Theory of everything? Ain’t no such thing

Home Forums Science & tech Theory of everything? Ain’t no such thing

Viewing 15 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #184575
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Theory of everything? Ain’t no such thing sis

    • #184576
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >blocks your path

    • #184577
      Anonymous
      Guest

      haa gordel

    • #184578
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Says the guy who starved himself to death so as not to be poisoned.

      • #184579
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Imagine coming with a weak ad hominem at one of the greatest logicians of all time. Irony of ironies.

        • #184580
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Not everyone is worth paying attention to. The homeless guy openly pooping on the sidewalk in front of the 7-11 in broad daylight might be mumbling to himself the most genius thing ever said, but there’s no reason to try to find out.

          • #184582
            Anonymous
            Guest

            >Not everyone is worth paying attention to.
            Y..You’re talking about yourself right?
            Not the greatest logician of the 20th century obviously.

          • #184600
            Solivagus
            Guest

            If he was screaming, "I AM NOT THIS TURD I AM EXCRETING FROM MY ANUS," then technically it would be a public lecture given pro bono and may be the most enlightening experience the general public could witness.

            >I would also accept it if it was, "EVERYBODY POOPS!"

    • #184581
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Today I will remind them.

      • #184583
        Anonymous
        Guest

        It fails because "God" is undefined. You can say anything with analytic language, including bullshit– so long as you use undefined terms.

        • #184584
          Anonymous
          Guest

          It’s defined in D1

          • #184585
            Anonymous
            Guest

            No, a definition must be both exhaustive and exclusive.

            • #184587
              Anonymous
              Guest

              Uhh yeah, that’s what the triple bar means. D = Definition, A = Axiom, C = Corollary, T = Theorem

              • #184588
                Anonymous
                Guest

                I got that, however, the definition "possesses all positive properties" does not encompass God, nor is God necessarily the only thing that possesses all positive properties.
                Also, you’re using the word "positive" in two different ways, twisting the definition as you go.

      • #184586
        Anonymous
        Guest

        logical proofs of god are notoriously stupid.

        let me give one
        >assume god exists and god is omniscient and omnipotent
        >god is omniscient, therefore he knows everything.
        >therefore god knows what he will do tomorrow. to denote this, we will say god does X tomorrow. X could be anything, or nothing
        >now god decides he does not want to do X tomorrow.
        >he does Y, which contradicts X instead, which he is allowed to do because he is omnipotent

        proof by contradiction that God cannot be both omnipotent and omniscient QED

      • #184589
        Anonymous
        Guest

        This was proved in Coq, so it must be true.

        • #184590
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Existence is not a real predicate. Anselm was a scrotebrain, and the ontological argument is nonsense.

          • #184592
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Friendly reminder that Kant’s deontology got BTFO by Catholic Elizabeth Anscombe.

            • #184594
              Anonymous
              Guest

              We’re not discussing ethics, here.

      • #184603
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >dude, just define real existence into your conception of a thing
        Didn’t Kant have a point about this?

      • #184631
        Anonymous
        Guest

        assuming the law of excluded middle.
        ISHYGDDT

    • #184591
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >Our experiments were repeated with the highly trustful proof assistants Isabelle/HOL and Coq. This provided additional assurance.

      wtf, I thought that atheist believed in science, why are they denying it now?

    • #184593
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >it’s another episode of pop-educated midwits misunderstanding Gödel

      • #184596
        Anonymous
        Guest

        pseud

        • #184597
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >i’m a pseud
          Yes, you are.

          • #184598
            Anonymous
            Guest

            you will never be a scientist

            • #184601
              Anonymous
              Guest

              Seethe, cope, and leave Gödel alone. He had nothing to say about the possibility of a "theory of everything".

              • #184607
                Anonymous
                Guest

                >wahhh leave Godel alone.
                If Kurt were here he’d side with me and spit on you..tfu. tfu. You dogmatists will never know true science, only scientism.
                "Materialism is false" ~ Kurt Godel

                Looks like fedora tippers only like logic and "facts" when it comes from the mouth of their pop-science popularizers: black science man and bill nye.

                "Religions are, for the most part, bad, but Religion is not." ~ Kurt Godel

                • #184609
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  "No! I don’t want to die! I’ll starve myself to death to avoid being poisoned!" ~ Also Kurt Gödel

                  • #184610
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    Andddd he resorts to the same shitty ad hom against a logical genius no less.
                    We are LAUGHING

                • #184611
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  >You dogmatists will never know true science, only scientism.
                  What are you on about, you deranged religitard? I’m not arguing anything for or against any gods, nor for or against materialism. I’m just telling you that Gödel’s incompleteness theorems don’t tell you much about physical reality.

                  • #184612
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    Your theory of everything can never be proved.
                    >This was enough to prompt John von Neumann to comment that “it’s all over“.

                    • #184613
                      Anonymous
                      Guest

                      It doesn’t need to be "proved". It just needs to be consistent with everything observed.

                      • #184614
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        >Everything observed
                        Are you freaking batshit stark mad?
                        You realize how little of the universe humans have observed? How little of our own ocean even. We will never have a grand theory of OURSELVES or the hard problem of consciousness let alone to presume one of the freaking universe. Delusional grand theory of nothing. REEEEeE

                      • #184616
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        >all that incoherent seething
                        I don’t see how it’s relevant. A "Theory of Everything" doesn’t need to be "proved" in a mathematical sense. It just needs to account for everything we know.

                      • #184620
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        >A "Theory of Everything" doesn’t need to be "proved" in a mathematical sense. It just needs to account for everything we know.
                        Read this again slow. It just needs to account for everything we know. Doesn’t need to be proved in a mathematical sense. Everything we know. Everything. But it excludes mathema…

                      • #184621
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        But that’s possible, because mathematics excludes itself, as Godel proved.

                      • #184623
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Mathematics isn’t a physical observation, anon.

                      • #184622
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        It literally does you freaking parasite. You all are legit going to be freaking killed in French Revolution 2.0.

                        This is beyond me. I’m a freaking pacifist, but I’m also a "prophet" to use a word that even an old freaking scrotebrain scrote bitch like you might understand.

                      • #184615
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        >It doesn’t need to be "proved". It just needs to be consistent with everything observed.

                        WHY THE FUCK YOU ARE YOU PEOPLE IGNORING THIS SHIT?

                        https://youtu.be/Z7cYtk5cdv8

                        Did… did you stupid freaking monkeys really not thing that this should would be solved online, just like mother fuckers are solving VR and WhatsApp and the rest of this bullshit..

                        Are you people freaking play acting science or do you actually care?

                        Jesus freaking christ.
                        https://youtu.be/Z7cYtk5cdv8

                      • #184617
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Please take your medications. You’re very clearly mentally ill.

                      • #184619
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        You should unitonically have a nice day before people do it for you in Grench Revolution 2.0.

                        I swear to freaking God Anon. I’m a pacifist who had a nervous breakdown the first time he accidently killed a freaking bug, but I’m also a prophet in a sense that is deeper than religion and I am telling you, you are marked for death

                      • #184618
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        IT IS LITERALLY RIGHT HERE YOU FAKE FRAUD freaking DAGGOT MOTHER FUCKERS. LITERALLY FUCK YOURSELVES. JESUS freaking CHRIST YOU PEOPLE LITERALLY NEED REVOLUTION TO PULL YOUR freaking HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES. WE ARE NOT DOING SHIT ON BLACKBOARDS ANYMORE. KIDS ARE freaking INCENTING VR IN THEIR freaking PARENTS GARAGES. YOU DIDNT THINK SOME DIPSHIP ONLINE WOULD UNIFY PHYSICS????

                        LITERALLY freaking KILL YOIRSELFS!!! EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU IS freaking FAKE!!!!!

                        FUCKJNG have a nice day

    • #184595
      Anonymous
      Guest

      […]

      A mind incapable of discussing ideas wrote this.

    • #184599
      Anonymous
      Guest

      […]

      No one’s reading your links. You just wasted your own time.

    • #184602
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Looks like fedora tippers only like logic and "facts" when it comes from the mouth of their pop-science popularizers: black science man and bill nye.

      • #184604
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Of course it’s not by accident. Look at what they did to Gallileo. Great minds have always been constrained by smaller minds, most often through the control of the masses with religion.

        • #184629
          Anonymous
          Guest

          yeah all of us smart people should move to china where the least amount of religious people are

          china’s about 49% atheist so if we try really hard we can make it the first country that’s majority atheist

      • #184605
        Anonymous
        Guest
    • #184606
      Anonymous
      Guest
    • #184608
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Nice nu-atheismoid/christcuck containment thread you got there.

    • #184624
      Anonymous
      Guest

      I swear to freaking God. You people are literally going to be genocide. We cannot go on like this. There is a guy right here in this thread who literally LITERALLY solved all of freaking physics and you don’t freaking listen because you only respond to force and your superiors. You are going to be fucming killed by the revolution. Not me. But by waves of humanity that you cannot even fathom.

      How the fuck are you ignoring the most basic and obvious proofs for unified science that are literally in this fucming thread???

      It’s because you don’t freaking listen to those "below you". And those below you are now like 99.9 percent of humanity and you are literally going to be murdered. Do you understand?

      • #184625
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Aww, Lisa. Just because I don’t care doesn’t mean I don’t understand.

        • #184627
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >Aww, Lisa. Just because I don’t care doesn’t mean I don’t understand.

          Haha. You really don’t get it Anon. And I don’t think you ever will.

    • #184626
      Anonymous
      Guest

      The "Ivy League" no longer exists you ape fucks. What exists now are kids like Palmer Luckey who invented modern VR at 15 years old in his parents garage…

      And a kid like that literally freaking unified physics in Excel and you don’t listen because you are freaking obsolete and play acting like Einstein, and this is epidemic at all levels of society and WHEN and of this revolution comes you are literally LITERALLY going to be executed as human waste. NOT BY ME. I say this as someone who is, essentially a P R O P H E T. And just like the French you will not listen until your head is removed holy freaking shit.

    • #184628
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Gary didn’t unify physics dude. We already went over this about a year ago.

      • #184632
        This is Sabina
        Guest

        >Gary didn’t unify physics dude. We already went over this about a year ago.

        Imagine seeing what has been happening in computer science the past few years and still believing this. But I am sure they can find a place for you to be I a teacher in public education somewhere, Anon

    • #184630
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >godel will never criticize lain point theory
      why live?

Viewing 15 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
startno id