55 thoughts on “COP or NOT

    • Anonymous says:

      Yes

      No

      https://i.imgur.com/tT2sFHA.jpg

      and this one, C/N?

      Yes

      https://i.imgur.com/WuQOSlr.jpg

      I’ve been wrestling with wanting to buy a Suede G9 in Sand Storm for months but 600€ just feels like way too hecking much and they never go on sale…

      Yes

      https://i.imgur.com/9jyFYR6.jpg

      I reminds me of this true religion shirt. I love the high contrast stitching that true religion does on all their shit, but I wish the pocket corners were sharp. Truey jackets used to have very sharp pocket corners and I hate that they’re more rounded now.

      No

    • Anonymous says:

      Because of the ((BlackRock))’s ESG ratings are forcing globohomo companies to show black and brown models if they want to be financed, get loans and so on.
      It’s part of ((their)) hatred against white people and ((their)) plan to destroy white identity.

        • Anonymous says:

          You’d be wrong. The strategy is done for exactly the same reason that the soviet union sent ethnic russians into every satellite state. It sews disunity and a disability to rally against your opressor.

        • Anonymous says:

          Sorry shitlib but you’ll have to lurk a bit longer if you want to be appear native. We have wordfilters for your Twitchspeak here

          • Anonymous says:

            Ok stupid, proof that ESG exists and how it works:

            ?si=rtFDg3jpAyclTFaB

            Proof of hebrew hatred towards white people and will to destroy white people:

            ?si=ORSlK7dhyHUNnMCn

          • Anonymous says:

            Because of the ((BlackRock))’s ESG ratings are forcing globohomo companies to show black and brown models if they want to be financed, get loans and so on.
            It’s part of ((their)) hatred against white people and ((their)) plan to destroy white identity.

            Esg is a thing but you are probably invested in blackrock without even knowing. The model is black because of the skin contrast.

          • Anonymous says:

            Forgive my tourism but im curious how esg is a fundamentally bad thing when the only qualms you have are that you hate everybody that isnt like you Appealing to a broader audience = needing more money to appeal to that audience hence why higher score grants them access to more money, no? What about that is bad business practice?

          • Anonymous says:

            Esg is just used as corporate blackmail to push whatever the rich want to inflict upon the poor against market forces. Anytime something has to be forced top down against the will of normal human beings you can bet it is not benefiting anybody but the rich. More specifically to this situation why don’t you ask the simple question of why a minority population would be detrimental or positive toward a nation of people and why it would be detrimental or positive toward an oligarchy of rich people ruling over a nation of people. Could you run that thought experiment?

          • Anonymous says:

            Their argument wasn’t to do with money, it was about hebrews or is that some weird antisemitic thing im not familiar with?
            > to be forced top down against the will of normal human beings
            Black model modeling for stupid clothing website is forcing what? and if forcing something, you are not mad at the exploitation anyway but rather the fact that you have to see them lol
            > why a minority population would be detrimental or positive toward a nation of people
            America, and many other countries are not homogenus. Detrimental because when everybody is too spread out ideology is mixed. We have too many conflicting opinions from people who aren’t interested in compromising.
            Positives? I don’t know maybe a little peace where we have to live amongst each other? I feel these are the most logical answers.
            > why it would be detrimental or positive toward rich people
            It isnt. Nobody will ever stop buying whatever the heck they’re selling. They’re looking for the biggest cashout and the more people seethe online about [RACE][GENDER][RELIGION][SEXUALITY] the more “wokeness” will be promoted because that’s what has been in for the last century

          • Anonymous says:

            >Their argument wasn’t to do with money, it was about hebrews or is that some weird antisemitic thing im not familiar with?
            It’s because Larry Fink runs Blackrock. Blackrock runs esg. Blackrock owns the esg rating agencies.
            >Black model modeling for stupid clothing website is forcing what? and if forcing something, you are not mad at the exploitation anyway but rather the fact that you have to see them lol
            It’s namely because it doesn’t actually make sense in a free market. Because black people are not the target demographic of the majority of the products they seem to be shoehorned into nor are they the largest market demographic in population nor are the the demographic with the most disposable income. From a marketing perspective it is illogical and cannot be selling more product than would advertisments targeted at the demographic most likely to purchase the good. Only through the blackmail of esg scoring has this come to be.
            >America, and many other countries are not homogenus. Detrimental because when everybody is too spread out ideology is mixed. We have too many conflicting opinions from people who aren’t interested in compromising.
            Positives? I don’t know maybe a little peace where we have to live amongst each other? I feel these are the most logical answers.
            This didn’t answer the question. Because there is no answer. This is circular reasoning. It is good because it is because it is. No. The detriment can be seen simply through history. When the minority of white people came was it good for the native americans? What about the astec nation of peoples? Where have they gone? How about hawaii, surely the minority of white people there were good. And let’s take white and brown out of it. The maori killed the prior inhabitants of new zealand off. The scandinavians who are on their peninsula now killed off the prior inhabitants as we know from dna testing and burial sites. Or we can look more recently and relevently at somewhere in the news…..

          • Anonymous says:

            Ukraine. During the Soviet Union, Stalin sent 3.3 million ethnic Russians into the satellite nations of the USSR. Why, you may ask? To shift the demographics of the nations and to remove their ethnic identity and reduce the unity of the nations. He did this in order to prevent breakaways or civil wars. And as we can see even today with the Donbas reigon of Ukraine, the strategy worked. This is why the rich do it even now. They deliberately want to reduce the homogenity and therefore unity of nations in which they control the keynesian banking systems. Because fiat currency is funny money and the combination of fiat and income taxation is essentially a form of slavery. The more uppity people get around the manipulation of markets via state interventionism the more likely the lower classes rally together. But how can they if they have no identity or kinship, no bonds with one another. Surely nobody would fight and die for a foreigner and no immigrant happy to take the crumbs the state rewards them with for destabilizing and dis-unifying a peoples would bite the hand that fed so generously.

            No my friend. The more you learn and the older you get the more you realize that absolutely everything is a hecking scam.

          • Anonymous says:

            > black people are not the target demographic largest market demographic most disposable income
            It’s 2024 lol come up with something better than that. Marketing has evolved to reach people reguardless of race, gender and class because we all have interests. Who’s to say what demographic is being catered to in terms of product when it all boils down to individual tastes

            > colonisers were once minorities and thats why minority opinion is bad
            They weren’t apart of the general population. And there was a power imbalance, otherwise it wouldn’t have been possible to rampage through another society. How does this equate to us as a country now? Minorities now aren’t going to ever be able to create an imbalance of power in an already imbalanced society. Tourists don’t need to be catered to, we are discussing people who live in places already. If a group of christians went to an islamic country to sightsee and were outraged by the lack of churches in their area, should they be able to dictate where the next church gets put up? I would hope not. The real detriment shows through the lack of structure that already exists in America. There are multiple people born and raised, people who are affected by policies getting put in place because minorities population is not taken into account.
            Im assuming you were also referencing Palestine, which still doesn’t fit in this argument because Israel are still the ones in control.

          • Anonymous says:

            >It’s 2024 lol come up with something better than that. Marketing has evolved to reach people reguardless of race, gender and class because we all have interests. Who’s to say what demographic is being catered to in terms of product when it all boils down to individual tastes
            13% of the population vs 56%
            Median household income of $48k, white is $78k
            Median black household net worth is $27k, average white net worth is $250k
            It simply is not logical. The population goes white > hispanic > black > asian > other. Average household wealth goes asian > white >>> hispanic > black. As for the rest, its state-run "education" gobbledymoron.

          • Anonymous says:

            Bringing up regurgitated statistics like 13% isnt almost 50 million people. Doesn’t it also make more sense to market towards the smaller population of people? Getting the smaller population of 50 million people to buy your product vs 50 million you can easily attain from a larger population but I digress. It’s unrealistic to assume products would be marketed towards any specific race, when it’s obviously it’s class driven. Black people don’t not buy [stuff] because there are only commercials of white people using that [stuff] they buy it because it’s being advertised to them.

          • Anonymous says:

            Anon at this point you’re just turning your brain off. Statistically and traditionally blacks have been the target of advertising for things that they can afford and prey on their neighborhoods. From "Do Yo Mothafuggin’ Dinnatimin’ at MacDonalds! You ain’t even gotsta tip!" To cool ass jazz-funky menthol. What doesn’t make any sense is a $400 dorky looking patagonia jacket being advertised with a black model. It’s pushed due to esg ratings from the top down against market forces. Market forces represent free choices of normal human beings who see a value proposition and think, yes that’s a good or at least a fair deal. If it were beneficial outside of esg diversity scoring by these ngos which hold hostage your stock prices, we would have seen out of place ads and weird advocacy far before the stock market got rigged by esg back in 1995. And you certainly wouldn’t see the rich people pushing this shit as hard if it weren’t for the bubble pop of 2009 which caused your said lower classes to unite against the banker class who then instructed their newspapers and media organizations to start pushing race and sexual degeneracy ad naseaum and against market reality (while getting bailed out and having a 0% fed fund rate aka free [legally counterfeited] money) Remember lady ghostbusters? Remember birds of prey? Remember bros? I have a liberal arts degree and took extensive critical theory classes. It was just always mentally stupid. There is no objective reason why a group should just give up and kill itself out of pity for historically dominating. There is near zero benefit to doing so. And in faurness there is a secondary reason besides the Stalin-Soviet demographics one for destroying a nations ethnic identity and weakening it by a divide and conquer strategy and that is socialized retirement and healthcare being a pyramid scheme and requiring more dupes to pay for the old people at the threat of state violence.

  1. Anonymous says:

    > I want a centerpiece item of my wardrobe to be a black shirt with white stitching
    >The stitch contrast means a lot to me
    Not trying to be mean exactly… but why

    • Anonymous says:

      >The stitch contrast means a lot to me

      You’re right and thank you because i didn’t verbalize my own psyche before you pointed it out.

      I guess i chose this one for the white stitching because it evokes some kind of artistry, authenticity and a retro vibe. Something evoking 1960s western shirts but in a very basic form that’s been stripped of it’s original identity.

      • Anonymous says:

        I don’t think I would call it western when it A. Doesn’t have a yoke, B. Is modern "untucked" length, C. Doesn’t have snaps. Also contrast stitching is still EXTREMELY common in modern westernwear. Walk inside of a boot barn.

        • Anonymous says:

          Yeah, that’s what i meant by evoking a western shirt but "stripped of its original identity".
          Because i don’t have a western style and don’t want a western shirt in the end, but something that would evoke the qualities of it.
          I have no western shirts in my inspo folder btw, but vibe pics like picrel that are mostly about the aforementioned qualities of artistry, authenticity and retro shit.

          I realize it’s a little too much thought for buying a $40 shirt.

          • Anonymous says:

            I would say it looks homemade by a teenage girl who took home economics in 1962. Perhaps in a good way if that is what you like. It has a definate homemade look with the large running stitch.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I’ve been wrestling with wanting to buy a Suede G9 in Sand Storm for months but 600€ just feels like way too hecking much and they never go on sale…

    • Anonymous says:

      I don’t like the idea of a suede harrington. It goes against the function of the jacket to be suede. It was invented as golf sportswear for inclement windy and somewhat wet weather. Suede just goes against the motion of a golf swing with friction at the armpits and obviously is not good for being waterproof or light. It’s just one of those things that goes against the technological function of a garment that disturbs my autism.

      • Anonymous says:

        I don’t like the idea of a suede harrington. It goes against the function of the jacket to be suede. It was invented as golf sportswear for inclement windy and somewhat wet weather. Suede just goes against the motion of a golf swing with friction at the armpits and obviously is not good for being waterproof or light. It’s just one of those things that goes against the technological function of a garment that disturbs my autism.

        Waxed cotton is too shiny, I really don’t like how it feels either.
        But yeah, it being so susceptible to rain is definitely part of why I’m so hesitant. I can just imagine some surprise shower ruining it completely

  3. Anonymous says:

    I reminds me of this true religion shirt. I love the high contrast stitching that true religion does on all their shit, but I wish the pocket corners were sharp. Truey jackets used to have very sharp pocket corners and I hate that they’re more rounded now.

    • Anonymous says:

      Looks like it would smell bad by the end of July. Skip it.

      https://i.imgur.com/WyzVHqL.jpg

      Classic, yes cop that especially if it’s on sale

      https://i.imgur.com/C7T4YIU.jpg

      I bet you could find the same jacket but vintage that’s nicer and cheaper than whatever they’re charging. So cop on principle but maybe not that specific one.

      https://i.imgur.com/b5PgCE0.jpg

      Yes or no? I mostly wear blue jeans with white t shirt

      Good for officemaxxing idk about casual wear unless you’re a 40 year old dad.

    • Anonymous says:

      cop

      https://i.imgur.com/jzU2YIB.jpg

      No, especially if you wanted to go sockless, double no.

      https://i.imgur.com/U0Vrl00.jpg

      Yes

      No
      […]
      Yes
      […]
      Yes
      […]
      No

      looks like shit but it’s supporting Ye, so yes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *