Can you please provide some actual examples of biblical contradictions?

Can you please provide some actual examples of biblical contradictions? The ones I've seen so far take a literal approach to allegorical passages. Not a good look.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My personal favorite is how John 18:28 says that the priests didn't want to go into Pilate's house for fear that doing so would (somehow) render them incapable of eating the paschal sacrifice; i.e. the morning of the crucifixion it had not yet been consumed.

    That's in stark contrast to the three synoptic Gospels, who record in Mark 14:12-16, Matthew 26:17-19, and Luke 22:7-13 that the last supper, which had occurred the evening before even in John's narrative, was a meal in which the paschal lamb was consumed.

    Second would probably be Mark and Matthew's discrepancy when Jesus quotes Psalm 22 on the cross. Mark gives it in transliterated Aramaic, while Matthew does it in transliterated Hebrew. I've seen bonkers Christian apologetics, but that one takes the cake because of how hard it is to get Christian apologists to even understand the problem.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      pesky one, eh?
      the Last Supper was not pesach celebration. Christ is the sacrificial lamb. in that pesach, He was the sacrifice. (for a little more, “Not one of his bones will be broken.” (Exodus 12:46; Numbers 9:12; Psalm 34:20). the two other crucified men had their legs broken, Christ didn't.)

      on the other one, it's the same quote but one chose to translate it. no issue, really.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Except the feast lasted seven days (not just one day) according to the Old Testament, and since it started on the evening of the first day there's no contradiction here.

      >For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18
      >Behold, I Paul say to you that if you shall become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. Galatians 5:2

      If you need this explained -- Jesus said torah law won't end until heaven itself passes away. Paul later says you don't even need to have your foreskin circumcised anymore. .... which is a major torah law.

      >Paul later says you don't even need to have your foreskin circumcised anymore. .... which is a major torah law.
      And it says in Romans 2,

      "For he is not a israelite, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
      But he is a israelite, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."
      - Romans 2:28-29

      And Christ said the following in the Gospels:

      "And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn.
      And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?
      And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when he had need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him?
      How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did eat the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave also to them which were with him?
      And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
      Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath."
      - Mark 2:23-28

      We see this law is fulfilled in this statement:

      "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
      Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ."
      - Colossians 2:16-17

      And so we see the Law is fulfilled. The Lord and Savior Jesus Christ has completely lived up to the Law. We, as Christians, are dead to the Law, which has been absolutely fulfilled in Jesus Christ; as explained in the New Testament in Romans 7:1-4. And this was the original intent of the Law: see Hebrews chapter 8 and 9, and Galatians 3:19-25.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ok but Jesus said not one jot or tiddle of torah law was changing, and then he suggested a change. Also changed divorce law. More contradictions. Supposedly changed dietary law too.

        None of what you're saying makes sense because Jesus wouldn't have gone into detail about the eternal nature of Torah law if in 3 months it was going to be "complete". Such nonsense.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >and then he suggested a change
          Nope, you just don't understand what it originally meant in the first place. He did, which is why our Lord and Savior so graciously explained it to us.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Are you allowed to eat pork now?
            Jesus said not one jot or tiddle of the law that says you cant will go away until heaven passes away. This is called a contradiction. Your reasoning is called "rationalization".

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jesus said not one jot or tiddle of the law that says you cant will go away until heaven passes away.
            See the New Testament references mentioned.
            >Are you allowed to eat pork now?
            I'm not sure exactly what this is supposed to mean. The ceremonial laws are fulfilled by the actions of Christ, and it has nothing to do with me. What it says in Hebrews is this:

            "Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God.
            But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:
            The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:
            Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;
            Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.
            But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building;
            Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.
            For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:
            How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
            And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance."
            - Hebrews 9:6-15

            Amen

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Are you allowed to eat pork now?
            >I'm not sure exactly what this is supposed to mean
            If you are confused by such a straightforward question, it should be a redflag to you that the source material you're trying to defend is a mess.

            Are you allowed to eat pork or not. It's a simple question.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Are you allowed to eat pork or not. It's a simple question.
            I was never disallowed, anon. It would be a false conception to suggest I was.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's hilarious you don't think eating swine is outlawed in the old law. Not going to bother citing it. You're a confused guy.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It is, in fact it says this in the epistle of James:

            "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
            - James 2:10

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            And you think this is applicable to the outlawing of eating swine....how?
            You must be used to accepting completely unrelated things as support for what you want to believe about the Bible. Having a cogent discussion with you is a chore.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            it's a new covenant. we've failed at all of them, and Christ fulfilled all. He is the mediator of the new covenant, and the sacrifice for purification is His blood, shed on the cross. He is the sacrificial lamb (see

            pesky one, eh?
            the Last Supper was not pesach celebration. Christ is the sacrificial lamb. in that pesach, He was the sacrifice. (for a little more, “Not one of his bones will be broken.” (Exodus 12:46; Numbers 9:12; Psalm 34:20). the two other crucified men had their legs broken, Christ didn't.)

            on the other one, it's the same quote but one chose to translate it. no issue, really.

            ) and the high priest.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >And you think this is applicable to the outlawing of eating swine...how?
            The outlawing in the ceremonial law applies to the one Who fulfills that law. And that's how it was always meant. Did you even read these references:

            Except the feast lasted seven days (not just one day) according to the Old Testament, and since it started on the evening of the first day there's no contradiction here.

            [...]
            >Paul later says you don't even need to have your foreskin circumcised anymore. .... which is a major torah law.
            And it says in Romans 2,

            "For he is not a israelite, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
            But he is a israelite, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."
            - Romans 2:28-29

            And Christ said the following in the Gospels:

            "And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn.
            And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?
            And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when he had need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him?
            How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did eat the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave also to them which were with him?
            And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
            Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath."
            - Mark 2:23-28

            We see this law is fulfilled in this statement:

            "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
            Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ."
            - Colossians 2:16-17

            And so we see the Law is fulfilled. The Lord and Savior Jesus Christ has completely lived up to the Law. We, as Christians, are dead to the Law, which has been absolutely fulfilled in Jesus Christ; as explained in the New Testament in Romans 7:1-4. And this was the original intent of the Law: see Hebrews chapter 8 and 9, and Galatians 3:19-25.

            "Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
            Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
            Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
            But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
            But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
            Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith."
            - Galatians 3:19-24

            "Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
            A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
            For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer.
            For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:
            Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.
            But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises."
            - Hebrews 8

            See also Romans 7:1-4 and Colossians 2:10-14, Praise the Lord, Amen!

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18
    >Behold, I Paul say to you that if you shall become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. Galatians 5:2

    If you need this explained -- Jesus said torah law won't end until heaven itself passes away. Paul later says you don't even need to have your foreskin circumcised anymore. .... which is a major torah law.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Love your enemies. Matthew 5:44

      >God hates all sinners. Psalm 5:5
      >Be perfect, therefore, as your Heavenly Father is perfect". Matthew 5:48

      So, God hates sinners (He hates the sinner, not the sin). And we are supposed to be like God. But we are also supposed to love our enemies. So love buttholes, and also hate them. Whatever cherry picked side of that coin you feel like, I guess.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >But we are also supposed to love our enemies.
        This refers to personal enemies. As in those who do us harm. It has to do with exercising forgiveness for personal harm.

        That doesn't mean a Christian should help the ungodly. That doesn't even make sense, because it would involve harming others, because the ungodly are evil. Someone who is merely my enemy by the reason of harming me is different than someone who is evil and diametrically opposed to the good.

        "And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD."
        - 2 Chronicles 19:2

        "He that saith unto the wicked, Thou are righteous; him shall the people curse, nations shall abhor him:
        But to them that rebuke him shall be delight, and a good blessing shall come upon them."
        - Proverbs 24:24-25

        "Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God."
        - James 4:4

        "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
        For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."
        - 2 John 10-11

        "All their wickedness is in Gilgal: for there I hated them: for the wickedness of their doings I will drive them out of mine house, I will love them no more: all their princes are revolters."
        - Hosea 9:15

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          None of this addresses the issue that we are to be like God. And God hates all sinners. So you need to be hating all sinners. Unless you choose an alternative contradiction in the Bible, which you list out in your post.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >And God hates all sinners.
            Actually, it says in the New Testament this:

            "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."
            - 2 Peter 3:9

            "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth."
            - 1 Tim. 2:4

            So if God is willing that all should come to the knowledge of the truth, and is withholding judgement for the time being, then why would I get out of line with that?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know what you're trying to say. Bible says to be like God. God hates sinners. So start hatting sinners.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Bible says to be like God. God hates sinners. So start hatting sinners.
            God is also reserving wrath at this present time, so you still haven't answered why I should get out of line with that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Hate and wrath are different things. One is a disposition, one is an action. You must be like God and hate sinners according to the Bible. Unless you opt to go with the alternative contradictions.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Ok, how do you know what I think, anon?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't suggest I know what you think. I'm telling you that you must hate sinners if you want to be in compliance with the Bible. Unless of course you opt to follow the contradictions.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            your only argument is taking a passage out of context and pushing it to the limit of the literal.
            what are you afraid of, holding that so strongly in front of your eyes?
            ever crossed your mind that the Bible is true?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Unless of course you opt to follow the contradictions.
            What contradictions, anon?

            "Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
            Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
            For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
            Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand."
            - Ephesians 6:10-13

            "And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
            In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
            And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will."
            - 2 Timothy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>God hates all sinners. Psalm 5:5
        incredible how the israelites raped God's divine message. God loves sinners because God loves to forgive

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Jesus held the torah in the highest regard.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. Matthew 16:28
    This of course is contradicted by the fact Jesus hasn't come back yet.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's referring to the next passage, see Matt. 17:1-8.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >That's referring to the next passage, see Matt. 17:1-8.
        No Jesus wouldn't tell a crowd of disciples that he was going to come with all his rewards and fullfill the second end of the messianic prophecy and establish his kingdom on earth, but "really" just mean he was going to sneak three of his closest apostles up a mountain and give them a vision of it. That would have been deception on the crowd. It's a nonsensical explanation for this. It was not a reference to the transfiguration. The transfiguration was just a more detailed special illustration of the same topic he was gifting to his three closest apostles. This is apparent to any objective reader.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >5 posters
    did you just start barraging after i answered the first one?
    these next ones are exactly what op is saying "contradictions" are, that is, merely warping of Scripture.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >taking a verse out of context and reading it absolutely literally
    >exactly the kind of so called "contradictions" op has said
    he has seen

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >That the earlier traditions recognized pre-Adamic civilization is clearly shown by the fact that later editors, intending to eradicate all reference to human affairs before Adam's time, neglected to remove the telltale reference to Cain's emigration to the "land of Nod," where he took himself a wife.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Couldn't the land of Nod simply be the name it was given later on? Sort of like how we would say Columbus sailed to America, even though it wasn't named that yet.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a pretty literal one
    1 Samuel 17:50
    >“So David triumphed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone; without a sword in his hand he struck down the Philistine and killed him.”
    2 Samuel 21:19
    >“And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam”
    So, who killed Goliath—David or Elhanan?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      "And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam."
      - 2 Samuel 21:19

      Not sure what Bible you're looking at, but it's not an accurate translation. See the above. It also says the same thing in 1 Chronicles 20:5. So, it's not a contradiction in the Bible because it says the same thing in every place.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Not sure what Bible you're looking at
        ESV.
        You're absolutely correct with regards to 1 Chronicles 20:5, but the original Hebrew in 2 Samuel 21:19 doesn't actually mention Goliath's brother—it was first changed in the KJV to be more in like with 1 Chronicles 20:5, which does mention him.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Actually, and I've explained this before, but the passage in 2 Samuel 21:19 says את גלית and not only: גלית

          This is important because the extra word particle at the beginning here: את signifies “among.”

          In 1 Chronicles 20:5 meanwhile, it says אחי גלית

          The only difference here (where the above phrases both represent “the brother of Goliath”) is the addition of an extra Jod to the end of the rightmost word (אחי ) in the second passage. Hence the passage in 2 Samuel does not simply say “Goliath” but rather “from among Goliath” and in context of the rest of the sentence here its meaning is “the brother of Goliath”

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I see. Thanks for the clarification.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Sure thing.

            The one I see people always bring up that they really have trouble with isn't that one, it's usually 1 Samuel 13:1 (textual) and 2 Chronicles 22:2 (numerical contradiction), but there are good explanations for those as well. Namely a second reign after already having a first reign in the northern kingdom twenty years earlier (hence, reigned in Jerusalem one year). And for the Samuel passage there is the simple fact that lack of mentioning a number automatically implies the number 1 in Hebrew, and this isn't a contradiction because the verse is quite simply saying Saul reigned another year after this, and now he has reigned two years total according to the preceding narrative. Not that he was one year old, as the Douay-Rheims Bible suggests. I'd be interested to see if anyone had anything that was actually difficult to explain and not relatively simple stuff like this.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Who is a God like You, Pardoning iniquity And passing over the transgression of the remnant of His heritage? He does not retain His anger forever, Because He delights in mercy.
    Micah 7:18
    >And you, even yourself, Shall let go of your heritage which I gave you; And I will cause you to serve your enemies In the land which you do not know; For you have kindled a fire in My anger which shall burn forever.”
    Jeremiah 17:4

    >And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.
    Genesis 22:1
    >Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man
    James 1:13

    >Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
    Galatians 2:16
    >Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
    James 2:24

    >And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.
    Exodus 33:20
    >And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.
    Genesis 32:30
    >And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him.
    Genesis 12:7
    >And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle.
    Exodus 33:11
    >No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
    John 1:18
    >Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.
    1 Timothy 6:16

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      1) Have you ever heard of hell before? It's a biblical teaching, but not everyone goes there, only the lost do.

      2) James is talking about tempting with evil specifically

      3) Paul in Romans 4 and elsewhere refers to justification before God, and this is without works. James in James 2 refers to justification before men, which has to be by works, but this is in order to save others, not oneself. See Romans 4:1-8, specifically verse 2. See also 1 Corinthians 4:2-4.

      4) Those are Theophanies. The Son of God makes several appearances throughout the Old Testament, for instance in Genesis 19:24, Exodus 33:11, and Daniel 3:24-25. It's not a contradiction because it speaks to the Holy Trinity. See S. John 1:14, and 1 John 1:1-3, and 1 Timothy 3:16.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Contradictions arise for lack of understanding and for translations without studying the scriptures and I really don't care to correct scoffers as they have nothing but contempt for scriptures and just get angry when you try to correct them. Proverbs 9

    I am tempted to try to help people learn and understand, but I'm just not convinced anyone even understands any of it. Half the time it's deliberate misunderstanding too on topics that have been covered thousands of times but they've never studied it for even one moment and had they they'd still reject the answers.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    uhh christbros?? I thought I just needed faith to go to heaven! My pastor told me that everyone sins

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >iphone screenshot
      >uhh christbros??
      They just put no effort in to learn, so why teach those without eyes to see or ears to hear? It's just a waste of time.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >no one who is born of God will continue to sin
        Explain it now

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
    Exodus 34:6
    >A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.
    Leviticus 20:27
    >And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death.
    Exodus 21:15
    >For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.
    Leviticus 20:9
    >And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the LORD thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.
    Deuteronomy 17:12
    >He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed.
    Exodus 22:20
    >And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
    Leviticus 20:10
    >Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it is holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
    Exodus 31:14
    >Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.
    Deuteronomy 13:15
    >and whoever would not seek the LORD God of Israel was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman.
    2 Chronicles 15:13
    >And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD, shall be put to death.
    Leviticus 24:16

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *