects interesting. Here is a nice song relating to Michigan history; specifically the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald. Oh! I forgot to mention that I like Michigan folklore such as that of the bear dunes or Paul Bunyan using lake Saginaw as a bathing spot. https://youtu.be/9vST6hVRj2A?si=MsjveGaBo7UeBnS1
what the FUCK is a michi gender?!
He is a homosexual so I automatically disregard anything he says.
>Do you enjoy domestic history?
American here, and not really. U.S. history is pretty boring until WWII.
I think you just havent looked into it far enough. The drastic chamges in how normal people lived day to day over the past 200 years are insane.
Son, I'm 56 years old and have been a history nerd my whole life, American history is in fact pretty boring.
Indians (kinda cool) > boring > Civil War (kinda interesting) > boring > WWII (interesting) > boring
>only cares about war
Classic histlet
Damn I wish I had a grandpa or uncle that browsed LULZ.
>56
>onLULZ
you're grooming kids
Sort of, but I do really like the history of foods and cuisine for some reason. I don't even cook or anything myself. I also like the history of crafts and industry if that counts. This interest makes more sense since I am a machinist who does wood working, some leather, and forging as hobbies.
Noice.
I was a chef when I encountered his videos. I used to make my family something different every week - a full course meal from a different part of the world. So it was cool to be able to do a different time (the Roman empire).
Yeah, this and Townsends makes me feel like I can get a glimpse of how these people lived. For some reason, especially when I see them make poorfag food.
Wait... so the history cooking guy is gay? I've been watching his videos for a while now. Now that I REALLY think about it, he does seem a little fruity. A tad bit zesty.
Yes. One of the better YT channels.
dis nigga a froot loop
Imagine watching a man and knowing that when the camera's off he bends over, spreads his shithole and moans like a bitch while being fucked by another man
>Imagine
No thanks, but you have as much fun as you want.
Kinda hot, I can see Max being a bottom
I don't think I would imagine that.
I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with gays is that they exist at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh grooming'
They are upset because gay men are well groomed and are a threat to the idea that men will be men and not shower for 3 days straight and otherwise be total slobs.
My problem with gays is that they're walking biohazards and mass spreaders of STDs and literally the sole reason why HIV exists as a public health concern
seems only a problem if you want to have sex with a bunch of them
Or share needles
I work in medicine and I don't like dealing with extra hepB/HIV scumbags
so you should look for another job or go to med school again if you think gay=hepB/HIV
>gay=hepB/HIV
it literally is, about 80% of the time
sometimes it's the full package with hepB, HIV and syphillis in one gaping asshole turbohomosexual
>about 80% of the time
only in your totally legit /misc/ info graphs
>He's not exactly keeping it a secret either.
and?
>Both provoke semi-irrational instinctual feelings of disgust .
not in most people
cope and don't forget to come visit when you get an anal fissure or prolapse
keep fantasying about it
why do you keep up the pretense in front of anonymous losers when we both know i'm right?
lol
what pretense ? the only one right here is me
So 7,6% of the gay population on the US
very far from the "80% of the time" you are claiming
you should go back to school
>7,6% of the gay population on the US
>63% of all HIV pozzed
>umm yeah what's wrong with that, CHUD
kek
>moving the goalpost and trying to pull a moat and bailey
>being a walking petri dish for multiresistant STD mutant strains
>trying to move the goal post again
.
that was not the claim you were making
>not in most people
Oh no...
He doesn't know!
If you don't like helping patients, then medicine isn't for you, murse.
>I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with gays is that they exist at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh grooming'
>I wish people were always this upfront that their problem with cancer is that it exists at all instead of disingenuously crying about 'muh carcinogens'
What's the difference?
Homosexuality is unnatural, that's my problem. The penis evolved to fit inside the vagina, not inside another man's butthole where fecal matter comes out.
The penis is evolved to scoop other men's cum out of a woman's vagina. It's designed so that you can have sloppy seconds and still have the child be yours.
That doesn't mean nature has decreed you go fuck other men's semen out of women.
>The penis is evolved to scoop other men's cum out of a woman's vagina.
No, it isn't. Humans aren't dragonflies ajd don't have barbed dicks or anything like a scoop.
And if you dispute that another easy way to find out that humans aren't meant to be competing with one another that way: horrible sperm motility. Creatures that do actually scoop sperm out of another creature typically compete a lot and have highly mobile sperm. Human sperm motility is barely above non-motile. Humans aren't and were not designed to just be gangbanging bitches so much that the penis evolved into a scoop. That is retarded.
>Species differences in genital morphology can arise by sexual selection Dixson, 1987, Eberhard, 1996, Verrell, 1992. Thus, the morphology of the human penis itself may have been influenced by sperm competition. Relative to other primates, the human penis is larger in both width and length, roughly twice as long and wide as that of our closest living relative, the chimpanzee (Short, 1980). The shape of the human penis also differs from many other primates because the glans is more exaggerated and uniquely configured (Izor, Walchuk, & Wilkins, 1981). The diameter of the posterior glans is larger than the penis shaft itself, and the coronal ridge, which rises at the interface between the glans and the shaft, is positioned perpendicular to the shaft. The human penis may displace seminal fluid from other males in the vagina by forcing it back around the glans. The effect of thrusting, according to this analysis, would be to draw foreign semen back away from the cervix. Because of its elasticity, the vagina expands around the penis during intromission creating suction that may further enhance this effect. If a female copulated with more than one male within a short period of time, this would allow subsequent males to “scoop out” semen left by others before ejaculating (Baker & Bellis, 1995)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513803000163
>Goes all in on a a single hare brained unreplicated study
lol
Why are fags so invested in the gangbang theory of evolution?
>Homosexuality is unnatural
So? The internet is as well, but you're here, fagging it up.
>Homosexuality is unnatural
No, it isn't. That doesn't make it good and it's clearly a mental illness and sexual aberration, but it is natural.
Is it that though, or is that an intellectualisation of a disgust/anger reaction?
That's what you say.
Womens' loudness during sex would also indicate that they're hollerin' for a gangbang on an evolutionary level.
I mean, not to edgepost, but aside from the access to children issue, yeah. There's no point in restricting people from doing good in one way because of their capacity for doing bad elsewhere. To counter-example, if a pedophile invents a cure for cancer it's not on us to not use it.
Straight people sometimes have anal sex too.
>a thread on domestic history
>Max Miller is mentioned or included
>/misc/ comes and leaves bait posts
Why does this board suck so much sometimes?
don't blame the bait, blame the homosexual that bites it
>max miller on LULZ
>whyyy are people being /misc/
Because the homosexual is about as historical as crab rangoon is traditional chinese cuisine.
This not being LULZ, the only other valid topic about him is his homosexualry, therefore /misc/.
>Because the homosexual is about as historical as crab rangoon is traditional chinese cuisine.
How is he not LULZ related?
>How is he not LULZ related?
Because the homosexual is about as historical as crab rangoon is traditional chinese cuisine.
Okay. But his content is certainly historical.
Every video I've seen of that guy just calls the recipe something people ate in the past, then give some pointless and often wrong pop-history commentary, so he can finally make the dish, only it's too hard to properly research it so he changes it in a billion ways so "modern kitchens can do it too".
Why the fuck would I bother with this retard if I wanted history content? The guy is only good for theme parties. And if you're looking for theme party cuisine go to LULZ.
>wrong pop-history
Such as?
>only it's too hard to properly research it so he changes it in a billion ways so "modern kitchens can do it too".
Okay? Are you expecting him to break out a set of Aramaic measuring cups or something?
>Why the fuck would I bother
I dunno, but it sure does make you butthurt.
>Such as?
Off the top of my head he had a whole spiel about gladiators that was straight out of the spartacus tv series.
>Are you expecting him to break out a set of Aramaic measuring cups or something?
I expect him to not make unnecessary changes. I expect him to give me HISTORICAL recipes, not his lazy adaptation.
But of course when you just want to ride trends and jump through 2500 years of history you can't afford to actually put effort in your research.
>your partecipation to this thread makes you butthurt
Lmao projection.
>he had a whole spiel about gladiators that was straight out of the spartacus tv series
Not sure which one you were talking about, but i don't remember any of them being incorrect. So maybe this tv show is also just correct?
>I expect him to give me HISTORICAL recipes
Which he does, you ADHD retard. And then he translates it into modern terms, then if necessary allows for the nearest practicable modification for it to be recreated in the modern world, and acknowledges the discrepancy.
Your parents must have been twins to whelp the kind of mongoloid who expects history themed youtube chefs to use silphium.
>projection
???
You're the one proceeding to bother with something you pretend to not care about, home slice.
>So maybe this tv show is also just correct
Lmao you gotta be trolling me.
>And then he translates it into modern terms
Making his whole video pointless. Might as well stop at giving the source, everything else is useless.
>bother with something you pretend to not care about
This thread is about domestic history. I care about it and don't pretend otherwise.
You on the other hand pretty clearly care about the homosexual.
>Lmao you gotta be trolling me.
From your tone, i'm assuming that your show is not in fact historically accurate. But as it stands, you have yet to explain what he got wrong in this one instance.
>Might as well stop at giving the source, everything else is useless.
Quite a dull library you must have; purely citations to other works. And Heaven forfend if they're translated into English.
>I care about it
My mistake, i thought
was you. I apologise for being so uncharitable as to confuse you with such a spectacular moron.
Why didn't he bring his little Filipino boy-toy with him to Morocco? Afraid of what the nafris might do if his secret got out?
Did anyone else think that April Fool goodbye video name was a really dumb idea? I seriously thought he was ending his channel but later learned the joke was he quit his day job to do the channel full time.
this nigga lookin zesty
this nigga lookin festive
I just learned from this handsome man that there was a slight rain early in the morning before the JFK assassination, and if it didn't stop, then the car likely would have its roof on.
What the fuck.
>God willed JFK life subscription canceled
What a handsome young man
certainly, with an exquisite taste for clothing if you ask me
He takes other men's sperm in his anus.
He scares me without the beard
>turns white
Yes. History isn't just numbers and maps, it's about humanity in the past. We have a habit of studying aspects of history that actually affected very few people.
Autistically memorizing border changes and generals and battles is historically only a small aspect, 99% of people in history were more concerned about what's for dinner. They just live their lives and sometimes who they pay taxes to changes.
Yes, the holy scriptures contain many precepts about domestic life, including about the kinds of relationships that are permitted. My favorite one is Leviticus 20:13 🙂
>If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.
What are some good ways to learn about domestic history in the early 20th century (pre-WW2)?
I have a huge book on Soviet domestic history.
What's it called?
i had no idea LULZ was so packed with fudgepackers before this thread
no i mean besides the guy in question; all the posters rabdily defending homos here rather than being indifferent/laughing at the idea of men getting fucked in the ass by other men
I enjoy his show.
The man's sexual pursuits are his own.
Why did he settle for an ugly spic?
He could have had any gay guy and he goes for an ugly spic.
>pssst, hey kids, want some Garum???
Grooming with Max Miller in 100 BC
>still caring about which gender people fuck, even tho he didn't mention it one single fucking time in his channel & isn't even relevant to its content
You retards really are chronically online.
If he was doing this and a pedophile, would that make it ok? Even if he didn't mention it? No it wouldn't. Despite what society tries to say homosexuality is not ok. It's disgusting.
>What is a false analogue
Both are morally reprehensible so it's not.
Incorrect, and Global Rule #2
>incorrect
Except you're wrong.
Pedophiles and homosexuals are analogous. Every homo wants to seduce and corrupt young boys.
Probably. All humans prize youth in their mates.
But an act between two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home/truck stop bathroom is of no relevance to anyone else.
Well I got the WW2 obsesses autist debuff so I only enjoy WW2 German and German occupied home-front, if that counts.
I even bought an original 1941 copy of Schönheit des Wohnens furniture/interior design book.
>who you fuck is the most important thing ever
Uh, rightoids, youre engaging in the same cringe the left does about race, retards
If you mean the history of how households worked, sure. Social history in general is extremely interesting to me.
I don't even mind culinary history specifically, but that homosexual is a low tier youtuber.
And not because he's a homosexual, because he's extremely superficial for the sake of shitting out as much content as possible.
The whole state of LULZ can be summed up by what this thread has turned into lol
I do, in fact. I also enjoy industrial history.
Yes
One of the best facts I learnt about domestic history is about serfs from the time of Kievan Rus all the way to the modern russian empire
In most houses you would have an heater and a chimney
The chimney would direct the smoke from the heater, this meant you could heat a house and cook food without the entire room being filled with smoke
Well for the serfs they didn't have chimneys and so it meant that their houses were perpetually full of smoke
This led to a thick layer of smog covering all surfaces in the home
Apparently this was due to the need for capturing all the heat from the heater but I'm not sure why the serfs in Eastern Europe were alone in doing this
The life of a serf was one in which they were constantly inhaling smoke
Unironically yes
>Anal, men
😐
>Anal, women
:O
I bet 90% of you think like this