Do Catholics believe Jesus exists inside a cracker?

Do Catholics believe Jesus exists inside a cracker?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shouldn't every Christian?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      So what's the difference between thinking Jesus is in the cracker and Shiva is in the wood statue?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The body and blood are the literal body and blood, so worshipping it is more logical than a mere representation
        Also shiva is a false god

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >worshipping it is more logical than a mere representation
          What makes you think Hindus don't think the Shiva statues aren't Shiva?

          >Also shiva is a false god
          So making your god into a material object is ok as long as it's your god?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Pagans always use the excuse they’re mere representations when you point out their gods die to mere gravity, and also God does all the work with the Eucharist, all the priest does is ask

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >when you point out their gods die to mere gravity,
            And yours dies every day in your mouth? I don't get it.0xxds

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Would you believe in Aristotelian hylomorphism if you weren't a Christian?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It’s literally not flesh and blood. It’s literally a bread wafer. The priest doesn’t actually turn it into flesh, it’s a trick. I cannot think of a dumber trick to fall for, honestly a problem that you have the right to vote.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >The priest doesn’t actually turn it into flesh,
            He doesn't, god does. 🙂

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The only difference is Shiva isn't God (a literal demon actually)

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Shiva is the god of the Aryans.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Is knowing they came from a nation of demon worshippers before they were accepted into Israel the reason they are so pro-interracial these days?

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not inside it, that’s the Lutheran heresy of Consubstantiation, the true Catholic dogma is that the elements fully transform into the body and blood of Christ, and are fully the body and blood of Christ with no bread or wine in them

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Cannibalism

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >n000 it’s the sacramental mode

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly, why would you want to eat your god?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Theophagy is a beyond ancient practice that is found nearly everywhere in legend and ritual. Maybe because you want the gods strength or a closer bond?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well in the old covenant era you had to eat the sacrifice for it to work, and now Jesus fulfilled the law by making one sacrifice to end them all, but we still have to eat the flesh of it to feel the effects

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the true Catholic dogma is that the elements fully transform into the body and blood of Christ
      It's so stupid. I'm sure even Jesus and the apostles all understood that it was a symbolic and/or spiritual gesture.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Jesus' main method of preaching is through parables
        NO THIS CAN'T BE SYMBOLIC

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      so uhh...why does it still taste look and smell like bread and wine?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It has the physical appearance of the species are identical to bread and wine, but they part of the body and blood of Jesus Christ in fact

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Jesus was made of bread and had wine for blood. What, do you think he was just speaking to the group using language meant to be rhetorical / hyperbolic for the purposes of underlining how solemn and serious this last meal was together?
        No, he literally meant that this is objectively and scientifically his blood and his flesh. If you strip away the voodoo sorcery, what are you left with? A bunch of useless sayings and lectures?

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If meme communication bread of weird American denomination were considered to be transubstantiated, the shit in the pic would be host desecration. You could get burned alive for that shit.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      *Communion bread

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Back in catholic school there was a meme that throwing the communion wafer into a toilet would make the toilet bowl full of blood, but I never tried it.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      No that's just Mary having her period

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No
    catholics delude themselves into believing that.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not a cracker. The unleavened bread that has been traditionally eaten during Passover, since the time of Moses.
    The concept that is believed Catholics (and other sects of Christianity) is called 'Transubstantiation'.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      In the Church it was historically leavened bread.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Catholics have so much to offer... but they die on the weirdest hills. It's weird.
    >Jesus was bread
    my boy JC spoke in parables half the time
    >priests/popes can't get married
    following Peter's example... of... being married?
    >praying to Mary
    all you had to do was say praying WITH Mary and the Charismatic Movement wouldn't have happened

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      can't get married
      >following Peter's example... of... being married?

      Yea but that's a church rule that they can change if they want. Apparently it's made because they wanted to keep the church property within the church and inheritance messes with that

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's very important you keep losing random churches and abbeys in inheritance disputes with the eldest son of a random parish priest.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yep, married men can be made rite priests can but they’re ordinations are still valid, the only thing they can’t do is marry once they’ve been ordained (decided at Nicaea)

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    no he's inside the ceremony

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    There are actually people here that spend every waking moment shaking in rage that their mom made them go to church on sunday morning

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      And there are people that spend every waking moment shaking in rage that other's moms didn't make them go to church on a sunday morning.
      It's all fricking bullshit if you ask me.

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bro, bro, I'm a vampyr, pass me the blood *hic*

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes they believe a dead israelite turns into a biscuit. There are even some low-iq morons who think there were "miracles" where biscuits were tested in a lab had traces of dead israelite.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      If the Eucharist is "literally" blood then why can it not be used for transfusions?

      can't get married
      >following Peter's example... of... being married?

      Yea but that's a church rule that they can change if they want. Apparently it's made because they wanted to keep the church property within the church and inheritance messes with that

      >religious rules for the protection of material goods
      Damn the more i think about this the more it looks like some sort of scam.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because it is the ultimate test of cathcuck epistemological vassalship

        >You WILL believe the wine is blood
        >You WILL believe the cookie is flesh
        >You WILL believe down is up
        >You WILL believe jesus is god

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If the Eucharist is "literally" blood then why can it not be used for transfusions?
        the success of transfusions depends heavily upon the accidents.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It has the physical appearance of the species are identical to bread and wine, but they part of the body and blood of Jesus Christ in fact

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It has the physical appearance of the species are identical to bread and wine, but they part of the body and blood of Jesus Christ in fact
            My God do I have Christian fatigue

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If the Eucharist is "literally" blood then why can it not be used for transfusions?
        It is literally incompatible with all of man, being the blood of god. It has an unique type.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          God's blood is literally booze?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It is heresy to say the Holy Eucharist has any alcohol in it

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Is the RCC calling breathalyzers heretical now?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It might have the physical appearance and effects of alcohol but it has no alcohol in it, it has no natural explanation

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If Christina’s wanna be so insistent that they’re literally cannibals, then they should be arrested for cannibalism.

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >believing in magic israelites
    >perfectly reasonable

    >believing in magic cookies
    >a step too far

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I grew up non-religious and always enjoyed reading about religion from a historical perspective. I'm not a fedora-tipping atheist irl

    But my god does stuff like transubstantiation transform me into one. I know it's a meme or whatever, "hurr silly christians thinks bread turns into flesh," but if you set aside your upbringing and long-held cultural traditions and take a good honest look at the claim that bread turns into flesh and wine turns into blood, I don't know how an honest person in connection with reality comes away from that analysis with the conclusion that it's true. It makes no sense whatsoever. It's so obviously demonstrable as a falsehood that scholars had to engage in pilpul-levels of twisted aristotilean philosophy to say "it doesn't actually turn into the body of christ, but it really turns into it" (or whatever the phrasing is, I don't care about to look it up).

    As an outsider who goes to mass every weekend with my tradcath wife, it strikes me as a ritual designed to be as irrational as possible in order to establish a state of non-questioning acceptance for worshippers.

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most dont.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/08/05/transubstantiation-eucharist-u-s-catholics/

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      and?

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The substance is changed not the exterior and how that happens is a mystery, why is that hard to understand?

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Do Catholics believe Jesus exists inside a cracker?

    Don't you?

    >all matter in the universe has a common origin

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like the follow-up question more tbh.
    >Is the bread fully Jesus or is it both Jesus and bread at the same time?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *