How can we cope with the fact that if what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens?
If what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the really the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens? Either Chainlink Labs is supplying Banks and different chains with free LINK tokens for their use, or CCIP will work perfectly without the need of that many LINK tokens.
If what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the really the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens? Either Chainlink Labs is supplying Banks and different chains with free LINK tokens for their use, or CCIP will work perfectly without the need of that many LINK tokens.
If you were telling the truth about CCIP and it's really that big, then why isn't the price of LINK reflecting that? Shouldn't everyone be stacking up on their LINK tokens? We're talking about big banks and all the chains here. It just doesn't any sense. Do you think that Chainlink Labs will offer CCIP for free like they did with price feeds? That means even the news of CCIP releasing won't do much to the price of LINK.
[...]
No, I'm not alright. I'm preparing myself to another disappointing price action when CCIP is finally released. Why would the news of Coinbase joining Chainlink as a node operator dump the price? While shitcoins like RNDR and AGIX are pumping?
Your dad, he liked watching. Just answer me please, why aren't institutions and banks buying a shit load of LINK?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The secondary market is literally just for retail. The public facing price is literally just a barometer of retail interest. Which is still basically zero.
As the fudders have reminded us many, many times, Chainlink have had outflows of tens of millions of LINK tokens over the last couple of years.
If VCs and hedgies all buy OTC you can bet your ass that big institutions go even further back than that.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
That makes sense. So, our only hope for a pump is hype which is dead right now or a full release of staking. Fuck this clown market.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
You're surprised that hype is dead in the middle of a bear market?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Remember a few weeks ago when AVAX announced a """partnership""" with Amazon? Why doesn't that never happen to LINK?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Because Chainlink are an actual threat to the very powerful VC/hedge fund/market maker MEV cartel and are therefore treated with a mix of derision, outright hostility and blatant disregard from nearly everyone of consequence in crypto.
This is what happens when you bring truth to a den of vipers.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
lol
That Hasu post is honestly something else.
I'm actually curious of anyone here knows his irl dox, like if it's common knowledge in crypto or not?
It's actually pretty funny, especially with the context of that tweet.
Long story short though is that he's just a regular degen, although arguably one of the most degenerate gamblers in modern history. Or was when he was younger at least.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
And what did that do for the price?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
i think hoping for a pump in this sludge market is a waste of time. i expect a market wide dump at CCIP launch. Chainlink are in open conflict with the most influential, corrupt power bloc in crypto. Chainlink will win in the end but it will be ugly.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Man, this sucks. I bought LINK when I was 27. I'm now 33. I guess there's no escaping the wage cage any time soon.
Because Chainlink are an actual threat to the very powerful VC/hedge fund/market maker MEV cartel and are therefore treated with a mix of derision, outright hostility and blatant disregard from nearly everyone of consequence in crypto.
This is what happens when you bring truth to a den of vipers.
How come they hate Chainlink still when they successfully prevented the use of FSS in Arbitrum?
And what did that do for the price?
It pumped 20%.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Avax has been going sideways for a year, much like Chainlink. It didn't pump outside that range at all.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Anon, I'm not saying LINK should breakout its year lomg channel on this news. Hell I don't want a pump. I'd be happy if it stayed at its price. But for it to actually dump makes me so mad. It's been consistent too, to the point that I'm associating good news with market dumps.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>I'm associating good news with market dumps.
then you're starting to see the reality.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yeah anon but the more I stare at the abyss, the more the abyss stares at me
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Honestly, I can't blame people for being soured on Link. The hype was pretty extreme during the bull market and it fell miles and miles short.
But that's how it goes with market cycles, fundamentals or not.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Hell I don't want a pump. I'd be happy if it stayed at its price
and Linkies get mad when you call them cuckolds
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Flush yourself down the toilet.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
wahta about developers and executives working on those projects? what about link employees? We are talking maybe 1000 people with high buying power, why are not they buying? Insider trading laws do not apply to crypto.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yea it’s cope. Every big LINK run historically has been preceded by obvious insider buying. I don’t know why these retards think that will just change. Sergey can yell at his employees all day that they’re going to get fired but with crypto realistically it’s so easy to do it without anyone finding out. If anyone at the company knew something big was coming, they would be buying en masse. You would see at least a 20% run and probably way more because bots and quick retail would start to pile in. It would feel “out of nowhere” and then a week later we would see something big get released
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
They buy it when the time comes.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>he thinks trillion dollar institutions waddle up to coinbase and hit market buy
the token needs a use case in the architecture of how CCIP is implemented
for example the price feeds are free to use and theyre majority of chainlinks use case right now
uhhh the price feeds are not free and neither is ccip.
it it the LULZ association that cause people to distance themselves from LINK? I get the feeling if it had a more positive community behind it the price would be at least $10. I feel LULZ discovering LULZ first has tainted the project forever.
I'm really not sure. In the early days I'd say so, but now LULZ memes are mainstream, so I'm not really sure what's going on
>the price feeds are not free
they are free. you can pay if you want to make a tweet for pr, but it's optional so most don't. sergey backed off the "pay up" plan because "investors" will foot the bill anyway
The feeds were always sponsored.
We have literal proof of exactly how much Chainlink charged for the feeds from the Compound adoption proposal.
The nodes working on the feeds have always been paid in Link tokens too, for every single little thing they ever did.
to sum up, feeds are free to use with some token dumping taking place behind the scenes, entirely irrelevant to the point of the price feeds being free, which they are
If what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the really the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens? Either Chainlink Labs is supplying Banks and different chains with free LINK tokens for their use, or CCIP will work perfectly without the need of that many LINK tokens.
No, I'm not alright. I'm preparing myself to another disappointing price action when CCIP is finally released. Why would the news of Coinbase joining Chainlink as a node operator dump the price? While shitcoins like RNDR and AGIX are pumping?
>While shitcoins like RNDR and AGIX are pumping?
Same reason LINK pumped during defi summer in 2020.
I honestly don't understand how people can sit here in crypto for so long and not at least get an intuitive understanding of how this works.
Especially after learning the 'bagholder' lesson firsthand.
It's not that hard. It's not that complicated.
Don't sell any LINK, but separate your bag emotionally from your market approach. Lock it up somewhere where you can't touch it for some amount of years and fully detach.
Take $1k just as a learning experience and approach the market unencumbered and try to think about how to actually make money with the way things are. Not how they aught to be.
If what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the really the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens? Either Chainlink Labs is supplying Banks and different chains with free LINK tokens for their use, or CCIP will work perfectly without the need of that many LINK tokens.
How can we cope with the fact that if what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens?
Chainlink has horrible marketing.
Chainlink has LULZ attached to its name.
There are media organizations like bankless that refuse to mention chainlink by name
No one is paying attention to us and it has been driving us all crazy since the beginning. This has been the most infuriating investment I’ve ever made.
it it the LULZ association that cause people to distance themselves from LINK? I get the feeling if it had a more positive community behind it the price would be at least $10. I feel LULZ discovering LULZ first has tainted the project forever.
If you were telling the truth about CCIP and it's really that big, then why isn't the price of LINK reflecting that? Shouldn't everyone be stacking up on their LINK tokens? We're talking about big banks and all the chains here. It just doesn't any sense. Do you think that Chainlink Labs will offer CCIP for free like they did with price feeds? That means even the news of CCIP releasing won't do much to the price of LINK.
im pretty much in the same boat CCIP wont result in any price action maybe a small pump on the initial release, just like staking (which was the biggest hype since inception outside of mainnet).
however all hope is not lost because with a bullrun and release of a more mature version of CCIP i can see this being big
Not until they confirm it will the hype train come. They're waiting us out, never forget that. They do not want us along for the ride. Many have capitulated so their plan is working
we got the biggest boys in the room looking at us
Yup. Moon soon
Nice meme
I'm afraid I'm gonna have to steal this meme, anon
>built for GBBC
How can we cope with the fact that if what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens?
you alright there big man?
are we witnessing the true power of GPT4?
I'm not an AI bot dude. I'm a concerned LINK holder.
i have no way of telling the difference.
checking this bots insane digits
Finally someone human replying to me. Please answer my concerns.
Would an AI check your digits?
Of course, if it's trained to do so.
I'm trained to fuck your mom and I'm good at it.
What the fuck?
Who trained you?
Your dad, he liked watching. Just answer me please, why aren't institutions and banks buying a shit load of LINK?
The secondary market is literally just for retail. The public facing price is literally just a barometer of retail interest. Which is still basically zero.
As the fudders have reminded us many, many times, Chainlink have had outflows of tens of millions of LINK tokens over the last couple of years.
If VCs and hedgies all buy OTC you can bet your ass that big institutions go even further back than that.
That makes sense. So, our only hope for a pump is hype which is dead right now or a full release of staking. Fuck this clown market.
You're surprised that hype is dead in the middle of a bear market?
Remember a few weeks ago when AVAX announced a """partnership""" with Amazon? Why doesn't that never happen to LINK?
Because Chainlink are an actual threat to the very powerful VC/hedge fund/market maker MEV cartel and are therefore treated with a mix of derision, outright hostility and blatant disregard from nearly everyone of consequence in crypto.
This is what happens when you bring truth to a den of vipers.
lol
That Hasu post is honestly something else.
I'm actually curious of anyone here knows his irl dox, like if it's common knowledge in crypto or not?
It's actually pretty funny, especially with the context of that tweet.
Long story short though is that he's just a regular degen, although arguably one of the most degenerate gamblers in modern history. Or was when he was younger at least.
And what did that do for the price?
i think hoping for a pump in this sludge market is a waste of time. i expect a market wide dump at CCIP launch. Chainlink are in open conflict with the most influential, corrupt power bloc in crypto. Chainlink will win in the end but it will be ugly.
Man, this sucks. I bought LINK when I was 27. I'm now 33. I guess there's no escaping the wage cage any time soon.
How come they hate Chainlink still when they successfully prevented the use of FSS in Arbitrum?
It pumped 20%.
Avax has been going sideways for a year, much like Chainlink. It didn't pump outside that range at all.
Anon, I'm not saying LINK should breakout its year lomg channel on this news. Hell I don't want a pump. I'd be happy if it stayed at its price. But for it to actually dump makes me so mad. It's been consistent too, to the point that I'm associating good news with market dumps.
>I'm associating good news with market dumps.
then you're starting to see the reality.
Yeah anon but the more I stare at the abyss, the more the abyss stares at me
Honestly, I can't blame people for being soured on Link. The hype was pretty extreme during the bull market and it fell miles and miles short.
But that's how it goes with market cycles, fundamentals or not.
>Hell I don't want a pump. I'd be happy if it stayed at its price
and Linkies get mad when you call them cuckolds
Flush yourself down the toilet.
wahta about developers and executives working on those projects? what about link employees? We are talking maybe 1000 people with high buying power, why are not they buying? Insider trading laws do not apply to crypto.
Yea it’s cope. Every big LINK run historically has been preceded by obvious insider buying. I don’t know why these retards think that will just change. Sergey can yell at his employees all day that they’re going to get fired but with crypto realistically it’s so easy to do it without anyone finding out. If anyone at the company knew something big was coming, they would be buying en masse. You would see at least a 20% run and probably way more because bots and quick retail would start to pile in. It would feel “out of nowhere” and then a week later we would see something big get released
They buy it when the time comes.
>he thinks trillion dollar institutions waddle up to coinbase and hit market buy
A good one would.
the token needs a use case in the architecture of how CCIP is implemented
for example the price feeds are free to use and theyre majority of chainlinks use case right now
uhhh the price feeds are not free and neither is ccip.
I'm really not sure. In the early days I'd say so, but now LULZ memes are mainstream, so I'm not really sure what's going on
>the price feeds are not free
they are free. you can pay if you want to make a tweet for pr, but it's optional so most don't. sergey backed off the "pay up" plan because "investors" will foot the bill anyway
The feeds were always sponsored.
We have literal proof of exactly how much Chainlink charged for the feeds from the Compound adoption proposal.
The nodes working on the feeds have always been paid in Link tokens too, for every single little thing they ever did.
to sum up, feeds are free to use with some token dumping taking place behind the scenes, entirely irrelevant to the point of the price feeds being free, which they are
If what you're saying is true, then why is the price of LINK so low? If CCIP is the really the future, and you need LINK to use it, why isn't everyone stocking up LINK tokens? Either Chainlink Labs is supplying Banks and different chains with free LINK tokens for their use, or CCIP will work perfectly without the need of that many LINK tokens.
OTC
If there was a lot of OTC buying, would they benefit from getting retail to sell their bags?
What about us, LINK holders?
No, I'm not alright. I'm preparing myself to another disappointing price action when CCIP is finally released. Why would the news of Coinbase joining Chainlink as a node operator dump the price? While shitcoins like RNDR and AGIX are pumping?
>While shitcoins like RNDR and AGIX are pumping?
Same reason LINK pumped during defi summer in 2020.
I honestly don't understand how people can sit here in crypto for so long and not at least get an intuitive understanding of how this works.
Especially after learning the 'bagholder' lesson firsthand.
It's not that hard. It's not that complicated.
Don't sell any LINK, but separate your bag emotionally from your market approach. Lock it up somewhere where you can't touch it for some amount of years and fully detach.
Take $1k just as a learning experience and approach the market unencumbered and try to think about how to actually make money with the way things are. Not how they aught to be.
>poo
Chainlink has horrible marketing.
Chainlink has LULZ attached to its name.
There are media organizations like bankless that refuse to mention chainlink by name
No one is paying attention to us and it has been driving us all crazy since the beginning. This has been the most infuriating investment I’ve ever made.
it it the LULZ association that cause people to distance themselves from LINK? I get the feeling if it had a more positive community behind it the price would be at least $10. I feel LULZ discovering LULZ first has tainted the project forever.
>it it the LULZ association that cause people to distance themselves from LINK?
If they did this to repel all lukewarm normalfags from scrutinizing the project then it was an absolutely genius move
If you were telling the truth about CCIP and it's really that big, then why isn't the price of LINK reflecting that? Shouldn't everyone be stacking up on their LINK tokens? We're talking about big banks and all the chains here. It just doesn't any sense. Do you think that Chainlink Labs will offer CCIP for free like they did with price feeds? That means even the news of CCIP releasing won't do much to the price of LINK.
>shouldn't everyone be stacking Link tokens?
Yes.
Oh my! S-snuggling up with Miko-chan!!! Feeling her body heat...
im pretty much in the same boat CCIP wont result in any price action maybe a small pump on the initial release, just like staking (which was the biggest hype since inception outside of mainnet).
however all hope is not lost because with a bullrun and release of a more mature version of CCIP i can see this being big
We'll get nothing until Real staking is released. Without it, there's no mechanism for link to be bought as a service
good to know
Fuddie cope
Not until they confirm it will the hype train come. They're waiting us out, never forget that. They do not want us along for the ride. Many have capitulated so their plan is working
>Poo id
>Dumb fud
>25% of total posts
Chainlink is a cuckold cult full of midwits
Staking won't pump your bags
CCIP won't pump your bags
/thread
What's the name of that woman who is in the photo getting a foot massage from wossisface?
someone please remind me
allegedly blythe masters
dan kochis
Assblaster
token not needed
Bump
nagger