Crop yields will collapse. You will run out of topsoil. Sugar is a high yielding plant so it died earlier.

Crop yields will collapse. You will run out of topsoil. Sugar is a high yielding plant so it died earlier.
You WILL eat the bugs. You WILL die.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    His will give some idiot economic reason.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But how does peak oil factor into all of this?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Capitalism collapses for multiple reasons, I'm just giving examples of how it would die anyway in addition to peak oil.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No physical evidence for density.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Or other countries started to produce sugarcane with higher yields and/or lower costs than the usa

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That is a idiotic and wrong theory. Hawaii would be the easiest place to grow and transport sugar.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You know in other countries they can pay less than $1 a day for agriculture labourers? and this

        High Fructose Corn Syrup has replaced sugar in many industries, no shit they are producing less of it

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    High Fructose Corn Syrup has replaced sugar in many industries, no shit they are producing less of it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is another idiotic theory; demand for sugar rose.

      You know in other countries they can pay less than $1 a day for agriculture labourers? and this[...]

      Idiotic reply due to automation. A American farmer makes 50k and there are only 10,000 farmers. India has 50 million farmers making a dollar a day. The sugar production was basically the same so india spends a hundred times more on wages for the same output.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Demand for sugar rose
        Which can and is substituted for HFCS

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You response is pure idiocy. Sugar demand rose and supply fell.
          It's obvious economists are mentally retarded but you will keep defending them.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Demand rose, and HFCS met that demand

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It didn't. You are mentally retarded.
              It's obvious that sugar demand increased and supply (in America at least) fell.
              The sugar grown in Brazil went to ethanol and further caused shortage.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The sugar output is basically the same
        Proof?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        im getting the feeling you are stalingrad poster

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          he is, and the gdp poster, and the horse artillery poster, basically if you see a bizare take and a iphone filename, its him

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lel. Thank you, wasnt sure.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The opposite is happening. The permafrost is getting smaller and smaller, as well, increased CO2 is excellent for plant growth and thus crop yeild. So humans will farm further north every decade with higher yeilds. Hawaii agriculture is fucked though, but it is an active volcano island after all so no surprise there.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The opposite is happening. The permafrost is getting smaller and smaller, as well, increased CO2 is excellent for plant growth and thus crop yeild.
      Everything you said is utter bullshit and categorically wrong. Temperature will collapse and you'll die.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HFCS and sugar are different markets. Hfcs is for drinks, it is not used for candy. HFCS did nothing to reduce sugar demand. It's too gross for anything but soft drinks and stuff like that.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nooooo now how will we sell soda and Twinkies to goys

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hawaii is the only place where sugar is grown
    ayylaom

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only countries where supply grew were met by population or ethanol (China, India, Brazil) so the economic explanations are garbage.
    His is a retard board and will deny its obvious death from resource depletion.

Your email address will not be published.