Hypothetically speaking, what would be the terrible implications if everyone's afterlife, regardless of belief, was CWCville?
Hypothetically speaking, what would be the terrible implications if everyone's afterlife, regardless of belief, was CWCville?
I can't imagine hell being much worse. Magichan is 100% a demon that possessed chris.
I'm a darkie, so Billy Mays would remove me from the premises.
CWCville is just a mind palace that Chris formed. It has no deeper implications than that.
Nice try.
It’s a mind palace that he populated with tulpas. It probably contributed to him completely losing it, but Chris isn’t powerful enough to make it anything more than that.
>another chris chan stalking thread not even trying to be paranormal
this shit is off topic
you have an entire fricking website for this, go there you freaks
> implications
It would mean that his dimensional merge was successful and Cwcville is like a "hubworld" to other worlds.
>terrible
Would mean that anybody who does not accept Chris is unable to properly enter the afterlife.
traverse town but stinks
As far as I know, Chris never preformed any rituals to try and bring the merge into being though. He talked about it a lot, but never made any efforts toward bringing it about. So, unless he’s the most powerful chaos magician who ever lived, this is highly unlikely.
Do you know what a hypothetical is?
No, not really.
Okay. For it to make sense I am going to create a system for you.
> Scenario: A scenario is a function that takes the current state of the environment then outputs the next [settled] state of the environment.
Typically a scenario can be represented using Bayesian analysis. If you are missing some parameters for your scenario function, you can substitute those with known parameters or even other functions. In doing this, you create a Hypothetical Scenario.
A Hypothetical of a Scenario is an agreement where the person conducting the learning function agrees to supplement missing data with given data even if under normal circumstances they would not be able to complete the learning function due to an unlikely scenario.
So Using the system I just generated, we can argue that
> A hypothetical is agreement between two or more individuals to suspend their skepticism function and run their learn function even though they know that the output (probably) is not worth the computation cost because they themselves must fabricate a scenario.
So when someone says, "Hypothetically speaking", using the system above that can be represented as
> What if X, but instead of Y, Z is true
Not that there is nothing preventing Y from being Z, or X from being Y or Z.
Please note that in actuality a hypothetical is defined strongly on its own name (something akin to "less than sufficient evidence"). The system I gave you above is reasoning based.
Hopefully this helps.
>inb4 sarcasm
I don’t get it.
>Chris
Ian Brandon Anderson
any updates on chris?
He's not been heard from since the end of August. He's likely still in jail. I think they're looking for a group home to keep him in, but it's hard to find an open bed in one let alone a group home that will accept him.
There are no gays in CWCville. So just suck a dick and you're gucci.