Christcucks have not yet refuted it.
Christcucks have not yet refuted it.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Christcucks have not yet refuted it.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
The better one that Christcumstains have never refuted is the argument in pic related.
God don't real + he raped Merry and he's also evol
Convince me otherwise you fucking retard christians, including my asshole parents for giving me the worst childhood by making me go to church.
no one implied the first thing
>The better one that Christcumstains have never refuted is the argument in pic related.
>my mommy made me go to church waah
This is how atheists act, then they cry when you don't baby sit them and handle them with kid gloves and spoonfeed them every little thing because they're incapable of learning on their own.
These low quality posts simply wouldn't be tolerated if the mods weren't antichrist israeli pedophile federal agents.
>No refutation, just ad hominem
hot
>What is evil?
>When did it began to exist?
>Does the definition of God (Who is eternal) depend on the status of beings that came into existence after him?
Also the answer is love and free will. If you deny that the latter exists, then your rhetorical question/conclusion becomes non-sensical.
>If you deny that the latter exists, then your rhetorical question/conclusion becomes non-sensical.
You can touch the lack of self awareness, it's rough like freshly cut wood.
>free will
So your answer is that he is unable.
Why can't an omnipotent creator have his cake and eat it too?
does one have free will in heaven?
if yes, then God could have actualized a world with free will and without evil but chose not to.
if not, then free will is unnecessary for a good world and a world without free will and without evil would have been better.
It is a bad argument because the concept of evil is invented by christians. They can define in however they want.
There is no evil outside of christian paradigm.
Zoroastrians would like to disagree.
HIs argumentation doesn't account for time.
All of the 'failings' implied by the OP are purposed by God to a good ultimate end: eternal life. Redemption of people's souls. Paradise.
>"The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief."
>raping you is not evil because you're get a recompense after some time
Whoa there, you've just #debunked Christianity with your epic logic
Insecure homosexual
>says the atheist
How am I an atheist?
So those footballers who raped a girl in their 20s were actually in the right because they paid them hush money when they made it big in their 30s?
Plantinga gave a pretty solid refutation to it. God is almighty only in relation to his own nature, so he can't do contradicting things.
No, not really: I'm almighty only in relation to my own nature too.
What I mean is:
He is almighty but with the following limitations:
He can't create other divine things
He can't do evil
He can't do logically impossible things (For example, a "Green red")
Consider how I'm almighty too, according to my following limitations:
I can't create other divine beings
I can do evil
I can't do logically impossible things
>what is free will
I'm so fucking tired of these lazy talking points. Atheists are so fucking dumb and ignorant
Free will does not solve the problem of evil.
Prove free will exists
Free will was debunked by Augustine and John Calvin
Would you abolish the police to respect people's free will to commit crimes?
Why not give everyone free will and still prevent evil?
>Y-YOU JUST CAN'T!!! OKAY!!!!
That would negate the point of the free will
No it wouldn't.
If your god couldn't do that, he's not omnipotent
Problem of Evil isn't even applicable to the Christian God.
The problem of evil as quoted was specifically targeted at the Christian God.
>no self control, only after-the-fact justification
>consistently fail to self-discipline
>would rather live urge to urge, occasionally having the ‘urge’ to do something moral or productive
>sense of shame builds, you’re basically an animal
>rather than change your ways, cherry-pick scientific and philosophical dogma to replace theology (genius move)
>nihilism to say “I just do what I feel like, and that’s ok!”
>satanism to say “I just do what feels good, and that’s ok!”
>literalism to say “this section of this book from 2000 years ago mentions something that was ok back then, but not today! That’s NOT ok!”
>atheism to wrap it up and say “there is no god, only neurons and chemicals and whatever I saw on this weeks scishow episode!”
>sense of shame persists, you’re still an animal, wasting free will on finding excuses for your consistent failure to use it productively
>make a thread (1ptid) to bait religious people, but ignore valid arguments
>chortle at having battled the entire religious establishment, and won
I really, really wish people would stop pretending Epicurus said that when it was made up by David Hume. It's pretty obvious the quote isn't greek or ancient.
>God is evil because of my short sighted subjective opinion on evil.
No need to refute.
>Blocks your path
calvinist.
Lmao so God just creates beings so that they are eternally tortured in hell? Did he also choose for Junko to be raped for 30 days and then die? Truly sounds like a good and just God.
again, you are using calvinist depiction of free will. calvinist. being calvinist is worser than being an atheist because god is always an evil being in calvinist theology.
Idk dude when i asked God to help me out it happened.
maybw you should try it to
Without God there is no objective morality.
without objective morality its your opinion.
If God exist(he does) than his plan his objectively good.
read the books of wisdom
Yeah but that doesn't stop your own notion of morality from being contradictory. Like, I just find what happened to Junko subjectivelly disgusting, but I know the universe doesn't give a shit as sad as that is. You on the other hand have to resolve the contradiction somehow.
Calvinism is the obvious end result of assumptions of omnipotence and omniscience.
>assumptions of omnipotence and omniscience.
what is a fall of humanity from God's grace as a result of disobedience.
God created humanity knowing already before their creation they are going to be disobedient due to his omniscience so lmao.
What's your point?
>Calvinism is the obvious end result of assumptions of omnipotence and omniscience.
calvinism is retarded, it analisies the scripture with a human lense.
again retarded extremely retarded
>You on the other hand have to resolve the contradiction somehow.
I dont claim to know everything about God's will since i m a human.
the scripture though leaves out a good understanding of that read the book of job
>Book of Job
>"I don't fucking know, just trust God even if his actions obviously contradict logic lmao" the book
>pagans doing pagan things
nothing new here. Japan needs God
calvinists did find a way out
>calvinists did find a way out
By making God out to be worse than devil.
>I literally cannot conceive of "negative" stimulation as being a part of something greater
kill yourself
>The Christian God is evil because this guy who lived before Jesus Christ was born says so
extremely retarded reply, seek professional help there may be an underlying cause