CHOOSE YOUR FIGHTER!

CHOOSE YOUR FIGHTER!

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    For me? Why yes, the Graeco-Bactrian kingdom, of course.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Meroe obviously. Maybe Blemmyes if I feeling like pic related.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Turdetani

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gallaeci BVLL

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes, he looks a bit like castro.
      but he looks 100% like his father, like a younger brother, so no point in arguing

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        0.50 has been deposited into your account.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >post-2013 total war
    Gtfo zoomer

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God this game was so visually beautiful. It's such a tragedy they ruined the combat, it made it unplayable for me. They did the factions right but they shat all over the combat. They ruined it in other ways too, but it's the combat itself is what makes it unplayable.

      Damn OP that's beautiful, where did you get this from?
      >choose
      well Lusitani cause they probably came from direct Bell Beaker migration

      The video game "total war rome 2"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        thx pham

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        do you have to play rome, can you play any other tribe?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, you can play most tribes, not all, like in a paradox game, but you have a few tribes from pretty much all different cultures. Especially if you find it with all the DLCs.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >if you find it with all the DLCs
            if it wasn't because I'm affraid of videogames addiction I'd defs pirate it or buy it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Also the OP pic is just the "vanilla" campaign. There are DLC with campaigns in other timeframes. Among others
            >Caesar conquest of Gaul
            >Punic War
            >Second Triumvirate war (this one for free)
            >Crisis of the Third Century/Aurelian
            >Pelloponesian War

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Op isnt vanilla, its modded

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah it's nice to look at and enjoy all the various tribes of the time, they've made it look very nice, if that's what you're into. The problem is it lacks real battle tactics like in older games like hammer and anvil, flanking, fighting on higher ground, cavalry charges and so on. From Rome 2 onwards these dont matter anymore the fights just turn into mass brawls no matter what tactic you use, it's all about having stronger and more elite units. I am half reviewing it for you and half ranting kek.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            do you think the warhammer franchise could pull some good IQfytorical shit? I don't know if I'm saying something moronic.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know if you know, but there is a warhammer total war? If i understood you right. If you mean like how the warhammer factions represent real world cultures i think it's 100% great. I love the comparisons.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Ironically Warhammer Total War solved the mass blobbing problem thanks to magic: putting all your troops/monsters in the same place usually means defeat, if the other army have a caster with AOE spells

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think WH should bet on it and make a IQfypilled videogame, I'd swear I've seen IQfytorical warhammer, but not sure if it was from them or not, same painted toys they had for WH they had for IQfytorical shit

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You mean a non fantasy tabletop war game?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            yeah, IQfytorically accurate, maybe drink a bit from myths to make it a bit more "magic"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They ruined it in other ways too, but it's the combat itself is what makes it unplayable.

        Such as what?? Btw if Im not mistaken, after so many years with countless mods and patches they say the game can be quite good now.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          1.You can only have armies under a general, you can never independent forces.
          2.City slots(a feature introduced in Empire but still) instead of a list of buildings to freely build

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >1.You can only have armies under a general, you can never independent forces.
            They did that because back in the older Total Wars, the AI would either send small armies on hilarious suicide runs or the AI Gets a brainfart and deploys a banner of purely archers or purely catapults.

            So to streamline all of that they put all armies under generals and with set parameters wherein the army shall have an even variety of units (cavalry, infantry, missile troops etc).

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes i assumed its the case. The ai is especially annoying in Empire in this regard. Still its a bad solution, i prefer the older way even with the dumb ai.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Damn OP that's beautiful, where did you get this from?
    >choose
    well Lusitani cause they probably came from direct Bell Beaker migration

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    icini
    'ate romans, not racist just dont like em
    simple as

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Rome
      'luve me emprah, luv me legate, luv me legion
      'ate Greeks, 'ate Persians (not racist just don't like em'), 'ate Germanics
      simple as

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why Carthage of course

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Fake tacky silent movie nothing to do with actual Carthage

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Europa Barbarorum II > Rome II

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Europa Barbarorum > Europa Barbarorum II

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bactria and then I become reverse-Alexander and conquer all the way back home to Macedonia

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Love me cataphracts, love me Ahura Mazda, ate' Romans, 'ate Greeks, 'ate Arabs, 'ate Turks, simple as.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I choose my own people; the Lusitani.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You know they probably descend directly from Bell Beakers?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, that's probable, which I'm fine with.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I find that super fricking cool 2bh.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    But I don't want to play as Pontus

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You vill play as ze Pontus, and you vill like it.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Minoans, please.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I will play as the Getae and I will make l*gionaries seethe and I will frick Thracian women.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    For me, it's the Veneti.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Etruscans.
    Ate romas (I'm very racist and I hate them.)
    Ate gauls
    Luv me pre-indoeuropean language.
    Luv me kings.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Frisii

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nova Carthago, Lusitani, Veneti, Raeti and ~~*Egypt*~~.
    My Ancestors

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Boii ma bois.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Minoans and Carthage are not contemporary

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why does Egypt have so much of the Levant? Anyway, I pic EMPIRE SELEUCIDE, hopefully I can manage to make it last longer than it really did.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Seleucid Empire
      This, that unit diversity is unmatched.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gutones of course

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Colchis for sure

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Sparta.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Himyar is the only unique and interesting culture on that map, the rest are either barbarians, greco-romans, or persians.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      was himyar qahtanite or adnanite?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Qahtanite.
        Oral tradition traces the origins of the adnanites to mesopetamia technically, cause ishmael.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          i remember there being a thread about the most advanced pre-islamic kingdoms, i remember 2 being mentioned as top-level, one of the qahtanites and one of the adnanites, himyar must have been the most powerful one of the qahtanites, would you perhaps know which one the most powerful of the adnanites was?

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    EGYPT!
    UGH! WHAT IT WAS! ALMOST HALF OF ALL COUPLES ARE SIBLINGS
    UGH....

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      wincest pilled

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    iirc seleucid was the name of the dynasty, not the state itself

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a slav and I think Budini is the closest to slavs. But otherwise either Auduni or Suebi.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nah man, Aestii is the closest as they were atleast Balto-Slavic.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Aestii were Baltic, at least if we go by that location, besides maybe southern half. Slavs probably chilled somewhere in the area of Budini, Anartes and east of that. It's not like we actually really know how that area was partitioned between tribes so no need to trust that map.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Aestii were Baltic
          And Balts and Slavs are closely related.
          >Slavs probably chilled somewhere in the area of Budini, Anartes and east of that
          I guess, but those tribes were Sarmatians and Scythians.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >but those tribes were Sarmatians and Scythians.
            Are we sure? They might have just been regarded as such by people who didn't know the region well. I seen theories by archeologists that Budini were slavs, or at least area were they are shown on this map was inhabited by them. And for this region you are better off trusting archeologists than scarce writen records.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Athens.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I bow to my African masters

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Blemmyes.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *