>debunks all of?

>debunks all of /misc/ arguments on history and geopolitics

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    This dipshit got mindbroken by Ryan Faulk of all people and after some years went back to saying the same stupid garbage that is just as wrong now that the kind of response videos he was getting back then will get banned. Literally the worst fucking idiot.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Didn't know Faulk was known outside Facebook

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Alternative Hypothesis uses to be huge channel pre 2017 or so, then it started being algorithmed, also Ryan doesn't help himself because he regularly scrubbed it from stuff he was embarrassed with and nowadays his activity online are relatively low effort on cozy and occasional video on holocaust denial(not on yt ofc).

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >WE DONT HAVE A KNOCKOUT STUDY ON CHIMPANZEES DICK SIZE!

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Budget brain 4 breakfast with none of his charm.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      RIP, his videos were something else 🙁

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Dude I'm telling you, Europe is rich because of feminism, gay rights and immigration
    >Colonialism? No way, Europe was just developed because of liberal social policies, Colonialism has nothing to do with that

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Colonialism? No way, Europe was just developed because of liberal social policies, Colonialism has nothing to do with that
      Kek. Give it time, and it will be an erased part of history because it destroys their narrative.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    A week ago, I came across a video.

    I don't know about Ilyin and Schmitt - I haven't read them.
    But the thoughts and ideas of Gumilyov are completely distorted, to the point where it ceases to be a misunderstanding, but already turns into a lie.
    And I think that the text was written by another person who read something, perhaps even in Russian. Then another person (apparently Kraut himself) redid the text once again. Otherwise, I do not understand where such absurd errors come from.
    But it works for the audience of the channel: they won’t check anyway, so you can feed them any shit.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      His descriptions on Schmitt very much reminds me of Historia Civilis and his not very hidden bias against Caesar and Augustus.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I rewatched the part with Schmitt several times, trying to figure how is Putin connected to him.
      I came to conlusion that Kraut considers any critique to wester liberal democracy to be undemocratical and equal to nazism.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, it's just a propaganda video, not a real analysis. He overhypes Schmitt being a Nazi since he is read in modern curriculums that churn out centre-left people.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Schmitt's nazism is just an example of academics having no spine tbh. He was working on a project to create legal justification for banning of NSDAP mere months before he joined it, literally just chasing grants, NSDAP quickly noticed this opportunism. I sincerely believe that huge reason why he had to go through like a decade of apologia in the 70's before his writings became mainstream is because this part is far more embarrassing than antisemitic writings or membership on the party.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well you gotta get resources to fuel your work (and subsequently yourself).

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    > institutes make good timez
    What brings about good institutes?
    > uhhhh Marx is wrong and Nazi is wrong and uhhh

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Institutes unironically pop up like mushrooms, randomly.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Must not like NazBols very much

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    i'm convinced he is financed by intelligence services. just like almost every political commentator who is pushed by the algorithm

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cmon how can the US ever do propaganda? It’s impossible bro

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The only sincere thing about him is his profile bird's obesity

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Watched his last video on Putin's ideology and its total bullshit.

    Putin doesn't have an ideology. He was literally just KGB muscle. he was a soldier, not a decision maker. his job was to literally follow orders and bully people with wavering loyalty into submission

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >5'4
      >KGB Muscle
      what

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous
  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not like there is much to debunk, /misc/acks take on geopolitics, as in much else, is contrarian for the sake of being contrarian. There's no thought to it, it's just "west bad, therefore Russia and China good".

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      If too much Russia and China good posting occurs the narrative flips as well.

      Basically the only thing '/pol/' agrees on is like hating israelites. I can't really think of anything else that's unifying on that board.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        MIGA

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    His analogy that North Korea vs South Korea proves race isn’t a factor is so fucking dumb it hurts the brain.
    On top of SK being propped up by the US and Japan, NK is actually very advanced technology wise, not the failure he’s trying to painting it as.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      North Korea despite all its handicaps and famine, managed to build a nuke and launch a satellite into space. I'd like to see Uganda or ?Somalia try to do that. Exactly they can't. because North Koreans are still a high IQ race, identical to South Koreans. Only difference is they are handicapped by communism.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        North Koreans had help from the Soviet Union
        Where's Vietnam's nuclear program?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Vietnam was reunited and the Americans left. In 1990s, they kissed and made up with America.

          Also, North Korea wasn't that friendly with the soviet union. Yes they had some trade. But Kim Il Sung was always trying to pit China and the USSR against each other. It wasn't a satellite state like East Germany.
          It they did get help, it would have been from Pakistan

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >handicapped by communism

        by westoid sanctions*

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          collective farming has historically been really inefficient.
          as for sanctions, those didn't happen until the 1990s.
          In 1980s, they were importing Japanese machinery with no problems.

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I really want him to make a video about my country

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I watched his video on Indian vs Chinese history, he obviously knows nothing about anything

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *