>historically verifible as a Roman political movement
>historically verifiable as a popular pagan configuration
>not supported remotely by the text so thousands more pages had to be written of "no really man it's in there I swear"
>when all else fails "dude you're not having enough faith right now lmao"
The Trinity of One
Brahma is 1
Vishnu is .999...
and Shiva is .000...1
God is One
So Brahma and Vishnu are identical?
>infinitely reductive fractions are totally whole numbers bro!!
Kill yourself.
0.9999... = 1 is objectively true
0.0000...1 doesn't even make sense
See me after class
>And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
the infinite one (.000...1) is my favourite one of
- science & math
the one which lives for ever and ever is the one which is most interesting
the 3 ones: 1 and .999... and .000...1
1 is shorthand for .999...
0 is shorthand for .000...1
lazy = limits
THERE'S ONLY ONE ONE! FUCK YOU.
TED
Jesus Isa Christ is my favourite.
>And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
>That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.
>Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation.
>Trust ye in the LORD for ever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting strength:
LORD JEHOVAH, even JEHOVAH, is the Creator's best nickname.
>THE LEAST INCOHERENT HERETIC.
Brahma the Father (1) and Vishnu the Son (.999...) are equally interesting as Shiva the Holy Ghost (.000...1)
in the Hindu-Islamic Numerals (0123456789) believed and used by LULZ daily
Allah the three ones of math are equally interesting
>>not supported remotely by the text so thousands more pages had to be written of "no really man it's in there I swear"
>1 John 5:7 (KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
>John 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
>John 1:14 (KJV) And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
>1 John 5:7 (KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
This is a fake verse
"A Trinitarian gloss (marginal note) known as the Johannine Comma, added to Latin translations of the epistle in the 4th century,[26] was interpolated (added to the main text) within 1 John 5:7-8 over the course of the Middle Ages.[26]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannine_Comma
>John 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
>John 1:14 (KJV) And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 1:1 speaks of two different gods, one of which is the Word.
The Word is said to be WITH God while also being called ‘God’. There are two different entities in this verse.
speaking of retards... lol
What did I say that was false ?
Jesus is a god but he is not Almighty God
>Isaiah 9:6 (KJV) For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Yes, Jesus is a mighty god (el ghibbor)
But he is not Almighty God (El Shaddai)
Doesn't He be given all the authorities?
>1 Peter 3:22 (KJV) Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.
There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad and Ali are his messengers.
IN the beginning was the Devil, and the
Devil was with God, and the Devil was
God, the Same was in the beginning
with God. All Things were made by
him; and without him was not any
thing made that was made. G-D
God-Devil
في البداية كان الشيطان و
كان إبليس مع الله ، وكان إبليس
الله ، نفس الشيء كان في البداية
مع الله. كل الأشياء صنعت بواسطة
له؛ وبدونه لم يكن هناك أي
الشيء الذي تم صنعه. G-D
الله الشيطان
>two different gods
HUH?!
SAY WHAT?!
God Allah has over 12,000 nicknames. John Yahya Baptist is my favorite.
The Word was WITH God, and the Word WAS God. It's like your voice is yours, is you, and that voice is always with you because it's part of you. When people heard your voice they'd say "I heard X talks" and not "I heard X's voice talks"
John makes a distinction between THE God and the word in the original greek by using the definite article for the first God
yeah, op's a retard.
The trinity is pagan
Two gods doesn't sound like monotheism to me
can you prove this without the masonic and obscurantist KJV?
the trinity is contamination from pagan religion, and only confims how delusional christcucks are
(You) are the one that doesn't understand - !
Maybe you need to get smarter?
OR else you should ask God to teach you (don't ask flippantly)
anon hates the infinite one
Please. Stop. Making. This. Thread. For fucks sake man. Every day I see the same thread. Do you not have your answer yet?
I'm not a Christian, and I don't believe in the existence of such a god, but I have not seen a good argument against a god existing in such a manner that doesn't impose massive limitations onto god itself.
I really think it comes down to an intellectual deficiency on the part of people who cannot comprehend it. If you're given a conception of god that shows that he is capable of transcending the laws of number and trying to argue that it is "illogical" because it does not conform to the laws of number (which is what all the sperging out about ones and threes is). The only explanation is that these people are incapable of a certain level of abstract thinking. Whether or not you believe such a being exists is irrelevant, the ability to find defensible is the single most important quality among members of our species. Those people that believe it is totally nonsensical and indefensible on logical grounds are closer to the all other animals by being bellow men who think otherwise.
>but I have not seen a good argument against a god existing in such a manner that doesn't impose massive limitations onto god itself.
Like what? Christianity does not put a single limit on God at all, which is why
this is possible. Im curious as to your examples, but I also know this thread is always full of bait and retards so we shall see
One is just the sperging out about ones and threes that I mentioned before. Anything that takes the form of "how can one be three?" Given what's being asserted by the trinity itself, even entertaining such an argument means that you just fundamentally do not understand what's going on, and it is a type of misunderstanding that indicates whoever finds it convincing is not capable of the abstract thought required to participate in philosophical and theological conversations. Anything they say is said for the purpose of preventing productive conversations from occurring. The only appropriate response is to tell them that they are a lesser form of life and that in a just world, they would be treated like livestock.
I suppose the worst argument I've ever heard is that such a conception of god insults the majesty of god. I think it was just cope because its absurd to assert that a god capable of more than his conception of it is somehow less majestic than the one he believes. It's clear to me that what really is an insult to the majesty of god is imposing limits on him. I know he would likely say that his conception of perfection itself insults the majesty of hi. I again think that such conclusions come from the inability to think abstractly. The vvery way in which this person conceives of god insults him, and it is not due to any malice, but. because he is intellectually incapable of true praise.
That being said I do not believe in a god at all, and I want to make that clear before someone accuses me of being a christian.
>if you live in a 2d plain you cannot comprehend a cube but you can still develop evidence to know its possible
>if you live in a 3d plain you cannot comprehend/fulfill a tesseract, but we know its possible
Apply this to the trinity, God, and thats it. The trinity is entirely possible and is real. Why 3? Because God said so. Why would the greatest thing ever be limited to our laws? He wouldn't otherwise they would not be great. Faith is evidence, faith is truth. We do not believe for the sake of it, nor have the men and women of the last 2000 years. You make these threads as if there isn't a plethora of books, great minds who have thought the same thing and figured it out. You make this thread, every, single, day. Read an actual book. Or something. Anything.