Hello LULZ,
>be me
>smoke weed
>do so either walking through woods but also at front door (never indoors)
>in process of making myself dumber
>notice spider web in corner of door frame
>web is in path of my smoke
>web is in erratic pattern
>am I making my arachnid neighbour stoned?
I should point out that I do not intentionally or conscientously blown smoke into the direction of a sentient creature.
Neither should you, unless you are giving some chick a blowback.
what if the spider gets sentient whenever he's stoned from your smoke? hence the erratic patterns. he's freaking the fuck out and doesn't know how to communicate and just does random shit in the hopes of getting your attention. which it kinda did. so I dunno man. maybe try talking to it while both high?
Then it will go down as another one of nature's tragedies brought on by its inherently limited designs. But at least the spider will be immortalised within the chan archives; the unknown soldier of his creed. Whether it makes the whole spiritual cycle worthwhile is another matter.
I would rather have the opinion of a qualified spidologist, but I appreciate your contribution.
I'm not a spidologist but it looks like a normal web to me, bud.
stop pointing out things chud
Bump
>muh vanity thread
How is it a vanity thread when I am completely anonymous?
You're a normie. Normies can't grasp the essence of anonymity on the intuitive level. You know your blogging is out of place here, but the flimsy rational understanding is not enough to change the deeply engrained logic of normie behavior.
>You're a normie.
You have no earthly idea who I am or what I am about.
>Normies can't grasp the essence of anonymity on the intuitive level.
Anonymity is a construct, Intuitiveness is innate. You're just throwing words together in a sorry attempt to appear smart... Anonymously
>You know your blogging is out of place here,
One of the few positives about LULZ is that it is not a hotbed of prescriptivism.
Besides, only newfags gatekeep LULZ. This is not some super elite secret society with a fundamentally entrenched code of conduct and you would be a sad bastard if you believed otherwise.
>but the flimsy rational understanding is not enough to change the deeply engrained logic of normie behavior.
Another unnecessarily and erroneously haughty word stew. I cannot imagine the burden of carrying around such a deletrious antipathy towards the world. I can only wish you well because any further ill-will cast towards you would be redundant.
Anyways, instead of derailing this fucking thread, can you tell me if my spiders are stoned? Also, if you are as smart as you present yourself, you can also advise me about the ethical implications of deliberately getting a captured prey exhaustively stoned for the sake of anaesthetisation.
Every single word in your pseud drivel reinforces my point. Thanks for going the extra mile to make me look more right.
What a lazy and vacuous cop out.
If you are only going to attack the anonymous poster (which is completely pointless) instead of the actual arguments (the only tangible element og this exchange) then you are wasting my time and your time without proving anything to yourself or others.
Take your redditspaced comment back to whatever sub you plucked it from and come back when you can write a honest-to-god post instead.
I have almost certainly been around the chans long before you have. Evidenced by the fact that LULZ is not a monolith and people considerate enough break comments down for the sake of aspies have been a constant feature of LULZ.
What is the reason you are refusing to actually engage in a debate (of your own instigation, no less)?
If you are confident that you are correct then I should be readily refuted. If you consider it a waste of your time, then you are only harming yourself by basing your esteem on a sense of intellectual superiority. You may well be smarter than myself, but that is not important to you or me. The only thing that matters in an anonymous exchange of ideas are the ideas themselves.
Either engage with the ideas or, for your own sake, get over yourself.
You're talking about yourself and other people again, aren't you?
This thread is about the science behind spiders getting stoned.
YOU raised the matter of vanity in an anonymous environment. I critiqued your point and substantiated my arguments accordingly. You pussied out. As a courtest, I figured you had the right to know from a peer why I think you have pussied out. What you do with that information is up to you.
Luckily, in examining your state of being an insecure pussy, a control anon posted after you and dealt with the premise at hand in a manner which, while sauceless, is perfectly satisfactory for the purposes of this thread.
So far in this thread, we have had;
An anon who raised an interesting philosophical perspective.
An anon who was decent enough to qualify his credentials before granting us his thoughts.
Some random anon making a meme comment.
An anon with a rudimentary but still useful graphic that appears to support the theory established at the outset.
Each of these anons has applied knowledge, thought, and/or creativity.
You have contributed nothing but your own vanity, ego and insecurity. What have you done today that would count towards strengthening your virtues and making your own life and world that bit more intellectually satisfying? If you happen to be doing something productive and positive then I am happy for you. But based on this exhange, I would be worried for you if I was your father.
Thank you for this contribution. There definitely appears to be sufficient similarities between the marijuana web and my own.
>YOU raised the matter of vanity
No, I didn't.
> I critiqued your point
No, you didn't. Not reading the rest of your reddit meltdown.
The first use of the word "vanity" came from you.
Prove this
statement.
>Every single word in your pseud drivel reinforces my point.
As with everything else, I have challenged you to back up your claims and you have pussied out on each occasion by resorting to baseless ad hominem on an anonymous board.
I honestly do not believe you are up to it. Not a single word you have used would lead me to believe that you are capable of academic criticism. I am happy to be proven wrong, but until you at least try, I am not wasting another word on you.
>The first use of the word "vanity" came from you.
No, it didn't. It's really funny to watch you double down on a normie relationship drama that's happening only in your own head.
Ready to kill yourself yet? You do realize this failure will be forever associated with your reddit handle, right? :^)
So you made a shitty response to my question and was unable to argue your position. This changes next to nothing.
As for how it makes me feel, I genuinely can't think of a way to quantify my indifference. Indeed, I am perfectly comfortable in arbitrarily conceding that you have pwnd me in every conceivable manner. Whether this makes you happy really isn't my concern. Take care of yourself, friendo.
I'm alright, thanks. I have my own grip on reality and it works well enough for me. I hope yours works well for you 🙂
>I genuinely can't think of a way to quantify my indifference
Your "indifference" (now there's an original way to spell 'rage') is easily quantifiable as a function of the number of words you keep chucking into the void trying to get back at me. lol
I was indifferent about being "exposed"
In a perverse way, I am actually enjoying indulging your shitposts while I'm reviewing video clips for a research project. Otherwise, I wouldn't be bothering.
Rest assured that my wordcount probably accounts for less than 5% of what I made in note form during the same period, and it took a negligible amount of mental effort.
How do you figure? Our being here forever notwithstanding.
You're a normie. Normies can't grasp the essence of anonymity on the intuitive level. You know your blogging is out of place here, but the flimsy rational understanding is not enough to change the deeply engrained logic of normie behavior.
>I'm reviewing video clips for a research project
20 bucks on babby's "research project" being about stoned spiders
If I was doing a sincere research project on stoned spiders, I wouldn't be asking LULZ for guidance.
No disrespect.
anon, you sound so intelligent. i bet you're a serious researcher. please tell everyone more about all the research you're doing, but only in terms of vague references
>anon, you sound so intelligent.
I appreciate your sentiment, but there are many people more intelligent than myself and most people regardless of cognitive capacity are able to teach others something.
>i bet you're a serious researcher.
Not a good bet, I'm afraid. I am certainly proficient and have made very useful findings. Nevertheless, research is a perpetual process and over the next however many years, I will never be as shit at research as I am today.
>please tell everyone more about all the research you're doing
Absolutely not. While I like the principle of all research being freely available, I have to keep my current examinations strictly among trusted advisors and collaborators. Money is involved as well as a solid reputation of discretion.
>but only in terms of vague references
Fine. I am working on strains of weed that might one day be sold to people who keep spiders as pets and want to treat them to a pleasantly distorted experience. Quite like how cat owners might buy catnip for their feline friends.
Hope this helps. Please don't steal my idea.
This website is bad for your mental health, you should leave it
get a grip
Yes, this is all your fault.
@15731640
Holy Mother of Untreated Mental Illness...
Strong assertion... Out of curiosity, which mental illnesses are you thinking?
I'm interested in the thought processes that leads an anon to such a conclusion.
>this BPD monkey just can't stop trying to start discussions about itself
LOL
And you just can't help engaging with me. I think you might have a bit of a crush on me. Not conviced that you're my type but maybe if you tell me a few things about yourself...
I have dated a few BPDs in my time (never ever again) but I am quite positive I am not one myself.
>this BPD monkey is still talking about itself
LOL