- This topic has 77 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 months, 3 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
>C is a great language because it’s so close to the metal
>Doesn’t even have a way to write numbers in binary
Computer science is such a freaking joke. -
what do you mean LULZtard?
-
>>C is a great language because it’s so close to the metal
That was never the motivation of C, who even told you that? C was created to facilitating wring software that is portable between different architectures; the polar opposite of what you claim. -
Why did Dany burning people alive make me suddenly want her? Scientifically speaking, or course.
-
It does and it is frequently used to toggle bits with bitmasks.
>><< -
1) This shit belongs on LULZ
2) You are scrotebrained
3) Fuck you-
OP clearly said computer science. The word science is there, it’s all legitimate.
-
If it has science in the name, it isn’t science.
>Social Science, Computer Science, Medical Science, Christian Science
vs
>Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Biology-
Like LULZ – science & math
-
yeah exactly, let’s get back to scientology.
-
Woke af
-
> hello, I want to fill a report on
-
-
-
You’re right. This is an iq and vaccine board. We don’t want any of this schizo computer ((((science)))) shit here.
-
you forgot race and asian women
-
-
-
I think it’s because hex literals can fulfill the same function, and are far more readable.
-
OP needs every binary digit written out for him because his brain is too limited to be able to compress and uncompress hex digits in his head.
OP, if you can’t do ‘4 XOR B’ in your head, you should stick to playing with React like the rest of the code monkeys.-
This
-
-
-
Nitpicking CS languages is a LULZ thing
>>>/g/-
That’s because 99% of them don’t actually code anything beyond the week-one shit you get from the first few chapters of a book. Hence the endless litany of eternal-beginner threads on editor wars, style conventions (camel case, brace styles, etc.), and operator nitpicks.
Look at their Sneedacity fork of Audacity that fell off the wagon. They spent the vast majority of their time updating the README, rewriting CODE OF CONDUCT, designing logos, making brainlet tweaks to the build system, importing from upstream, and whatnot. One scrotebrain changed strcpy() to strncpy() in some dumb little Audacity side utility and didn’t even know that strncpy() won’t write a terminating NUL character if receiving a long enough string.-
>changed strcpy() to strncpy() in some dumb little Audacity side utility
>didn’t even know that strncpy() won’t write a terminating NUL character if receiving a long enough string.
that’s you sis-
Yes, someone writing a post saying that something won’t happen in a certain condition doesn’t know that something won’t happen in a certain condition.
You must have an IQ of 70.-
both strcpy and strncpy are unsafe. strcpy even more so.
-
Who said otherwise, you stupid fuck? Learn reading comprehension.
-
btw, I would prefer to write "both strncpy and strncpy can be used unsafely." But still, you stupid fuck, nobody claimed otherwise.
-
strcpy is always unsafe.
-
You’re an idiot. gets() is always unsafe. strcpy() can be used safely.
Back to LULZ.-
strcpy is dog shit like everything in C
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
>computer
>science
kek -
You have to go back >>>/g/
-
C doesn’t even have a method to access the magnetic charge of the hard drive. What a cucked programming language, lmao.
-
lol what type of normie uses this shit.
Fuq just get python already.
Also why are the captchas so hard
-
reading and writing to drives is a system call, C can get whatever input the system its running on can provide.
-
-
>it’s so close to the metal
said nobody ever. C is great because it’s readable alias for asm that handles everything unsafe and tedious about the latter. -
You know you can format your integer types with 0b right?
-
You failed. C is close to metal as its 1 on 1 correspondence to assembly that is 1 on1 what the machine does. C++ is close to metal as it is 1 on 1 to C. Java is not as its run by java virtual machine, there is high level of abstraction and its slows process, but bowadays ao little that its most effectove to write safe Java OOP than dangerous C.
-
>C is […] 1 on 1 correspondence to assembly
Wrong. Not even remotely true. For instance, C completely abstracts over calling convention.>assembly that is 1 on1 what the machine does
Not true on modern architectures.-
>C completely abstracts over calling convention.
Calling conventions are too far from the metal. Fuck off with your C# bullshit. You’re not a real programmer.-
Calling convention is something you need to know and do by hand if you are programming in Assembly. C abstracts over it, and C# sure as shit does to. You don’t know what you’re talking about, and are probably a nocode loser.
-
If it’s not in C, it’s not close enough to the metal. SIMPLE AS.
-
Calling conventions are "in C", C compilers abstract over calling convention so the programmer doesn’t have to handle it. C is not "close to metal" and was never intended to be. C was invented to facilitate writing code that is portable between different architectures. The design intent of C is that a C programmer should not need to know the specific conventions and nuances of each architecture their code will run on.
-
Lmao. I bet you can’t even program in x86 assembly.
-
You obviously never have, if calling convention is new to you.
-
The only "calling convention" I recognize is manually setting the instruction pointer, brainlet.
-
You’re a codelet. You never even heard of calling convention before today. At this point you probably looked it up and realized that you’re wrong. But instead of admitting it, you’ve decided to cover for your ignorance and shitpost instead.
Conversation over.
-
>m-m-m-muh calling """convention"""
You will never be a real programmer.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
>unsigned a = 0b1001; // 9
off yourself, brainlet-
Literally this. Not that it matters because hex literals do the same thing in less space.
-
>Literally this.
That’s not standard C.-
Name a relevant compiler that doesn’t support it
-
>b-b-but muh "relevant" compiler supports this!
It’s still not standard C, though.-
It’s standard in the new revision and supported by every relevant compiler
-
>It’s standard in the new revision
No, it isn’t.>supported by every relevant compiler
Still not standard C, though, and it’s being intentionally omitted time and time again from newer standards.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Is game of thrones sexist against men or is it worth it for the blonde dragon chick?
-
Read the books. It’s fun if you like medieval fantasy and political thrillers
-
what about "the age of men is over"? and "winter is coming" what are you trying to say? should I become a meninist to combat this?
-
What are you talking about
>the age of men is over
"Man" as in "human" and this is from Lord of the Rings, not A Song of Ice and Fire
>winter is coming
In the literal sense, winter is coming, and winter in A Song of Ice and Fire can last years. Winter sucks if you’re living in the middle ages-
fuck it i’m rereading harry potter
-
-
-
-
>the blonde dragon chick?
Fugly bottle-blonde.
-
-
what scrotebrain writes numbers in binary instead of hex? Do you just wanna jerk yourself off like WOAH I’M SUCH A LEET HAXXOR >:)
-
0b10101010
OP is a stupid scrote and should commit suicide
-
OP is stupid, but 0b literals are a compiler extension, not part of the standard language.
-
-
None of you people shit talking C are embedded devs. It’s very close to perfect for the vast majority of embedded projects. Not to go full Terry, but I do seriously doubt anyone here has written an ISR or a driver.
-
I’ve written an RTOS with IPC mechanisms and synchronization primitives, with drivers for a touch screen SPI display, gamepad and joystick input, gyro and accelerometer control and some other stuff. Also I designed an oscilloscope from the PCB and hardware up that had a pseudo OOP gui system.
But I don’t disagree with you, C is wonderful. -
>None of you people shit talking C are embedded devs
Unfortunately, people still insist to use C in other contexts as well, where it is woefully inadequate.
-
-
Java is the best language, python babies seething rn C/++ scrotes on suicide watch
-
I bet yall siss don’t even use gets()
-
inline assembly basically is binary, only an autist would suggest otherwise
-
>basically is binary
Literally is not binary.Only a scrotebrain would suggest otherwise.
-
-
[code]
int OP_IS_A_scrote = 0b10101101010;
[/code] -
computers really are crazy. C is the most powerful, along with most compiled languages in general, if you are talking about performance. But the sort of features you might assume to be part of a language are at times very ad hoc. To create a loop, you have to make a variable, then add a line that adds to that, and then add a line to break the loop once the variable has reached a certain number. Sorting anything is a science itself, not something you can just tell the computer to do. It would be nice if our devices and networks were powerful enough to use interpreted languages (not that they are even that much better to code in) but they’re not. Surfing the web should be a basic task any pentium 3 could handle but you generally need a powerhouse to handle all the crazy shit that pops up on most sites
-
>>Doesn’t even have a way to write numbers in binary
someone’s ‘intro to programming’ homework still doesn’t compile? -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/g/
changing the visual representation of a number for (your) benefit isn’t the job of a near-metal language you scrotebrain.
C is king, you are scum. -
Daenerys-sama….
-
OP here. I may be dumb, but you’re all stupid for replying to (and bumping) this thread with variations of the same post.
-
Readable codes should be a bannable offense. Coders must use esoteric languages and gatekeep everything from normies.
-
>waaah! waaah! i need to be able to write down a whole number while specifying all of its individual bits!!
Present a realistic use case. -
Finally, a use case for brainfuck
-
-
freaking LMAO
>computer science
>sciencealso nobody enters data using bits you freaking scrotebrain lol
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.