>claims to be blackpilled
>claims to be an edgy pessimist
>too cowardly to take the final, ultimate blackpill: humanity is irrevocably broken then, now, and forever and the only it way ends is if we exterminate human consciousness
Even the erudite sages and wise ancients knew this forbidden knowledge.
I am a philosophical pessimist but I find antinatalist too much of preachy vulgar materialist redditors.
So what you’re saying is your a bitch who is using made up buzzwords to protect your fragile psyche from cognitive dissonance and acknowledgement that you’re too much of a homosexual pussy to go all the way
Wow… so cool!!!!
>too much of preachy vulgar materialist redditors
Just like OP
>thinking non-existence is even possible
No one will ever take you seriously
Life's not a bitch
Life is a beautiful woman
You only call her a bitch because she won't let you hit that pussy
Maybe she didn't feel y'all had any similar interests
Or maybe you're just an asshole who couldn't sweet talk the princess
Truly amazing how even literature can't elevate the shallowness of pussy dry retards.
>humanity is irrevocably broken
explain please
Universal pessimism is a cope. The idea that some people are inherently better and more happier than you is harder to bare.
Oh no, I've wanted this at times, but for distinct, more modern reasons: better that the entire species go extinct than that a single asshole escape into something like biological immortality. But happily even those first phases would be helplessly dependent on supply chains, strong people who can put you down if they really want to... The pleasure of life is knowing that where it really counts, and in the final analysis, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jesus Christ come to the exact same one undifferentiated end.
Happily nature takes care of this for us, it seems. No one escapes.
It's fair to read pessimism this way, and the joy of this cope is that it's still a winning cope. One does not "win the game of life" by living well, or by having children, passing one one's genes, etc. That's the obverse, life-defending normie cope. One wins the game of life by not dying. And no one wins the game of life. The crabs still pull you back into the bucket. The real aberration, the real cope is to insist on any sort of differentiation of status in some afterlife, but happily this doesn't happen.
Piques my interest but non-being (if we accept death as non-being) is obviously escape, unless this person is arguing some afterlife. I'm guessing simply by the name that he may have mounted some unsatisfying bullshit Continental-sort of argument, as they regularly do.
>humanity is irrevocably broken
Humanity is broken, although not irrevocably. It cannot save itself by its own power. However, God will redeem and is redeeming humanity through His Son.
>the final, ultimate blackpill
Wrong. The final, ultimate blackpill is that there is no escape, not even in death, as Bahnsen argued.
>the final blackpill is that the israeli propaganda is true
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Okay, you go first 🙂
>humanity is irrevocably broken
This is a useless, false statement. It serves no purpose other than to demoralize and justify one's own self-destruction.
You're going to die.
Yes, and? Life is more than just suffering, ending it sooner than it needs to be makes no sense.
>You're going to die.
And?
I have made peace with my mortality and my fear of it.
> Humanity is irrevocably broken then, now, and forever
Something that has never been "whole" cannot be broken. Something cannot be broken if there is no possibility of that thing ever being whole: Hence humanity cannot be broken, because you do not think it could ever possibly be whole.
> The only way it ends is if we exterminate human consciousness
I don't see much of a problem in the first place. In fact, I consider human consciousness to be an inherent good. But really I reject the priors for your theory so the whole discussion is a non-starter.
>antinatalists make thread after thread about how their beliefs make others seethe
>always get BTFO and end up seething
>anons sick of their shit start making threads to make fun of antinatalists
>antinatalists seethe
I understand why these guys think there's no winning when it comes to life, kek.
Nah. I like life.
In the end, it's the only thing that exists.
Hard to say even that for dumbass pussies like you
I do in fact exist. Also, who are you calling a pussy, you are the harm reduction homosexual here.
>t. David Benatar
I think most of these people are seeing how shitty the world is and not wanting to have children to subject said children to a nightmare. Very few actually believe giving birth is immoral in itself
I strongly feel that life doesn't want us to become attached to it, and that being attached to life is unnatural. I wouldn't want to be attached to life in the twilight of my life, knowing I'll die and not having a clue what awaits me once I'm dead.
>humanity is irrevocably broken
You cant just make a wild generalization when the real implication is that (You) feel irrevocably broken and are now projecting that onto your own interaction with reality. Your post reads like a cry for positive affirmation of your beliefs from people you believe think just the way you do. A cope for the deeply ingrained resentment you feel toward your position in life.
Every "blackpilled" bitch is still alive because deep down they know suicide is a mortal sin and they will never escape Samsara.
the problem of the anti-natalist is not in the existence of actual human suffering but in their perceiving of said suffering.
there is, after all, no efficient, or even feasible way to determine the amount of suffering experienced by all available humanity.
the anti-natalist assumes that suffering always weighs heavier on the scale than whatever state of being should run counter or at least is more beneficial to humanity.
but lacking any means of quantifying said suffering the only logical basis for the anti-natalist to measure suffering is by the perception of suffering held by people.
therefore it only makes sense that to decrease the amount that suffering is perceived is to decrease the state of suffering in the world.
the best way to reach this objective is to eliminate the populace with the greatest and most intensely felt perception of human suffering, ie: anti-natalists
>israelites don't want you to have children.
Literally the opposite, stupid goy
Of course the israelite want us gentiles to spread forth and reproduce. Where else are they going to steal foreskins and groom trannys.