Is China’s alleged IQ more fakery? They haven’t really accomplished anything on their own.

Home Forums Science & tech Is China’s alleged IQ more fakery? They haven’t really accomplished anything on their own.

Viewing 34 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #116772
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >be china
      >109 average iq
      >never invent formal mathematics
      what gives?

    • #116773
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Except they did

      • #116774
        Anonymous
        Guest

        not a single complete proof.

        • #116776
          Anonymous
          Guest

          If proofs are the only thing that can be considered formal mathematics, then fair. In that case, I’d attribute it to lack of aristolean thinking.

          • #116778
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Because Aristotle invented the idea of a proof. Next time you post; Do some basic research or even just use common sense if youre up for a challenge

          • #116957
            Anonymous
            Guest

            I need you to feel bad about being scrotebrained and never talk about math again as if you know anything.

            • #116959
              Anonymous
              Guest

              seethe more chang, even today the asians clear out of mathematics after diffeq. Asians simply are too solipsistic to do rigorous proofs.

              • #116960
                Anonymous
                Guest

                Reminder that white people won most fields and abel medals.

              • #116962
                Anonymous
                Guest

                I’m actually drunk and misread your post. Sorry. You were correct. Im obligated, because this is LULZ, to tell you to seeth and dilate.
                I may have been totally wrong but am obligated to tell you to fuck yoursi

      • #116956
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >According to the CCP

    • #116775
      Anonymous
      Guest

      i don’t know

    • #116777
      Anonymous
      Guest

      They copy. The Chinese are really good copiers.

      • #116784
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Everyone literally copes. the Germans were infamous for being copiers back in the day.

        • #116953
          Anonymous
          Guest

          The Germans in the middle ages were actually quite well known for being a useless dreamy group.

    • #116779
      Anonymous
      Guest

      They invented the Chinese Remainder Theorem

    • #116780
      Anonymous
      Guest
      • #116843
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >the one source posted in the thread is ignored

        • #116847
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >wikipedo link full of nationalistic bullshit
          >doesn’t contain a single complete proof

          • #116849
            Anonymous
            Guest

            >primary sources dont count because i say so

    • #116781
      Anonymous
      Guest

      They didn’t even realize they could put counterweights on trebuchets before some Muslims told them

    • #116782
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >109 average iq
      >Liveleak video no.1573859949 of chinks running on each other

      • #116794
        Anonymous
        Guest

        All you see is all you know. Ever see that clip of the USA that North Koreans get shown? It’s just some guys drinking coffee from a truck on a work break but the narrator says they’re drinking snowmelt from gutters and eating birds.

        • #116971
          Anonymous
          Guest

          The subtitles were written by some anglo "comedian" and they have nothing to do with the actual narration

      • #116810
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >Seething about IQ so much you’re ready to post liveleak videos
        Why is whitey so sensitive?

        • #116812
          Svetovid
          Guest

          >Westoid too low IQ to play daredevil traffic
          Typical

      • #116950
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Intelligence is more than just "IQ". It involves critical thinking, imagination, understanding, self-awareness, social skills and the ability to put yourself into another person’s shoes.

        • #116952
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >Intelligence is more than just "IQ"
          Followed by a vapid explanation. Intelligence is g which IQ tries to measure
          >imagination, creativity
          Trait openness, nothing to do with IQ itself but correlated
          >self-awareness, social skills, and the ability to put yourself into another person’s shoes
          That is EQ and trait agreeableness
          >critical thinking, understanding
          IQ

          • #116966
            Anonymous
            Guest

            No, intelligence isn’t "g". You think intelligence is just about crunching numbers when it’s much more than that imo.

    • #116783
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Does that matter?

    • #116785
      Anonymous
      Guest

      To be fair, none did it the same way like Greeks. There was just something special that happened there once that made it possible to do it, and it hasn’t happened before or since

      • #116786
        Anonymous
        Guest

        The Chinese had some Persian scholars trying to teach it to them but they just asked them to fuck off

        • #116790
          Anonymous
          Guest

          What I’m saying, none came close to inventing the idea of formal proof like the Greeks. Egyptians had advanced mathematics(for their time) that was develop for amongst others the construction of the pyramids. Babylonians and Chinese had it. One of earliest oroofs of the Pythagorean theorem is a chinese one, that uses practical geometric to prove it. I guess it took special Greek autism, to try to abstract it away.

          • #116792
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Yeah but then you had the first caliphates practically bordering China, all very autistic about Greek philosophy and science with the Chinese just refusing to care

            • #116820
              Anonymous
              Guest

              All true what you say. It takes a special kind of Greek autism to invent formal math, but it takes a special kind of Chinese narcissism to reject even better solutions because they weren’t invented by superior Chinese.

          • #116825
            Anonymous
            Guest

            >I guess it took special Greek autism, to try to abstract it away.
            Greeks didn’t abstract it away. Their "proofs" were only ever geometric because they believed that any piece of mathematics can be described through a drawing.
            Which is completely wrong and why the first real mathematical proofs are made only after modern math proves them wrong and has actual mathematicians go and fix all of the proofs from before.

            Ancient mediterranean is all just good ideas with botched execution. And it usually takes about a millennium of pondering before people notice the mistakes.

            • #116829
              Anonymous
              Guest

              > Their "proofs" were only ever geometric because they believed that any piece of mathematics can be described through a drawing.
              No they weren’t. Greeks were the first to use axioms in geometry and to derive mathematical proofs from them, Chinese were the ones who used exclusively geometric "proofs" the few times they bothered to proof a theorem

              • #116837
                Anonymous
                Guest

                >Greeks were the first to use axioms in geometry and to derive mathematical proofs from them
                But that’s my point, anon. Geometry doesn’t form a complete and valid system.

      • #116977
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Greeks copied it from Egypt and Mesopotamia

    • #116787
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Chinese never existed.all these dynasties were foreign people

      • #116789
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >Europeans never existed they were all ruled by Habsburgs

    • #116788
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >invent the CHINESE FIRE DRILL
      >take shit from some whipper snapper
      damn kids

    • #116791
      Anonymous
      Guest

      why is it impossible to have a normal conversation about china, its just schizo shitflinging from both sides. there are plenty of interesting topics to talk about but all that ever happens are threads with a false premise

      • #116795
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Well, it all starts from a /poo/ basis so it can’t go anywhere good from there.

    • #116793
      Svetovid
      Guest

      because they envision it, so no need for tools.

    • #116796
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Iq
      Is
      A
      Meme

    • #116808
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >Believing in IQ
      >Believing being smart means you must give a shit about nerd mathematics

      • #116855
        Anonymous
        Guest

        It doesn’t matter if you "believe" in iq because at the end of the day iq is correlated to future income, crime, general succes in life, oh and it’s also mostly heritable

        • #116857
          Anonymous
          Guest

          Correlation doesnt imply what you think it implies

          • #116948
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Enlighten us

            • #116949
              Anonymous
              Guest

              The cause for high IQ is the same as the one that causes success, social class.
              T.127 IQ son of an engineer himself son of an engineer

    • #116814
      Anonymous
      Guest

      It wasn’t 109 1000 years ago

    • #116816
      Anonymous
      Guest

      It’s probably lower. They only test students from Shanghai. 109 is the Chinese maximum the average is probably 85-95.

    • #116818
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >>109 average iq

      People still believe this when they don’t even test the people who don’t have access to the internet?

    • #116823
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Does anyone genuinely believe chink IQ meme? Chinks had good clay and were still poor as shit before foreign capitalists came and set up sweatshops in their shithole. Today they’re only at the level of Malaysia or Indonesia, in their mass it just gives them a larger punching power. Russians were able to build a functional communist state, even if it was inefficient. Chinese weren’t able to do even that and they had the advantage of bug masses being collectivists unlike multi ethnic Russia. I wouldn’t peg average Chink iq at anywhere far from average SEA iq. Chinks do have a intelligent core though, the ones who are ruling class in Singapore for example.

    • #116827
      Anonymous
      Guest

      They lie on iq

    • #116841
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >109 average iq

    • #116845
      Anonymous
      Guest

      If IQ can’t explain creativity then it’s too bad it doesn’t work hahahahag

    • #116851
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Wikipedo is not a primary source zoomer. Post the proof.

      • #116853
        Anonymous
        Guest

        https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35471958.pdf
        here’s a paper about how both the ancient chinese and greeks approached the Pythagorean theorem

        • #116861
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >Chinese “theorem” status: not even generalized, much less proven
          Embarrassing

          • #116863
            Anonymous
            Guest

            do you know what a theorem means

            • #116865
              Anonymous
              Guest

              Yes. You don’t, Wikipedia-scholar.

              • #116871
                Anonymous
                Guest

                i have a BS in math
                did you read the paper i cited? it clearly describes how they generalized the problem and understood it

                • #116872
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  have you googled yet what a “primary source” is you absolute fuckwit?

                  • #116873
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    do you want scans of the original book?

                • #116935
                  Anonymous
                  Guest

                  I finally read this you, you giant scrote and master Ching Chong asserted it for a 3-4-5 triangle , the author of the article “assumes” he asserted it for all right triangles, and he proves it for neither. Ask for a refund from wang-Chung university.

                  • #116936
                    Anonymous
                    Guest

                    You must understand, fortune cookie say “jut lie and make opponent disprove you. Wasting his time is a victory as well”

    • #116859
      Anonymous
      Guest

      from what i understand their entire study of mathematics was very ad hoc, that is, they didn’t study mathematics for it’s own worth, but to help them with something else like engineering or astrology. so they never bothered with making formal proofs because they didn’t see the point of it. that’s my guess at least.

      • #116869
        Anonymous
        Guest

        That’s how it was everywhere else up until the Greeks invented the concept of axioms and proof.
        Everyone after them either copied the foundation laid by the Greeks and improved upon it or stagnated.

    • #116880
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Why are people so obsessed with chinks

      • #116882
        Anonymous
        Guest

        because its either they were primitive savages for all of existence until they stoles yt’s tech or they were superior in every aspect. I cant tell if they are bait posts or if there are genuine scrotebrains who really believe this shit

        • #116884
          Anonymous
          Guest

          I don’t know man I feel like china threads are something else
          Just shitflinging from both sides, there’s never anything worthwhile
          Also I feel like the supernationalist chink posters have to be false flags or bait, they’re too cringy

          • #116898
            Anonymous
            Guest

            i feel the same. every once in a while you get a thread with genuine discussion and people with an interest in history. i doubt there are any actual shills, but the shitflinging makes it impossible to discuss anything

      • #116947
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Coronavirus

    • #116896
      Anonymous
      Guest

      https://i.4cdn.org/his/1633034180761.webm

      >They don’t even have a number for a million.
      > Believing the high IQ East Asian myth

      scrotebrain

      • #116900
        Anonymous
        Guest

        一百万

      • #116912
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >reddit spacing
        >reddit spelling
        >scrotebrained take

      • #116922
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >They don’t even have a number for a million.
        >一百万

      • #116932
        Anonymous
        Guest

        >french don’t have unique numbers for 80-99
        Always knew frogs were scrotebrained

        • #116933
          Anonymous
          Guest

          >vingt et un
          full scrotebrain.

          • #116934
            Anonymous
            Guest

            Is 21 found in "80-99" anon?

    • #116908
      Anonymous
      Guest

      BEHOLD the TRUE CHINA

      • #116945
        Anonymous
        Guest
    • #116931
      G2a for Gigachad Master Race
      Guest

      Not enough G2a ancestry. Prove me wrong.

    • #116937
      Anonymous
      Guest
    • #116951
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Most great Chinese devoted their lives to figuring out how to better feed/pacify/exploit their giant population of peasant rice farmers. All else was secondary.

    • #116954
      Anonymous
      Guest

      I am completely convinced that so-called mathematics is mental masturbation, and the only thing it allows us to do is to create meaningless symbols that confuse us. If we could somehow get rid of these symbols, all our problems would be solved. This is not unlike most religions and their God. A bunch of fictional nonsense that helps us cope with life’s serious problems. If you seriously think about it, mathematics is a dangerous pseudoscience that claims that 2 + 2 = 4. What difference does it make if we believe it or not? We still need to pay bills, feed families, and provide shelter. When was the last time you used this "equation" in your daily life? I guarantee it won’t help you in any way. Mathematics is not some kind of truth, it is a dangerous cult dating back to Plato and ancient Hellas. We need to leave that behind and move on to a more practical and rewarding science of mechanics that can be applied to problems in the real world and that doesn’t have the "calculus" gimmicks to protect us from reality. Don’t lie to me about bitcoin and the digital age. Your abstract nonsense is only useful for confusing and misleading ordinary people, and it has no place in our world. Mathematics was a historical error that brought nothing but suffering to humanity. Without useless mathematical nonsense, humanity could develop much faster than it is now.

      • #116955
        Anonymous
        Guest

        Woke af quads don’t lie

    • #116964
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >109 average iq
      i like how this number keeps getting higher with every retelling.
      anyone who thinks chinks have a 109 average iq needs to touch grass

    • #116972
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Because Asians don’t have the Faustian spirit of the huWhite man. Even in Silicon Valley all the tech companies were founded by White and gnomish men but they have competent Indians and East Asians dong the tedious work

    • #116973
      Anonymous
      Guest

      >109 average iq
      Lol no. Most of their population are illiterate rice farmers and coal miners. That 109 "average" is an average of the best of their best. The average Chinese is probably somewhere around 90 IQ
      t. 145 IQ American Chad

Viewing 34 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
startno id