So are Africans actually primitive or is that just a meme? No fiddling around the bush

Home Forums History So are Africans actually primitive or is that just a meme? No fiddling around the bush

Viewing 15 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #192097
      Anonymous
      Guest

      So are Africans actually primitive or is that just a meme? No fiddling around the bush want a straight answer

    • #192098
      Anonymous
      Guest

      humans moved out of africa to cold regions, cold regions required seasonal farming which obviously takes more intelligence than year round abundant food
      so through selective breeding people in europe and asia became more intelligent, because it’s a basic fact you can’t survive as easily outside of africa
      over many thousands of years this selective breeding and necessary intelligence made europeans and asians on average more intelligence than africans

      thats not to say there can’t be smart blacks or dumb whites, just that on average non-africans are smarter than africans

      • #192102
        Anonymous
        Guest

        So you’re saying global warming will turn us into dimbasses

        • #192139
          Anonymous
          Guest

          not necessarily. we already have the philosophy and technology. only if we lose it will we turn stupid.

          • #192189
            Anonymous
            Guest

            >We

            • #192190
              Anonymous
              Guest

              >Once happened to be

      • #192104
        Anonymous
        Guest

        If this is the only reason, why aren’t people who live in hot deserts smarter than whites who live on mild islands? Or are they?

      • #192107
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Are you freaking stupid? Have you never heard of the dry season before? Almost half of Africa is deserts and steppe.

        FFS the entire reason Pygmies are so short is an adaptation against the nutrient poor forests.

        • #192140
          Anonymous
          Guest

          so they adapted by being short dumbos instead of getting big brains.
          you dont carry your conclusions through because you’re scared of the implications.

          • #192142
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Not him, but it evolutionarily makes more sense to be physically smaller than to be scrotebrained.

            • #192145
              Anonymous
              Guest

              did you mean to say "not be scrotebrained"? because they’re small and unintelligent.

              • #192147
                Anonymous
                Guest

                So scrotebrained that they share the capacity for abstract thought and culture with the rest of humanity, apparently.

      • #192108
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Is this what race theorists actually believe? The rest of the world is more dangerous than Africa?

        • #192116
          Anonymous
          Guest

          If scrotes with sticks and mud huts can manage to exist in sub-Saharan Africa for thousands of years, then yes it is “easy” to live there.

          • #192117
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Also

          • #192119
            Anonymous
            Guest

            I just figured lions would be a greater threat to humans than, you know, the cold.

            • #192120
              Anonymous
              Guest

              Unironically if you really think that than you’re honestly scrotebrained.

              A bad winter wipes out entire villages. A lion attack kills n’bagu because he was being a scrotebrain and went into the long grass.

              • #192121
                Anonymous
                Guest

                Okay what about all those diseases then like malaria? That’s a bigger killer than winter.

                • #192123
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  Local communities tend to develop resistances to local diseases. Africans for example have a higher percentage of people with sickle cell which makes them resistant to malaria. Similar things happened for Europeans with European diseases and Asians for Asian diseases.

                  Honestly the only reason we think of Africa as being especially disease ridden is because Euro’s died in droves colonizing it as they didn’t have those local resistances.

                  • #192124
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    Hey malaria has still killed plenty of people, resistance is not immunity. I wonder if you tallied up all the cause of deaths in human history if cold or malaria has killed more.

                  • #192127
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    >Africans for example have a higher percentage of people with sickle cell
                    Often absent in many many population even in malaria areas.

                    >Euro’s died in droves colonizing it as they didn’t have those local resistances.
                    and Africans died to them in large amounts. there’s a freaking reason the African population that Europeans tried to up for labour use did not jump like they wanted.

                • #192132
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  Except unlike the cold, diseases didn’t really motivate people to survive, because it was so mysterious and misunderstood before the advance in medicine that people just thought it was the wrath of the gods. IQ doesn’t just equal fatalities scrotebrain. Jesus imagine being this moronic

                  • #192133
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    Oh yeah I was wondering if someone was going to make this argument. If you have to evolve to be smart and survive in the cold, then why didn’t the cold instantly kill every human that came across it? Since none of them would be smart enough to survive.

                    • #192137
                      Anonymous
                      Guest

                      Because they were migrating gradually you imbecile. Human migrations over the continents took 10s of thousands of year. Of course charkcoal black africans from the savannah didn’t just suddenly appear in Europe one day. Jesus what an insane freaking dumbass

                      • #192138
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        If the cold makes smart people because stupid people cannot survive in it. How are humans ever going to get smart enough to survive in the cold at all? Either humans are already smart enough to survive winter or not. There are no gradual winters.

            • #192130
              Anonymous
              Guest

              >I just figured lions would be a greater threat to humans than, you know, the cold.

              • #192131
                Anonymous
                Guest

                I know which one I would rather go up against.

                • #192136
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  I would definitly rather fight a lion 1v1 with a spear and a shield, than have to live in a village in 1700s Europe in a harsh winter.

                  • #192144
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    Oh yeah a village but what about hunting and gathering? At least you can work your way south with the animals.

            • #192141
              Anonymous
              Guest

              and yet they live with, "you know", sticks and mudhuts.
              reddit post.

              • #192146
                Anonymous
                Guest

                Do you guys actually think the whole continent of Africa is sticks and mud huts? One of the largest early civilization came out of one of the hottest parts of Africa.

            • #192158
              Anonymous
              Guest

              Did you know that Southern Europe had lions and all of Europe used to have wolves and bears?

              • #192159
                Anonymous
                Guest

                Really all of Europe used to have cave lions until quite recently (by evolutionary standards), along with other dangerous megafauna that muh ancestors hunted to extinction during the ice age.

              • #192160
                Anonymous
                Guest

                Well we could compare all the dangerous animals of the world, there are a lot more in Africa. I mean hippos kill more people than the big cats. Wolves and bears are small potatoes, especially black bears.

                • #192162
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  >Later cave lions seem to have preyed foremost on reindeer, up to the brink of local extinction or extirpation of both species. Other possible prey species were giant deer, red deer, wild horse, musk ox, aurochs, wisent, steppe bison, young woolly rhino and young woolly mammoth. It likely competed for prey with the European Ice Age leopard (P. pardus spelaea) as well as cave hyenas, cave bears and wolves.
                  but tell me more about how the African environment is oh so hostile

                  • #192163
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    You want to say that the rest of the world had hostile wildlife comparable to sub Saharan Africa?

                    • #192165
                      Anonymous
                      Guest

                      If your argument is that megafauna are a greater threat to humans than the cold, then prehistoric eurasians suffered from both.
                      (Speaking of Eurasians, South Asians and East Asians had to deal with tigers and crocodiles and shit.)

                      • #192167
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Right, I’m not saying they didn’t have hostile animals in Eurasia, I’m just saying they had more hostile and more dangerous animals in SSA.

                      • #192169
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Are hippos more hostile and dangerous than tigers and wolves? They might kill more people nowadays, but that’s after thousands of years of people hunting the latter to extinction in many regions.

                      • #192171
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Yeah the definitely are, just in different ways. I don’t think its really a matter of comparing the dangers of individual animals anyway since you have to take into account the whole environment.

                      • #192172
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        For comparison:
                        >The most comprehensive study of deaths due to tiger attacks estimates that at least 373,000 people died due to tiger attacks between 1800 and 2009 averaging about 1800 kills per year
                        Meanwhile I’m told
                        >Every year hippos kill around 500 people in Africa – more than lions, elephants, leopards, buffaloes and rhinos put together.

                        In short tigers alone appeared to be more dangerous than all the african megafauna put together

                      • #192174
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Hippos are no joke

                        They WILL murder you even tho they probably won’t consume your flesh

                      • #192176
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        >provide statistical proof that man-hunters are more dangerous
                        >h-hippos are no joke
                        how many hippos have bodycounts in the hundreds?

                      • #192177
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Hippo is the biggest man-killer in Africa ya jackass.

                      • #192175
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        There’s even one tiger that killed over 400 people alone, meaning she individually killed more people than "lions, elephants, leopards, buffaloes and rhinos put together" kill in a year in africa.

                      • #192178
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        India had a population twice that of Africa in 1800. Maybe that’s related.

                      • #192180
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        you mean India thrived and prospered in spite of its hostile fauna?

                      • #192181
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        India’s large population was probably because of its productive river-valley agriculture. The yearly number of people killed by animals wouldn’t have been enough to keep the population down. Not by a mile.

                      • #192182
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        The argument is not that hostile fauna prevent places from developing, its that hostile fauna are a greater threat to the unintelligent than cold. You are going to have to be clever to deal with animals, not so much with winter.

                      • #192179
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        We need a per-capita animal killing statistic. Statistics in places like India can be very misleading.

                  • #192168
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    Most of those disappeared 12-13k years ago. The only surviving one that could pose a significant danger to people would be the aurochs, and according to ancient authors, they weren’t aggressive unless provoked. I guess there were lions too, in SE Europe.

                    • #192170
                      Anonymous
                      Guest

                      >Most of those disappeared 12-13k years ago.
                      So what? We’re talking about human evolution, 10k years is a blip.

                      • #192173
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        Not according to "race realists."

                    • #192186
                      Anonymous
                      Guest

                      >Most of those disappeared 12-13k years ago.

                      Yeah, when the humans who had moved out of Africa 100k years ago exterminated them after having undergone several dozens thousands of years of evolution who turned them more intelligent than the scrotes who remained in Africa

                      • #192188
                        Anonymous
                        Guest

                        More recent research suggests climate change was a big part of what killed them actually.

                • #192185
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  >Well we could compare all the dangerous animals of the world, there are a lot more in Africa.

                  Because Africans weren’t intelligent enough to get rid of them while Europeans and Asians were

          • #192125
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Have you actually lived in Africa?

            Unironically if you really think that than you’re honestly scrotebrained.

            A bad winter wipes out entire villages. A lion attack kills n’bagu because he was being a scrotebrain and went into the long grass.

            >A lion attack kills n’bagu because he was being a scrotebrain and went into the long grass
            Lions intruding human areas is not uncommon. elephants do enter human farms and often eat everything around them and holy shit if you encounter a bull in Musth dear God help you.

          • #192134
            Anonymous
            Guest

            You’re thinking in a circle.

        • #192153
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Madagascar 4 is looking pretty good

        • #192184
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Uh it’s almost like other humans exterminated their dangerous animals because they were more intelligent and less lazy than scrotes….

      • #192112
        Anonymous
        Guest
        • #192115
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Here’s the actual reason.

        • #192143
          Anonymous
          Guest

          NOO YOU CANT JUST HOLD SIMILAR VIEWS TO OTHER PEOPLE WHO DISRESPECT MUH METHODS

      • #192128
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >out of africa

      • #192148
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Why aren’t sibirians, inuits and sami conquering the starts then?

      • #192194
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Is this what race theorists actually believe? The rest of the world is more dangerous than Africa?

        Africa selects for those who conquer the present, Eurasia selects for those who conquer the future.

        If scrotes with sticks and mud huts can manage to exist in sub-Saharan Africa for thousands of years, then yes it is “easy” to live there.

        I dare you to move to Africa with nothing and prosper from scratch

    • #192099
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Some of them are and some of them aren’t

    • #192100
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Bantus are more advanced than small uncontacted tribes in Papua New Guinea I guess.

    • #192101
      Anonymous
      Guest

      They literally live in tribes even now, they were and remain primitive

    • #192103
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Depends on the country. It’s like asking if Europe is poor or rich. You say yes until you go to Serbia, which is literally a turd world country.

    • #192105
      Anonymous
      Guest

      They were sitting in huts when Europeans sailed up to their shores, so yeah I’d say so.

      • #192110
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >They were sitting in huts
        That apoplectic to a lot of European areas in Europe anon. you think everyone was living in cathedrals or the good urban areas? I know middle/old age Portuguese with stories that would literally not seem any place if you replaced Portugal with Senegal.

    • #192106
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Africa is probably the fastest developing continent currently. But every country/region is different and it can vary wildly from one end to another.

    • #192109
      Mrrandom
      Guest

      It’s called the cold weather theory. It’s much harder to survive in a cold area then one so you had more idiots die every generation in the cold areas vs warmer one’s. Over 40,000 years you end up with a average iq difference of 20 points which is massive.

      • #192111
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >It’s much harder to survive in a cold area
        It’s not really. Idiots just jack off to this theory who have no idea how climate works at all in Europe let alone the world.

      • #192113
        Anonymous
        Guest

        These mofos must be the smartest people around.

        • #192191
          Anonymous
          Guest

          i heard their iqs are good its just they live in a frozen shithole

          • #192192
            Anonymous
            Guest

            If they were so intelligent they would’ve moved OUT of the frozen shithole years ago.

            • #192193
              Anonymous
              Guest

              you mean like to america?

          • #192196
            Anonymous
            Guest

            They should have good IQs, they should have the best IQs of the species, since they had to adapt to the most amount of cold.

    • #192114
      Anonymous
      Guest

      "the raw kaffir whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with, and then, pass his life in indolence and nakedness." -freaking Gandhi

      • #192126
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Didn’t he sleep next to ah who am I kidding he slept next to young girls to test himself

    • #192118
      Anonymous
      Guest

      no they’re just as modern as non-africans but modern in a different way. the key is to divorce the concept of modernity from a sense of inevitable technological progression

    • #192122
      Anonymous
      Guest

      A tiny bit, but they’re developing much quicker than /poo/yps would like to admit.

    • #192135
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Just a meme? Fiddling around the bush? Just look at (subsaharn) africa and its history, or lack thereof, and tell me yourself. Better yet, just look at the africans in question yourself and tell me if they, overall, look primitive or not to you.
      Just a meme, lmao

    • #192149
      Anonymous
      Guest

      https://i.4cdn.org/his/1633964053323.webm

      If you want to know how to feel about SubSaharan Africans then you should interact with them.

      My personal opinion is that most west African and Bantu people are kind of stupid and have displaced many actually intelligent Africans. I’ve met some good, kind, and inventive African people from Ethiopia but I’ve met so many bad Bantu. I am myself Nigerian but I consider Bantu to be sub human. Most American blacks are Bantu and lack the qualities that make a man human.

      • #192151
        Anonymous
        Guest

        I must stipulate, before you say Nigeria is the heart of Bantu west Africa, I am not Bantu, I am Tutsi migrant and my family did not live there forever.

        • #192157
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >I am not Bantu, I am Tutsi migrant
          Tutsi are Bantu though???

      • #192154
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >Bantu
        Somalian detected

      • #192164
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >I am myself Nigerian but I consider Bantu to be sub human
        fuck off this is the problem with you scrotes. you adopted the anglo mentality used to enslave blacks. you will never progress as a people thinking like this.

        • #192166
          Anonymous
          Guest

          You’re not even germanic, mutt

          • #192183
            Anonymous
            Guest

            My grandmother speaks Pennsylvanian Dutch, she has problems understanding me.

        • #192187
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Get a load of this guy
          scrotes had been enslaving each others over slight ethnic differences for thousands of years before Anglos even arrived there

    • #192150
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Africans are to modern Western civilization what the Germanic peoples were to the Roman Empire.
      They’re the reason it collapses, and they live during the chaotic period that immediately preceded, thought the long centuries of feudalism that promotes some form of stability, rising slowly but steadily until a Renaissance happens, when the barbarians gain a newfound appreciation for the precursors they destroyed and try to emulate them.
      This follows further historical developments until the barbarians become highly civilized and they reach their peak in power.
      The difference is the “precursor civilization” this time around is the modern Western one. Africans will use it as a base to model their own civilization on and seeing how much Westerners could achieve using the Romans as a model, it’s not unrealistic to expect that Africans will become a type-I, possibly II if they use modern Western civilization as its model.
      Wakanda isn’t a vision of some long-forgotten African past, it’s a vision of the African future.

    • #192161
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Define "primitive"

Viewing 15 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.