Is Wikipedia’s FAQ on race and intelligence accurate?

Home Forums Science & tech Is Wikipedia’s FAQ on race and intelligence accurate?

Viewing 16 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #118950
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Is Wikipedia’s FAQ on race and intelligence accurate?

    • #118951
      Anonymous
      Guest

      not science
      not math
      simple as

      […]

    • #118952
      Anonymous
      Guest

      No, it’s an example of Lewontin’s fallacy.

    • #118953
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Yes and any sort of disagreement is a /poo/scum cope.

    • #118954
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Look at all the weasel words
      >>No evidence for RECENT natural selection
      No shit.
      >Race is not a MEANINGFUL way to categorize humans
      No shit. It’s a USEFUL way. You know, like in prescribing medication uniquely to Africans. Or how Asians are allergic to beer and get flushed faces. Or how blacks need hair specialists for their uniquely dense hair.
      >Cognitive differences between ancient groups unlikely to exist
      Source: dude just trust me. So evolutionary pressures on geographically distinct populations for tens of thousands of years has absolutely no impact on cognition. Yet, somehow humans evolved cognition and chimps didn’t.
      >Iq differences are environmental in origin
      No shit. Nobody disputes this. It’s that they’re environmental AND genetic.
      >Scientifically obsolete
      Doesnt exist in science. Either your model is falsified or its still accurate. It’s not been falsified.

      • #118956
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Its almost as if they had a garden gnome write it

      • #118963
        Anonymous
        Guest

        This, it’s pure pilpul

      • #118971
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Such a relief knowing that at least some other people are capable of identifying bullshit like this. Couldnt have said it better myself

      • #118974
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Isn’t it lovely how the English language can let you lie through your teeth while not even being technically wrong?

        • #118977
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Any language can do that. Meaning is only alluded to.

      • #118991
        Anonymous
        Guest

        It’s become somewhat of a hobby of mine to search for and identify all the ways they weasel in their little bullshit.
        It’s actually sort of impressive to me how effortlessly they add all that bullshit in such subtle and graceful ways, and sometimes you really gotta give them credit for how clever and creative they can be.
        Truly an art.

      • #119008
        Anonymous
        Guest

        reminder they have to know the truth in order to obfuscate from it this hard

    • #118955
      Anonymous
      Guest

      The suppression of information that goes against a government-backed narrative either by mitting/ignoring it or calling it fraudulent/wrong despite no proof is typical of totalitarian
      societies.

      The west is a totalitarian society.
      Rather than criticially analyzing and discussing the consequences of such analyses ‘why do black people perform worse at IQ tests?’ ‘what does IQ mean in the first place’ etc., the west simply denies the results and punishes those who have published and researched it. Simultaneously, this might be understood as a silent acknowledgment of the results. The West’s questionable handling of politically insensitive information is one of the major reasons for the rise of the alt-right and the concept of human biodiversity.

    • #118957
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >A statement signed by 143 senior human population geneticists
      Yeah well a Nobel laureate disagrees with all of them, so they’re wrong

      • #118962
        Anonymous
        Guest

        but he’s a racist, so he doesn’t count.
        only opinions of non-racists count

        • #118964
          Anonymous
          Guest

          holy trips of truth.
          its time to burn the poltards at the stake

      • #118983
        Anonymous
        Guest

        When will the freaking "consensus" meme die? It doesn’t matter how many academics agree on something if the data says the opposite.

        • #119002
          Anonymous
          Guest

          It’s important to know the effectiveness of political propaganda programs within academia.

    • #118958
      Anonymous
      Guest

      yes

    • #118959
      Anonymous
      Guest

      The redpill is that intelligence is phenomenally difficult to study to begin with and that this sort of thing is nearly impossible to prove either way. You might be able to make some elementary conclusions about brain size and frontal lobe activity but much in the same way that our ancient ancestors could only have differentiated between material in the sky by how bright it shone.

      • #118965
        Anonymous
        Guest

        we have meta analysis of twin studies

    • #118960
      Anonymous
      Guest

      I really dont understand this approach.

      Its not appealing to leftists, who already believe that everyone is equal, diversity is our strength etc etc

      And to anyone else, its such an obvious propaganda push that they would realize the exact opposite of this indoctrination is true.

      So really, this only serves to further entrench the correct belief that race and intelligence are correlated.

      • #118966
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Ok, so suppose that the correlation between race and iq was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. What happens next? What’s step 2?

        • #118967
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >What’s step 2?
          Demonstrating the correlation between low IQ and negative life outcomes blamed on "racism" (protip: this, too, has been done). Now you guess what step 3 is.

          • #118973
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Abolish affirmative action?

            • #118975
              Anonymous
              Guest

              No, but that’s good for a step 2.1.

        • #118981
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Abolishment of all racial preference programs, ideally restriction of immigration of low IQ populations.

        • #118986
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Making racial discrimination legal again

        • #118999
          Anonymous
          Guest

          We resurrect hitler ofc

        • #119005
          Anonymous
          Guest

          We institute an extreme Eugenics program on Africa. Through this we can slowly eliminate their bottom 2% in intelligence every generation, just enough to eliminate every African 2 sd below their mean. Then, over the generations they’ll slowly catch up, hopefully, then we’ll be able to put all this race shit behind us, both sides.

          • #119006
            Anonymous
            Guest

            I mean the bottom 5%

        • #119009
          Anonymous
          Guest

          The crumbling of the globomerican empire

    • #118961
      Anonymous
      Guest

      every point in there is made up bullshit.

      • #118968
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >cites prominent scientists and scientific organizations
        >made up bullshit
        how?

        • #118969
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Because there are no prominent scientists who believe in that, just political organizations. Why should political organization opinions be valid?

          For example, all scientists in the genetic sciences are "racists". All behavioral genetics are. Antiracists are so freaking stupid that we even have word games where we can say the most genetic determinists thing on race and these scrotes (like all leftists) will not even notice because they are unable to understand what we say.

          All antiracists need to be imprison, and I think its time that LULZ realize thats not a political belief, its a scientific belief that anti racists are a danger to society.

        • #118970
          Anonymous
          Guest

          1. What explains IQ differences between these groups if it isn’t genetics?
          2. They also say male and female is not a biologically meaningful way to classify people. Their categories can be safely ignored on categorical grounds.
          3. Agreement isn’t truth. Consensus isn’t truth.
          4. Psychologists can’t do stats and have failed to do any proper study. Much like when these scrotebrains talk about policing. Cherry picking is the goto.
          5. Opinions do not matter.

        • #118980
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >appeal to authority

    • #118972
      Anonymous
      Guest

      I live near blacks and I can guarantee you that race is an important category and those people are mentally and physically different than we are. You can cope all you want, but it’s obvious to anyone who interacts with them that blacks are less intelligent than whites. They keep expecting equal results given equal or even slightly favoring blacks, but that’s never going to happen and is an impossible totalitarian demand. They have to actively cripple whites for that to be true.

      • #118976
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >those people are mentally and physically different than we are
        you’re right, humans don’t do this only whites do

        • #119000
          Anonymous
          Guest

          I used to look at pictures like this and think, "wow, racism is horrible".

          Now I see this and think
          >I wonder what those scrotes did

        • #119001
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >Hundreds of thousands of black people hack each other to pieces with any piece of metal they can find
          HOW COULD WHITE PEOPLE FAIL TO INTERVENE?? LOOK AT WHAT WHITE PEOPLE DID TO THESE INNOCENT BLACK AFRICANS.

      • #118994
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Tell me about some experiences that made you come to this conclusion anon?

      • #118995
        Anonymous
        Guest

        woke af and truthpilled

    • #118978
      Anonymous
      Guest

      It’s not. Only 15% of psychologists believe that B-W IQ gap is purely environmental.

    • #118982
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Post link OP, I want to know who these shitlib troglodytes think "leading psychologists" are.
      My bet is it will be that Vox hitpiece by Turkheimer et al.

    • #118989
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >muh environmental origin
      Guns, Germs, and Steel has been thoroughly debunked

      https://archive.is/PWyaZ

    • #118992
      Anonymous
      Guest

      imagine not believing your own eyes. I love how most of you are NPCs. You idiots keep me so fucken rich.

      Yes, NPC, all races are equal…. LOL.

      Here’s the spoiler, if white people aren’t better than why did white people CRUSH the planet? Where is the 1st world country run by black people? Where is technology equivalent to the net that we use every day created by something in Africa?

      You can answer none of these, but you will struggle and cope. Good. Now go make me more money by posting on facebook and twitter.

      Anyone else benefit from the stupidity of NPCs? Who else here to laugh at them? lol i love it

    • #118996
      Anonymous
      Guest

      It’s because of things like this that we will never see any real scientific progress in our lifetimes. Inconvenient truths are censored and sociologists try to rewrite history to support their made up bullshit

      • #118997
        Anonymous
        Guest

        No the system can work even despite this. Because despite all the ridiculous taboos, people still recognize people are not equal. They actually do test intelligence in interviews for tech companies, they judge woke af on how well the person can speak, they also judge in interviews wether you are a good "team-player". Meaning they judge agreeableness, Conscientiousness.
        It’s just one big clown world with all the apes in cognitive dissonance.

Viewing 16 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
startno id