i got into a discussion with a friend about the hypocrisy of eating meat and how fucked up it is, claiming to like certain animals while slaughtering others himself, not even just paying for them. anyway i showed him the cat blender video in attempt to give him some perspective on how fucked up it is, he didnt see the correlation however and now hates me and wants nothing to do with me.
i feel like such an asshole, i got overly heated, overreacted, and now ruined a close friendship. robots, is there any hope to revive this friendship ;-;
>using the cat blender video to make a point in a gay veganism argument
you done goofed anon
>i got into a discussion with a friend about the hypocrisy of eating meat and how fucked up it is, claiming to like certain animals while slaughtering others himself
This is such a stupid argument. Human cultures differ in what they qualify as kin as it relates to non humans. Vegan retards are so insufferable it's unreal I would eat you if it was legal
Technically a cat blender video is an animal byproduct and if OP is using it to get a point across, he is vegetarian at best and not vegan
Fair point I had not considered
Isn't the atmosphere technically an animal byproduct?
I have some animal byproduct for you bb
Technically cum is actually animal byproduct
Technically an internet connection is an animal byproduct.
huh wrong time to get a b0ner
Yes, you are exploiting that cat. Shame on you.
how is documenting reality exploiting? are all shock tactics used in civil rights movements in history just exploiting?
am i directly funding animal torture by showing him the video? am i really as bad as someone who pays assassins to kill animals, AND who kills them in person himself, just for watching a video of it happening?
You are a bad person anyway
Subhuman filth
>how is documenting reality exploiting?
You're using that poor cat to get your point across and resorting to an appeal to emotions.
>are all shock tactics used in civil rights movements in history just exploiting?
Modern civil rights movements use tactics such as peaceful protest and international political better-than-youism.
Not eating meat is only being nicer to animals in theory, You never interact with those farm animals, and factory farming still happens.
However, you decided to show a cat being blended to a person with a brain. You had an opportunity to be a nice person towards a very advanced animal in the form of your now former friend, and you blew it. You may as well be a meat eater.
im as bad as a meat eater for showing him a video of the same stuff he does, but to another animal? this guy was boasting about torturing and slaughtering animals personally himself for some islamic festival, knowing my view on the subject, but got mad when i show him a video of someone else doing it to a cat.
that guy simply realised you're fucking insane and not worth conversing with. go find some other homosexual to convince with your shitty methods
atleast post the video im interested now
its not hard to find if you just search for it long enough. im not going to post it here because people will get upset watching it while eating their blended alive chicken nuggies
ironic that vegans are the ones who obsess over cruelty to animals like it's a fetish. why not just settle for taking small victories, like cooking delicious vegan food and spreading the recipes. if you get a meat eater to replace 1-2 meals a week with vegan friendly options then you've made progress for your cause. horrifying people with deranged animal cruelty content is some psycho shit. you're more likely to convince people that some nutritional deficiency from your diet is driving you crazy by those methods.
yeah, because you're the ones forcefully impregnating billions of mammals and drinking their breast milk and eating their ovulation, all while finding legal loopholes to claim it not to be bestiality. yeah, its the vegan's fetish, definitely not the yours
chickens eat their own eggs if you let them anon. most of an egg is just a nutritious goo to feed the embryo that will grow in them if the egg is fertilized, and most eggs aren't fertilized. cat in a blender has nothing to do with eating meat, and is just animal cruelty with no purpose. humans eating meat is what enabled us to evolve our intelligence, as it has much more nutritional density than forage. it's only modern technology that made a pure vegan diet a viable option for people, as vegans today can get complete nutrition from foods sourced from different locations around the world, and with modern knowledge of what complete nutrition is.
if you care about the issue, you should try to take small wins with people who aren't willing to accept your ideology, but i think most vegans are more interested in wagging their moral superiority around in people's faces than actually reducing demand for animal products.
I saw a video a while ago of a flock of those birds pecking away at one of those grocery store rotisserie chickens. It was incredible stuff. Never again would I feel bad for eating these fowl creatures.
id say killing for meat is animal cruelty with no purpose. in the modern day you can live fine without it , so its just for the taste and pleasure. its no different than the guy killing the cat for his own sick pleasure
yeah, but nobody cares what you think and they certainly aren't going to stop eating meat because you think it's morally equivalent to putting a cat in a blender. slaughtering an animal for meat serves a purpose, even if you say that purpose is obsolete. make the case that the purpose is obsolete by sharing satisfying meals. If my usual interactions with vegans leave me feeling sick to my stomach, that's what i'll associate veganism with.
>le heckins animals FEELINGS!!!
Tell me what would happen if all chickens, cows, pigs, etc were set free this instant. Go ahead, tell me.
i dont have to tell you, because that's just crazy talk. the world will never go vegan, and if it does it will be over the span of at least >50 years. theyd slowly stop being forcefully bred into existence.
I'm going to go against the lame ass echo chamber hivemind here and just say that you're actually in the right in this scenario and your buddy just couldn't cope with his cognitive dissonance. Cope and seeth about how much y'all want meat your mouths
Cat in a Blender is my favourite Eve 6 song
I think it's morally fucked up to allow animals with an IQ only able to live off their instincts to be alive, only thing they know is attack, defend, rape, and compete. There is no intimacy with them unless it's with a human they trust or deem worthy after being tamed. Said is the same about letting humans with low IQ to exist and be bred into the gene pool. Though as much as I'm against breeding less unfortunate living things to farm off of, I'm just as hesitant on breeding animals to be food. It is time we invest in genetic editing for humans, and lab grown meat for people that eat meat since it's not as processed as being "meat". If you think nature is ethical and we should preserve it, the hypocrisy is in your court.
>If you think nature is ethical and we should preserve it, the hypocrisy is in your court.
I do, and I agree, because nature would be fine without mankind. However, as a human, I have vested interest in my own existence. How artificial.
>Without mankind
Nature is horrible and cruel just like man kind, it produces life in how it can satisfy itself. It's like that one fat ass kid reaching into a bag of m&M's with it's cum crusted fingers and squishing together the pieces to see which is stronger. Luckily with man kind we can fix this, slowly, but it will happen eventually. Perhaps we can also change this on a quantum level to change the way nature works. You say mankind as if it is us that does it wrong but it is the other way around, we as humans are just trying to make do. We are simply the victim of a greater cause that is misunderstood.
It seems like you have a rather pessimistic view of nature and humanity. It's important to acknowledge that nature can indeed be harsh and unforgiving at times, with the survival of the fittest being a fundamental aspect of the natural world. However, it's also worth noting that nature can be incredibly beautiful, diverse, and awe-inspiring. It's not solely defined by cruelty and competition; it also encompasses cooperation and symbiosis among species.
Regarding humanity, people have a complex relationship with nature. While humans have certainly had a significant impact on the environment and sometimes engage in destructive behaviors, it's not accurate to say that we are solely victims of a misunderstood greater cause. We have the capacity to make choices and take actions that can either harm or benefit the planet and its ecosystems.
Efforts are being made worldwide to address environmental issues, such as climate change, deforestation, and pollution. Many individuals, organizations, and governments are working to find solutions and mitigate the negative impact of human activities on the environment.
The idea of changing nature on a quantum level is a complex and speculative one. While scientific advancements have allowed us to manipulate certain aspects of the natural world through technologies like genetic engineering, it's important to approach such endeavors with caution and ethical considerations.
In summary, while nature can be harsh, it also has its positive aspects, and humanity has the potential to make positive changes to coexist more harmoniously with the natural world. It's essential to consider both the challenges and opportunities when discussing these topics.
It seems like your aspect of beauty is either sadistic or superficial, appreciating diversity and change by seeing the bigger picture also harbour sadistic aspects of enjoying war and chaos take place. This is why people hate gods, they don't understand the human suffering but only care about their own system. Beauty comes with craftsmanship, design, and satisfaction of the stillness of unification. Beauty is transcendent. Funny thing with your sense of beauty is it requires bloodshed to paint a picture.
As for people taking into account of preserving nature, I could care less. It is rather smug that you would mention that as if it mattered. It is time we replace earth, it is time we change the way nature functions. And by using scientific methods, it is not unethical to do so. Sure in the process there are sacrifices but those do not go in vain unlike what nature forces upon us. It is unethical to leave it as is, it is the argument of a lesser evil. We can coexist with nature, if it serves us and our spiritual needs.
I still have several cat gore videos on my phone
Shoot cat with arrows, use scissors on cat, acid on cat, drive on cat with a zoom on the wheel, use acid on cat, cook cat, dismember cat into 2 halfes and fuck one part, place several cats on a grill and ignite them etc.
Cats need to die
2Chan has a Subculture of Japanese who hate cats and kill stray cats
If you ver wondered why Gato playlists have a lot of JP comments thats why
Even if you don't eat meat the cow still dies.