- This topic has 125 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 months, 2 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
What is the greatest number less than infinity?
-
No infinite set has a supremum you absolute twat
-
In the set [math]{0,1,2,infty}[math] with the ordering [math]<1<2<infty[math], the greatest number less than [math]infty[math], is 2.
Or did you have another set and/or another ordering in mind? -
>he confuses infinite with unbounded
this is what happens when scrotebrained professor let students who make these mistakes not fail the class-
How is that different from infinite?
-
[math](0,1) subset mathbb{R} [/math] is infinite but bounded
-
>is infinite
how is 1=inf-
how many element does the set I described contain?
-
1
-
you could have baited with a bit more effort lol
-
>element
that’s a singular, seriously what else did you expect
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[math]sup {frac{1}n:ninmathbb{Z}^+} = ?[/math]
[math]sup (0,1) = ?[/math]
-
No infinite subset of the natural numbers has a supremum. That’s not true for infinite sets in general.
-
>t.freshman who failed analysis
-
Man this board has some dumb motherfuckers on it.
Although you’re probably baiting anyways.-
I wasn’t baiting I just wrote what I wanted to say wrong, posted it, read it and realized I posted some scrotebraination.
Guess I was just scrotebrained on accident
-
-
-
Smaller infinity
-
[…]
or any other number.
-
Infinity is not a number but a conceptual placeholder.
-
so is your mother
-
-
1/(1/.999)
-
the size of my d.
-
no such thing
-
Rayo’s number is pretty freaking big, so I’ll say that. It probably can’t be surpassed without using the same exact idea and just putting bigger numbers in the equation
-
>Rayo’s number: The smallest number bigger than every finite number m with the following property: there is a formula φ(x1) in the language of first-order set-theory (as presented in the definition of Sat) with less than a googol symbols and x1 as its only free variable such that: (a) there is a variable assignment s assigning m to x1 such that Sat([φ(x1)],s), and (b) for any variable assignment t, if Sat([φ(x1)],t), then t assigns m to x1.
Wat-
>if Sat([φ(x1)],t), then t assigns m to x1.
Literally what tf is wrong with math and science fields? What is this non-sense -
Basically you get to spam a googol (10^100) symbols, and the number is one bigger than any definition you can possibly come up with. Grahams Number, TREE function, Busy Beaver – all are possible to define in way fewer symbols than a googol, so you could nest billions of all of these functions together, and that’s still way smaller than the absolute theoretical maximum of a googol symbol definition of a number
-
-
-
3.5
-
-
I wanna fuck violet
-
-
Wouldn’t it be better to just get rid of the notion of infinity all together?
I doubt infinity actually exists beyond fantasy. -
infinity minus one
-
But what about infinity – .1
-
-
Infinity – 1.
>"Noooooo you cant do that because thatd still be infinity noooo"
-
Literal child logic.
-
That still equals infinity according to Science!TM and MATH!TH STEM!TM, etc.
wait
doesnt infinity contain all numbers?
what about 0/0? isnt that a number too? if it doesnt, then how can it be infinity?-
infinity is larger than any number, and is boundless.
‘contain’ has no meaning
-
-
-
[…]
That still equals infinity according to Science!TM and MATH!TH STEM!TM, etc.
-
Thought experiment
Lets take 1 second and cut it in half again and again and again. How many times can you cut it in half? What is that number -1
-
>Lets take 1 second and cut it in half again and again and again. How many times can you cut it in half?
your life span * how long you take to cut it in half
-
-
Yeah, so? Numbers aren’t real, I think you’re confused.
-
-
Googleplex
-
it’s googolplex scrotebrain
-
-
This question is no more sensible if you replace infinity with one.
-
>This question is no more sensible if you replace infinity with one.
0.999999……-
1/inf=0
-
you mean 0.inf?
-
-
-
-
Your mom’s weight.
-
yo momma so fat, she legitimizes tooker
-
Speaking of wich, I haven’t seen old tookie boy on here in a few months.
What’s up with that?
-
-
-
infinity-(1/infinity)? I know the math fascists will disagree, but I mean more theoretically.
-
I like 10 and 22.
-
Infinity – 0.00…1
-
First up, there is no such thing as infinity. You might argue that its a conceptual construct, but so is the existence of flying pigs, with wings and shit. You can conjure them up in your imagination but they are no less unreal.
Now, the biggest number in existence is MOAN. The Mother Of All Numbers. This number sits at the end of the number line. There is no number beyond it, so there is no point saying some scrotebrained shit like "MOAN + 1". Unless of course you are a scrotebrained shithead, in which case go for it, you scrotebrained shithead you.
MOAN is by definition the largest number in existence. Its exact value will most likely never be known. But that is fine because we know it exists and we know it is finite. Indeed, the value of MOAN is also likely to be variable, depending on the nature of the Universe and its age, and upon the base units used to count. For example if new matter is coming into existence as the Universe expands ( as postulated by the Steady State Theory ) then MOAN will certainly increase over time. If the base unit is expressed as total subatomic particles in existence in the Universe then the value of MOAN will be quite smaller than if the Planck length was being used as the base unit instead.
MOAN is indelibly tied to the physical reality of the Universe and not to some scrotegy fantasy dreamed up by homosexuals with infected arses.
Although we may never know its exact value, one thing is certain. The value of MOAN is finite and it can not be exceeded. Just like GOD intended. Attempting to add anything to MOAN results in you sailing off the edge of reality and being devoured by hyperspatial sea monsters.
This makes those GOD CURSED INFINITY LOVING SODOMITES very upset. And they will BURN in the DISCRETE fires of HELL for a very long but ultimately FINITE duration.
Amen.
-
>biggest number
no such thing
either moan+1 exists, or moan isn’t a number-
>moan+1 exists
>exists-
>i have no argument
-
No number exists that is larger than the largest number of physical elements that actually exist. Fuck off with your imaginary numbers. They don’t exist by definition. lol
-
>No number exists that is larger than the largest number of physical elements that actually exist.
lolol. microbrainlet can only count in unary -
>largest number of physical elements that actually exist
ok, in how many ways can you arrange them?
easy mode: try with only 10^30 atoms-
>10^30 atoms
about 100 tons of iron
same weight as a Boeing 757 -
>in how many ways can you arrange them?
You can’t arrange them, scrote.-
low iq post
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think we can all agree that if there exists a largest number, then for numbers it is not generally the case that they have a successor.
-
if
-
-
-
This is the only correct answer.
-
-
-
Infinity minus one
-
I love kots so much bros.
-
from the unit infinity you can construct multiples of infinity, fractions of infinity, etc.
so any real number n<1 times the unit infinity would be the "smaller than infinity" -
infinity minus one over infinity
-
Infinity isnt a number
-
This is the best answer. Everyone else is just shitposting.
-
-
can infinity be perceived as anything else except infinite space, infinite time, or a gradual representation of something similar to them through a continuum and all encompassing set of numbers? infinite set of numbers – 1, infinite time minus 1 second, infinite space minus 1 cm radius. it takes the very sense of the thing you are supposed to understand and warps it to become meaningless. what is infinity if not the very definition of an infinite continuum of something, and if this is the truth, how can you limit something which just goes on forever? legit question here, is there any use to such question? how is it apllied in any science? does scientists receive more funds when they act like idiots? I’m not from this board btw, this thread appeared on the front page and it looked like a troll so here I am to see what is going on on this board.
-
cute kot
-
Infinite minus zero.
-
remove mathematics from this board, mathematics is not related to science
-
>this board
LULZ – Science & Mathlrn2read, scrotebrain
-
-
[math] hat{infty} [/math]
-
Infinity is fake and gay. It is a cope.
-
You just discovered the crux issue.
I’ve been studying it for some time. -
Inf – lesser inf – even lesser inf – …. – first number you hit that is not an inf
EZ-
scrotebrain
Inf – lesser inf – even lesser inf – …. – first number you hit that is not an inf < Inf – lesser inf < Inf
-
-
Your question is nonsense. Specify how your infinity was created, then you can figure out the next smallest value. (likely looking like
[…]
)
-
The size of my penis
-
There is no stronger number as an Googolplexplex. Its even bigger as infinity.
-
It would need a libary of the size of the earth to print all the zeros of an googolplex, but we talking about an googolplexplex.
This is how big it gets and that’s why its stronger as infinity.
-
-
A thousand elephants
-
It would be a wonderful art project to print 1 Googolplexplex, on ultra thin graphite paper, and build an tower out of it.
the GOOGLPLEXPLEX tower.
-
If i would be rich i would print 1 googlplexplex, on ultrathin paper, barley readable with magnifying glasses. And suspend it from an 500 meter high tower.
-
six gorillion
-
Infinity-hat, i.e. infinity without the absorptive property.
-
-1/12
-
It’s like the Ali G episode where he interviews the computer guy. The answer to your question is somewhere around 99999999999999 times 999999999999999 right around there
-
If we take the assertion that a numbers existence is woke af on the information required to conceptualize it, I believe that would put a limiting tangible factor on the largest number that could exist. At that point it would become some kind of arbitrary number representation optimization question, so long as the universe could contain the number information in question and someway to "experience" it.
-
prove it
-
I’m not in a position to prove anything, I’m asserting the idea that a numbers existence is woke af on it’s perception by some other entity. Like an idea, numbers are a great way to reference quantifiable tangible objects, but they only exist when ‘thought’ about. I suppose if we wanted to go a step further and try to define a thought in terms of physical processes we could get to a point where the largest number is some electro chemical interaction that ‘perceives’ the most optimized largest number representation.
-
-
-
[…]
the infinity before and after substraction are different kind of infinity, they’re not equal
-
https://i.4cdn.org/sci/1633139002579.webm
Grahams Number.
-
Grahams Number +1
-
-
A number that never happens.
-
[math] frac{1}{eta} [/math] where
[math] eta [/math] is op’s iq -
What is the greatest number less than potato? Infinity is not a number, scrotebrain.
-
it’s relation to numbers is clear, unlike potato
-
Can you define "less than" for me?
-
no, idiots are beyond help
-
When do I stop?
>n-n-no i can’t define "less than"
Ok, scrotebrain.
-
-
>define "less then"
In terms of what? Some other concept X? Will I then have to define the concept X in terms of some concept Y and so on?When do I stop?
-
-
-
-
14
-
14 year olds do not look like your drawings, at least not in brazil
-
-
That number is [math]n[/math]. Oh no it’s [math]n+1[/math]. Oh no it’s [math](n+1) + 1[/math]. Oh no it’s …
thread
-
Same answer as for: who is the biggest idiot dumber than OP?
-
42
-
Okay everybody. You can all go home. I got this.
the answer is infinity-1
Bam, easy. You can all leave.
-
infinity-.1
-
-
Infinity – (1/Infinity).
-
That is not less, it is equal.
-
lol prove it scrote
-
Proof: 1/infinity = 0 implies infinity – 1/infinity = infinity.Qed.
-
>1/infinity = 0
prove it, scrote -
Wrong. Infinity is not a number. Therefore 1/NaN cannot equal a number ((0)).
-
sure bud
[math] displaystyle
lim_{x to infty} dfrac{x+1}{x} =
lim_{x to infty} 1+ 1/x = 1+0 = 1
[/math]-
Okay and? Infinity is not a number.
-
Okay and?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
infinity minus 1
-
Infinity minus 1/infinity
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.